Funding and Managing the U.S. Inland Waterways System: What Policy Makers Need to Know: What Policy Makers Need to Know (2015)

Chapter: Appendix F Summary of Correlations Between Lock Performance and Lock Age (in 2014) Calculated from the Date of Known Major Rehabilitation Construction

Previous Chapter: Appendix E Illustrations of Delay and Possible Metrics by Major River System
Suggested Citation: "Appendix F Summary of Correlations Between Lock Performance and Lock Age (in 2014) Calculated from the Date of Known Major Rehabilitation Construction." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Funding and Managing the U.S. Inland Waterways System: What Policy Makers Need to Know: What Policy Makers Need to Know. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21763.

APPENDIX F

img

Summary of Correlations Between Lock Performance and Lock Age (in 2014) Calculated from the Date of Known Major Rehabilitation Construction

River SystemAverage Age of Lock Installations (years)Correlation with Effective Age of Locks on a River System
LockagesVessels Delayed (%)Tows Delayed (%)Average Vessel DelayAverage Tow DelayAverage Closure DurationClosure Frequency
All installations61.040.21840.1404-0.07500.1321-0.12260.16910.2254
Ohio River35.45-0.0076-0.0957-0.09590.10810.04000.2407-0.0477
Mississippi River24.86-0.30190.1758-0.0103-0.2738-0.04630.64580.1295
Illinois River22.28-0.57540.0357-0.2425-0.3880-0.2560-0.6243-0.5700
Columbia–Snake Rivers44.88-0.19530.10880.15660.08510.06770.82200.4676
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway71.800.16030.12730.1050-0.1422-0.14030.2972-0.1875
Arkansas River45.330.4568-0.7410-0.7359-0.71230.4552-0.2562-0.1563
Suggested Citation: "Appendix F Summary of Correlations Between Lock Performance and Lock Age (in 2014) Calculated from the Date of Known Major Rehabilitation Construction." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Funding and Managing the U.S. Inland Waterways System: What Policy Makers Need to Know: What Policy Makers Need to Know. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21763.
Black Warrior, Tennessee, Tennessee–Tombigbee, Tombigbee61.040.34740.56550.70400.3585-0.1630-0.17350.7485
Monongahela River56.670.55450.75210.86320.55260.3800Gaps in data0.6358
Allegheny River61.75-0.04540.3048-0.04260.1435-0.1276Gaps in data0.0612

NOTE: High positive correlation (dark blue shading), greater than 75 percent correlation; high negative correlation (dark pink shading), less than -75 percent correlation; medium positive correlation (light blue shading), between 50 and 75 percent correlation; low correlation (white), within ±50 percent correlation. Some rivers indicate negative correlations with lock age because the correlations are affected by traffic level and rehabilitation; that is, some of the older locks have less traffic and so fewer traffic-related problems, or they may be rehabilitated and so experience fewer closures and delays.

SOURCE: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Lock Use, Performance, and Characteristics, http://www.navigationdatacenter.us/lpms/lpms.htm, Locks by Waterway, Tons Locked by Commodity Group, Calendar Years 1993–2013; Locks by Waterway, Lock Usage, Calendar Years 1993–2013; and Locks by Waterway, Locks Unavailability, Calendar Years 1993–2013. Accessed July 2014.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix F Summary of Correlations Between Lock Performance and Lock Age (in 2014) Calculated from the Date of Known Major Rehabilitation Construction." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Funding and Managing the U.S. Inland Waterways System: What Policy Makers Need to Know: What Policy Makers Need to Know. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21763.
Page 194
Suggested Citation: "Appendix F Summary of Correlations Between Lock Performance and Lock Age (in 2014) Calculated from the Date of Known Major Rehabilitation Construction." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Funding and Managing the U.S. Inland Waterways System: What Policy Makers Need to Know: What Policy Makers Need to Know. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21763.
Page 195
Next Chapter: Appendix G Energy Intensity Comparisons for Water, Rail, and Highway
Subscribe to Emails from the National Academies
Stay up to date on activities, publications, and events by subscribing to email updates.