REVIEW OF THREE DIVISIONS OF THE
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY AT THE NATIONAL
INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND
TECHNOLOGY
FISCAL YEAR 2015
Panel on Review of the Information Technology Laboratory at the
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Committee on NIST Technical Programs
Laboratory Assessments Board
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001
This study was supported by Contract No. SB1341-12-CQ-0036/15-034 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project.
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-38906-8
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-38906-2
DOI: 10.17226/21877
Copies of this report are available from
Laboratory Assessments Board
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
500 Fifth Street, NW
Keck 928
Washington, DC 20001
Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
Copyright 2015 by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America
Suggested Citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Review of Three Divisions of the Information Technology Laboratory at the National Institute of Standards and Technology: Fiscal Year 2015. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president.
The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.
The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.
Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.national-academies.org.
This page intentionally left blank.
PANEL ON REVIEW OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY AT THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
CONSTANTINE GATSONIS, Brown University, Chair
DON EUGENE DETMER, University of Virginia
PETER T. HIGGINS, Higgins & Associates, International
GERARD J. HOLZMANN, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
NIKIL S. JAYANT, University of California, Santa Barbara
KAREN KAFADAR, University of Virginia
JAMES M. LANDWEHR, Avaya Laboratories
GARY MARCHIONINI, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
MITCHELL P. MARCUS, University of Pennsylvania
MICHAEL MULLER, IBM Research
PHILIP M. NECHES, Teradata Corporation
J. MARC OVERHAGE, Cerner Corporation
GEORGE J. PAPPAS, University of Pennsylvania
DANIEL A. REED, University of Iowa
JOEL SALTZ, Stony Brook University
ALBERTO SANGIOVANNI-VINCENTELLI, University of California, Berkeley
WILLIAM L. SCHERLIS, Carnegie Mellon University
STEPHANIE A.C. SCHUCKERS, Clarkson University
PETER TU, General Electric Global Research
STEPHEN B. VARDEMAN, Iowa State University
Staff
LIZA HAMILTON, Associate Program Officer
EVA LABRE, Administrative Coordinator
JAMES P. McGEE, Director
ANDREA SHELTON, Administrative Assistant
COMMITTEE ON NIST TECHNICAL PROGRAMS
ELSA REICHMANIS, Georgia Institute of Technology, Chair
LEWIS BRANSCOMB, Harvard University
WILLIAM C. GEAR, NEC Research Institute, Inc. (retired)
JENNIE S. HWANG, H-Technologies Group
KANTI JAIN, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
C. KUMAR N. PATEL, Pranalytica, Inc.
ALICE WHITE, Boston University
Staff
LIZA HAMILTON, Associate Program Officer
EVA LABRE, Administrative Coordinator
JAMES P. McGEE Director
ANDREA SHELTON, Administrative Assistant
LABORATORY ASSESSMENTS BOARD
JOHN W. LYONS, National Defense University, Chair
ROSS B. COROTIS, University of Colorado, Boulder
PAUL A. FLEURY, Yale University
C. WILLIAM GEAR, Princeton University
WESLEY L. HARRIS, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
JENNIE S. HWANG, H-Technologies Group
W. CARL LINE BERGER, University of Colorado, Boulder
C. KUMAR N. PATEL, Pranalytica, Inc.
ELSA REICHMANIS, Georgia Institute of Technology
LYLE H. SCHWARTZ, U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (retired)
Staff
LIZA HAMILTON, Associate Program Officer
EVA LABRE, Administrative Coordinator
JAMES P. McGEE, Director
ARUL MOZHI, Senior Program Officer
ANDREA SHELTON, Administrative Assistant
This page intentionally left blank.
Acknowledgment of Reviewers
This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:
Philip A. Bernstein, Microsoft Corporation,
Luis A. Escobar, Louisiana State University,
C. William Gear, NEC Research Institute, Inc.,
Michael Lesk, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey,
Alexa T. McCray, Harvard Medical School,
Richard Pew, Raytheon BBN Technologies, and
David Scott, Rice University.
Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by David E. Crow, University of Connecticut, who was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring panel and the institution.
This page intentionally left blank.
This page intentionally left blank.
