Previous Chapter: Report Contents
Suggested Citation: "2. REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Evaluation of Bridge Scour Research: Geomorphic Processes and Predictions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22884.
Page 10
Suggested Citation: "2. REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Evaluation of Bridge Scour Research: Geomorphic Processes and Predictions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22884.
Page 11
Suggested Citation: "2. REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Evaluation of Bridge Scour Research: Geomorphic Processes and Predictions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22884.
Page 12
Suggested Citation: "2. REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Evaluation of Bridge Scour Research: Geomorphic Processes and Predictions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22884.
Page 13
Suggested Citation: "2. REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Evaluation of Bridge Scour Research: Geomorphic Processes and Predictions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22884.
Page 14
Suggested Citation: "2. REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Evaluation of Bridge Scour Research: Geomorphic Processes and Predictions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22884.
Page 15
Suggested Citation: "2. REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Evaluation of Bridge Scour Research: Geomorphic Processes and Predictions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22884.
Page 16
Suggested Citation: "2. REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Evaluation of Bridge Scour Research: Geomorphic Processes and Predictions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22884.
Page 17
Suggested Citation: "2. REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Evaluation of Bridge Scour Research: Geomorphic Processes and Predictions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22884.
Page 18
Suggested Citation: "2. REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Evaluation of Bridge Scour Research: Geomorphic Processes and Predictions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22884.
Page 19
Suggested Citation: "2. REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Evaluation of Bridge Scour Research: Geomorphic Processes and Predictions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22884.
Page 20
Suggested Citation: "2. REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Evaluation of Bridge Scour Research: Geomorphic Processes and Predictions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22884.
Page 21
Suggested Citation: "2. REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Evaluation of Bridge Scour Research: Geomorphic Processes and Predictions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22884.
Page 22
Next Chapter: 3. RESEARCH PRIORITIZATION AND EVALUATION
Subscribe to Emails from the National Academies
Stay up to date on activities, publications, and events by subscribing to email updates.