REFERENCES

66th Legislature. 2020 (June 11). Postsecondary educational institutions—sexual misconduct. 2020 Regular Session. Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2327, Chapter 335, Laws of 2020. http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2019-20/Pdf/Bills/Session%20Laws/House/2327-S.SL.pdf#page=1.

American University in Cairo. 2019. Drafting and implementing relevant policies. Year 1 public description of work for Action Collaborative on Preventing Sexual Harassment in Higher Education. https://www.nationalacademies.org/docs/D3E1D69EF59D9F597C3D286BF0A80BB873E167ADED4.

Baird, S., and S. Jenkins. 2003. Vicarious traumatization, secondary traumatic stress, and burnout in sexual assault and domestic violence agency staff. Violence and Victims 18(1):71-86. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.2003.18.1.71.

Banaji, M. R., M. H. Bazerman, and D. Chugh. 2003. How (un)ethical are you? Harvard Business Review 81(12). https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=15861.

Batson, C. D., S. Early, and G. Salvarani. 1997. Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(7):751-758.

Bazerman, M. H., and A. E. Tenbrunsel. 2012. Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Belmi, P., M. Neale, D. Reiff, and R. Ulfe. 2020. The social advantage of miscalibrated individuals: The relationship between social class and overconfidence and its implications for class-based inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 118(2):254-282.

Bies, R. J., and J. F. Moag. 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Research on negotiations in organizations, 1st ed., edited by B. H. Sheppard and M. H. Bazerman. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Pp. 43-55.

Brockner, J., M. Konovsky, R. Cooper-Schneider, R. Folger, C. Martin, and R. Bies. 1994. Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of Management Journal 37(2):397-409.

Brown, S. 2019. Life inside the Title IX pressure cooker. Chronicle of Higher Education, September 5. https://www.chronicle.com/article/life-inside-the-title-ix-pressure-cooker.

Callisto. 2021. My Callisto. https://mycallisto.org (accessed April 2, 2022).

Chugh, D., M. H. Bazerman, and M. R. Banaji. 2005. Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. Conflicts of Interest: Challenges and Solutions in Business, Law, Medicine, and Public Policy 74-95.

Cialdini, R. B. 2001. Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard Business Review 79(9):72-81.

Code, L. 1995. Rhetorical spaces: Essays on gendered locations, 1st ed. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203724132.

Colquitt, J. A. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 86:386-400.

Colquitt, J. A. 2004. Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology 89(4):633.

Colquitt, J. A., B. A. Scott, J. B. Rodell, D. M. Long, C. P. Zapata, D. E. Conlon, and M. J. Wesson. 2013. Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology 98(2):199-236.

Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 139.

Devine, P. G., P. S. Forscher, A. J. Austin, and W. T. Cox. 2012. Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48(6):1267-1278.

Dobbin, F., and A. Kalev. 2020. Why sexual harassment programs backfire and what to do about it. Harvard Business Review 98(3):44-52. https://hbr.org/2020/05/why-sexual-harassment-programs-backfire.

Duncan, P. 2014. Hot commodities, cheap labor: Women of color in the academy. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 35(3):39-63. https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.35.3.0039.

ED (U.S. Department of Education). 2020. Nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in education programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance. 34 CFR 106, Federal Register 85(97) (May 19). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-05-19/pdf/2020-10512.pdf.

Epstein, D. 2020. Discounting credibility: Doubting the stories of women survivors of sexual harassment. Seton Hall Law Review 51(2):289-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3575843.

Eyre, L. 2000. The discursive framing of sexual harassment in a university community. Gender & Education 12(3):293-307.

Fitzgerald, L. F. 2021. Understanding power differentials: It’s not just your boss. Presentation at the Third Annual Public Summit of the Action Collaborative on Preventing Sexual Harassment in Higher Education, virtual.

Fitzgerald, L. F., and L. M. Cortina. 2018. Sexual harassment in work organizations: A view from the 21st century. In APA handbook of the psychology of women: Perspectives on women’s private and public lives, edited by C. B. Travis, J. W. White, A. Rutherford, W. S. Williams, S. L. Cook, and K. F. Wyche. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Pp. 215-234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000060-012.

Fitzgerald, L. F., M. J. Gelfand, and F. Drasgow. 1995. Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 17:425-445. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1704_2.

Folger, R., and J. Greenberg. 1985. Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In Research in personnel and human resource management, edited by K. M. Rowland and G. R. Ferris, vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Pp. 141-183.

Fox, M. 2008. American Indian women in academia: The joys and challenges. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education 1(1):204-223. https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-7890.1011.

Galinsky, A. D., and G. B. Moskowitz. 2000. Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(4):708.

Goldman, B. M. 2003. The application of reference cognitions theory to legal-claiming by terminated workers: The role of organizational justice and anger. Journal of Management 29:705-728.

Griffin, K., J. Bennett, and J. Harris. 2011. Analyzing gender differences in Black faculty marginalization through a sequential mixed-methods design. New Directions for Institutional Research (Special Issue: Using Mixed-Methods Approaches to Study Intersectionality in Higher Education) 2011(151):45-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.398.

Grinnell College. 2020. Grinnell College policy, procedures, and guide to preventing, reporting, and responding to sexual misconduct and other forms of interpersonal violence. https://www.grinnell.edu/sites/default/files/docs/2020-11/Grinnell%20College%20Guide%20for%20

Prohibited%20Behavior%208.14.20%20%28FINAL%29-Final.pdf.

Gruenfeld, D. H., M. E. Inesi, J. C. Magee, and A. D. Galinsky. 2008. Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95(1):111-127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111.

Guarino, C., and V. Borden. 2017. Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education 58:672-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9454-2.

Haidt, J. 2012. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon Books.

Harvard University External Review Committee. 2021. Report of the External Review Committee to Review Sexual Harassment at Harvard University. https://provost.harvard.edu/files/provost/files/report_of_committee_to_president_bacow_january_2021.pdf.

Hirshfield, L., and T. Joseph. 2012. “We need a woman, we need a black woman”: Gender, race, and identity taxation in the academy. Gender and Education 24(2):213-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2011.606208.

Holland, K. J., Cipriano, A. E., and Huit, T. Z. 2019. “The fear is palpable”: Service providers’ perceptions of mandatory reporting policies for sexual assault in higher education. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 1-24.

Holland, K. J., and Cortina, L. M. 2013. When sexism and feminism collide: The sexual harassment of feminist working women. Psychology of Women Quarterly 37(2):192-208.

Houston-Kolnik, J., C. Odahl-Ruan, and M. Greeson. 2017. Who helps the helpers?: Social support for rape crisis advocates. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1-2):406-427.

Judge, T. A., and J. A. Colquitt. 2004. Organizational justice and stress: The mediating role of work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology 89(3):395-404.

Kant, I. 1992. Theoretical philosophy, 1755-1770, edited and translated by D. Walford in collaboration with R. Meerbote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kim, W. C., and R. A. Mauborgne. 1993. Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals’ corporate strategic decisions. Academy of Management Journal 36:502-526.

Kirkner, A. C., K. Lorenz, and L. Mazar. 2020. Faculty and staff reporting & disclosure of sexual harassment in higher education. Gender and Education 34(2):119-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1763923.

Lee, F., and L. Tiedens. 2001. Is it lonely at the top?: Independence and interdependence of power-holders. Research in Organizational Behavior 23:43-91.

Leventhal, G. S. 1976. The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 9, edited by L. Berkowtiz and W. Walster. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 91-131.

Leventhal, G. S. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? In Social exchange: Advances in theory and research, edited by K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, and R. H. Willis. New York: Plenum Press. Pp. 27-55.

Lind, E. A., R. Kanfer, and C. Early. 1990. Voice, control, and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59:952-959.

Magee, J. C., and A. D. Galinsky. 2008. Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals 2(1):351-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211628.

McDonald, P. 2012. Workplace sexual harassment 30 years on: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews 14(1):1-17.

McFarlin, D. B., and P. D. Sweeney. 1992. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational

outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 35:626-637.

MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 2019. MindHandHeart Department support program. Year 1 public description of work for Action Collaborative on Preventing Sexual Harassment in Higher Education. https://www.nationalacademies.org/docs/5A9DE8E576C71407921DA2CD0D69C1A7C68258B0F93.

Moore, D. A., L. Tanlu, and M. H. Bazerman. 2010. Conflict of interest and the intrusion of bias. Judgment and Decision Making 5(1):37-53.

NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2018. Sexual harassment of women: Climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24994.

NASEM. 2021. The impact of COVID-19 on the careers of women in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26061.

NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2020. NOAA WVPR. Year 1 public description of work for Action Collaborative on Preventing Sexual Harassment in Higher Education: Office of Workplace Violence Prevention and Response (WVPR). https://www.nationalacademies.org/docs/764CA9188AC75B450BE74893C87AD95F5A36EFA7C9.

Peirce, E. R., B. Rosen, and T. Bunn Hiller. 1997. Breaking the silence: Creating user-friendly sexual harassment policies. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 10:225-242. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025643318386.

Peirce, E., C. A. Smolinski, and B. Rosen. 1998. Why sexual harassment complaints fall on deaf ears. Academy of Management Executive 12(3):41-54.

Powers, R. A., and J. Leili. 2017. Bar training for active bystanders: Evaluation of a community-based bystander intervention program. Violence Against Women 24(13):1614-1634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217741219.

Princeton University. 2021. Title IX sexual harassment policy. https://inclusive.princeton.edu/addressing-concerns/policies/title-ix-sexual-harassment-policy#TIXPSection6.

Privilege. 2021. Open education sociology dictionary. https://sociologydictionary.org/privilege.

Purdue University. 2021a. Center for advocacy, response, & education. https://www.purdue.edu/odos/care.

Purdue University. 2021b. Harassment and discrimination. https://www.purdue.edu/oie/Office%20of%20Institutional%20Equity/investigations.php.

Ridgeway, C., and J. Berger. 1986. Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. American Sociological Review 51:603-617.

Rupp, D. E., D. L. Shapiro, R. Folger, D. P. Skarlicki, and R. Shao. 2017. A critical analysis of the conceptualization and measurement of organizational justice: Is it time for reassessment? Academy of Management Annals 11(2):919-959.

Rutgers University. 2015. University policy. Office of Academic Labor Relations. https://policies.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/60.5.1-current.pdf.

Rutgers University. 2019a (October 1). Rutgers University community engagement plan for the NASEM Action Collaborative on Preventing Sexual Harassment in Higher Education. https://www.nationalacademies.org/docs/51626E2734E8712EBB7346F15B76EC3785961E587.

Rutgers University. 2019b. Incorporating behavioral considerations into evaluation of faculty for reappointment, promotion, and tenure. Year 1 public

description of work for Action Collaborative on Preventing Sexual Harassment in Higher Education. https://www.nationalacademies.org/docs/27242DB21C3969FD0D9FF654E7AC3BAD51723D52BA.

Schreiber, N., and J. Creswell. 2017 (December 12). Sexual harassment cases show the ineffectiveness of going to HR. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/12/business/sexual-harassment-human-resources.html.

Shaw, E., A. Hegewisch, and C. Hess. 2018 (October). Sexual harassment and assault at work: Understanding the costs. Briefing Paper No. B376. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research. https://iwpr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/IWPR-sexual-harassment-brief_FINAL.pdf.

Skarlicki, D. P., and C. Kulik. 2005. Third-party reactions to employee (mis)treatment: A justice perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior 26:183-230

Slattery, S., and L. Goodman. 2009. Secondary traumatic stress among domestic violence advocates: Workplace risk and protective factors. Violence Against Women 15(11):1358-1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209347469.

Spell, C. S., and T. J. Arnold. 2007. A multilevel analysis of organizational justice climate, structure, and employee mental health. Journal of Management 33(5):724-751.

Thibaut, J. W., and L. Walker. 1975. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Todd, A. R., G. V. Bodenhausen, J. A. Richeson, and A. D. Galinsky. 2011. Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100(6):1027.

Treviño, L. K., G. R. Weaver, D. G. Gibson, and B. L. Toffler. 1999. Managing ethics and legal compliance: What works and what hurts. California Management Review 41(2):131-151.

Tyler, T. 1988. What is procedural justice?: Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law & Society Review 22(1):103-135. doi: 10.2307/3053563.

Tyler, T. R. 1990. Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

UC (University of California) Berkeley. 2021. SVSH annual reports and data. Addressing sexual violence & sexual harassment. https://svsh.berkeley.edu/leadership-data/svsh-annual-reports.

UC Santa Barbara. 2020. Departmental conduct policies. Year 1 public description of work for Action Collaborative on Preventing Sexual Harassment in Higher Education. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.nationalacademies.org/docs/737D03FAD-21CC47123BF02CD458CFFA5361B8E7FE-6B&sa=D&ust=1611354568141000&us-g=AOvVaw2vTU5DOy2TXVWDPWLusR_m.

UC Santa Cruz. 2020. A guide on best practices for graduate students impacted by SVSH. Year 1 public description of work for Action Collaborative on Preventing Sexual Harassment in Higher Education. https://www.nationalacademies.org/docs/93A36A581A60887248B37971A7E-2A48B00D84DB0663.

UI (University of Illinois) System. 2020. Policy on consideration of sexual misconduct in prior employment. System human resource services. https://www.hr.uillinois.edu/cms/One.aspx?portalId=4292&pageId=1411899.

University of Iowa. 2021. Chapter 14.1—rationale. Anti-harassment. Operations manual. https://opsmanual.uiowa.edu/community-policies/anti-harassment.

University of Michigan. 2021. Preventing sexual harassment. College of Literature, Science, and the Arts. https://lsa.umich.edu/lsa/about/preventing-sexual-harassment.html.

University of Virginia. 2021. Title IX and sexual misconduct. Office for Equal Opportunity and Civil Rights. https://eocr.virginia.edu/title-ix.

UW (University of Wisconsin) System. 2021. Rethinking the hiring process. Compliance & Integrity. https://www.wisconsin.edu/compliance/rethinking-the-hiring-process.

Vanderbilt University. 2019. Vanderbilt University—community engagement plan. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Action Collaborative (AC) on Preventing Sexual Harassment in Higher Education. https://www.nationalacademies.org/docs/3519493B3B-CB42D656DDF4A5F3E2D02CC8A4847E2D6.

Yale University. 2021a. Title IX, reports. Office of the Provost. https://provost.yale.edu/title-ix/reports.

Yale University. 2021b. Title IX, committees. Office of the Provost. https://provost.yale.edu/title-ix/committees.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17226/26563

SUGGESTED CITATION

Umphress, E., and Thomas, J. M. (Eds.). 2022. Applying Procedural Justice to Sexual Harassment Policies, Procedures, and Practice. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7226/26563.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

The authors of this paper are institutional representatives to the Prevention Working Group of the Action Collaborative on Preventing Sexual Harassment in Higher Education. In developing this paper, this group of authors was led by Elizabeth Umphress, Professor of Management, University of Washington. Other authors include Cheryl Cooky, Professor of American Studies and Women’s Gender and Sexuality Studies, Purdue University; Melissa Kwon, Associate Director for Prevention, PATH to Care Center, University of California, Berkeley; Fiona Lee, Social Science Associate Dean, University of Michigan; and Thaddeus Potter, Director of Legislative Affairs, National Association of Graduate-Professional Students.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge Mary Gower, Chief Title IX Officer, University of Alaska System, a former Prevention Working Group representative who contributed to this document. The authors would also like to thank Frazier Benya, Senior Program Officer; Abigail Harless, Senior Program Assistant, at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; and Jeena Thomas, Program Officer, for the valuable support they provided for this paper.

This paper was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in making each publication as sound as possible and to ensure that it meets the institutional standards for quality, objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the process.

We thank the following individuals for their review of this paper:

Linda Boyd, Johns Hopkins University; Nicole Buan, University of Nebraska–Lincoln; Kristina Larsen, Kristina Larsen Law; Ericka Lewis, Duke University; and Deborah Rupp, George Mason University.

Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the content of the paper, nor did they see the final draft before its release. The review of this paper was overseen by Marilyn Baker, National Academies, with assistance from Barbara Lee, Rutgers University. They were responsible for making certain that an independent examination

of the paper was carried out in accordance with the standards of the National Academies and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content rests entirely with the authors.

ABOUT THE ACTION COLLABORATIVE

The Action Collaborative on Preventing Sexual Harassment in Higher Education brings together academic and research institutions and key stakeholders to work toward targeted, collective action on addressing and preventing sexual harassment across all disciplines and among all people in higher education. The members actively collaborate to identify, research, develop, and implement efforts that move beyond basic legal compliance to evidence-based policies and practices for addressing and preventing all forms of sexual harassment and promoting a campus climate of civility and respect. The Action Collaborative includes four Working Groups (Prevention, Response, Remediation, and Evaluation) that compile and gather information, and publish resources for the higher education community. The Prevention Working Group focuses on developing, implementing, evaluating, and compiling approaches for creating environments and organizational climates that prevent sexual harassment from occurring.

CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST DISCLOSURES

None disclosed.

CORRESPONDENCE

Questions or comments should be directed to Jeena Thomas at jmthomas@nas.edu.