Previous Chapter: Appendix A: Committee, Staff, and Consultant Biographies
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Open Session Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Building Confidence in New Evidence Streams for Human Health Risk Assessment: Lessons Learned from Laboratory Mammalian Toxicity Tests. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26906.

Appendix B
Open Session Agendas

September 23, 2021
Web Meeting
Times in EST

1:00Welcome
Cliff Duke, Director, BEST
1:05Chair’s Opening Remarks and Introduction of Committee Members
Weihsueh Chiu
1:30Question and Answer Session on the Statement of Task
Rusty Thomas or other EPA staff and Committee Members
2:00Opportunity for Public Comment
2:15Adjourn Open Session

December 9, 2021
Virtual Workshop
Times in EST

10:00Welcome, Introduction to Committee and Charge Questions
Kate Guyton, National Academies Project Director
Weihsueh Chiu, Committee Chair
Session I: How are traditional mammalian toxicity studies used in informing chemical safety decisions?
10:25Summary of Pre-Recorded Presentations, Panel Discussion, and Committee Q&A
Moderators: Weihsueh Chiu and Tracey Woodruff
Risk assessment introduction, contexts and challenges
Thomas Burke, Johns Hopkins University
Hazard identification of endocrine agents
Sharon Munn, Joint Research Centre
Hazard identification and dose-response of carcinogens
Vincent Cogliano, California Environmental Protection Agency.
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Open Session Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Building Confidence in New Evidence Streams for Human Health Risk Assessment: Lessons Learned from Laboratory Mammalian Toxicity Tests. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26906.
Insights from recent NASEM committees: Predicting acute toxicity and a class approach to organohalogens
David Dorman, North Carolina State University
Session II: What do we know about the variability of traditional mammalian toxicity studies with different levels of complexity?
11:25Summary of Prerecorded Presentations, Panel Discussion, and Committee Q&A
Moderators: Nicole Kleinstreuer and Holly Davies
Variability within the same traditional mammalian toxicity studies
David Allen, Integrated Laboratory Systems, LLC
Variability among traditional mammalian toxicity studies of the same and different design
Katie Paul Friedman, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Variability within and across species in traditional mammalian toxicity studies
Suzanne Fenton, National Toxicology Program
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Malcolm Macleod, University of Edinburgh
Session III: What do we know about the concordance of traditional mammalian toxicity studies with humans?
12:40Summary of Prerecorded Presentations, Panel Discussion, and Committee Q&A
Moderators: Nancy Lane and Patience Browne
Concordance of traditional mammalian toxicity studies with human clinical outcomes
Thomas Hartung, Johns Hopkins University
Concordance between animal and human toxicology
Joshua Robinson, University of California, San Francisco
Application of systematic review methods in low-dose endocrine toxicity
David Dorman, North Carolina State University
Session IV: Panel Reflections
1:40Panel Reflections and Q&A from Committee
Moderators: Kristi Pullen Fedinick and Corie Ellison
Panelists:
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Open Session Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Building Confidence in New Evidence Streams for Human Health Risk Assessment: Lessons Learned from Laboratory Mammalian Toxicity Tests. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26906.
  • David Dorman, North Carolina State University
  • Helen Goeden, Minnesota Department of Health
  • Rashmi Joglekar, Earth Justice
  • Sharon Munn, Joint Research Centre
  • Reza Rasoulpour, Corteva
2:40Public Comment Period
3:00Adjourn

May 12, 2022
Virtual Workshop
Times in EST

11:00Welcome, Introduction to the committee and the charge questions
Kate Guyton, National Academies Project Director
Weihsueh Chiu, Committee Chair
Session I: Mixtures
11:20Summary of Prerecorded Presentations, Panel Discussion, and Committee Q&A
Moderators: Kim Boekelheide and Weihsueh Chiu
Panelists:
  • Carl-Gustaf Bornehag, Karlstad University
  • Beate Escher, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
  • Chris Gennings, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Cynthia Rider, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  • Tom Webster, Boston University School of Public Health
Session II: Developmental Neurotoxicity
12:40Summary of Prerecorded Presentations, Panel Discussion, and Committee Q&A
Moderators: Robyn Tanguay and Heather Patisaul
Panelists:
  • Elaine Faustman, University of Washington
  • Helena Hogberg, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  • Tim Shafer, Environmental Protection Agency
  • Jason Stein, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Shirlee Tan, Senior Toxicologist for Public Health, Seattle and King County
Session III: Estrogenicity
2:00Summary of Prerecorded Presentations, Panel Discussion, and Committee Q&A
Moderator: Nicole Kleinstreuer and Marie Fortin
Panelists:
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Open Session Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Building Confidence in New Evidence Streams for Human Health Risk Assessment: Lessons Learned from Laboratory Mammalian Toxicity Tests. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26906.
  • Richard Judson, Environmental Protection Agency
  • Paul Mermelstein, University of Minnesota
  • Ruthann Rudel, Silent Spring Institute
  • Laura Vandenberg, UMass Amherst
  • Fred Wright, North Carolina State University
3:10Public Comment Period
3:30Adjourn

July 28, 2022
Web Meeting
Times in EST

1:00Welcome and Introductions
Kate Guyton, National Academies Project Director
Weihsueh Chiu, Committee Chair
1:15EPA Presentations
Maureen Gwinn, PhD DABT, US EPA
Russell Thomas, PhD, US EPA
1:45Committee Q&A
2:30Opportunity for Public Comment
2:45Adjourn Open Session
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Open Session Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Building Confidence in New Evidence Streams for Human Health Risk Assessment: Lessons Learned from Laboratory Mammalian Toxicity Tests. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26906.
Page 122
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Open Session Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Building Confidence in New Evidence Streams for Human Health Risk Assessment: Lessons Learned from Laboratory Mammalian Toxicity Tests. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26906.
Page 123
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Open Session Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Building Confidence in New Evidence Streams for Human Health Risk Assessment: Lessons Learned from Laboratory Mammalian Toxicity Tests. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26906.
Page 124
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Open Session Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Building Confidence in New Evidence Streams for Human Health Risk Assessment: Lessons Learned from Laboratory Mammalian Toxicity Tests. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26906.
Page 125
Next Chapter: Appendix C: Evidence Review: Approach, Methods, and Results
Subscribe to Emails from the National Academies
Stay up to date on activities, publications, and events by subscribing to email updates.