
This chapter provides a set of strategies and approaches for transportation organizations to consider in their transportation service delivery and administration during an emergency event. The strategies and approaches outlined are based on examples and findings from transportation organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic; some of these strategies and approaches are specific to service for people with disabilities and older adults, while many others apply to all transportation services and the well-being of the organization.
The rest of this chapter is organized into broad topic areas in emergency management for transportation. Each topic area section is introduced with a brief overview, followed by a set of highlights particularly relevant for providing service to people with disabilities and older adults, and then followed by subsections of key strategy areas within that topic. The strategy subsections contain a list of brief bulleted descriptions of approaches that transportation organizations can consider for their own emergency planning purposes.
The topic area sections also include text boxes with specific case examples from several transportation organizations on their strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic as discovered during the research. While many approaches were used by several transportation organizations around the United States, the examples showcased in the text boxes are intended to highlight unique or particularly relevant practices that were used to address service challenges during the pandemic. As with the summary bullet points, these callouts are intended to merely provide examples for consideration.
The topic area sections contained within the remainder of this chapter are as follows:
Planning effectively for pandemics and other emergencies can help transit agencies prepare for all highly infectious diseases and other types of disasters. Having a plan that sets forth roles, responsibilities, and policies for staffing, safety, and communications will help ensure that transportation organizations are resilient and able to make good decisions in evolving emergency
events. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a small number of transportation organizations had existing pandemic plans, which provided a starting point for each agency’s response.
Pandemic plans are a variation of existing plans such as continuity of operations plans (COOPs), emergency response plans, and operational plans that establish what departments and/or staff members do. Along with vulnerability assessments and a comprehensive emergency plan, the pandemic plan should include an activation section that provides leadership with guidance on when to activate specific actions and make operational decisions. Pandemics are dynamic events that change with subsequent waves of the disease; handling these changes successfully during the COVID-19 pandemic involved taking a measured and tiered approach to planning. Activation of different levels of response should be coordinated with local emergency management, public health, and other local/regional/state transportation agencies.
Existing plans and procedures for providing transportation for people who are immunocompromised and people with communicable diseases can be useful during different types of health-related emergencies.
Identifying existing community-based groups and programs for people with disabilities and older adults can help planners know where populations are located, their main destinations, and their specific service needs.
Planning for emergencies requires coordination and collaboration because effective response and recovery involves many agencies and community
organizations and usually more than one jurisdiction. Strategic, innovative relationships can lead to smoother, better-coordinated responses to disasters and improve recovery.
Emergency situations will disrupt transportation service continuity for at least a short-term period in response to the circumstances encountered by transportation organizations. In the immediate anticipation and aftermath of an emergency, some routes and services may need to be temporarily suspended in order to keep riders and employees safe as well as to use available resources (e.g., staffing and safety protections) on the most critical services. If emergencies extend for a longer period of time, as they did during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is important for transportation organizations to preserve accessible transportation service and the distribution of goods and services for customers with a higher level of need (including people with disabilities and older adults). Strategies to minimize the impact of emergencies on transportation for people with disabilities and older adults can be incorporated into planning and mitigation efforts ahead of an emergency.
Organizations can proactively determine services affecting customers with the highest level of need as part of emergency mitigation planning; these services could include providing transportation to places like dialysis centers, adult day care centers, and local community centers.
Because paratransit is a critical service for riders that use it, reductions in fixed-route service hours should not be the sole rationale for reducing paratransit service during an emergency. Reserving service capacity for transportation customers with health risks (potentially through single isolated trips) may be a needed solution.
Organizations can explore methods for conducting eligibility assessments remotely or granting temporary eligibility status for new paratransit applicants over a certain period of months as alternatives to the regular eligibility determination process.
any additional demand with additional vehicles. For paratransit, this may mean exclusive rides for some customers.
During the response phase of emergency management, new or temporary services can fill a service gap or community need, enabling the use of vehicles and drivers not needed for regularly scheduled service. These services, sometimes termed “incidental uses,” may be particularly aimed at providing assistance for people with disabilities and older adults or helping the general public. Types of incidental use instituted by a transportation organization (or in partnership with other organizations) may differ depending on the nature and length of the emergency (e.g., a short-term weather event versus a long-term pandemic).
During COVID-19, new incidental uses were common at large and small transportation organizations throughout the United States. One of the most common was meal and grocery delivery (as well as delivery of other essential items) to fill a community need for access to food and daily supplies. These services often target older adults and paratransit customers. Other common incidental uses were shuttle rides to access testing or vaccinations or trips to emergency medical care or isolation. Numerous transportation organizations and their community partners developed these services through demand-response or private automobile-based services while identifying resources at each partner that could be relevant to service delivery.
Adjust incidental use services as new community needs are discovered based on customer feedback, including adding eligibility for different delivery items or access to additional destinations. This can be particularly relevant for communities with longer travel distances such as exurban or rural communities.
Separate vehicles should be used for passenger trips and goods delivery in order to keep the rider prioritized under the circumstances of the emergency. It may also be necessary to permit trips with one passenger per vehicle if the passenger needs to be isolated for medical
reasons. At the same time, it is important to be flexible in allowing vehicles to be used for multiple emergency needs.
In all emergencies, transportation organizations need to protect employees and customers while ensuring continuity of operations and the resilience of the transportation system. Employee and passenger health and safety are especially critical in a pandemic. Employee availability is essential for the provision of agency services but can become limited due to illness, exposure, need to quarantine, or family concerns such as vulnerable members, illness, or disruption of school or day care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, transportation organizations prioritized driver safety and worked to make it clear to employees that this was important. Because a pandemic is “invisible” relative to other types of emergencies, riders may not feel safe, even though precautions are in place to ensure their safety.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, all transportation organizations put in place safety measures and procedures in response to the pandemic, doing what was being recommended at the time by local and state public health officials and the CDC. Research conducted during the pandemic found that if employees and the public believe that a transportation organization is concerned for their welfare and is trying to meet their needs and if safety measures are highly visible or recognizable, they will feel safe. A multilayered approach to safety that includes protective measures, policies, communication, and education was found to be effective by some transportation organizations.
Be aware that social distancing or other safety requirements during an emergency can create challenges for individuals who need assistance with boarding, wheelchair securement, or assistance to the front door.
Recognize that practices effective in fixed-route services may not be possible in paratransit and other services for people with disabilities and older adults. For example, it is not possible to safely leave a wheelchair unsecured in a vehicle. Transportation organizations may also need to limit trips to one or two passengers in some emergencies.
Look out for unintended consequences of safety procedures or for protective measures that exacerbate existing problems. Limiting contact with passengers as a safety precaution can result in problems with assistance for wheelchair securement and challenge riders with hearing difficulties.
For respiratory-based pandemics, public health guidelines are likely to recommend that all employees and travelers wear masks and/or gloves to protect themselves and others, in addition to following regular handwashing and sanitation measures. Based on these guidelines, transportation organizations can
identified. Agencies also used scented cleaners and other sensory clues to make their cleaning efforts more obvious.
agencies conducted contact tracing for employees who became ill or were exposed to an active infection during the pandemic.
Pandemics and other extended emergencies emphasize a transportation organization’s need to balance safety with service, a challenge that agencies wrestle with every day. The following principles can help better match safety and protective measures for an agency to a particular emergency:
During emergency situations, transit agencies and other transportation-providing organizations may make temporary service changes due to limited resources and capacity along with environmental conditions that may hinder the safe operation of service. Under normal operating conditions, to implement a major service change or fare change, transportation providers that receive federal funding and “operate 50 or more fixed-route vehicles in peak service and are located in [an urbanized area] of [at least] 200,000” would be required to conduct a full Title VI equity analysis to ensure the changes do not result in disparate impacts or disproportionate burdens for Title VI protected populations. FTA states that temporary service changes in response to an emergency do not require a service equity analysis so long as the change does not last longer than 12 months; the same is true for fare changes within a 6-month period. Additionally, FTA states that transit agencies are expected to take reasonable measures to ensure that any temporary service or fare changes are implemented equitably to prevent any unintentional discrimination.
As FTA indicates, regardless of mandate, transportation organizations still have a responsibility to ensure that temporary service changes during an emergency, as well as any incidental use programs that are launched in response to the emergency, are implemented equitably within its service area and that these services address the needs of the people who rely on their service the most. Disparate impacts from service changes on people with disabilities and older adults need to be mitigated and avoided as much as possible during the planning and coordination phases of the service change rather than discovered after the implementation. Likewise, transportation organizations should be open and responsive to input and feedback from customers (particularly those with accommodation needs) in order to adjust service to meet their needs and maintain accessibility to transportation.
Ensure that there is no prioritization of ADA paratransit trip requests based on trip purpose since it is not an allowable qualification for agencies to use in screening trip requests. Customer travel needs should be respected in all cases, especially for paratransit users.
Proactively designate services used by riders with high need as part of core route networks and services used as the default during emergency situations, helping to prevent inequitable service reductions.
Prioritize access to incidental use services for customers with high need in collaboration with local partner organizations to understand and address the needs of people with disabilities and older adults for these services.
Relationships between public and private organizations are essential in the coordination of resources and leveraging strengths together. Within the context of emergency management, relationships are key to success in all four phases that occur around the emergency. Along with
communication and coordination, informal or sometimes formal partnerships can help further develop services and address community needs in more defined roles for each participant. To serve people with disabilities and older adults effectively during an emergency, relationships with other community organizations and stakeholders who are knowledgeable about the needs of these individuals are critical.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many transportation organizations developed new coordination efforts with other government entities and local assistance organizations. This coordination was useful in communicating service changes and safety procedures, discovering community needs, and other organizations’ efforts, and developing incidental use services. Partnerships with these organizations and private transportation providers, sometimes through existing agreements, were used to adjust service terms and procedures to fit the conditions of the pandemic so that service and deliveries could be provided safely. Having preexisting relationships and emergency planning in place helped with coordinating transportation efforts during the pandemic. Existing partnerships and collaborations with various departments enabled prompt responses to community needs and helped resolve issues during and after the pandemic.
Identify partnerships for responding to emergencies with appropriate and available resources. Transportation provision in concert with other organization efforts may be the most appropriate in some instances (meal delivery), while facility and in-kind asset use may be better in other situations (mobile vaccination buses).
Use partnerships for coordination and communication of special emergency efforts. Partner resources and relationships can extend the broadcast range to areas and community groups beyond those a transportation organization already reaches.
businesses can help with discovering available resources and allocating them (e.g., cleaning products, PPE) to other organizations in need.
Communication and engagement are key activities during the planning and response stages of emergency management, particularly in providing people with disabilities and older adults with information on service status and updates about their transport options. During COVID-19, transportation organizations used a variety of mechanisms to communicate service changes and safety policies to customers. Printed materials such as letters and mailers/flyers sent to customers’ homes and signage at transit stops or on vehicles informed riders about service and safety directly. Online information on service changes was available on organization websites and social media channels; some transit agencies also provided live dashboards with data on service utilization. Direct emails to paratransit customers and other customers were also used by transportation organizations with email lists available to send out messages.
Many public meetings were shifted to virtual meeting settings, a change that provided access for some customers but could be frustrating for those who were less technologically adept. Virtual meeting tools were also useful for meetings with businesses, elected officials, local jurisdictions, community partners, and employees. The ability to receive information by phone was critical for many older adults and paratransit customers; communication by phone included staffed phone hotlines, callouts to customers, and prerecorded phone messages with information. Local partners were also key in assisting transportation organizations with outgoing communication such as messages on changes in service or safety protocols and incoming communication such as customer feedback and information on community needs. Transportation organizations need to use a variety of communication methods to reach and engage customers during a pandemic, particularly people with disabilities and older adults who often rely on communication methods that are accessible and familiar.
Keep communication procedures such as those regarding boarding assistance and wheelchair securement in place for accommodating the needs of people with disabilities. Customers should be able to communicate their accommodation needs during an emergency service state.
Use phone calls as a communication method to directly reach customers. This includes informing customers about changes to service when they call, providing recordings during hold times, and proactively making outbound calls to customers. Communication through the web and social media is not as useful for some customers.
Communicate through community leaders and key individuals knowledgeable about the needs of people with disabilities and older adults in the community. Word-of-mouth communication can be one of the most-effective indirect ways for riders to learn about transportation changes.
Financial support for service during an emergency is another critical barrier that transportation agencies may encounter while working to sustain existing operations, implement measures for staff and rider safety, and temporarily operate incidental use services. Increased costs for staff wages and overtime may be incurred for emergency transportation service as well as workforce retention. Similarly, unanticipated costs for new safety supplies or market-related inflationary effects on the cost of fuel and vehicle parts can drive up expenses for transportation organizations during an emergency. Larger metropolitan transit authorities could be impacted by a loss of sales tax revenues, while smaller transit agencies and transportation-providing organizations may be in a more difficult position, covering short-term financial challenges themselves.
Approaching financial sustainability from an emergency management perspective can help an agency address these challenges appropriately in each management stage. The pre-emergency areas of mitigation and preparedness are opportune times to reduce the impacts of a future event and subsequent incurred costs. The response and recovery phases are periods to identify approaches and procedures that will improve the response and mitigation for the next emergency. Federal agencies will sometimes provide financial assistance to transportation organizations during a disaster event or public health crisis on a one-time basis; during the COVID-19 pandemic, funding from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act was a critical resource for transportation providers and other government agencies in addressing financial issues during different phases of the pandemic.
Collaborate with partners at local stakeholder organizations with similar goals in serving people with disabilities and older adults. These organizations could help provide partial funding support for incidental use services or continued service provision that assists these groups.
Establish agreements with local or state emergency management agencies for support. Having MOUs established in advance that specify roles in support of transportation service for people with disabilities and older adults during emergencies can help activate available funding from partners.
and older adults. For emergencies where service beyond maximum service capacity is needed, the need for resources and supporting funding will be higher.