The workshop closed with remarks from Jayaraman and from a leader of the sponsoring organization.
Jayaraman highlighted key points from the workshop, including potential approaches to increase the adoption of reusable personal protective equipment (PPE) (see Box 9-1), and discussed possible paths forward in exploring reusable health care textiles (HCTs). He described the need to strike a balance in accounting for numerous factors when considering greater use of reusable HCTs. These factors include economics, environmental effects, and the safety of patients and health care workers (HCWs), which is of paramount concern and entails equitable protection. The One Health paradigm that considers the interconnected health of humans, animals, and the environment is relevant to achieving this balance, Jayaraman noted.
Jayaraman described ensuring the safety of HCWs and patients as paramount within a health care setting, with all other considerations being secondary. He remarked that a systems approach is essential when considering implementation of reusable HCTs. Therefore, efforts to increase the adoption of reusable HCTs should engage HCWs, procurement personnel, executives, and manufacturers and suppliers. A risk-based decision-support framework facilitates the exploration of
Innovation
End-User Engagement
Cost Reduction
Education
Reducing Logistical Barriers
__________________
a This list is the rapporteurs’ summary of points made by the individual speakers identified, and the statements have not been endorsed or verified by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. They are not intended to reflect a consensus among workshop participants.
technical, economic, environmental, logistical, regulatory, and education facets of implementing a reusable PPE program. He stated his optimism that adoption of reusable HCTs will increase—particularly given the higher levels of environmental awareness present in the new generation of HCWs—and this effort will contribute toward protecting the safety of people, animals, and the environment.
Maryann D’Alessandro, director of the National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL), offered final reflections and outlined next steps. Sponsored by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the workshop was designed to examine the feasibility and potential benefits of increased use of reusable PPE. The workshop will serve as input for a NIOSH report exploring the increased use of reusable PPE in health care while ensuring the safety and health of HCWs and patients. The NIOSH report will emphasize health care delivery that (1) is conducted in an environmentally sustainable manner, (2) is provided at a potential cost savings, and (3) catalyzes action in the space of reusable PPE. Outlining NPPTL responsibilities, she described conformity assessment goals to address PPE workplace needs. NPPTL is addressing the goal of reducing inhalation hazards through leadership in research, federal standards development, and respirator approval activities. Efforts toward the goals of reducing dermal hazards and reducing injury hazards are less extensive. Although NPPTL has established a robust research
portfolio and participates in consensus standards regarding these goals, the research center does not own the standards and does not certify PPE related to dermal and injury hazard reduction.
D’Alessandro remarked that this workshop catalyzed conversations to identify potential actions in several areas:
She stated that communication tools should be used before the purchase of reusable gowns, respirators, or other forms of reusable PPE. These tools could facilitate understanding of the exposures being addressed and the options available with possible consideration of a control banding approach based on risk. Recalling the example of respirator stockpiling performed without first determining whether the respirators would fit the intended population, D’Alessandro emphasized that steps should be taken to ensure that reusable PPE is acceptable to end users before purchasing. This workshop identified numerous factors to consider in these determinations.
Benefits and drawbacks are both associated with the use of disposable or reusable gowns in health care, said D’Alessandro (see Box 9-2). Increased use of reusable gowns presents opportunities for enhanced pandemic preparedness, reduced environmental impacts, and potential cost savings in terms of cost per use. However, gowns must provide appropriate barrier resistance and address end-user concerns regarding design and comfort; appropriate laundry services must also be available. D’Alessandro outlined that increasing the use of reusable isolation and surgical gowns in the U.S. health care system will require a multifaceted approach involving research and development, regulatory support, standardization and guidance, investment in education and awareness, and investment in infrastructure through incentives, legislation, and other approaches.
D’Alessandro explained that NIOSH will consider the information presented in the workshop and work to identify (1) actions that can be taken
Manufacturing
Purchasing
Storage and Use
End of Life
__________________
a This list is the rapporteurs’ summary of points made by the individual speakers identified, and the statements have not been endorsed or verified by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. They are not intended to reflect a consensus among workshop participants.
now, (2) actions that require a 1- to 3-year time frame, and (3) long-term actions requiring more than 3 years. Long-term actions include research to address gaps identified in this workshop, such as gaps in standards and communication tools to address hazards confronting health care practitioners. By addressing such factors and implementing comprehensive strategies, increased use of reusable isolation and surgical gowns and reusable respirators could lead to benefits for health care providers and the environment. D’Alessandro stated that NIOSH will consider potential partners in this endeavor and seek to leverage the Allegheny Health Network elastomeric respirator case study and the Providence Health System isolation gown case study. She remarked that given that the term “reusable” could potentially generate confusion regarding the requirement that gowns should be appropriately processed between uses, terms such as “environmentally friendly,” “green,” or other descriptors should be considered.
Recalling that 1980s child passenger safety laws requiring children to wear seatbelts spurred change in seatbelt behaviors, D’Alessandro underscored that improved child safety might not have been realized in the absence of legislation. Similarly, the realization of the potential benefits of reusable PPE—such as reduced waste, decreased overall costs, and lowered environmental impact—is unlikely without legislation. NIOSH will work to identify partners to engage in advancing the effort to increase the use of reusable PPE. D’Alessandro closed by extending gratitude to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine staff, the workshop planning committee, Jayaraman for his leadership in chairing the committee, and all speakers and panelists for their contributions to this effort.