Q1 - Please select the State Department of Transportation (DOT) you represent:
| State / Agency Name | State Abbreviation |
|---|---|
| Alabama | AL |
| Alaska | AK |
| Arizona | AZ |
| Arkansas | AR |
| California | CA |
| Colorado | CO |
| Connecticut | CT |
| Delaware | DE |
| Florida | FL |
| Georgia | GA |
| Idaho | ID |
| Illinois | IL |
| Indiana | IN |
| Iowa | IA |
| Kansas | KS |
| Kentucky | KY |
| Louisiana | LA |
| Maine | ME |
| Maryland | MD |
| Massachusetts | MA |
| Michigan | MI |
| Minnesota | MN |
| Mississippi | MS |
| Missouri | MO |
| Nebraska | NE |
| Nevada | NV |
| New Hampshire | NH |
| New Jersey | NJ |
| New York | NY |
| North Carolina | NC |
| North Dakota | ND |
| Ohio | OH |
| Oklahoma | OK |
| Oregon | OR |
| Pennsylvania | PA |
| Rhode Island | RI |
| South Carolina | SC |
| South Dakota | SD |
| Tennessee | TN |
| Texas | TX |
| Utah | UT |
| Vermont | VT |
| Virginia | VA |
| Washington | WA |
| West Virginia | WV |
| Wisconsin | WI |
| Wyoming | WY |
Q2 - Please enter your contact information.
This question collected names, phone numbers and email addresses of the survey participants for communication purposes.
Q3 - Which of the typical bridge replacement construction strategies and techniques for complex scenarios has the DOT used? Please select all that apply.
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Alaska | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Arizona | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Arkansas | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| California | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Colorado | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Connecticut | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Delaware | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Florida | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Georgia | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Idaho | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Illinois | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Indiana | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Iowa | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Kansas | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Kentucky | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Louisiana | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Maine | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Maryland | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Massachusetts | X | X | X | X | X | X | Bridge slides | |
| Michigan | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Minnesota | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Mississippi | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Missouri | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Nebraska | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Nevada | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| New Hampshire | X | X | X | X | X |
| New Jersey | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| New York | X | X | X | X | X | X | SPMT bridge moves and bridge slides | |
| North Carolina | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| North Dakota | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Ohio | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Oklahoma | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Oregon | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Pennsylvania | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Rhode Island | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| South Carolina | X | X | X | X | ||||
| South Dakota | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Tennessee | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Texas | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Utah | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Vermont | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Virginia | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Washington | X | X | X | X | ||||
| West Virginia | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Wisconsin | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Wyoming | X | X | X |
Q4 - Which of the typical bridge replacement construction strategies and techniques for complex scenarios has the DOT used or considered? Please select all that apply.
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. |
| Alaska | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Arizona | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Considered but could not use due to restrictions. | Did not consider. |
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. |
| California | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Colorado | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Connecticut | Used and may use in future. | Considered but could not use due to restrictions. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Delaware | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Considered but could not use due to restrictions. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Florida | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Georgia | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Idaho | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Illinois | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. | Used and may use in future. | Considered but could not use due to restrictions. |
| Indiana | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Iowa | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Kansas | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Considered but could not use due to restrictions. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Louisiana | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Maine | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. |
| Maryland | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Massachusetts | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. |
| Michigan | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Minnesota | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Mississippi | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Considered but could not use due to restrictions. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Missouri | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Nebraska | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. |
| Nevada | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. |
| New Hampshire | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| New Jersey | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| New York | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. |
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| North Dakota | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Ohio | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Oklahoma | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Oregon | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Pennsylvania | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Rhode Island | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| South Carolina | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| South Dakota | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Tennessee | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Texas | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Utah | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Vermont | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Virginia | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Washington | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Wisconsin | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
| Wyoming | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. | Used and may use in future. | Used and may use in future. | Did not consider. |
Q5 - Are there certain bridge replacement construction strategies and techniques for complex scenarios that the DOT has not considered or implemented due to the state contracting and procurement restrictions?
| DOT | Response | Strategy/Technique |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Yes | |
| Alaska | No | |
| Arizona | No | |
| Arkansas | No | |
| California | No | |
| Colorado | Yes | IDIQ Delivery methods for multiple bridges in a bundle |
| Connecticut | No | |
| Delaware | No | |
| Florida | No | |
| Georgia | No | |
| Idaho | No | |
| Illinois | No | |
| Indiana | No | |
| Iowa | Yes | Iowa is not permitted to use alternative contracting methods such as D - |
| B and CM/GC. | ||
| Kansas | No | |
| Kentucky | No | |
| Louisiana | No | |
| Maine | Yes | Currently our ability to use ABC is extremely limited based on our |
| contractor’s ability to staff a project with a compressed schedule. | ||
| Maryland | No | |
| Massachusetts | No | |
| Michigan | No | |
| Minnesota | No | |
| Mississippi | Yes | We currently can only use design-build for alternative delivery |
| methods. | ||
| Missouri | No | |
| Nebraska | No | |
| Nevada | No |
| DOT | Response | Strategy/Technique |
|---|---|---|
| New Hampshire | No | |
| New Jersey | Yes | NJDOT is in the process of implementing Design Build project delivery. |
| New York | No | |
| North Carolina | No | |
| North Dakota | Yes | Bridge Slide |
| Ohio | No | |
| Oklahoma | No | |
| Oregon | No | |
| Pennsylvania | No | |
| Rhode Island | No | |
| South Carolina | No | |
| South Dakota | No | |
| Tennessee | No | |
| Texas | No | |
| Utah | No | |
| Vermont | No | |
| Virginia | No | |
| Washington | No | |
| West Virginia | No | |
| Wisconsin | No | |
| Wyoming | No |
Q6 - Which project delivery and procurement methods does the DOT use? Please select all that apply.
| DOT | A | B | C | D | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | X | X | |||
| Alaska | X | X | May use progressive design-build in the future | ||
| Arizona | X | X | X | X | |
| Arkansas | X | X | X | Progressive Design-Build | |
| California | X | X | X | X | Progressive Design-Build (PD-B) |
| Colorado | X | X | X | X | |
| Connecticut | X | X | X | ||
| Delaware | X | X | X | ||
| Florida | X | X | X | X | Phased Design-Build. Also, CM/GC has been extremely limited. |
| DOT | A | B | C | D | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | X | X | X | X | |
| Idaho | X | X | X | Early procurement | |
| Illinois | X | X | X | Illinois just passed legislation that allows the use of Design Build and CM/GC, so no projects have gone to construction yet. But I expected projects in the future using these procurement methods. | |
| Indiana | X | X | X | X | |
| Iowa | X | ||||
| Kansas | X | X | |||
| Kentucky | X | X | X | Progressive Design Build | |
| Louisiana | X | X | X | X | |
| Maine | X | X | X | We use a contracting method that we call Contractor Input During Design which involves prequalifying contractors for a project and then holding meetings with them during design to work through constructability issues. | |
| Maryland | X | X | X | X | |
| Massachusetts | X | X | |||
| Michigan | X | X | X | X | Progressive Design Build |
| Minnesota | X | X | X | ||
| Mississippi | X | X | |||
| Missouri | X | X | |||
| Nebraska | X | ||||
| Nevada | X | X | X | ||
| New | X | X | |||
| Hampshire | |||||
| New Jersey | X | ||||
| New York | X | X | |||
| North Carolina | X | X | X | X | |
| North Dakota | X | X | |||
| Ohio | X | X | X | Progressive Design Build | |
| Oklahoma | X | ||||
| Oregon | X | X | X | ||
| Pennsylvania | X | X | X | ||
| Rhode Island | X | X | X | X | |
| South Carolina | X | X | |||
| South Dakota | X | ||||
| Tennessee | X | X | X | X | |
| Texas | X | X | X | ||
| Utah | X | X | X | ||
| Vermont | X | X | X | ||
| Virginia | X | X | X | ||
| Washington | X | X | Progressive Design-Build | ||
| West Virginia | X | X | |||
| Wisconsin | X | X | |||
| Wyoming | X |
Q7 - Which of the below site or location-related factors or characteristics does the DOT consider when deciding bridge replacement construction strategies and techniques for complex scenarios? Please select all that apply.
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Alaska | X | X | X | X | No detour available | |||||
| Arizona | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Arkansas | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| California | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Colorado | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Hazardous Materials | ||
| Connecticut | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Delaware | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Florida | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Georgia | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Stakeholder input | |
| Idaho | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Illinois | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Indiana | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Iowa | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Public input | ||
| Kansas | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Kentucky | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Louisiana | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Maine | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Maryland | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Work zone (Worker) Safety | |
| Massachusetts | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Michigan | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Minnesota | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Mississippi | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Missouri | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Nebraska | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Nevada | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Hampshire | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| New Jersey | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| New York | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| North Carolina | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| North Dakota | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Ohio | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Oklahoma | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Oregon | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Pennsylvania | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Rhode Island | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| South Carolina | X | X | X | |||||||
| South Dakota | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Tennessee | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Texas | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Utah | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Vermont | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Virginia | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Washington | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| West Virginia | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Wisconsin | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Wyoming | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Q8 - Which of the below bridge or design-related factors does the DOT consider when deciding bridge replacement construction strategies and techniques for complex scenarios? Please select all that apply.
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Alaska | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Arizona | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Arkansas | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| California | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Colorado | X | X | X | X | X | Haul Routes / Weight Restrictions for Precast elements | ||
| Connecticut | X | X | X | X | X |
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Florida | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Georgia | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Idaho | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Illinois | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Indiana | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Iowa | X | X | X | |||||
| Kansas | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Kentucky | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Louisiana | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Maine | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Maryland | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Massachusetts | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Michigan | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Minnesota | X | X | X | |||||
| Mississippi | X | X | X | |||||
| Missouri | X | X | X | |||||
| Nebraska | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Nevada | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| New Hampshire | X | X | X | X | ||||
| New Jersey | X | X | X | X | ||||
| New York | X | X | X | X | ||||
| North Carolina | X | X | X | X | ||||
| North Dakota | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Ohio | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Oklahoma | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Oregon | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Pennsylvania | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Rhode Island | X | X | X | X | ||||
| South Carolina | X | |||||||
| South Dakota | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Tennessee | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Texas | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Utah | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Vermont | X | |||||||
| Virginia | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Washington | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| West Virginia | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Wisconsin | X | X | ||||||
| Wyoming | X | X | X |
Q9 - Which of the below construction management factors or characteristics does the DOT consider when deciding bridge replacement construction strategies and techniques for complex scenarios? Please select all that apply.
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | X | |||||||||
| Alaska | X | X | X | X | ||||||
| Arizona | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Arkansas | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| California | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Colorado | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Connecticut | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Delaware | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Florida | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Georgia | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Idaho | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Illinois | X | X | X | X | ||||||
| Indiana | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Iowa | X | X | X | X | ||||||
| Kansas | X | X | X | X | ||||||
| Kentucky | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Louisiana | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Maine | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Maryland | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Massachusetts | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Michigan | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Minnesota | X | X | X | X | ||||||
| Mississippi | X | X | X | X | ||||||
| Missouri | X | X | X | X | ||||||
| Nebraska | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Nevada | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| New Hampshire | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| New Jersey | X | X | X | X | X |
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| North Carolina | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| North Dakota | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Ohio | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Oklahoma | X | X | X | |||||||
| Oregon | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Pennsylvania | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Rhode Island | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| South Carolina | X | X | X | |||||||
| South Dakota | X | X | X | |||||||
| Tennessee | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Texas | X | X | X | X | ||||||
| Utah | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Vermont | X | X | X | X | ||||||
| Virginia | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Washington | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| West Virginia | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Wisconsin | X | X | X | |||||||
| Wyoming | X |
Q10 - Which of the below cost factors does the DOT consider when deciding bridge replacement construction strategies and techniques for complex scenarios? Please select all that apply.
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | X | ||||||
| Alaska | X | ||||||
| Arizona | X | X | X | X | |||
| Arkansas | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| California | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Colorado | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Connecticut | X | X | X | X | |||
| Delaware | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Florida | X | ||||||
| Georgia | X | X | X | X | |||
| Idaho | X | X | X | X |
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois | X | X | X | ||||
| Indiana | X | X | X | X | |||
| Iowa | X | X | X | ||||
| Kansas | X | ||||||
| Kentucky | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Louisiana | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Maine | X | X | X | X | |||
| Maryland | X | X | X | X | |||
| Massachusetts | X | X | X | ||||
| Michigan | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Minnesota | X | X | |||||
| Mississippi | X | X | |||||
| Missouri | X | X | X | ||||
| Nebraska | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Nevada | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| New Hampshire | X | X | X | ||||
| New Jersey | X | X | X | ||||
| New York | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| North Carolina | X | X | X | X | |||
| North Dakota | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Ohio | X | X | X | X | |||
| Oklahoma | X | X | X | ||||
| Oregon | X | X | X | ||||
| Pennsylvania | X | X | X | ||||
| Rhode Island | X | X | X | X | |||
| South Carolina | X | ||||||
| South Dakota | X | X | |||||
| Tennessee | X | X | X | ||||
| Texas | X | X | X | ||||
| Utah | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Vermont | X | X | X | X | |||
| Virginia | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Washington | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| West Virginia | X | X | X | ||||
| Wisconsin | X | X | X | ||||
| Wyoming | X | X | X |
Q11 - Did the DOT implement any strategies that helped gain buy-in (e.g., from legislators or other stakeholders) for various bridge replacement strategies?
| DOT | Response |
|---|---|
| Alabama | No |
| Alaska | Yes |
| Arizona | No |
| Arkansas | Yes |
| California | Yes |
| Colorado | Yes |
| Connecticut | Yes |
| DOT | Response |
|---|---|
| Delaware | Yes |
| Florida | Yes |
| Georgia | Yes |
| Idaho | Yes |
| Illinois | Yes |
| Indiana | Yes |
| Iowa | Yes |
| Kansas | Yes |
| Kentucky | Yes |
| Louisiana | Yes |
| Maine | No |
| Maryland | Yes |
| Massachusetts | Yes |
| Michigan | Yes |
| Minnesota | Yes |
| Mississippi | Yes |
| Missouri | No |
| Nebraska | No |
| Nevada | Yes |
| New Hampshire | Yes |
| New Jersey | No |
| New York | Yes |
| North Carolina | Yes |
| North Dakota | Yes |
| Ohio | Yes |
| Oklahoma | Yes |
| Oregon | Yes |
| Pennsylvania | Yes |
| Rhode Island | Yes |
| South Carolina | Yes |
| South Dakota | Yes |
| Tennessee | Yes |
| Texas | Yes |
| Utah | Yes |
| Vermont | Yes |
| Virginia | Yes |
| Washington | Yes |
| West Virginia | No |
| Wisconsin | Yes |
| Wyoming | Yes |
Q12 – Which of the below strategies helped the DOT gain buy-in for complex bridge replacement scenarios?
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | X | ||||||
| Alaska | X | We are physically constrained, so we usually have no other viable choice; the public accepts | |||||
| Arizona | X | ||||||
| Arkansas | X | X | X | ||||
| California | X | X | X | X | |||
| Colorado | X | X | X | X | Negotiated property improvements | ||
| Connecticut | X | X | X | X | |||
| Delaware | X | X | X | ||||
| Florida | X | X | X |
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | X | X | X | X | |||
| Idaho | X | X | X | ||||
| Illinois | X | X | X | ||||
| Indiana | X | X | X | ||||
| Iowa | X | X | X | ||||
| Kansas | X | X | X | ||||
| Kentucky | X | X | X | ||||
| Louisiana | X | X | X | ||||
| Maine | X | ||||||
| Maryland | X | X | X | X | |||
| Massachusetts | X | X | X | ||||
| Michigan | X | X | |||||
| Minnesota | X | X | |||||
| Mississippi | X | ||||||
| Missouri | X | X | X | ||||
| Nebraska | X | X | X | ||||
| Nevada | X | X | X | X | |||
| New Hampshire | X | X | X | ||||
| New Jersey | X | X | |||||
| New York | X | X | X | ||||
| North Carolina | X | X | X | ||||
| North Dakota | X | X | X | ||||
| Ohio | X | X | |||||
| Oklahoma | X | X | X | ||||
| Oregon | X | X | |||||
| Pennsylvania | X | X | X | ||||
| Rhode Island | X | X | X | ||||
| South Carolina | X | X | X | ||||
| South Dakota | X | X | |||||
| Tennessee | X | X | X | X | |||
| Texas | X | X | |||||
| Utah | X | X | |||||
| Vermont | X | X | X | X | |||
| Virginia | X | X | |||||
| Washington | X | X | X | X | |||
| West Virginia | X | X | X | ||||
| Wisconsin | X | X | X | X | |||
| Wyoming | X |
Q13 - How often does the DOT use the following strategies to gain buy-in for complex bridge replacement scenarios?
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | |||||
| Alaska | Always | Rarely | Always | Rarely | Rarely |
| Arizona | Never | Sometimes | Sometimes | Never | Never |
| Arkansas | Very often | Very often | Sometimes | Rarely | Rarely |
| California | Always | Always | Always | Always | Never |
| Colorado | Very often | Very often | Always | Rarely | Rarely |
| Connecticut | Always | Always | Very often | Sometimes | Never |
| Delaware | Always | Very often | Always | Never | Never |
| Florida | Very often | Sometimes | Sometimes | Sometimes | Sometimes |
| Georgia | Always | Always | Always | Always | Never |
| Idaho | Always | Very often | Sometimes | Never | Never |
| Illinois | Always | Very often | Very often | Rarely | Rarely |
| Indiana | Very often | Very often | Very often | Never | Never |
| Iowa | Always | Sometimes | Very often | Rarely | Never |
| Kansas | Always | Always | Sometimes | Never | Never |
| Kentucky | Sometimes | Sometimes | Sometimes | Never | Never |
| Louisiana | Very often | Always | Sometimes | Rarely | Never |
| Maine | |||||
| Maryland | Very often | Very often | Very often | Sometimes | Never |
| Massachusetts | Very often | Very often | Sometimes | Rarely | Never |
| Michigan | Always | Always | Rarely | Rarely | Always |
| Minnesota | Always | Sometimes | Very often | Never | Never |
| Mississippi | Rarely | Sometimes | Never | Never | Never |
| Missouri | Very often | Very often | Always | Always | Sometimes |
| Nebraska | Very often | Sometimes | Sometimes | Never | Never |
| Nevada | Very often | Very often | Sometimes | Sometimes | Sometimes |
| New Hampshire | Always | Very often | Sometimes | Rarely | Rarely |
| New Jersey | Very often | Sometimes | Always | Rarely | Never |
| New York | Always | Very often | Very often | Rarely | Never |
| North Carolina | Very often | Always | Very often | Never | Never |
| North Dakota | Always | Very often | Sometimes | Never | Never |
| Ohio | Very often | Sometimes | Very often | Sometimes | Never |
| Oklahoma | Always | Very often | Sometimes | Never | Never |
| Oregon | Sometimes | Very often | Very often | Sometimes | Never |
| Pennsylvania | Always | Very often | Sometimes | Never | Never |
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island | Very often | Very often | Very often | Rarely | Never |
| South Carolina | Very often | Very often | Very often | Never | Never |
| South Dakota | Always | Always | Very often | Never | Never |
| Tennessee | Always | Sometimes | Always | Sometimes | Never |
| Texas | Always | Always | Sometimes | Rarely | Never |
| Utah | |||||
| Vermont | Always | Always | Sometimes | Always | Never |
| Virginia | Always | Sometimes | Rarely | Never | Never |
| Washington | Always | Always | Always | Always | Never |
| West Virginia | Very often | Very often | Rarely | Never | Never |
| Wisconsin | Always | Sometimes | Very often | Sometimes | Never |
| Wyoming | Very often | Very often | Very often | Never | Never |
Q14 - Based on the experience from past projects with complex staging, has the DOT incorporated any changes into policy and/or practice regarding the areas below? Please select all that apply.
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | |||||||||||
| Alaska | X | Possibly some use of CM/GC for difficult projects, but it is only 1 factor in the decision | |||||||||
| Arizona | X | ||||||||||
| Arkansas | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| California | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Colorado | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Connecticut | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Delaware | X | X | X | X | |||||||
| Florida | X | X | There are likely other areas with change, but I am not 100% sure. | ||||||||
| Georgia | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Idaho | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Illinois | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| DOT | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana | X | X | X | X | |||||||
| Iowa | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Kansas | X | X | |||||||||
| Kentucky | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Louisiana | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Maine | |||||||||||
| Maryland | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Massachusetts | X | X | X | X | |||||||
| Michigan | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Minnesota | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Mississippi | X | X | X | X | |||||||
| Missouri | X | X | X | X | |||||||
| Nebraska | X | X | X | X | |||||||
| Nevada | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| New Hampshire | X | X | |||||||||
| New Jersey | X | X | X | ||||||||
| New York | X | X | X | X | |||||||
| North Carolina | X | X | X | X | |||||||
| North Dakota | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Ohio | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||
| Oklahoma | X | X | X | X | |||||||
| Oregon | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Pennsylvania | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||
| Rhode Island | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| South Carolina | X | None of the above | |||||||||
| South Dakota | X | X | X | X | |||||||
| Tennessee | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Texas | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Utah | |||||||||||
| Vermont | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Virginia | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Washington | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| West Virginia | X | X | X | ||||||||
| Wisconsin | X | None | |||||||||
| Wyoming | X |
Q15 - The synthesis will include case examples illustrating the use of bridge replacement construction strategies and techniques for complex scenarios. Follow-up interviews will be conducted (approximately thirty minutes) with selected DOTs to get more information for the development of the case examples. During the development of the case example, additional follow-up questions may be required. The DOT will be provided with the opportunity to review the case example write-up for accuracy. Would DOT be interested in participating in a case example?
| DOT | Response |
|---|---|
| Alabama | Yes |
| Alaska | Yes |
| Arizona | No |
| Arkansas | No |
| California | Yes |
| Colorado | Yes |
| Connecticut | Yes |
| Delaware | No |
| Florida | No |
| Georgia | No |
| Idaho | No |
| Illinois | Yes |
| Indiana | No |
| Iowa | Yes |
| Kansas | No |
| Kentucky | No |
| Louisiana | Yes |
| Maine | Yes |
| Maryland | No |
| Massachusetts | Yes |
| Michigan | Yes |
| Minnesota | Yes |
| Mississippi | No |
| Missouri | Yes |
| Nebraska | No |
| Nevada | No |
| New Hampshire | Yes |
| New Jersey | No |
| New York | No |
| North Carolina | Yes |
| North Dakota | No |
| Ohio | No |
| Oklahoma | No |
| Oregon | No |
| Pennsylvania | No |
| Rhode Island | No |
| South Carolina | No |
| South Dakota | No |
| Tennessee | Yes |
| Texas | Yes |
| Utah | No |
| Vermont | Yes |
| Virginia | No |
| Washington | Yes |
| West Virginia | Yes |
| Wisconsin | Yes |
| Wyoming | No |
Q16 - Does the DOT have written policies, rubrics, guidelines, metrics, or tools for bridge replacement decision-making in complex scenarios?
| DOT | Response |
|---|---|
| Alabama | No |
| Alaska | No |
| Arizona | No |
| Arkansas | Yes |
| California | Yes |
| Colorado | Yes |
| Connecticut | No |
| Delaware | No |
| Florida | Yes |
| Georgia | No |
| Idaho | No |
| Illinois | No |
| Indiana | No |
| Iowa | Yes |
| Kansas | No |
| Kentucky | No |
| Louisiana | Yes |
| Maine | No |
| Maryland | No |
| Massachusetts | Yes |
| Michigan | Yes |
| Minnesota | Yes |
| Mississippi | No |
| Missouri | No |
| Nebraska | No |
| Nevada | No |
| New Hampshire | No |
| New Jersey | No |
| New York | Yes |
| North Carolina | No |
| North Dakota | No |
| Ohio | No |
| Oklahoma | No |
| Oregon | No |
| Pennsylvania | No |
| Rhode Island | No |
| South Carolina | Yes |
| South Dakota | No |
| Tennessee | No |
| Texas | Yes |
| Utah | Yes |
| Vermont | Yes |
| Virginia | Yes |
| Washington | Yes |
| West Virginia | No |
| Wisconsin | Yes |
| Wyoming | No |
Q17 - If possible, please provide documentation or directions on where we can find documentation that reflects the DOT’s written policies, rubrics, guidelines, metrics, or tools for bridge replacement decision-making in complex scenarios.
| DOT | File Name | Link |
|---|---|---|
| California | Caltrans ABC Manual 2021 | https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/engineering/documents/abc/ctabc-2021-06-30_a11y.pdf |
| Colorado | CDOT Bridge Design Manual 2023 | https://www.codot.gov/programs/bridge/bridge-manuals/design_manual |
| Iowa | Preliminary Design of Bridges | https://iowadot.gov/bridge/policy/03-01-00Prelim.pdf |
Figure B-1. Massachusetts design–build suitability checklist.