Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action (1994)

Chapter: 8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS

Previous Chapter: 7 STATE PRIORITY SETTING
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 225
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 226
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 227
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 228
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 229
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 230
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 231
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 232
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 233
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 234
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 235
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 236
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 237
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 238
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 239
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 240
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 241
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 242
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 243
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 244
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 245
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 246
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 247
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 248
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 249
Suggested Citation: "8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
Page 250
Next Chapter: 9 TOWARD A UNIFIED NATIONAL APPROACH
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.