The estimated population of NEOs1 includes approximately 1400 Earth crossers (Atens, Apollos, and Earth-crossing Amors) of at least 1-km size and an additional ~1500 noncrossing Amors. As of April 1998, about 140 known Earth crossers and some 120 noncrossing Amors were of this size. Thus, the discovery of NEOs is estimated to be about 9% complete for objects larger than 1 km in diameter. Although the task is well begun, the vast majority of NEOs remain to be found.2
In the past few years the annual rate of discovery of Earth crossers larger than 1 km has been at about 1% of the estimated remaining population.3 However, new CCD detection systems that are becoming available for dedicated search telescopes will permit an increase in the discovery rate by an order of magnitude. Three systems (Table 3.1) whose development is being supported by NASA include the Near-Earth Asteroid Tracking (NEAT) CCD camera, developed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and currently in use on a U.S. Air Force Ground-based Electro-Optical Deep-space Surveillance System (GEODSS) 1.0-m telescope; the Lowell Observatory Near-Earth Object Survey (LONEOS), which utilizes a dedicated 0.6-m Schmidt telescope; and the Spacewatch system of the University of Arizona, currently operating a 0.9-m telescope, with the addition of a 1.8-m telescope now under construction.
The LONEOS system, which began test observations in 1997, has an instantaneous field of view of 3° × 3° and an expected threshold of detection of about V magnitude 19.5. In full operation, LONEOS will be capable of
TABLE 3.1 NASA-Supported Surveys of NEOs
|
Program |
Survey Telescope |
Aperture (m) |
|
Spacewatch, University of Arizona |
Existing telescope |
0.9 |
|
|
Telescope under construction |
1.8 |
|
LONEOS, Lowell Observatory |
Schmidt telescope (near completion) |
0.58 |
|
NEAT, Jet Propulsion Laboratory |
U.S. Air Force GEODSS telescope |
1.0 |
Figure 3.1
Survey completeness after 10 years versus diameter of NEOs for various system-limiting magnitudes. All-sky coverage (approximately 15,000 degree2) is assumed each month. The photographic Schmidt telescope on Palomar Mountain (~0.5-m aperture) is capable of all-sky coverage to a limiting magnitude of 17. A single 0.5-m CCD system (e.g., LONEOS) should be able to achieve all-sky coverage to a limiting magnitude of 19. A system of one or two 1-m telescopes should be able to survey to about limiting magnitude 20. To reach limiting magnitude 21 will probably take a system of several 2-m telescopes.
covering the entire accessible sky (about 15,000 degree2) each month to detect all observable asteroids to apparent magnitude 19.5. It is expected that about 80% of the Earth-crossing objects of 1-km diameter or greater could be detected by LONEOS in 10 years of full operation (see Figure 3.1). It must be noted, however, that LONEOS by itself could not carry out sufficient astrometric follow-up observations to obtain reliable orbits on the NEOs detected. To do this would require an approximate doubling of telescopic resources (either a second dedicated telescope of comparable aperture or the use of multiple smaller telescopes).
If the 1.8-m Spacewatch telescope under construction were to be instrumented with appropriate large-format CCDs, it could be operated in a program similar to that of LONEOS. Such a program would lead to detection of about 95% of Earth crossers of 1-km size in 10 years (see curve for limiting magnitude 22 in Figure 3.1). The LONEOS and Spacewatch systems used in a coordinated program of detection and orbit determination could yield the orbital elements for about 1000 new Earth-crossing asteroids larger than 1-km diameter, as well as thousands of smaller NEOs, in 10 to 15 years. Continued support of these projects would be necessary to achieve this goal. Participation of the NEAT system and international observers would ensure that high-precision orbits were obtained for most of the bright NEOs discovered. COMPLEX supports the coordination of ongoing NEO search programs.
There is a possibility that the U.S. Air Force, as an expansion of the NEAT project, will undertake a more intensive survey of NEOs in collaboration with NASA, using the U.S. Air Force's GEODSS satellite-tracking network upgraded with large-format CCD cameras. Such a program would have a capability similar to that of the
combined LONEOS and Spacewatch surveys. COMPLEX supports the U.S. Air Force's involvement in this effort.
Given the greatly increased rate of NEO discoveries that will follow from the surveys described above, a database system that will not be overwhelmed with new information must be developed. The role of the Spaceguard Foundation, at present an international advocacy organization for the study of NEOs and the hazard they pose, is undefined and unclear. The Minor Planets Center had already demonstrated its capability in handling a similar, though smaller, database. The same organization could potentially handle the task of cataloging all new NEO discoveries, with augmented funding.
The survey will probably find a few objects that, for a period of time (a few weeks to a few years), have a significant probability of hitting Earth, before it eventually is shown (in all probability) that they will not. NASA and the astronomers engaged in discovering NEOs must address the question of how to behave responsibly in the public arena, in terms of reporting and explaining any potentially threatening discoveries. Some preliminary work on this problem has already been published,4 but this difficult and important issue requires that protocols be established. Organizations such as the International Astronomical Union and COSPAR may have a role to play in this task.
The Space Studies Board has stated previously that reconnaissance and initial exploration of asteroids by spacecraft constitute a high-priority goal.5 Three classes of observations are required to identify targets of sufficient scientific interest to justify exploration by spacecraft:
In favorable cases, surface mapping can be carried out by radar observations, allowing the recognition of features of geologic interest such as craters, stratification, or possibly fracture systems. As the asteroid rotates and different parts of its surface come into view, spatial variations in its spectral properties can be determined if the
These observations should provide the basis for selection of NEO targets of high scientific interest for exploration by spacecraft.
Laboratory studies have shown that meteorites (and hence the asteroids from which they may have been derived) display a great variety of mineral assemblages, chemical and isotopic compositions, and physical properties, but these studies have also told us much more. A few examples of important measurements possible only, or best done, in the laboratory are quantitative age determination; thermal, shock, and irradiation histories; detailed mineralogy; trace element and isotopic measurements; and the inclusion of interstellar grains. All of this information is critical for reconstructing an object's geologic history. Laboratory studies have obvious advantages over telescopic and spacecraft observations, particularly in the far richer variety of instruments, the flexibility of experimental designs to meet the needs of specific samples, and the possibility of successive experiments. This rich store of information can be transferred to our knowledge of asteroids as soon as one question is answered: Which asteroid types are the parents or siblings of which meteorite classes? Telescopic observations of NEOs, particularly by visible and near-infrared spectroscopy, likewise reveal a rich variety of objects.
Meteorites are important geologic materials, but they are samples out of context. Spacecraft data on NEOs and returned samples provide this critical context for relating diverse lithologies and understanding the processes that formed them. Since most NEOs are fragments of larger objects, they also allow direct sampling of otherwise inaccessible interiors of differentiated objects. NEOs are, in reality, small planets with distinctive structures and geologic histories, and these can best be understood by close-range observations from spacecraft, complemented with returned samples.
Although most meteorite classes presumably originate from some asteroid type, not all asteroids supply meteorites. That is, in our present state of understanding, the variety of asteroids is almost certainly greater than that of meteorites now in collections, and NEOs may represent unsampled types and dormant comets. Nevertheless, we should expect new knowledge and new opportunities as our mission-based science database grows.
The Space Studies Board has previously noted that Discovery-class spacecraft missions to asteroids and comets provide great scientific return for the funds invested.6 Spacecraft missions to NEOs can be classified into three types with progressively greater complexity, scientific yield, and cost: flyby, rendezvous, and rendezvous with sample return. There can be no doubt that rendezvous, with a well-selected instrument set and close approach capability, makes possible much more definitive study of a given object than does a flyby. The added value provided by sample return is likely to be great, and the Space Studies Board and its committees have repeatedly noted that the return of asteroid samples for laboratory analysis will be necessary to meet the objectives of continuing solar system science.7,8
The following ongoing or already approved spacecraft missions relate directly to the exploration of near-Earth objects:9
The NEAR spacecraft, launched in February 1996, carries an instrument payload that includes a multispectral imaging system, an x-ray/gamma-ray spectrometer, a near-infrared spectrometer, a magnetometer, a laser rangefinder, and a radio science experiment. After insertion of the spacecraft into polar orbit around Eros, the science payload should provide sufficient data for nearly complete topographic and geologic maps showing features as small as a few meters across. Spectral types will be mapped at a resolution of a few meters, mineral abundances at a resolution of several hundred meters, and major and minor radioactive elements at a similar or coarser scale. Thus, the NEAR mission should provide a major advance in our knowledge of the composition and geologic evolution of this asteroid.
1. E.M. Shoemaker, R.F. Wolfe, and C.S. Shoemaker, “Asteroid and comet flux in the neighborhood of Earth,” pp. 155–170 in Global Catastrophes in Earth History, V.L. Sharpton and P.D. Ward, eds., Geological Society of America Special Paper 247, Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colo., 1990.
2. Solar System Exploration Division, Office of Space Sciences, Report of the Near-Earth Objects Survey Working Group, NASA, Washington, D.C. , 1995.
3. D. Morrison, ed., The Spaceguard Survey, Report of the NASA International Near-Earth-Object Detection Workshop, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., 1992, 50 pp. plus appendixes.
4. R.P. Binzel, “A near-Earth object hazard index,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 822:545–551, 1997.
5. Space Science Board, National Research Council, Strategy for the Exploration of Primitive Solar-System Bodies—Asteroids, Comets, and Meteoroids: 1980–1990, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1980, p. 15.
6. Space Studies Board, National Research Council, The Role of Small Missions in Planetary and Lunar Exploration, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1995, p. 12.
7. Space Studies Board, National Research Council, An Integrated Strategy for the Planetary Sciences: 1995–2010, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1994, p. 66.
8. Space Science Board, National Research Council, Strategy for the Exploration of Primitive Solar-System Bodies—Asteroids, Comets, and Meteoroids: 1980–1990, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1980, p. 53.
9. H.Y. McSween, “The role of meteoritics in spaceflight missions, and vice versa,” Meteoritics and Planetary Sciences 31:727–738, 1997.