Previous Chapter: Meeting the Education Challenge
Suggested Citation: "The Northeast Ohio Experience." National Research Council. 1999. Harnessing Science and Technology for America's Economic Future: National and Regional Priorities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9456.

The Northeast Ohio Experience

Dorothy Baunach

Cleveland Tomorrow

Today's Presentation

  • Give an overview of Northeast Ohio.
  • Describe our technology infrastructure and model.
  • Share lessons learned.

Northeast Ohio Overview

  • Eight-county region with two major urban areas, Cleveland and Akron
  • Almost 3 million people (fourteenth largest consumer area in the United States)
  • Twenty-three percent of jobs are in manufacturing
  • About half as high-tech as San Francisco or Boston
  • High-school educated region
  • High-poverty region, 11.8 percent
  •  

     

Northeast Ohio's Technology Infrastructure

  • Years of experience (making it up as we go along)
  • But the key has been a comprehensive partnership with industry; academic and research organizations; state, federal and local governments; and foundations.
  • All partners are organized and managed to harness technology for economic benefit.
Suggested Citation: "The Northeast Ohio Experience." National Research Council. 1999. Harnessing Science and Technology for America's Economic Future: National and Regional Priorities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9456.

Targeted R&D/Industry Clusters

  • Automotive—large employment base, losing inventive edge.
  • Aerospace—anchored by NASA Lewis Research Center.
  • Biomedical—eighteenth largest city for receipt of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding.
  • Polymers/advanced materials—ranks in top five U.S. regions for industry and research and development (R&D).
  • Information/telecommunications—impacts all other segments.
  •  

     

Our Strategy

  • Increase the competitiveness of businesses in key sectors of the economy.
  • Form, incubate, and retain new businesses.
  • Support research collaborations and tech transfer.
  • Develop the workforce—general, highly skilled, entrepreneurial.
  • Figure B-1.

Our Vehicle Enhanced: A Complementary Set of Financial Tools

  • Primus Venture Partners ($350 million venture capital fund)
  • Cleveland Development Partnership ($60 million real estate development fund)
  • Ohio Innovation Fund ($11 million in seed capital)
  • Figure B-2.

Economic Impact

This has been difficult to track and measure. Anecdotes abound and a few accomplishments are worthy of note:

  • Manufacturing employment has stabilized and CAMP's (Cleveland Advanced Manufacturing Program) GLMTC (Great Lakes Manufacturing Technology Center) has reached annual fees of $5 million from industrial projects.
  • Industrial research consortia and networks have formed around several key technologies.
  • Incubator tenants have returned state investment in payroll taxes.
  • Biomedical research base has tripled and company formation is improving.
  • Companies started during the past 15 years are making real contributions to the economy (STERIS Corp. is an example).
Suggested Citation: "The Northeast Ohio Experience." National Research Council. 1999. Harnessing Science and Technology for America's Economic Future: National and Regional Priorities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9456.

Figure B-1

Northeast Ohio technology intermediaries and funding trends

Technology Leadership Council Lessons Learned

  • Leadership matters.
  • Public/private partnerships work.
  • It's really hard to maintain long-term commitments.
  • Partners and programs need to innovate as region learns/changes over time.
  • Federal funds are critical to regional science and technology strategies.
  • Toughest support to find is for early stage, technology-based business formation.
Suggested Citation: "The Northeast Ohio Experience." National Research Council. 1999. Harnessing Science and Technology for America's Economic Future: National and Regional Priorities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9456.

Figure B-2

Technology Leadership Council Model

Examples of Federal Government Role in Technology-Based Economic Development, Northeast Ohio

  • Research grants—National Science Foundation (NSF), NIH, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Department of Defense (DoD), etc.
  • Small Business Innovation Research grants
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology—Manufacturing Technology Center funding; Advanced Technology Program
  • NSF Science and Technology Center
  • EDA (Economic Development Administration) grant for urban Bio-Enterprise incubator
  • NASA—RTTC (Regional Technology Transfer Center), incubator, education grants
  • DoD ECRC (Electronic Commerce Resource Centers) funding
Suggested Citation: "The Northeast Ohio Experience." National Research Council. 1999. Harnessing Science and Technology for America's Economic Future: National and Regional Priorities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9456.

Technology Leadership Council, an Executive Network

  • Enhance the model by identifying and implementing select initiatives.
  • Facilitate activities among intermediaries to remove barriers, build linkages, and garner support.
  • Communicate and advocate the importance of technology to regional economic growth.
  • Target technology investments to build on regional strengths and focus on economic development returns.
Suggested Citation: "The Northeast Ohio Experience." National Research Council. 1999. Harnessing Science and Technology for America's Economic Future: National and Regional Priorities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9456.
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation: "The Northeast Ohio Experience." National Research Council. 1999. Harnessing Science and Technology for America's Economic Future: National and Regional Priorities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9456.
Page 139
Suggested Citation: "The Northeast Ohio Experience." National Research Council. 1999. Harnessing Science and Technology for America's Economic Future: National and Regional Priorities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9456.
Page 140
Suggested Citation: "The Northeast Ohio Experience." National Research Council. 1999. Harnessing Science and Technology for America's Economic Future: National and Regional Priorities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9456.
Page 141
Suggested Citation: "The Northeast Ohio Experience." National Research Council. 1999. Harnessing Science and Technology for America's Economic Future: National and Regional Priorities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9456.
Page 142
Suggested Citation: "The Northeast Ohio Experience." National Research Council. 1999. Harnessing Science and Technology for America's Economic Future: National and Regional Priorities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9456.
Page 143
Suggested Citation: "The Northeast Ohio Experience." National Research Council. 1999. Harnessing Science and Technology for America's Economic Future: National and Regional Priorities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9456.
Page 144
Next Chapter: Appendix A: Forum Agenda
Subscribe to Emails from the National Academies
Stay up to date on activities, publications, and events by subscribing to email updates.