Skip to main content

Confucius Institutes at U.S. Institutions of Higher Education

Completed

A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine committee will conduct a study of Confucius Institutes in the U.S. and the potential risks they may pose to academic institutions, especially in openness, research integrity, and the free flow of talent and ideas. The committee will identify best practices and principles regarding appropriate operations for U.S. academic institutions that the Department of Defense could use regarding waivers to the prohibition of research support at institutions that host Confucius Institutes. The committee will also explore characteristics and features of these and similar foreign-funded programs that could serve as flags for academic partnerships.

Description

In light of recent restrictions placed on the Department of Defense (DoD) that would prohibit support for research conducted at academic institutions that host Confucius Institutes, an ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will conduct a study of Confucius Institutes in the United States and the potential risks these Institutes may pose to academic institutions and by extension to DoD-funded academic research.

Specifically, the committee will identify existing Confucius Institutes and conduct case studies of existing and recently closed or soon to be closed Institutes, to understand the attributes of the relationship between Institutes and their United States host institutions of higher education. The study will include a consideration of such things as the characteristics of funding and reporting requirements and foreign government involvement in staffing, curriculum, and other Institute activities. Further, the study will be conducted within the context of possible threats to the inherent values of U.S. academic institutions such as openness and free expression of thought in instruction and scientific research, and the ethos of scientific research such as research integrity, reciprocity, and the free flow of talent and ideas.

In cases where an Institute has been closed or will not be renewed, the committee will explore why these decisions were made, whenever possible. In cases where Institutes will continue, the committee will examine the policies and processes the academic institutions have in place to guard against any untoward foreign government influence that might distort the academic education and research environment.

While the focus of this study is on Confucius Institutes, the committee will also seek information on other foreign-funded institutes at U.S. institutions, to the extent possible.

Drawing on its analysis of Confucius Institutes, the committee will describe some of the characteristics and features of foreign-funded programs at U.S. institutions that could serve as flags for academic institutions that would lead to further deliberation and vetting to determine whether or not to enter into a partnership. As the Confucius Institute program evolves, these characteristics and features will allow academic institutions and DoD to identify programs that may not meet academic criteria for openness and independence in education and research.

Additionally, the committee will identify best practices and principles regarding appropriate operations for U.S. academic institutions that the DoD could use as it makes its determinations regarding whether to grant or deny waivers to the prohibition of support for research conducted at academic institutions that host Confucius Institutes.

Finally, the committee will consider what, if any, role the sensitivity of the research conducted on campus (unclassified, controlled, classified) should play in determining what foreign-funded international partnerships like Confucius Institutes are appropriate.

The committee will deliver an interim report at 12 months on what conditions it recommends be in place for DoD to consider granting a waiver of its prohibition against research support for an academic institution hosting a Confucius Institute, along with any other preliminary findings the committee may have.

Following its 18 month analysis, the committee will issue a consensus report with findings and recommendations to the DoD on the issues described above.

Collaborators

Committee

Chair

Vice Chair

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Sarah Rovito

Staff Officer

Download all bios

Committee Membership Roster Comments

Committee members Dr. Jenny J. Lee and Dr. Jeffrey M. Riedinger were added 4/8/22
Committee member Dr. Jayathi Y. Murthy was added 4/21/22
Committee member Anna B. Puglisi was added 1/10/23 (added for report #2)

Sponsors

Department of Defense

Staff

Sarah Rovito

Lead

SRovito@nas.edu

Jordan Graves

JGraves@nas.edu

Beau Nielsen

ANielsen@nas.edu

Frazier F Benya

FBenya@nas.edu

John Veras

JVeras@nas.edu

Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.