Completed
Increasing income and wealth inequality has characterized the U.S. economy for several decades. While researchers differ on the extent of the increase and its causes, they no longer disagree on the essential phenomenon. Yet the nation's disparate federal statistics make it difficult to accurately measure income and wealth inequality and other aspects of economic well-being for the nation's households and families. This study will review the major income, consumption, and wealth statistics currently produced by U.S. statistical agencies and provide guidance for modernizing and integrating the information to better inform policy and research.
Featured publication
Consensus
ยท2024
Many federal agencies provide data and statistics on inequality and related aspects of household income, consumption, and wealth (ICW). However, because the information provided by these agencies is often produced using different concepts, underlying data, and methods, the resulting estimates of pov...
View details
Description
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Committee on National Statistics will appoint an ad hoc panel to (1) review the major income, consumption, and wealth statistics currently produced by U.S. statistical agencies, and (2) provide guidance for modernizing the information to better inform policy and research (such as understanding trends in inequality and mobility). As part of its review, the panel may consider a range of issues, including the following:
- appropriate definitions of household, family, and individual income, consumption, and wealth; variations in definitions that would be useful for particular purposes (e.g., market income before government taxes and transfers); inclusion of particular components (e.g., capital gains and wealth transfers); different reference periods (e.g., sub-annual versus annual); and comparability with commonly used international concepts and methods;
- the treatment of and method(s) used to value in-kind benefits and services (e.g., health insurance or transfers of food or housing);
- the treatment of retirement income and plan contributions;
- the population groups (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, and gender groups) for which separate estimates are appropriate;
- the appropriate breakouts of income, consumption, and wealth statistics (e.g., by deciles, top and bottom 1% and 5%);
- the level of geographic granularity for which estimates are appropriate;
- the desired frequency and timeliness of updated estimates;
- needed quality improvements for relevant data collection programs (including cross-sectional and longitudinal data sets);
- the cost and respondent burden for collecting the data;
- the potential for using multiple data sources, including surveys, state and federal administrative records, and commercial data, as well modeling, to produce integrated, highest-quality estimates; and
- legal, administrative, and other barriers to creating an integrated system of household, family, and individual income, consumption, and wealth statistics.
As part of its deliberations, the panel will evaluate the need for and value of a fully integrated system of income, consumption, and wealth statistics to provide consistent macro-level statistics (e.g., total household or family income) and micro-level statistics (e.g., income for households in each quintile of the distribution). The panel will produce a final report with conclusions and recommendations regarding the relevance, accuracy, timeliness, geographic and population detail, and consistency of statistics on income, consumption and wealth, and the need for an integrated system of these statistics.
Collaborators
Committee
Chair
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Constance F. Citro
Staff Officer
Sponsors
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Omidyar Network Services LLC
The California Community Foundation
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Staff
Connie Citro
Chris Mackie