Skip to main content

Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors

Completed

This study responds to a congressional mandate in the FY2020 Appropriations Act's Conference Report in the subsection titled “Used Nuclear Fuel Disposition R&D," which calls for the Academies to “evaluate the merits and viability of different nuclear fuel cycles and technology options, including both existing and future technologies” and will examine “the waste aspects of advanced reactors.” The study will result in two reports produced by a committee of experts convened by the Academies. The reports will contain consensus findings and recommendations to advise the Department of Energy, Congress, and other relevant stakeholders.

Description

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will appoint an ad hoc committee of experts to evaluate and assess nuclear fuel cycles and technology options and the waste aspects of advanced nuclear reactors that could be commercially deployed by 2050. The committee will consider the relevant work performed by the fuel cycle program of the Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), the various proposed advanced reactors investigated by DOE-NE, and other relevant programs. The committee will prepare a consensus report that will:

  • Evaluate the merits and assess the viability of different nuclear fuel cycles, including fuel cycles that may use reprocessing, for both existing and advanced reactor technology options by:

Ø Accounting for linkages among all elements of the fuel cycle, including waste transportation, storage, and disposal associated with the front- and back-ends of the fuel cycle, and concerns related to safety.

Ø Examining the potential costs of the different nuclear fuel cycles required for advanced nuclear reactors.

· Evaluate nonproliferation implications and security risks of fuel cycles for advanced reactors by:

Ø Including assessments of high-assay low-enriched uranium, uranium-plutonium mixed oxide fuel, and advanced fuel cycles that require separating plutonium from spent fuel.

Ø Examining nuclear material accounting and control as well as containment, surveillance, monitoring, and timeliness of detection of diversion.

Ø Accounting for how these can be addressed by International Atomic Energy Agency safeguard activities.

  • Evaluate the waste management and disposal options for the various proposed advanced nuclear reactors by:

Ø Accounting for typical volumes and physical, chemical, and isotopic characteristics of waste streams, including from possible reprocessing, from these advanced nuclear reactor technologies.

Ø Examining transportation, storage, and ultimate disposal requirements for these wastes.

The consensus report will provide findings and recommendations that may consider evidence-based policy options.

Collaborators

Committee

Chair

Vice Chair

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Staff Officer

Download all bios

Committee Membership Roster Comments

Houston G. Wood resigned from the committee effective September 16, 2021.

Rodney C. Ewing resigned from the committee effective July 11, 2022.

John C. Lee resigned from the committee effective September 16, 2022.

Jasmina Vujic served on the committee through September 16, 2022.

Sponsors

Department of Energy

Staff

Charles Ferguson

Lead

CFerguson@nas.edu

Catherine Wise

CWise@nas.edu

John Holmes

JHolmes@nas.edu

Ourania Kosti

OKosti@nas.edu

Darlene M Gros

DGros@nas.edu

Kasia Kornecki

KKornecki@nas.edu

Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.