Skip to main content

Defending Forward-Deployed U.S. Navy Platforms from Potential Enemy Missile and Rocket Attacks

Completed

This consensus study explored ways to defend forward-deployed U.S. Navy platforms from potential enemy missile and rocket attacks over the next 15 years. The study reviewed current and projected missile and rocket threats and Department of the Navy capabilities to defend forward-deployed U.S. Navy platforms. It also evaluated the Department of the Navy’s current technology investment strategy and recommended novel kinetic and non-kinetic defensive approaches.

Description

At the request of the Chief of Naval Operations, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine--under the auspices of the Naval Studies Board--will convene an ad hoc committee to conduct a 12-month, classified study to explore ways to defend forward-deployed U.S. Navy platforms from potential enemy missile and rocket attacks. Specifically, the terms of reference for the study are as follows:

(1) Review current and projected missile and rocket threats to forward-deployed U.S. Navy platforms over the next 15 years.

(2) Assess the Department of the Navy’s capabilities and concepts aimed at defending forward-deployed U.S. platforms vis-a-vis the kinetic threats reviewed in (1), accounting for any kinetic and non-kinetic efforts also being pursued by the other Services and defense agencies.

(3) Evaluate the Department of the Navy’s current technology investment strategy in defending forward-deployed U.S. Navy platforms vis-a-vis the kinetic threats reviewed in (1), accounting for any kinetic and non-kinetic technology investments also being made by the other Services, defense agencies, and defense community at-large (e.g., laboratories industrial base, and academia).
(4) Recommend any novel kinetic and non-kinetic ways (e.g., future capabilities, concepts, and technologies) to defend forward-deployed U.S. Navy platforms from potential enemy missile and rocket attacks over the next 15 years.

This 12-month study will produce two reports: (1) an interim report that provides initial observations and insights into each of the four tasks above; and (2) a comprehensive (final) report that addresses the tasks in greater depth.

Collaborators

Committee

Co-Chair

Co-Chair

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Download all bios

Committee Membership Roster Comments

Addition of two additional members approved on 8/7/16: Admiral J. Paul Reason, USN (Ret.) and Dr. Allan Steinhardt.

Sponsors

Department of Defense

Staff

Cherie Chauvin

Lead

CChauvin@nas.edu

Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.