Skip to main content

Using Systematic Reviews to Support the Dietary Reference Intakes: A Letter Report

Recently completed

A committee-supported project or activity that has been completed and for which output dissemination has begun. Its committee has been disbanded and closeout procedures are underway.

A standing committee will review: 1) whether de novo systematic reviews are needed in future DRI reviews; 2) what are the appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria for using exisitng reviews; and can previously published systematic reviews can be updated? The committee will develop a decision tree that includes the three questions and addresses the need for meta-analysis questions as part of the systematic review process.

Description

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will appoint a standing committee to review the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) framework, structure, and process relevant to future DRI reviews. The committee will consider past experiences and learning from previous DRI reports, including the report on "Guiding Principles for Basing DRIs on Chronic Disease", the recent meeting of experts, "Strategic Planning for a New Review of Macronutrient Dietary Reference Intakes," and other relevant documents related to the DRI process such as "Development of DRIs 1994-2004: Lessons Learned and New Challenges". The standing committee will produce approximately 2 letter reports a year in response to questions relevant to a range of questions relevant to the DRI framework and structuring new DRI reviews as questions arise from various DRI consensus committees. The sponsor will utilize its learning from the standing committee discussions to inform future DRI reviews, including a review of DRIs for macronutrients.

For this second letter report questions from the Federal Joint US-Canadian Working Group include:

1) Are de novo systematic reviews needed in future DRI reviews or can qualified systematic reviews be used?
2) If qualified systematic reviews can be used, what are the appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria?
3) Can previously published systematic reviews be updated?

The committee will develop a decision tree that includes the three questions and addresses the need for meta-analysis questions as part of the systematic review process.

Collaborators

Committee

Chair

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Sponsors

Other, Federal

Staff

Ann Yaktine

Lead

Alice Vorosmarti

Lead

Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.