Recently completed
A committee-supported project or activity that has been completed and for which output dissemination has begun. Its committee has been disbanded and closeout procedures are underway.
Topics
A standing committee will review: 1) whether de novo systematic reviews are needed in future DRI reviews; 2) what are the appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria for using exisitng reviews; and can previously published systematic reviews can be updated? The committee will develop a decision tree that includes the three questions and addresses the need for meta-analysis questions as part of the systematic review process.
Featured publication
Letter
ยท2023
In response to a request from the US Department of Agriculture, the Health and Medicine Division (HMD) of the National Academies established the Standing Committee to Review the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) Framework. The committee was asked to respond to DRI-related questions to inform the Federa...
View details
Description
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will appoint a standing committee to review the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) framework, structure, and process relevant to future DRI reviews. The committee will consider past experiences and learning from previous DRI reports, including the report on "Guiding Principles for Basing DRIs on Chronic Disease", the recent meeting of experts, "Strategic Planning for a New Review of Macronutrient Dietary Reference Intakes," and other relevant documents related to the DRI process such as "Development of DRIs 1994-2004: Lessons Learned and New Challenges". The standing committee will produce approximately 2 letter reports a year in response to questions relevant to a range of questions relevant to the DRI framework and structuring new DRI reviews as questions arise from various DRI consensus committees. The sponsor will utilize its learning from the standing committee discussions to inform future DRI reviews, including a review of DRIs for macronutrients.
For this second letter report questions from the Federal Joint US-Canadian Working Group include:
1) Are de novo systematic reviews needed in future DRI reviews or can qualified systematic reviews be used?
2) If qualified systematic reviews can be used, what are the appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria?
3) Can previously published systematic reviews be updated?
The committee will develop a decision tree that includes the three questions and addresses the need for meta-analysis questions as part of the systematic review process.
Collaborators
Sponsors
Other, Federal
Staff
Ann Yaktine
Lead
Alice Vorosmarti
Lead
Major units and sub-units
Center for Health, People, and Places
Lead
Food, Nutrition, and Agriculture Program Area
Lead