TABLE E.1Pharyngeal Cancer and Exposure to Asbestos—Case-Control Studies
Reference* | Study Population | Exposed Cases | Estimated RR (95% CI) |
Berrino et al. 2003 | 100 male cases of hypopharyngeal cancer from six centers in Southern Europe, < 55 years old (adjusted for smoking and alcohol consumption) |
|
|
| Possible | na | 1.8 (0.9-3.9) |
| Probable | na | 1.8 (0.6-5.0) |
| (More detailed findings from combined analysis with 215 cases of laryngeal cancer on Table E.2) |
|
|
Luce et al. 2000 | 5 hypopharyngeal cancer cases among residents of New Caledonia |
|
|
| Whitewash from tremolite asbestos | 1 | 0.64 (0.01-6.68) |
Marchand et al. 2000 | 206 hypopharyngeal cancer cases among male residents of six cities in France (adjusted for smoking and alcohol consumption) |
|
|
| Any exposure | 161 | 1.80 (1.08-2.99) |
| Low cumulative exposure | 52 | 1.92 (1.03-3.57) |
| Intermediate | 52 | 1.40 (0.74-2.63) |
| High | 57 | 2.14 (1.14-4.01) |
Reference* | Study Population | Exposed Cases | Estimated RR (95% CI) |
Gustavsson et al. 1998 | 138 pharyngeal cancer cases among male residents of two regions in Sweden (adjusted for smoking and alcohol consumption) |
|
|
| Asbestos (low) | 24 | 1.01 (0.57-1.80) |
| Asbestos (high) | 22 | 1.08 (0.62-1.91) |
Zheng et al. 1992b | 115 male oral or pharyngeal cancer cases among residents of Shanghai, China Asbestos, occupational exposure | 16 | 1.81 (0.91-3.60)a |
Merletti et al. 1991 | 86 oral cavity or oropharynx (n = 12) cancer cases among male residents of Turin, Italy (adjusted for smoking and alcohol consumption) |
|
|
| Any exposure | 45 | 1.1 (na) |
| Probable or definite | 3 | 0.4 (na) |
NOTES: CI = Confidence interval; na = not available; RR = relative risk. Data points included in meta-analyses are bolded. * Full citations can be found in the reference list for Chapter 6. aOR and 95% CI calculated with standard methods from observed numbers of exposed cases and controls in original paper. | |||
TABLE E.2Laryngeal Cancer and Exposure to Asbestos—Case-Control Studies
Reference* | Study Population | Exposed Cases | Estimated RR (95% CI) |
Berrino et al. 2003 | 213 male cases of endolaryngeal cancer from six centers in Southern Europe, < 55 years old |
|
|
| Possible | na | 1.7 (1.0-3.0) |
| Probable | na | 1.8 (0.8-4.0) |
| Combined analysis with 100 hypopharyngeal cancer cases |
|
|
| Asbestos (JEM-derived agent), any exposure | 215 | 1.6 (1.0-2.5) |
| 10+ years duration and 20+ years lag | 121 | 1.4 (0.8-2.4) |
| Likelihood of exposure |
|
|
| Possible | 175 | 1.7 (1.1-2.8) |
| Probable | 40 | 1.9 (0.9-3.8) |
| Duration of exposure |
|
|
| < 10 years | na | 1.3 (0.6-2.7) |
| 10-19 years | na | 1.4 (0.7-2.7) |
| ≥ 20 years | na | 1.7 (0.9-3.0) p-trend > 0.05 |
| Tertiles of weighted exposure |
|
|
| 1 | na | 1.4 (0.8-2.3) |
| 2 | na | 1.9 (1.2-3.2) |
| 3 | na | 1.6 (1.0-2.6) p-trend = 0.037 |
Dietz et al. 2003 | 257 laryngeal cancer cases among residents of Rhein-Neckar region, Germany Asbestos | 59 | 1.3 (0.8-2.1) |
Elci et al. 2002 | 940 laryngeal cancer cases among male residents of Istanbul, Turkey (smoking-adjusted) |
|
|
| Asbestos (JEM-derived agent) | 150 | 1.0 (0.8-1.3) |
| Glottis | 28 | 0.8 (0.5-1.2) |
| Supraglottis | 71 | 1.0 (0.8-1.4) |
| Other laryngeal | 51 | 1.2 (0.9-1.7) |
| Intensity of exposure |
|
|
| Low | 45 | 0.9 (0.6-1.3) |
| Medium | 93 | 1.2 (0.9-1.6) |
| High | 12 | 0.6 (0.3-1.1) |
| Probability of exposure |
|
|
| Low | 121 | 1.2 (0.9-1.5) |
| Medium | 20 | 0.6 (0.4-1.1) |
| High | 9 | 0.7 (0.3-1.5) |
Reference* | Study Population | Exposed Cases | Estimated RR (95% CI) |
Luce et al. 2000 | 20 laryngeal cancer cases among male residents of New Caledonia (all smokers) |
|
|
| Whitewash from tremolite asbestos | 3 | 0.72 (0.22-2.30) |
| Melanesians | 2 | 0.71 (0.14-3.63) |
| Non-Melanesians | 1 | 0.60 (0.07-5.22) |
Marchand et al. 2000 | 296 laryngeal cancer cases among male residents of six cities in France (smoking-adjusted) |
|
|
| Any exposure | 216 | 1.24 (0.83-1.90) |
| Low cumulative exposure | 67 | 1.10 (0.66-1.82) |
| Intermediate | 72 | 1.20 (0.73-1.99) |
| High | 77 | 1.47 (0.87-2.46) |
| Supraglottic, any exposure | 56 | 1.12 (0.61-2.05) |
| Low cumulative exposure | 15 | 0.84 (0.38-1.84) |
| Intermediate | 22 | 1.31 (0.62-2.76) |
| High | 19 | 1.27 (0.58-2.78) |
| Glottic and subglottic, any exposure | 75 | 1.15 (0.68-1.95) |
| Low cumulative exposure | 27 | 1.19 (0.62-2.27) |
| Intermediate | 21 | 0.90 (0.45-1.78) |
| High | 27 | 1.44 (0.73-2.83) |
| Epilarynx, any exposure | 77 | 1.77 (0.94-3.30) |
| Low cumulative exposure | 22 | 1.45 (0.67-3.13) |
| Intermediate | 25 | 1.69 (0.79-3.64) |
| High | 30 | 2.22 (1.05-4.71) |
De Stefani et al. 1998 | 112 laryngeal cancer cases among male residents of Montevideo, Uruguay (smoking-adjusted) |
|
|
| Asbestos (self-reported agent) |
| 231.8 (0.9-3.2) |
| 1-20 years | 4 | 0.9 (0.3-2.7) |
| 20+ years | 19 | 2.4 (1.2-4.8) |
| Supraglottic | na | 2.3 (0.9-5.7) |
| Glottic | na | 2.9 (0.8-10.5) |
Gustavsson et al. 1998 | 157 laryngeal cancer cases among male residents of two regions in Sweden |
|
|
| Asbestos (low) | 28 | 1.21 (0.73-2.02) |
| Asbestos (high) | 34 | 1.69 (1.05-2.74) |
| Quartile I | 13 | 1.16 (1.02-1.32) |
| Quartile II | 15 | 1.35 (1.04-1.74) |
| Quartile III | 16 | 1.56 (1.06-2.30) |
| Quartile IV | 18 | 1.82 (1.08-3.04) p-trend = 0.02 |
Reference* | Study Population | Exposed Cases | Estimated RR (95% CI) |
Muscat and Wynder 1992 | 186 laryngeal cancer cases among white, male residents of New York, Illinois, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, US |
|
|
| Asbestos, any exposure | 66 | 1.1 (0.7-1.9) |
| Glottis | 40 | 1.3 (0.7-2.7) |
| Supraglottis | 26 | 1.1 (0.5-2.6) |
Wortley et al. 1992 | 235 laryngeal cancer cases among residents of western Washington state, US |
|
|
| Asbestos—peak |
|
|
| None | 145 | 1.0 |
| Low | 3 | 1.2 (0.6-7.1) |
| Medium | 57 | 1.3 (0.8-2.0) |
| High | 30 | 1.1 (0.6-1.9) |
| Asbestos—duration |
|
|
| < 1 year | 151 | 1.0 |
| 1-9 | 50 | 1.0 (0.5-2.1) |
| ≥ 10 | 34 | 1.2 (0.6-2.3) |
| Asbestos—exposure scores |
|
|
| < 5 | 173 | 1.0 |
| 5-19 | 25 | 1.1 (0.6-2.1) |
| ≥ 20 | 37 | 1.4 (0.7-2.5) |
Zheng et al. 1992a | 201 laryngeal cancer cases among residents of Shanghai, China (smoking-adjusted) |
|
|
| Asbestos, occupational exposure | 26 | 2.0 (1.0-4.3) |
Ahrens et al. 1991 | 85 laryngeal cancer cases among male residents of Bremen, Germany (smoking-adjusted) |
|
|
| Asbestos | na | 1.1 (0.5-2.4) |
Brown et al. 1988 | 180 laryngeal cancer cases among male residents along Gulf Coast of Texas (smoking-adjusted) |
|
|
| Asbestos | 88 | 1.5 (1.0-2.2) |
| < 5 years | 20 | 1.3 (0.7-2.6) |
| 5-14 | 24 | 2.2 (1.1-4.3) |
| ≥ 15 | 40 | 1.4 (0.8-2.4) |
| unknown | 4 |
|
Zagraniski et al. 1986 | 92 laryngeal cancer cases among white, male residents of New Haven, CT (smoking-adjusted) |
|
|
| Asbestos workers (ever held occupation) | 11 | 1.1 (0.4-2.9) |
Reference | Study Population | Exposed Cases | Estimated RR (95% CI) |
Olsen and Sabroe 1984 | 276 male laryngeal cancer cases among residents of Denmark (smoking-adjusted) Asbestos | 17 | 1.8 (1.0-3.4) |
Burch et al. 1981 | 184 laryngeal cancer cases among male residents of southern Ontario, Canada (smoking-adjusted) |
|
|
| Self-reported asbestos exposure | 36 | 1.6 (p = 0.069) |
| Occupational hygienist classified exposure | 14 | 2.3 (p= 0.052) |
Hinds et al. 1979 | 47 laryngeal cancer cases among male residents of three counties in WA; self-reported asbestos exposure |
|
|
| All subtypes | 25 | 1.75 (p= 0.21) |
| Glottis | na | 1.29 (p = 0.63) |
| Supraglottis | na | 4.00 (p = 0.22) |
Shettigara and Morgan 1975 | 43 laryngeal cancer cases among male hospital patients in Toronto, Canada Asbestos | 10 | ∞(0 exposedcontrols) |
Stell and McGill 1973 | 100 laryngeal cancer cases among male hospital patients in Liverpool, UK Asbestos | 31 | 14.53 (4.27-49.43)a |
NOTES: CI = Confidence interval; na = not available; RR = relative risk. Data points included in meta-analyses are bolded. * Full citations can be found in the reference list for Chapter 6. aOR and 95% CI calculated with standard methods from observed numbers of exposed cases and controls in original paper. | |||
TABLE E.3Esophageal Cancer and Exposure to Asbestos—Case-Control Studies
Reference* | Study Population | Exposed Cases | Estimated RR (95% CI) |
Parent et al. 2000 | 99 esophageal cancer cases among male residents of Montreal, Canada; IH-derived agent: chrysotile asbestos (smoking-adjusted) |
|
|
| All subtypes |
|
|
| Any exposure | 21 | 1.4 (0.8-2.4) |
| Nonsubstantial | 19 | 1.4 (0.8-2.5) |
| Substantial | 2 | 1.3 (0.3-6.2) |
| 63 squamous-cell carcinomas |
|
|
| Any exposure | 17 | 2.0 (1.1-3.8) |
| Nonsubstantial | 16 | 2.1 (1.1-4.0) |
| Substantial | 1 | 1.1 (0.1-9.7) |
Gustavsson et al. 1998 | 122 esophageal cancer cases among male residents of two regions in Sweden; IH-derived agent (smoking-adjusted) |
|
|
| Asbestos (low) | 22 | 1.21 (0.67-2.17) |
| Asbestos (high) | 21 | 1.00 (0.54-1.82) |
Hillerdal 1980 | Gastrointestinal carcinoma cases among male residents of Uppsala county, Sweden (exposure = pleural plaques) |
|
|
| 21 esophageal | 1 | 2.86 (0.07-15.91)a |
NOTES: CI = Confidence interval; na = not available; RR = relative risk. Data points included in meta-analyses are bolded. * Full citations can be found in the reference list for Chapter 6. aOR and 95% CI calculated with standard methods from observed and expected numbers presented in original paper. | |||
TABLE E.4Stomach Cancer and Exposure to Asbestos—Case-Control Studies
Reference* | Study Population | Exposed Cases | Estimated RR (95% CI) |
Krstev et al. 2005 | 443 stomach cases among residents of Warsaw, Poland |
|
|
| 285 males, ever exposed | 42 | 1.5 (0.9-2.4) |
| 1-9 years | 19 | 1.2 (0.6-2.3) |
| ≥10 years | 23 | 1.9 (0.9-3.8) |
| 158 females, ever exposed | 1 | 0.3 (0.03-3.0) |
| 1-9 years | 1 | 0.4 (0.0-6.0) |
| ≥10 years | 0 | — |
Ekstrom et al. 1999 | 565 gastric cancer cases among residents ofSweden | 155 | 1.11 (0.87-1.42) |
Parent et al. 1998 | 250 male gastric cancer cases among residents of Montreal, Canada |
|
|
| Chrysotile asbestos |
|
|
| Nonsubstantial | 43 | 1.2 (0.8-1.7) |
| Substantial | 4 | 0.7 (0.2-1.8) |
| Amphibole asbestos |
|
|
| Nonsubstantial | 10 | 0.6 (0.3-1.2) |
| Substantial | 3 | 1.9 (0.6-6.9) |
Cocco et al. 1994 | 640 gastric cancer cases among male residents of Italy |
|
|
| Ever exposed | 239 | 0.7 (0.5-1.1) |
| 21+ years | na | 1.4 (0.6-3.0) |
Hillerdal 1980 | Gastrointestinal carcinoma cases among male residents of Uppsala county, Sweden (exposure = pleural plaques) |
|
|
| 148 stomach | 6 | 2.40 (0.88-5.22)a |
NOTES: CI = Confidence interval; na = not available; RR = relative risk. Data points included in meta-analyses are bolded. * Full citations can be found in the reference list for Chapter 6. a95% CI calculated with standard methods from observed and expected numbers presented in original paper. | |||
TABLE E.5Colorectal Cancer and Exposure to Asbestos—Case-Control Studies
Reference* | Study Population | Exposed Cases | Estimated RR (95% CI) |
Goldberg et al. 2001 | 497 colon cancer cases among male residents of Montreal, Canada; industrial-hygiene-derived agent |
|
|
| Adjusted for age and non-occupational factors |
|
|
| Nonsubstantial | 60 | 0.9 (0.6-1.3) |
| Substantial | 18 | 2.1 (1.1-4.0) |
| Further adjusted for occupational factors |
|
|
| Nonsubstantial | 60 | 0.9 (0.6-1.3) |
| Substantial | 18 | 1.8 (0.9-3.6) |
| Frequency |
|
|
| 1-5% | 21 | 0.9 (0.5-1.6) |
| 6-30% | 49 | 1.1 (0.7-1.5) |
| > 30% | 8 | 1.5 (0.6-3.7) |
| Concentration |
|
|
| Low | 40 | 0.9 (0.6-1.4) |
| Medium | 32 | 1.2 (0.8-1.8) |
| High | 6 | 1.4 (0.4-4.3) |
| Duration (10-year increment) | 78 | 1.1 (0.9-1.2) |
Dumas et al. 2000 | 257 rectal cancer cases among male residents of Montreal, Canada |
|
|
| Chrysotile, any | 30 | 0.7 (0.5-1.0) |
| Substantial | 3 | 0.5 (0.2-1.6) |
| Amphiboles, any | 11 | 0.7 (0.3-1.2) |
| Substantial | 2 | 1.5 (0.3-7.6) |
Demers et al. 1994 | 261 colorectal cancer cases among white males residents of southeast Michigan | 15 | 0.5 (0.3-1.0) |
| Duration (years) |
|
|
| < 20 | 9 | 0.6 (0.3-1.5) |
| 20+ | 6 | 0.4 (0.1-1.2) |
| Latency (years) |
|
|
| < 40 | 5 | 0.4 (0.1-1.3) |
| 40+ | 10 | 0.6 (0.2-1.4) |
Vineis et al. 1993 | 74 colon cancer cases among male residents of industrialized northern Italy (job titles) Jobs with putative asbestos exposure | 4 | 4.8 (1.05-21.5) |
Garabrant et al. 1992 | 419 male colon cancer cases among residents of Los Angeles County, CA Never exposed | 353 | 1.00 |
Reference* | Study Population | Exposed Cases | Estimated RR (95% CI) |
| No latency |
|
|
| Any exposure | 66 | 0.99 (0.66-1.50) |
| Asbestos on hands and clothes |
|
|
| Did not get on hands or clothes | 17 | 2.32 (0.87-6.23) |
| Got on hands or clothes | 49 | 0.82 (0.52-1.30) |
| Use of mask |
|
|
| Did not wear mask | 55 | 0.95 (0.61-1.46) |
| Wore mask | 11 | 1.43 (0.49-4.17) |
| Frequency of exposure |
|
|
| < 5 times/week | 18 | 1.00 (0.50-2.00) |
| ≥5 times/week | 31 | 0.79 (0.43-1.46) |
| Brief, intense exposure | 17 | 1.48 (0.64-3.38) |
| Ordinal trend |
| p = 0.70 |
| Duration of exposure (years) |
|
|
| < 5 | 24 | 0.98 (0.53-1.84) |
| 5-14 | 20 | 1.47 (0.67-3.22) |
| ≥ 15 | 22 | 0.76 (0.39-1.49) |
| Continuous trend |
| p = 0.61 |
| Ordinal trend |
| p = 0.81 |
| Time since first exposure (years) |
|
|
| < 1-14 | 10 | 1.66 (0.54-5.10) |
| 15-29 | 21 | 1.37 (0.65-2.91) |
| ≥ 30 | 35 | 0.77 (0.45-1.31) |
| Continuous trend |
| p = 0.61 |
| Ordinal trend |
| p = 0.66 |
| Cumulative exposure index |
|
|
| 1-30 | 41 | 1.26 (0.74-2.15) |
| 31-60 | 11 | 0.80 (0.34-1.88) |
| ≥61 | 14 | 0.65 (0.28-1.51) |
| Continuous trend |
| p = 0.22 |
| Ordinal trend |
| p = 0.46 |
| 15-year latency |
|
|
| Exposed, latency > 15 years | 56 | 0.93 (0.60-1.44) |
| Asbestos on hands and clothes |
|
|
| Did not get on hands or clothes | 12 | 1.75 (0.62-4.94) |
| Got on hands or clothes | 44 | 0.83 (0.51-1.33) |
| Use of mask |
|
|
| Did not wear mask | 46 | 0.86 (0.55-1.37) |
| Wore mask | 10 | 1.95 (0.55-6.90) |
| Frequency of exposure |
|
|
| < 5 times/week | 14 | 0.83 (0.39-1.76) |
| ≥ 5 times/week | 30 | 0.93 (0.49-1.77) |
| Brief, intense exposure | 12 | 1.14 (0.46-2.87) |
| Ordinal trend |
| p = 0.78 |
Reference | Study Population | Exposed Cases | Estimated RR (95% CI) |
| Duration of exposure (years) |
|
|
| < 5 | 19 | 0.74 (0.37-1.47) |
| 5-14 | 21 | 1.60 (0.75-3.44) |
| ≥ 15 | 16 | 0.69 (0.30-1.55) |
| Continuous trend |
| p = 0.58 |
| Ordinal trend |
| p = 0.79 |
| Cumulative exposure index |
|
|
| 1-30 | 36 | 1.07 (0.63-1.81) |
| 31-60 | 10 | 0.94 (0.33-2.65) |
| ≥ 61 | 10 | 0.55 (0.21-1.47) |
| Continuous trend |
| p = 0.33 |
| Ordinal trend |
| p = 0.40 |
Gerhardson de Verdier et al. 1992 | Colon and rectal cancer cases among male residents of Stockholm, Sweden; self-reported agents |
|
|
| 163 colon cancers | 22 | 1.9 (0.9-4.2) |
| Right colon | 16 | 2.6 (1.2-5.9) |
| Left colon | 3 | 0.5 (0.1-1.9) |
| 107 rectal cancers | 17 | 1.9 (0.8-4.6) |
| Colorectal cancer: latency (years) |
|
|
| 1-19 | 5 | 1.4 (0.3-9.9) |
| 20+ | 34 | 2.0 (1.0-3.9) |
| 1-29 | 12 | 1.6 (0.5-5.0) |
| 30+ | 27 | 2.0 (1.0-4.4) |
| 1-39 | 22 | 1.4 (0.7-3.0) |
| 40+ | 17 | 3.2 (1.1-11.5) |
Neuget et al. 1991 | 51 colorectal cancer cases among males undergoing colonoscopy in 3 NYC medical centers |
|
|
| Asbestos exposure | 10 | 1.8 (0.8-5.6) |
| Significant exposure | 3 | 4.3 (0.8-23.5) |
Fredriksson et al. 1989 | 329 colon cancer cases among residents of Umea, Sweden |
|
|
| Asbestos, low grade | na | 1.2 (0.6-2.4) |
| Asbestos, high grade | na | 2.1 (0.8-5.8) |
Spiegelman and Wegman 1985 | Colorectal cancer cases in seven US metropolitan areas and two states; JEM-derived agent |
|
|
| Males: 343 colorectal cancer | na | 1.28 (p= 0.17) |
| 224 colon cancer only | na | 1.22 (p = 0.33) |
| Females: 208 colorectal cancer | na | 1.08 (p= 0.65) |
| 171 colon cancer only | na | 1.09 (p = 0.64) |
Reference* | Study Population | Exposed Cases | Estimated RR (95% CI) |
Hardell 1981 | 153 colon cancer cases among male residents of Umea, Sweden Asbestos, any | 16 | 1.9 (1.0-3.6) |
Hillerdal 1980 | Gastrointestinal carcinoma cases among male residents of Uppsala county, Sweden (exposure = pleural plaques) |
|
|
| 108 colon | 3 | 1.67 (0.34-4.87)a |
| 101 rectal | 3 | 1.76 (0.36-5.16)a |
NOTES: CI = Confidence interval; na = not available; RR = relative risk. Data points included in meta-analyses are bolded. * Full citations can be found in the reference list for Chapter 6. aOR and 95% CI calculated with standard methods from observed and expected numbers presented in original paper. | |||