Suggested Citation:
"Appendix B: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/26500.
Presentations from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy
Opening Remarks on Behalf of the Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), William Boyle, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition, U.S. Department of Energy
Perspectives on the Congressional Mandate, Christopher T. Hanson, Commissioner, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Former Staff Member, U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee
U.S. House of Representatives’ Appropriations Staff Presentation on the Congressional Mandate, Scott McKee, Professional Staff Member, U.S. House Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee on Energy and Water
Overview of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply Chain Program, Andrew Griffith, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply Chain, U.S. Department of Energy
Support for Advanced Reactor Development and Deployment, Alice Caponiti, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Reactor Fleet and Advanced Reactor Deployment, U.S. Department of Energy
Overview of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Evaluation and Screening, Bhupinder P. Singh, Program Manager, Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply Chain (NE-4), Office of Nuclear Energy, U.S. Department of Energy
Overview of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Regulatory Programs on Fuel Cycles and Waste Aspects of Advanced Reactors, Christopher M. Regan, Deputy Director, James Hammelman, Senior Chemical Process Engineer, and Jose R. Cuadrado, Project Manager, Division of Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
PUBLIC MEETING #2: DECEMBER 7–8, 2020, VIRTUAL
Presentations from Argonne National Laboratory and Idaho National Laboratory
Versatile Test Reactor (VTR) Project Status and Overview, Thomas O’Connor, Director, Versatile Test Reactor Program, Office of Nuclear Energy, U.S. Department of Energy
Suggested Citation:
"Appendix B: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/26500.
VTR Core Design and Fuel Selection, Thomas Fanning, Manager, Safety and Engineering Analysis Department, Nuclear Science and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory
VTR Experimental Capabilities, Kevan Weaver, Director, Experimental Capabilities for the VTR, Idaho National Laboratory
VTR Fuel Cycle and Waste Management, Douglas Crawford, Director of the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT), Idaho National Laboratory
Systems Perspective on Advanced Fuel Cycles and Waste Management, Temitope Taiwo, Interim Director, Nuclear Science and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory
Summary of DOE-NE Material Recovery and Waste Form Campaign R&D, Terry Todd, Laboratory Fellow, Idaho National Laboratory
Ceramic Fuel and TRISO Fuel Recycle Options, Terry Todd, Laboratory Fellow, Idaho National Laboratory
Molten Salt Reactor Fuel Recycle Options, Candido Pereira, Deputy Director, Chemical and Fuel Cycle Technologies Division, Argonne National Laboratory
Metal Fuel Recycle Options, Mark Williamson, Division Director, Chemical and Fuel Cycle Technologies Division, Argonne National Laboratory
Waste Form Development, Bill Ebert, Manager, Pyroprocess and Waste Form Development, Chemical and Fuel Cycle Technologies Division, Argonne National Laboratory
Nonproliferation Considerations, Michael Miller, Director, Nuclear Nonproliferation, Idaho National Laboratory
Economics of Future Fuel Cycle Options, Brent Dixon, Deputy National Technical Director, DOE-NE Systems Analysis and Integration, R&D Campaign, Idaho National Laboratory
PUBLIC MEETING #3: JANUARY 11 AND 13, 2021, VIRTUAL
NuScale Power: A Scalable Clean Energy Solution, José Reyes, Chief Technology Officer and Cofounder, NuScale Power
Terrestrial Energy: Overview of the Integral Molten Salt Reactor, David LeBlanc, President, Chief Technology Officer and Director, Terrestrial Energy
ThorCon 1 GW Plant, Lars Jorgensen, Chief Executive Officer, ThorCon
BWXT’s Advanced Nuclear Reactor, Erik Nygaard, Director of Research and Engineering, BWXT Advanced Technologies
Natrium, Pavel Hejzlar, TerraPower Technical Fellow, and Tara Neider, SVP Program Development and Lab Facilities, TerraPower
TerraPower’s Molten Chloride Fast Reactor (MCFR), Jeff Latkowski, Senior Vice President (Innovation) and Program Director of Molden Chloride Fast Reactor Program, TerraPower
The ARC-100 Advanced SMR, Ed Arthur, Vice President, Fuel Cycle Management and Safeguards, and John Sackett, Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, ARC Clean Energy
LeadCold, Janne Wallenius, Project Leader, SEALER Blykalla/LeadCold
Moltex Technology, Rory O’Sullivan, CEO for North America, Moltex Energy
Suggested Citation:
"Appendix B: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/26500.
Oklo, Caroline Cochran, COO and Co-Founder, and Jacob DeWitte, CEO and Cofounder, Oklo
Application of Safeguards by Design to Advanced Reactors, Jeremy Whitlock, Section Head for Concepts and Approaches, Department of Safeguards, International Atomic Energy Agency
Perspectives on Proliferation-Resistance (and Terror-Resistance): Fuel Cycles and Advanced Reactors, Matthew Bunn, Co–Principal Investigator, Managing the Atom Project, Belfar Center, Harvard University
Safeguards and Security Analysis for Fuel Cycle Facilities, Ben Cipiti, Sandia National Laboratories
New Approaches Utilizing Process Monitoring Data and Machine Learning, Ben Cipiti, Sandia National Laboratories
Advanced Reactor Safeguards and Security, Ben Cipiti, Sandia National Laboratories
IAEA Safeguards Considerations Associated with HALEU, Warren Stern, Deputy Chair, Nonproliferation and Security, Brookhaven National Laboratory
Aspects of Material Accounting and Control for Advanced Reactors, Robert K. Larsen, Senior Nuclear Security Officer, Nuclear Security of Materials and Facilities Section, Division of Nuclear Security, Department of Nuclear Safety and Security, International Atomic Energy Agency
Proliferation Risks of Laser Enrichment of Uranium, Ryan Snyder, Visiting Fellow, University of Hamburg, Institute of Peace Research and Security Policy
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation and Cooperation with the Advanced Reactor Industry, Jeffery Chamberlin, Associate Assistant Deputy Administrator, Office of Material Management and Minimization, Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation, National Nuclear Security Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation’s Civil Nuclear Security Program, Katherine C. Holt, Program Director for Analytics and Innovation, Office of International Nuclear Security, National Nuclear Security Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
Support to U.S. Advanced Reactor Stakeholders, Anagha Iyengar, Program Manager, Office of International Nuclear Safeguards, National Nuclear Security Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
HALEU Security Theft and Diversion at Fixed Sites and in Transit, Tim Harris, Senior Program Manager, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response (NSIR), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Safeguards and Material Accounting for Advanced Reactors and Associated Fuel Cycles, James Rubenstone, Chief of the Material Control and Accounting Branch in the Division of Fuel Safety, Safeguards, and Environmental Review, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
PUBLIC MEETING #6: JUNE 2 AND JUNE 7, 2021, VIRTUAL
Status and Prospects of HALEU Production in the United States, Daniel B. Poneman, President and CEO, and Larry Cutlip, Senior Vice President, Field Operations, Centrus Energy Corporation
The Rationale for Reprocessing and Recycling, Andrew Worrall, Section Head, Integrated Fuel Cycle, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Deputy Director, Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear, and UK Country Coordinator, DOE Office of Nuclear Energy
Impacts of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Choices on Permanent Disposal of High-Activity Radioactive Waste, Peter N. Swift, Sandia National Laboratories
Radioactive Waste Management Issues to Be Considered When Evaluating Different Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options, Piet Zuidema, Chief Scientific Officer, European Joint Programme on Radioactive Waste Management (EURAD)
Some Impacts of Advanced Fuel Cycle Options on Waste Management and Long-Term Disposal Risks, Bernd Grambow, Professor of Excellence and Chair of Nuclear Waste Management, IMT Atlantique, École des Mines Télécom Atlantique, Nantes, France
Suggested Citation:
"Appendix B: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/26500.
Economic and Environmental Costs and Benefits of Reprocessing, Frank N. von Hippel, Senior Research Physicist and Professor of Public and International Affairs, Emeritus, Princeton University
The Economics of Reprocessing and Recycling Versus Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, Matthew Bunn, Co–Principal Investigator, Managing the Atom Project, Belfer Center, Harvard University
Westinghouse eVinci™ Micro-Reactor, Vefa N. Kucukboyaci
PUBLIC MEETING #7: JULY 20, 2021, VIRTUAL
Attractiveness of Materials in Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles, Charles G. Bathke, Los Alamos National Laboratory
PUBLIC MEETING #8: SEPTEMBER 13–15, 2021, VIRTUAL
Advanced Research Project Agency—Energy (ARPA-E) Efforts Supporting Advanced Nuclear, Jenifer Shafer, Program Director, ARPA-E
Proliferation Resistance Using Methodology of the International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO), Brian Boyer, Section Head, International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO) Section, Division of Nuclear Power, Department of Nuclear Energy, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Implementation of IAEA Safeguards within the United States, David H. Hanks, Senior International Nuclear Safeguards Analyst, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Front End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, Amir Vexler, President and CEO, Orano USA
Back End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, Arnaud Gay, Executive VP, Technical Department and International Operations, Orano, and Sven Bader, Technical Consultant, Orano Federal Services
Russia’s Efforts to Develop Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles, Pavel Podvig, Independent Analyst, Geneva, Switzerland
PUBLIC MEETING #9: SEPTEMBER 28–29, 2021, VIRTUAL
Overview of the Generation IV International Forum, Hideki Kamide, Deputy Director General for Sector of Fast Reactor and Advanced Reactor Research and Development, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), and Chair of the Generation IV International
Status of the SFR Technology Developments in the Generation IV International Forum: Reactor Design and Fuel Research and Development, Gilles Rodriguez, Technical Director of the Generation IV International Forum, and Frédéric Serre, Chair of the Generation IV International Forum Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor (SFR) System Steering Committee
Review of Spent Fuel Reprocessing and Associated Accident Phenomena, Fred Gelbard, Chemical Engineer, Sandia National Laboratories
Meeting Advanced Reactors’ Needs for High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium: (1) U.S. Department of Energy’s Plans and (2) Independent Report with Results from Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear April 2020 Workshop; (1) Andrew Griffith, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply Chain, U.S. Department of Energy, and (2) Monica Regalbuto, Director, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Strategy, Idaho National Laboratory
Role of Aqueous Separations in Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles, Gregg Lumetta, Lab Fellow, Chemist, Nuclear Chemistry and Engineering Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
France’s Strategy on the Back-End of the Fuel Cycle and the Management and Disposal of Radioactive Waste, Patrick Landais, High Commissioner for Atomic Energy, CEA, French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission
Treatment of EBR-II Spent Fuel, Michael N. Patterson, Program Manager, Used Fuels Treatment, Materials and Fuels Complex, Idaho National Laboratory
Suggested Citation:
"Appendix B: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/26500.
Panel Discussion with Utility Executives, Greg Cullen, Vice President for Energy Services and Development, Energy Northwest; Nick Irvin, Research and Development Director, Advanced Energy Systems, Cross Cutting Technology, and Strategy, Southern Company; Marilyn C. Kray, Vice President of Nuclear Strategy and Development, Exelon; and Chris Nolan, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Policy, and Emergency Preparedness, Duke Energy
PUBLIC MEETING #10: OCTOBER 14–15, 2021, VIRTUAL
Canada’s Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) Perspectives on Waste Acceptance from Advanced Reactors, Paul Gierszewski, NWMO Director, Safety and Technical Research, Canada
The U.S. Government Accountability Office’s Reports on Uranium Management, Allison Bawden, Director in the U.S. Government Accountability Office’s Natural Resources and Environment Team
Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Technologies, Robert Hill, Program Manager, Advanced NE R&D and Argonne Distinguished Fellow, Argonne National Laboratory
Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Back-End Safeguards, Rowen Price, Research Assistant, Nuclear Safeguards, and Cindy Vestergaard, Senior Fellow and Director, Block Chain in Practice and Nuclear Safeguards, Stimson Center
Safeguards Technology Considerations and Research Needs for Thorium Fuel Cycles and Molten Salt Reactors, Louise G. Worrall, Senior R&D Scientist, Non-Destructive Measurement Science and Technology Group, Nuclear Nonproliferation Division, National Nuclear Security Sciences Directorate, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Nuclear Waste from Small Modular Reactors, Lindsay Krall, Geochemist, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company
Hazards Associated with Molten Salt Reactor Systems, Joanna Mcfarlane, Chemist, Nuclear Energy and Fuel Cycle Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Westinghouse’s Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor, Paolo Ferroni, Fellow Engineer and Technical Lead, Westinghouse Lead Fast Reactor Project, and Fausto Fraceschini, Consulting Engineer, Westinghouse Mangiarotti, Westinghouse Electric Company
PUBLIC MEETING #11: DECEMBER 6, 2021, VIRTUAL
China’s Nuclear Fuel Cycle Programs, Hui Zhang, Senior Research Associate, Project on Managing the Atom, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kenny School
Trends in Nuclear Fuel Cycle Workforce, Terry A. Todd, Emeritus Fellow, Idaho National Laboratory
Perspectives from the Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy, Kathryn D. Huff, Acting Assistant Secretary and Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Office of Nuclear Energy, U.S. Department of Energy
Perspectives from Congress: Panel Discussion with Key Staff of the Appropriations Committees of the Senate and House of Representatives—Aaron Goldner, Professional Staff Member, Senate Appropriations Committee, and Scott McKee, Professional Staff Member, House Appropriations Committee
PUBLIC MEETING #12: DECEMBER 16, 2021, VIRTUAL
Advanced Non–Light Water Reactors: Integrated Waste Management System Considerations, Mark Nutt, Deputy National Technical Director of the DOE-NE Integrated Waste Management System
Suggested Citation:
"Appendix B: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/26500.
Suggested Citation:
"Appendix B: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/26500.
Suggested Citation:
"Appendix B: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/26500.
Suggested Citation:
"Appendix B: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/26500.
Suggested Citation:
"Appendix B: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/26500.
Suggested Citation:
"Appendix B: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/26500.
Suggested Citation:
"Appendix B: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/26500.
The United States has deployed commercial nuclear power since the 1950s, and as of 2021, nuclear power accounts for approximately 20 percent of U.S. electricity generation. The current commercial nuclear fleet consists entirely of thermal-spectrum, light water reactors operating with low-enriched uranium dioxide fuel in a once-through fuel cycle. In recent years, the U.S. Congress, U.S. Department of Energy, and private sector have expressed considerable interest in developing and deploying advanced nuclear reactors to augment, and possibly replace, the U.S. operating fleet of reactors, nearly all of which will reach the end of their currently licensed operating lives by 2050. Much of this interest stems from the potential ability of advanced reactors and their associated fuel cycles - as claimed by their designers and developers - to provide a number of advantages, such as improvements in economic competitiveness, reductions in environmental impact via better natural resource utilization and/or lower waste generation, and enhancements in nuclear safety and proliferation resistance.
At the request of Congress, this report explores merits and viability of different nuclear fuel cycles, including fuel cycles that may use reprocessing, for both existing and advanced reactor technologies; and waste management (including transportation, storage, and disposal options) for advanced reactors, and in particular, the potential impact of advanced reactors and their fuel cycles on waste generation and disposal.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Sign in to access your saved publications, downloads, and email
preferences.
Former MyNAP users: You'll need to reset your password on your first
login to MyAcademies. Click "Forgot password" below to receive a reset
link via email. Having trouble?
Visit our FAQ page
to contact support.
Members of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of
Engineering, or National Academy of Medicine should log in through their
respective Academy portals.
Register
Register
Thank You
Thank You
Thank you for creating a MyAcademies account!
Enjoy free access to thousands of National Academies' publications, a
10% discount off every purchase, and build your personal library.
Forgot Password
Forgot Password
Enter the email address for your MyAcademies (formerly MyNAP) account to
receive password reset instructions.
Reset Requested
Reset Requested
We sent password reset instructions to
your email
. Follow the link in that email to create a new password. Didn't receive
it? Check your spam folder or
contact us
for assistance.
We sent a verification link to your email. Please check your inbox (and
spam folder) and follow the link to verify your email address. If you
did not receive the email, you can request a new verification link below