
For many areas, ferry transportation services play an important role in regional transportation by providing additional transit capacity to transportation networks and serving as a lifeline for geographically isolated communities. Despite the long history of ferry transportation and recent expansion of ferry service in several regions, research and guidance for ferry capacity planning are underdeveloped compared to other transportation modes. The objectives of this research are to present guidance for defining the capacity of a ferry system as well as for understanding capacity challenges, and to provide quantitative procedures for designing and operating both scheduled and fixed-route ferry transit services and facilities that serve only passengers as well as passengers and vehicles. This report presents capacity concepts and analysis focused on vessels, terminals, and service schedules, and discusses the relationships and dependencies between these elements.
The target audience of this report includes ferry operators and transit decision makers with existing ferry services. The report assumes that its readers have a foundational understanding of the ferry industry or will reference background information in existing ferry reports.
Another goal of this report is to identify gaps in this and previous research where additional data collection and research are needed to more fully develop capacity guidance and quantitative procedures and further the availability of information for ferry capacity planning.
This section provides definitions of ferry and transit terms as used in this report. Many of these terms could be used or defined differently in other publications.
Ferries serve a vital role in transportation systems throughout the United States and internationally. The 2020 National Census of Ferry Operators conducted by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics included responses from 164 U.S. ferry operators, with at least one operator reported from 42 out of the 54 states, territories, and the District of Columbia. Of the reported vessels, 98.54% carry passengers, 37.76% carry vehicles, and 17.35% carry freight. Total reported boarding counts for 2019 included 112.1 million passengers and 26.3 million vehicles (Bureau of Transportation Statistics 2020).
Ferry service is distinct from other transit modes for several reasons, including the regulations and challenges of the marine operating environment and the wide range in vessel and terminal designs and capacities. Each ferry system has unique operating conditions, ridership levels, route geography, and other service characteristics that define vessel and terminal infrastructure needs. However, less data and research are available for ferry planning and design than for other transportation modes, as noted in TCRP Report 165: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (TCQSM) (Ryus et al. 2013) and other reports.
Terminal and vessel infrastructure involve long-term, and typically expensive, investments. Understanding the information and procedures necessary to evaluate, prioritize, and address capacity issues in a ferry system supports operators and agencies in making these investment decisions. Additionally, this data analysis can also support funding endeavors, whether the funding is from grants or other sources.
Ferry systems are complex and dynamic. System elements such as vessels, terminals, and operations are highly integrated and affected by many operating conditions that cannot be controlled, such as weather, sea states, marine mammals, vessel traffic, and other environmental operating conditions. This integration of system elements and dynamic operating environment can make it challenging to identify one system element that may relieve a capacity constraint. For example, design of a terminal element such as queuing area can have an impact on both the capacity (number of passengers or vehicles that can be accommodated at one time) and throughput (rate at which passengers or vehicles can move through the terminal), which then affects the vessel capacity that can be accommodated and how often vessel landings can be scheduled. Identifying each element—landside or on the vessel—that creates a pinch point or delay is critical to maximizing system capacity and therefore overall operating efficiency.
Ferry system capacity in relation to terminals and vessels is illustrated in Figure 1. These elements contribute to system capacity, which can be measured both by sailing and over given periods of time.
The research for this project expanded on the ferry guidance provided in previous TCRP and other reports and focused on:
Data collection included conducting a literature review of previous ferry reports, administering an operator questionnaire, and observing existing terminal passenger throughput. The following sections provide details on each data collection method.
As a first step toward developing key quantitative procedures for designing and operating scheduled and fixed-route ferry transit services and facilities, the research team reviewed existing ferry studies and identified gaps in the information presented where further research or development of procedures would be needed to support informed ferry planning efforts. The gaps in information identified from the literature review are addressed in this report or are identified as topics recommended for further research in Chapter 6.
Resources reviewed for planning and operating ferry services included:
Four seminal ferry planning reports were identified, as summarized in the following. In addition to these four reports, numerous other ferry and transportation planning documents were reviewed and are referenced throughout the report.
The first three of these reports provide a foundational overview of the physical elements and operations of various types of ferry services, while the fourth takes a focused look at one aspect of ferry service planning, the integration with land-based transit. TCRP Report 165: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, Third Edition (Ryus et al. 2013), introduces several concepts foundational to calculating the capacity of ferry systems (discussed further in the last section of this chapter, Quantitative Procedures). This report references and builds on the foundational information presented in these previous reports to provide discussion and guidance focused on capacity planning of specific ferry system elements as well as overall route and system capacity and the interconnections between ferry system elements. This report furthers the guidance available for planning and calculating the capacity of ferry systems by providing additional quantitative procedures for calculating capacity, identifying best practices for capacity planning and management currently in use by ferry operators, and conducting data collection and observation of passenger flows at terminals to validate and supplement previous guidance. This report also recommends key areas for additional research that would improve the guidance available for ferry system capacity planning.
As part of this project, a questionnaire was developed and distributed to ferry operators across the United States and internationally. The goals of the questionnaire were to gather data and best practices related to capacity planning and to gain an understanding of the elements of ferry operations and associated policies that contribute to system capacity. Operators were asked to provide data on and descriptions of how their ferry systems address the following topics:
Five vehicle ferry operators and five passenger-only ferry operators provided responses. The respondents included domestic and international operators.
Table 1 lists the operators that provided responses to the questionnaire.
The questions asked of the operators and summaries of responses are included in Appendix A. Findings from the operator questionnaire informed the quantitative procedures and capacity components and best practices that are included throughout this report.
Table 1. Ferry operator questionnaire respondents.
| Vehicle Ferry System/Respondent | Passenger-Only Ferry System/Respondent |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To identify how the design of terminal elements, such as queuing lanes and ramps, affects overall ferry system capacity, the research team conducted on-site observations and reviewed footage from security cameras mounted at selected domestic terminals of ferry operators who responded to the questionnaire. The observations and video footage were used to collect data on walking speed and overall passenger throughput. Observations and empirical data for walk speed and passenger throughput were collected at 11 passenger-only ferry locations:
Kitsap Transit Fast Ferries (Washington)
New York City Ferries (New York)
San Francisco Bay Ferries (California)
Data collection included video and live observation. Walkways, including the gangways and ramps, were observed to identify the relationship of passenger throughput to the slope and width of the walkways. Additional terminal observations included fare collection operations, the dwell time between passenger embarking and disembarking, capacity constraint points (i.e., where queuing occurred), and total passenger counts. Egress time was calculated between two points along the path of travel and compared to the distance traveled to estimate the average walk time for each ferry terminal.
Once data were collected, they were imported into and analyzed using data analysis software to visualize passenger walk speed and passenger throughput for all terminals observed. Findings were compared to the ferry-capacity spreadsheet-based tool developed for the TCQSM (Ryus et al. 2013) to estimate overall ferry operational capacity. The research informed operating procedures for passenger-only facility capacity planning.
More information on the data collection and analysis for the throughput observation is provided in Appendix B.
This report builds on the research and guidance presented in previous ferry reports and the TCQSM, which serves as a reference work providing research-based guidance on evaluation of quality of service measuring transit capacity, speed, and reliability, and sizing elements of transit stations. References to background information presented in previous reports are provided within the text, and a list of references is included at the end of the main body of this report.
A summary of the report’s organization and topics included within each chapter is provided in the following:
Quantitative procedures addressing ferry system capacity are presented in previous reports, including the TCQSM (Ryus et al. 2013) and Habib et al. (1980). Those procedures are summarized in Table 2 (listed in the order in which they appear in each report).
This report builds on these previously developed quantitative procedures and includes several new procedures, which are summarized in Table 3.
Table 2. Summary of existing ferry capacity quantitative procedures.
| Capacity Concept | Reference | Procedure |
|---|---|---|
| Berth and dock capacity | TCQSM: Equation 9-1, Equation 9-5, Ferry Capacity Computational Engine | Maximum number of vessels per hour based on a given passenger demand that a berth or dock can accommodate |
| Vessel service time | TCQSM: Equation 9-2 | Design vessel service time |
| Dwell time (passengers) | TCQSM: Equation 9-3, Ferry Capacity Computational Engine | Passenger disembarking and embarking time |
| Dwell time (vehicles) | TCQSM: Equation 9-4, Ferry Capacity Computational Engine | Vehicle disembarking and embarking time |
| Schedule capacity | TCQSM: Equation 9-6 | Capacity on the route’s maximum load segment = vessel capacity × frequency × peak-hour factor |
| Passenger facility holding capacity and throughput | TCQSM, Chapter 10 | Doorway flow rates (Exhibit 10-25), number of required ticket vending machines (Equation 10-1), fare gate capacity (Exhibit 10-27), pedestrian flow/LOS (Equation 10-5) |
| Average park-and-ride discharge rate | Habib et al. 1980 | Average rate of vehicles exiting a terminal from the park and ride, based on passenger volume, walk time from the vessel, and average auto occupancy |
| Terminal seating requirements | Habib et al. 1980 | Method for estimating seating requirements based on service frequency |
| Vehicle facility holding capacity requirements | Habib et al. 1980 | Required holding lane capacity based on number of routes, destinations, and vessel capacity |
Note: LOS = level of service.
Table 3. Ferry capacity quantitative procedures included in this report.
| Capacity Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Passenger-Only Ferries | |
| Equation 1: Calculating Operating Margin | Estimates the time needed to account for typical delays and longer-than-average dwell times |
| Equation 2: Passenger Boarding Station Throughput | Estimates the passenger throughput of a given vessel boarding station |
| Vehicle Ferries | |
| Equation 3: Using AEU to Calculate Vehicle Capacity of the Vessel | Applies AEUs to calculate the number of standard-sized vehicles that can be carried on a vessel |
| Equation 4: Estimating Vehicles Left Behind | Estimates vehicles left behind at the terminal |
| Equation 5: Sizing Vehicle Fare Collection Facilities | Estimates the number of toll booths needed to process vehicles at a targeted rate |