Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions (2023)

Chapter: Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions

Previous Chapter: Appendix A: Examples of Functional Criteria in the Social Security Administration's Adult Listing of Impairments
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.

Appendix B

Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions

Functional Tests for Stroke

Name of TestArea of Assessment (Specific Conditions)International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) DomainLevel of Evidence
6-Minute Walk TestTests aerobic capacity and endurance (arthritis/joint, MS, pain, PD/neuro; SCI; stroke)Activity4
Berg Balance ScaleObjective balance scale (14 items, predetermined tests) [NINDS CDE; peds, stroke, SCI, CP, MS, exploratory for aneurysm and subarachnoid hemorrhage)Body structures and function4
Dynamic Gait IndexClinical tool to assess gait, balance, fall risk; likelihood of falling [NINDS CDE, sport-related concussion, ALS, MS, PD/neuro, stroke, vestibular]Activity4
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor PerformanceStroke-specific, performance-based assessment of motor function, balance, sensation, joint function [stroke recovery]Body Structures and Function4
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.
Name of TestArea of Assessment (Specific Conditions)International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) DomainLevel of Evidence
Functional ReachAscertaining dynamic balance (also used in SCI), vestibular function, functional mobility [NINDS CDE, PD/neuro, SCI, stroke, vestibular, CP w/supplement]Body Structures and Function4
Motor Activity LogQuality and amount of movement of paretic arm [stroke]Body Structures and Function4
Stroke Impact ScaleSelf report questionnaire; evaluates disability and HRQOL after strokeParticipation4
Timed Up and GoMobility, balance, walking ability, fall risk in older adults [arthritis, joint conditions, CP, MS, PD, SCI, Stroke, Vestibular]Activity4
10-Meter Walk TestFunctional mobility, gait, vestibular [BI, amputation, MS, PD, SCI, Stroke]Activity4
Modified Ashworth ScaleSpasticity/antispasticity drugs [MS, SCI, CP, ALS, peds]Body Structures and Function3
NIH Stroke ScaleQuantifies stroke; 15-item neuro exam; eval effect of acute stroke on consciousness, language, neglect, visual field cut, extraocular movement, motor, ataxia, dysarthria, sensation) [stroke recovery]Participation3
Activity Balance Confidence ScaleBalance, vestibular function, mobility [MS, PD, stroke, vestibular]Participation3
5 Times Sit to Standfunctional mobility, strength [CP, PD, stroke, vestibular]Body Structures and Function3
Modified Rankin Scale Score (mRS)measures degree of disability/dependence in daily activities after stroke [BI, stroke recovery]
Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)balance [BI, CP, MS, PD/neuro, stroke]

SOURCE: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures; APTA condition specific task forces.

NOTES: ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; BI = Barthel Index; CDE = Common Data Elements; CP = Cerebral Palsy; HRQOL = health-related quality of life; MS = multiple sclerosis; NINDS = National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; PD = Parkinson’s Disease; SCI = spinal cord injury.

Levels of Evidence: 4 = highly recommended; the outcome measure has excellent psychometric properties and clinical utility; 3 = recommended; the outcome measure has good psycho-

Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.

metric properties and good clinical utility; 2 = unable to recommend at this time; there is insufficient information to support a recommendation of this outcome measure; 1 = not recommended; the outcome measure has poor psychometric properties and/or poor clinical utility.

Functional Tests for Spinal Cord Injury

Name of TestArea of Assessment [Specific Conditions]ICF DomainLevel of Evidence
International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ASIA Impairment Scale)Classifies motor and sensory impairment [SCI]
AIS Classifications: AIS A (complete absence of motor or sensory function); AIS B (incomplete sensory function); AIS C and D (incomplete motor function); and AIS E (no detectable neurological deficits).
Body Structures and Function4
6-Minute Walk TestFor incomplete motor AIS C and D [see above]Activity4
10-Meter Walk TestFor incomplete motor AIS C and D [see above]Activity4
Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI, WISCI II)For acute motor incomplete AIS C and D [SCI]Activity4
TUGFor acute and subacute motor incomplete AIS C and D for chronic issues lasting >6 mo [see above]Activity4
World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)For motor incomplete and complete chronic issues lasting >6moParticipation4
Manual Muscle TestMuscle strength and function [ALS, NMD, MD, CP, SMA, SCI]Body Structures and Function3
Spinal Cord Independence Measures (SCIM-III)ADLs, coordination, mobility, incontinence, respiratory function [SCI]Activity3
Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Inventory (SCI-FAI)Walking/functional mobility in ambulatory [SCI]Activity3
Wheelchair Users Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI)Self-report, upper extremity function and pain [SCI]Body Structures and Function3
Capabilities of the Upper Extremity (CUE)Upper extremity functional limitations [SCI]
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.

SOURCE: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures; APTA condition specific task forces.

NOTES: AIS = ASIA Impairment Scale; ASIA = American Spinal Injury Association; ADL = Activities of daily living; ALS = Amyotropic lateral sclerosis; CP = Cerebral Palsey; MD = Muscular Dystrophy; NMD = Neuromuscular disorder; SCI = Spinal cord injury; SMA = Spinal muscular atrophy.

Levels of Evidence: 4 = highly recommended; the outcome measure has excellent psychometric properties and clinical utility; 3 = recommended; the outcome measure has good psychometric properties and good clinical utility; 2 = unable to recommend at this time; there is insufficient information to support a recommendation of this outcome measure; 1 = not recommended; the outcome measure has poor psychometric properties and/or poor clinical utility.

Functional Tests for Multiple Sclerosis

Name of TestArea of Assessment [Specific Conditions]ICF DomainLevel of Evidence
EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale) and Kurtzke Functional Systems Score (FSS)Coordination, gait, mental health, vision/perception [MS]
EDSS scale ranges from 0 to 10 in 0.5 unit increments that represent higher levels of disability. EDSS steps 1.0 to 4.5 refer to people with MS who are able to walk without any aid and is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems (pyramidal, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, bowel and bladder function, visual function, cerebral functions, other). EDSS steps 5.0 to 9.5 are defined by the impairment to walking.
12-Item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12)For EDSS level of disability from 0 to 7.5; Gait [MS]Activity4
6-Minute Walk TestFor EDSS level of disability from 0 to 5.5 [see above]Activity4
9-Hole Peg TestFor EDSS level of disability 0–7.5; Measures finger dexterity [BI, stroke recovery]Activity4
Timed 25-Foot WalkFor EDSS level of disability 0–7.5Activity4
TUG with Cognitive and ManualFor EDSS level of disability 0–7.5 [see above]Activity4
Berg Balance ScaleFor EDSS level of disability 0–7.5 [see above]Body Structures and Function4
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.
Name of TestArea of Assessment [Specific Conditions]ICF DomainLevel of Evidence
Box and Block TestFor all EDSS levels of disability; ADLs, coordination, dexterity, upper extremity function [BI, limb loss, MS, pain, PD/neuro, stroke]Activity3
Dynamic Gait IndexFor EDSS level of disability 0–5.5; balance, functional mobility, gait [NINDS CDE; sports-related concussion, ALS]Activity3

SOURCE: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures; APTA condition specific task forces.

NOTES: ALS = Amyotropic lateral sclerosis; BI = Barthel Index; MS = multiple sclerosis; NINDS CDE = National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Elements.

Levels of Evidence: 4 = highly recommended; the outcome measure has excellent psychometric properties and clinical utility; 3 = recommended; the outcome measure has good psychometric properties and good clinical utility; 2 = unable to recommend at this time; there is insufficient information to support a recommendation of this outcome measure; 1 = not recommended; the outcome measure has poor psychometric properties and/or poor clinical utility.

Functional Tests for Parkinson’s Disease

Name of TestArea of Assessment [Specific Conditions]ICF DomainLevel of Evidence
UPDRS (Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale) RevMeasure severity and progression PD
Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scaleProgression of PD; staging of the functional disability associated with Parkinson’s disease.
Stage 1: Unilateral involvement only usually with minimal or no functional disability.
Stage 2: Bilateral or midline involvement without impairment of balance.
Stage 3: Bilateral disease; mild to moderate disability with impaired postural reflexes; physically independent.
Stage 4: Severely disabling disease; still able to walk or stand unassisted.
Stage 5: Confinement to bed or wheelchair unless aided.
6-Minute Walk Test[see above]Activity4
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.
Name of TestArea of Assessment [Specific Conditions]ICF DomainLevel of Evidence
Functional Gait AssessmentFor H&Y score I–IV; Postural stability, ability to perform motor tasks while walking (mod of Dynamic Gait Index) [PD/neuro, SCI, stroke, vestibular]Activity4
10-Meter Walk TestFor H&Y score I-III [see above]Activity4
Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Rev (MDS-UPDRS revision)Comprehensive assessment of burden of PD [PD]Participation4
Mini Balance Evaluation Systems TestFor H&Y scores I-IV; Balance, mobility [BI, MS, PD/Neuro, stroke, vestibular]Activity4
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)For H&Y scores I–IV; cognition [cardiac, PD/neuro, stroke; Huntington’s disease, mitochondrial disease, PD, stroke, epilepsy, aneurysm, subarachnoid hemorrhage supplements]Activity4
Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39For all H&Y scoresParticipation4
2-Minute Walk TestFor H&Y scores I–IV; aerobic capacity, mobility [BI, limb loss, MS, pulmonary, SCI, stroke]Activity3
9-Hole Peg TestFor H&Y scores I–IV; QO [PD/neuro]Activity3
Freezing of Gait QuestionnaireFor H&Y scores II–IV [PD]Activity3
Fatigue Severity ScaleFor H&Y scores I–III [cancer, MS, PD/neuro, stroke, SCI]Body Structures and Function3

SOURCE: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures; APTA condition specific task forces.

NOTES: BI = Barthel Index; MS = multiple sclerosis; PD = Parkinson’s disease; SCI = Spinal cord injury.

Levels of Evidence: 4 = highly recommended; excellent psychometrics in target population AND excellent clinical utility; 3 = Recommended; good psychometrics in target population AND good clinical utility; 2 = Reasonable to use, but limited study in target group; good or excellent psychometric data demonstrated in at least one population, but insufficient study in target population to support a stronger recommendation; good clinical utility; no negative psychometric data; 1 = Do not recommend; poor psychometrics OR limited clinical utility (extensive testing time, unusual or expensive equipment, ongoing costs to administer, etc.)

Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.

Functional Tests for Traumatic Brain Injury

Name of TestArea of Assessment [Specific Conditions]ICF DomainLevel of Evidence
Coma Recovery Scale-RevisedCognition, language, vision/perception, communication, functional mobility [NINDS CDE; BI]Body Structures and Function4
High Level Mobility Assessment (HiMAT)For complete to mild independence—functional mobility [BI, PD/neuro, pediatrics, sports medicine]Activity4
6-Minute Walk TestFor complete to mild independence [see above]Activity3
Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI)[BI, MS, vestibular]Body Structures and Function3
Functional Assessment Measure (FAM)For complete independence through severe dependence; 12 items added to FIM [BI, MS, stroke]Activity3
Berg Balance Scale[see above]Body Structures and Function3
Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI)Participation3
Rancho Los Amigos Levels of Cognitive FunctionPattern of recovery after BI [BI]Body Structures and Function3

SOURCE: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures; APTA condition specific task forces.

NOTES: BI = Barthel Index; FIM = functional independence measure; MS = multiple sclerosis; NINDS CDE = National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Elements; PD = Parkinson’s disease.

Levels of Evidence: 4 = highly recommended; the outcome measure has excellent psychometric properties and clinical utility; 3 = recommended; the outcome measure has good psychometric properties and good clinical utility; 2 = reasonable to use, but limited study in target group; the outcome measure has good or excellent psychometric properties and clinical utility in a related population, but insufficient study in target population to support higher recommendation; 1 = do not recommend; the outcome measure has poor psychometric properties and/or poor clinical utility.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.

Functional Tests for Vestibular Dysfunction

DiagnosisName of TestArea of Assessment [Specific Conditions]ICF DomainLevel of Evidence
AcuteDGI[see above]Activity3 & 4
Dix-Hall Pike ManeuverBenign paroxysmal positional vertigo [BI, vestibular]Body Structures and Function3 & 4
ChronicDGIActivity3 & 4
FGAActivity3 & 4
Dix-Hall PikeBody Structure and Function3 & 4
Dizziness Handicap InventoryParticipation3 & 4
CentralDGIActivity3 & 4
FGAActivity3 & 4
Dizziness Handicap InventoryParticipation3 & 4
BPPVDix–HallpikeBody Structure and Function3 & 4
Dizziness Handicap InventoryParticipation3 & 4
OtherDizziness Handicap InventoryParticipation3 & 4

SOURCE: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures; APTA condition specific task forces.

NOTES: BI = Barthel Index.

Levels of Evidence: 4 = Highly Recommended; this outcome measure has excellent psychometric properties and clinical utility, AND this measure is free or reasonably accessible to the broad community of providers; 3 = Recommended; this outcome measure has good psychometric properties and good clinical utility, OR this measure has excellent psychometric properties and clinical utility; however, it is not free and may require access to specialized testing equipment that is beyond the means of many clinicians or clinics; 2 = Reasonable to Recommend at this time; This measure has adequate to good psychometric properties and clinical utility; however, it is not free and may require access to specialized testing equipment that is beyond the means of many clinicians or clinics, OR this measure has been validated in other patient populations but not in persons with vestibular deficits OR this measure has only adequate clinical utility; 1 = Not Recommended; this outcome measure has poor psychometric properties, OR this measure has poor clinical utility.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.
Page 227
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.
Page 228
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.
Page 229
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.
Page 230
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.
Page 231
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.
Page 232
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.
Page 233
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Selected Functional Assessments for Debilitating Neurologic Conditions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Advances in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Disabling Physical Health Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26941.
Page 234
Next Chapter: Appendix C: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members
Subscribe to Emails from the National Academies
Stay up to date on activities, publications, and events by subscribing to email updates.