TWSIs have a broad range of potential applications for guiding pedestrians at a variety of motor vehicle, bicycle, and at-grade rail crossings. In most street applications, pedestrians with vision disabilities follow a path primarily by staying within or following detectable edges, such as the edge of a sidewalk next to a landscape buffer or the vertical face of a curb. However, the use of curb ramps and other treatments to serve people using wheeled devices removes the detectable edges. TWSIs can help pedestrians with vision disabilities identify the appropriate pedestrian path where detectable edges are not provided or where they may be confusing, misleading, or insufficient.
TWSIs can help pedestrians with vision disabilities identify the following:
When developing a design that will use different TWSIs, DWSs should be positioned first because they serve a critical and standardized warning function. PROWAG (36 CFR Part 1190) sections R205 and R305 provide specific guidance on the use of DWSs. In crossing applications, DWSs should always be installed in pairs. The first DWS of a pair marks the beginning of an area that may be hazardous to a person walking, such as the boundary before stepping into a motor vehicle or bicycle lane or into the space within or next to a rail crossing. The second DWS of the pair marks the end of the hazardous area. The analogy of open and closed parentheses may be useful in understanding their function.
TWDs should be positioned next, as these serve an important role in defining the boundary between adjacent bicycle and pedestrian facilities without horizontal or vertical separation between them.
After DWSs and TWDs have been positioned, TDIs can be positioned to provide guidance for any of the following purposes:
TDIs are used in three basic configurations in crossing applications:
This section presents several potential applications of TWSIs related to crossings. These are intended to illustrate some of the more commonly anticipated applications; they are not intended to encompass all possible applications.
Midblock crossings and crossings at roundabouts and channelized turn lanes come in a variety of configurations, with or without islands that are integral to the crossing. However, each share a common feature of having a crossing that may be in an unexpected location, such as some distance away from the corner of an intersection or between intersections.
For curb ramps along sidewalks away from intersection corners, there are at least three common configurations:
Sidewalk alert bars, used to inform pedestrians with vision disabilities about the location of midblock and roundabout crossings, should extend across the full width of the sidewalk. They should be 24 in. (61.0 cm) wide to minimize the likelihood of a person stepping over the bars and missing them. Sidewalk alert bar TDIs can be combined with alignment bar TDIs such that the bars of both are perpendicular to the crossing direction so they also provide an accurate cue for alignment. Crosswalk markings should be wide enough to encompass the path demarcated by the alignment bar TDIs. The alignment of bars parallel to the sidewalk maximizes the ability for people with wheelchairs to move smoothly between the bars.
Figures 26 and 27 illustrate two major variations in the placement of alignment bar TDIs: either behind the DWS on the ramp slope, or on the ramp flare next to the DWS. Research is inconclusive on a best placement method, and both methods appear viable. Advantages of placement of alignment bar TDIs on the curb ramp slope behind the DWS include:
However, a major disadvantage of alignment bar TDI placement on the ramp slope is on narrow curb ramps, or curb ramps that are 4–5 ft (1.2–1.5 m) wide. In these cases, a 3-ft (0.9 m) desirable clear width cannot be provided to allow a person with a mobility disability to traverse the ramp without also traversing the alignment bar TDI. This creates an additional rough surface that cannot be avoided through careful wheel placement. For narrow ramps, the placement of alignment bar TDIs next to the DWS has been shown to provide adequate alignment cues for people with vision disabilities.
The use of TWSIs in islands depends on the width of the island in the direction of pedestrian travel. If the width of the island at the pedestrian crossing is less than 6 ft (1.8 m), or if the island is painted, the island cannot be treated as a pedestrian refuge and no DWSs should be placed on it. For islands wide enough to be treated as a pedestrian refuge, the use of alignment bars in addition to DWSs depends on the width of the island. Two common configurations are:
Alignment bars are only needed in islands where the crossing is not perpendicular to the curbline and detectable warning. If alignment bars are used at islands, there should be a gap of 2 ft (0.6 m) behind the bars aligned with the crossing of interest so there is a discriminable
separation between bars used for different crossings. Because of this need, some islands that are wide enough for DWSs—and thus able to serve as a pedestrian refuge—are too narrow to also have alignment bars. For median islands between traffic in opposing directions, the minimum dimension is 8 ft (2.4 m). For channelizing islands between traffic in the same direction, the minimum dimension is 10 ft (3 m). The larger dimension for channelizing islands is needed because the alignment bars are on the same (downstream) side of the crossing and need to have a minimum 2-ft (0.6 m) gap between the two sets of alignment bars. In all cases, the alignment bars are preferentially on the downstream side of the crossing.
Figure 31 shows the case where a raised median of sufficient width for pedestrian refuge is located between opposing motor vehicle lanes. In each case, the alignment bars are located on the downstream side from the oncoming vehicular conflict. The alignment bars are only needed if the median cut-through is at an angle to the street crossing because the vertical curb face in the cut-through would provide a misleading alignment for crossing.
Figure 32 shows an example of adjacent bicycle and pedestrian facilities on the same grade and separated horizontally from the adjacent motor vehicle lane by a raised median. In this application, a TWD is provided between the bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Because the direction of bicycle traffic is the same as that of the adjacent motor vehicle lane, the alignment bars are on the same (downstream) side at each crossing point. TDI alignment squares are not needed if the crossings are perpendicular to the curb.
Crossing applications at intersection corners have a variety of curb ramp configurations:
Bicycle ramps are sometimes used at roundabouts and other locations where a transition is desired between separated bicycle and pedestrian facilities and shared bicycle-pedestrian
facilities. Bicycle ramps are intended only for use by bicyclists and are not intended for use as a pedestrian curb ramp. A 12-in.-wide (30.5 cm) guide strip in the shape of a stretched-out Z is used to guide a pedestrian past the bicycle ramp. Figure 39 illustrates this application at a roundabout where an on-street bicycle lane transitions to a shared-use path. Further examples can be found in Kittelson & Associates, Inc. et al. (2023).
Pedestrian crossings of rail tracks come in a variety of configurations. Two of the more common applications are: