Completed
The study addresses four broad areas, risk analysis, flood insurance, risk reduction, and risk communication, regarding how levees are considered in the NFIP. Specific issues within these areas include current risk analysis and mapping procedures behind accredited and non-accredited levees, flood insurance pricing and the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement, mitigation options to reduce risk for communities with levees, flood risk communication efforts, and the concept of shared responsibility.
Featured publication
Consensus
·2013
The Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration (FIMA) manages the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which is a cornerstone in the U.S. strategy to assist communities to prepare for, mitigate against, and recover from flood disasters. The NFIP...
View details
Description
An ad hoc committee will examine current FEMA treatment of levees within the National Flood Insurance Program, and provide advice on how those levee-related policies and activities could be improved. The study will address the following topics regarding how levees are considered in the NFIP:
1) risk analysis;
2) flood insurance;
3) risk reduction;
4) risk communication.
More specifically, within this framework the committee will consider the following key issues and topics:
1 RISK ANALYSIS
· Current risk analysis and mapping procedures and guidelines of levees implemented to determine risk premium rate zones for flood insurance purposes.
· Existing Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA) and their corresponding risk premium rates for areas behind accredited and non-accredited levees.
· Existing requirements for levee accreditation under 44 CFR 65.10.
2 FLOOD INSURANCE
· Flood insurance pricing options for areas behind levees.
· Direct annualized flood loss estimates for residential and commercial structures behind levees.
· Waiving mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements for areas behind accredited levees.
3 RISK REDUCTION
· Floodplain management, building standards, and land use practices employed behind levees across the nation.
· Engineered overtopping and breaches as a risk reduction or mitigation measure for levee systems.
· Existing and proposed levee-related grants and personal assistance policies. How can communities maximize benefits and reduce risks by using these?
· Mitigation options for communities with levees to help offset risks as investments grow in them and in areas behind levees
4 RISK COMMUNICATION
· Existing FEMA levee outreach activities, programs, and material.
· The concept of “shared responsibility” for flood risk management and how it might be promoted.
· Incentives for communities to participate in mitigation activities that reduce levee-related risks.
· Non-regulatory products that can complement regulatory products in terms of risk communication.
The study and report will examine the efficacy of these practices and policies, make observations regarding levee policies, and analyze options for improving FEMA's treatment of levees within the National Flood Insurance Program. All conclusions and recommendations will be grounded in physical and social science and engineering concepts and evidence.
Contributors
Committee
Chair
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Sponsors
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Staff
Laura Helsabeck
Lead
Major units and sub-units
Division on Earth and Life Studies
Lead
Water Science and Technology Board
Lead