TABLE E.1 Avobenzone
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute or Short Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Phaeodactylum tricornutum | SW | Population growth rate | 72-h EC50 | 9,450 | 2 | Vieira Sanches et al., 2021 | Highest exposure was 10,000 μg/L, nominal |
| Raphidocelis subcapitata | FW | Population growth rate | 96-h EC50 | > 55 | 1 | ECHA | Tested as saturated solution, measured exposure | |
| Invertebrate | Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | > 30 | 1 | ECHA | Used filtrate (5μM) of 100 mg/L; measured concentration 0-h 0.194 mg/L; 48-h < 0.04 mg/L (i.e., below LOD) thus decreased over exposure time |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 1,950 | 2 | Park et al., 2017 | Nominal conc.; DMSO 0.0001% | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 1,200 | 2 | Boyd et al., 2021 | DMSO 0.1%; Used both controls. Cite following OECD guidelines for Daphnia Treatment conc 0.2, 2, 20 and 200 μg/L. | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | 6,800 | 2 | Boyd et al., 2021 | DMSO 0.1%; used both controls; cited following OECD guidelines for Daphnia treatment conc 0.2, 2, 20 and 200 μg/L | |
| Balanus amphitrite | SW | Immobilization | 24-h EC50 | > 10,000 | 2 | Tsui et al., 2019 | DMSO 0.01% | |
| Fish | Cyprinus carpio | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | > 30 | 2 | ECHA | 10-fold dilution series of filtrate (5 μm) of 100 mg/L, measured below LOD 40 μg/L; concentrations less than 80% of initial concentration |
| Chronic or Long Term | ||||||||
| Invertebrate | Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction; body length; daily immobilization | 21-d NOEC | ≥ 3 | 1 | ECHA | Tested at maximal solubility; DMF solvent used; flow-through system; no effect observed |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 21-d NOEC | 20 | 1 | Boyd et al., 2021 | Noted no survival at 150 μg/L at 7-d | |
| Chironomus riparius (sediment-water test) | FW | Mortality | 28-d NOEC | ≥ 50,000 μg/kg DW | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | Nominal | |
| Chironomus riparius (sediment-water test) | FW | Reproduction (# clutches, # eggs per egg mass, mean emergence time, Sex ratio) | 28-d NOEC | ≥ 50,000 μg/kg DW | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | Nominal | |
| Lumbriculus variegatus (sediment-water test) | FW | Biomass. (#worms/replicate) | 28-d NOEC | ≥ 50,000 μg/kg DW | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | Nominal | |
| Melanoides tuberculate (sediment-water test) | FW | Reproduction (# embryos per snail) | 28-d NOEC | ≥ 50,000 μg/kg DW | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | Nominal | |
| Potamopyrgus antipodarum (sediment-water test) | FW | Reproduction Mean # embryos per snail | 56-d NOEC | ≥ 50,000 μg/kg DW | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | Nominal | |
| Invertebrate (Coral) | Stylophora pistillata | SW | Photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) | 35-d NOEC | 87 | 2 | Fel et al., 2019 | Unfiltered natural seawater used; measured concentrations; likely non-soluble fraction included |
| Fish | Danio rerio (embryo) (sediment-water test) | FW | Mortality | 48-h NOEC | 100,000 μg/kg DW | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | Nominal |
TABLE E.2 Dioxybenzone
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute or Short Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Population growth rate | 72-h EC50 | 1,270 | 1 | ECHA | Measured geometric mean |
| Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Biomass | 72-h EC50 | 907 | 1 | ECHA | Measured geometric mean | |
| Invertebrate | Balanus amphitrite | SW | Immobilization | 24-h EC50 | 2,200 | 2 | Tsui et al., 2019 | DMSO 0.01% |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 4,270 | 1 | ECHA | 21.1% of filtrate at 100 mg/L | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 3,550 | 1 | Liu et al., 2015 | DMSO solvent < 0.1%; test concentration range was not defined | |
| Dugesia japonica | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | 4,400 | 1 | Li, 2012 | Solute: ISO water | |
| Dugesia japonica | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 3,300 | 1 | Li, 2012 | ||
| Fish | Danio rerio | FW | Mortality | 24-h LC50 | 4,494.2 (18.4 μM) | 2 | Meng et al., 2020 | DMSO solvent did not exceed 0.1%; hatching delayed at all concentrations and time points, NOEC not determined; was stable via measuring over 96h; dose: 1-5 μM for 96 h; reported only a DMSO control |
| Danio rerio | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 1,147.9 (4.7 μM) | 2 | Meng et al., 2020 | ||
| Danio rerio | FW | Hatching delay | 48-h LOEC | 2,44.5 (1 μM) | 2 | Meng et al., 2020 | ||
| Oryzias latipes (7-dph larvae) | FW | Mortality | 24-h LC50 | 3,529 (14.45 μM) | 1 | Thia et al., 2020 | DMSO solvent at 0.0125%; static exposure; solvent control used as a blank control 1–50 uM (comparing UVFs in paper); cited OECD and Taiwan guidelines; concentrations were based on 3–4 range finding test | |
| Oryzias latipes (7-dph larvae) | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 395.6 (1.62 μM) | 1 | Thia et al., 2020 | ||
| Chronic or Long Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Population growth rate | 72-h EC10 | 1,040 | 1 | ECHA | Measured geometric mean |
| Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Biomass | 72-h EC10 | 549 | 1 | ECHA | Measured geometric mean | |
| Invertebrate (coral) | Pocillopora damicornis (adult nubbins) | SW | Bleaching | 1-14d NOEC | 100 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | Methanol solvent at 2 μl/10ml (0.02%); included range finder experiments; Used blank and solvent controls; 0.10–1000 μg/L in filtered natural seawater; measured different endpoints for the 2 coral species; measured concentrations for treatments; indicates neither control impacted coral larvae or nubbins |
| Pocillopora damicornis (adult nubbins) | SW | Mortality | 14-d NOEC | 100 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | Nominal conc reported, but did have analytical measurements in supplement | |
| Pocillopora damicornis (larvae) | SW | Larval settlement | 14-d no effect | No effect | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (adult nubbin) | SW | Bleaching | 14-d LOEC | 100 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (adult nubbin) | SW | Bleaching | 14-d NOEC | 10 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (adult nubbin) | SW | Mortality | 6-d LOEC | 100 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (adult nubbin) | SW | Mortality | 6-d NOEC | 10 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (larvae) | SW | Larval settlement | 14-d EC50 | 539.1 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (larvae) | SW | Larval settlement | 14-d NOEC | 1 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (larvae) | SW | Larval settlement | 14-d LOEC | 10 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (larvae) | SW | Bleaching | 14-d LOEC | 250 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (larvae) | SW | Mortality | 14-d LC50 | ≥ 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seriatopora caliendrum (larvae) | SW | Mortality | LOEC | 50 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Pocillopora damicornis (larvae) | SW | Bleaching | 14-d LOEC | > 1,000 | He et al., 2019c | |||
| Pocillopora damicornis (larvae) | SW | Mortality | 14-d LOEC | > 1,000 | He et al., 2019c |
TABLE E.3 Homosalate
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute or Short Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Population growth rate | 72-h EC50 | > 8,900 | 1 | ECHA | No solvent used; measured geometric mean; followed OECD 201 |
| Invertebrate | Balanus amphitrite | SW | Immobilization | 24-h EC50 | > 10,000 | 2 | Tsui et al., 2019 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.01% |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | > 100,000 | 1 | ECHA | Nominal concentrations used as saturated solution | |
| Fish | Danio rerio | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | > 82,000 | 1 | ECHA | Measured concentration |
TABLE E.4 Octinoxate
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute or Short Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Chlorella vulgaris | FW | Growth inhibition | 72-h IC50 | ≥ 1,000 | 2 | Pablos et al., 2015 | Used acetone solvent at 0.5% |
| Chlorella vulgaris | FW | Growth inhibition | 72-h NOEC | ≥ 1,000 | 2 | Pablos et al., 2015 | ||
| Desmodesmus subspicatus | FW | Growth inhibition | 72-h IC10 | 70 | 2 | Sieratowicz et al., 2011 | Used ethanol solvent at 0.05% and cited to OECD 201 method | |
| Phaeodactylum tricornutum | FW | Population growth rate (ISO 10253) | 72-h EC50 | 2,330 | 2 | Vieira Sanches et al., 2021 | Nominal concentrations; highest exposure was 10,000 μg/L | |
| Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Growth inhibition | 72-h EC50 | 1,800 | 2 | Molins-Delgado et al., 2016 | Treatments prepared in culture medium and followed ISO 8692 guideline using Algaltoxkit F | |
| Raphidocelis subcapitata (=Selenastrum capricornutum) | FW | Growth rate | 72-h EC50 | > 100,000 | 2 | ECHA | Nominal loadings of WAF with initial concentrations above solubility limits; measurements showed that by 72-h concentrations were below detection levels indicating loss; pH increased | |
| Scenedesmus vaculoatu | FW | Growth inhibition | 24-h EC50 | 190 | 2 | Rodil et al., 2009 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.1%; included both controls and a test range of 24–400 μg/L | |
| Invertebrate | Artemia salina | SW | Mortality | 24-h LC50 | No effect | 2 | Gackowska et al., 2018 | Used the Artoxkit M test |
| Balanus amphitrite | SW | Immobilization | 24-h EC50 | > 10,000 | 2 | Tsui et al., 2019 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.01% | |
| Chironomus riparius (4th instar larvae) | FW | Mortality | 24h-LC50 | > 10,000 | 2 | Ozáez et al., 2013 | Tested with 3 nominal concentrations using ethanol solvent at 0.02%; concentrations (100, 1000, 10000 μg/L) | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | ≥ 27 | 1 | ECHA | Used OECD 202; analysis revelaed decline in exposure concentrations to < 80% during test; median value between 0-48-h was used to judge exposure | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h NOEC | ≥ 27 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 570 | 2 | Sieratowicz et al., 2011 | Used OECD 202 guideline with ethanol solvent at 0.05% | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 2,730 | 2 | Park et al., 2017 | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 3,400 | 2 | Molins-Delgado et al., 2016 | Used ISO6341 guidelines | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 2,170 | 2 | Jang et al., 2016 | Used OECD 202 guideline with methanol solvent at 0.001% | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 151.2 | 2 | Pablos et al., 2015 | Used acetone solvent at 0.1% | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | No effect | 2 | Gackowska et al., 2018 | Used Daphtoxkit F test | |
| Ficopomatus enigmaticus | SW | Percent normal larval development | 48-h EC50 | 2,810 | 2 | Vieira Sanches et al., 2021 | Used nominal concentration; 20% abnormal development in control was set as threshold; tests used approximately 300 fertilized eggs/replicate from wild-caught parents | |
| Mytilus galloprovincialis | SW | Larval development | 48-h EC50 | 3,118.19 | 2 | Paredes et al., 2014 | Used DMSO solvent at < 0.1% with nominal and measured concentrations | |
| Mytilus galloprovincialis | SW | Larval development | 48-h NOEC | 500 | 2 | Paredes et al., 2014 | ||
| Paracentrotus lividus | SW | Larval development | 48-h EC50 | 284 | 2 | Paredes et al., 2014 | ||
| Paracentrotus lividus | SW | Larval development | 48-h NOEC | 600 | 2 | Paredes et al., 2014 | ||
| Siriella armata | SW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 199.43 | 2 | Paredes et al., 2014 | ||
| Tetrahymena thermophila | FW | Growth inhibition | 24-h EC50 | > 15,000 | 2 | Gao et al., 2013 | Used DMSO solvent at <0.1% and a dose range of 1–15,000 μg/L | |
| Invertebrate (coral) | Pocillopora damicornis (adult) | SW | Mortality | 7-d LOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019b | |
| Pocillopora damicornis (adult) | SW | Visual bleaching | 7-d LOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019b | ||
| Pocillopora damicornis (adult) | SW | Zooxanthellae density | 7-d LOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019b | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (adult) | SW | Mortality | 7-d LOEC | 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019b | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (adult) | SW | Visual bleaching | 7-d LOEC | 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019b | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (adult) | SW | Zooxanthellae density | 7-d LOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019b | ||
| Fish | Cyprinus carpio | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | > 100,000 | 1 | ECHA | Used OECD 203 method; test solutions were WAF at 10 mg/L and 100 mg/L with % dilutions then filtered to yield clear solution |
| Danio rerio | FW | Mortality | 96-h NOEC | > 2,000 | 1 | Cahova et al., 2021 | Used OECD 236 with DMSO solvent at 0.01% | |
| Danio rerio | FW | Hatching | 96-h NOEC | > 2,000 | 1 | Cahova et al., 2021 |
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danio rerio | FW | Malformations | 96-h NOEC | > 2,000 | 1 | Cahova et al., 2021 | ||
| Danio rerio | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 1,216,100 | 2 | ECHA | Used OECD 203; test solutions reported to be turbid with fat-like droplets on surface; test used concentrations up to 4,640 mg/L | |
| Danio rerio | FW | Hatch rate % | 6-d NOEC | > 4,000 | 2 | Jang et al., 2016 | Used OECD 212 with methanol solvent at 0.001%; nominal concentrations included 100, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000 μg/L; EC or LC50s were not determined; supplement to paper indicates a LOEC | |
| Danio rerio | FW | Abnormal development % | 6-d LOEC | 2,000 | 2 | Jang et al., 2016 | ||
| Danio rerio | FW | Mortality | 6-d LOEC | 2,000 | 2 | Jang et al., 2016 | ||
| Danio rerio (embryos) | FW | Mortality | 48-h NOEC | ≥ 1,000,000 μg/kg DW sediment (nominal) | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | Used DIN 38415-6 protocol with 10, 100, 1,000 mg/kg sediment DW.; included sediment negative and positive controls, aqueous negative and positive controls, and a solvent control | |
| Danio rerio (embryos) | FW | Developmental anomalies | 48-h NOEC | 100,000 μg/kg DW sediment (nominal) | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | ||
| Plant | Lemna minor | FW | Dry weight | 7-d EC50 | > 60 | 1 | ECHA | Used OECD 221 guideline |
| Lemna minor | FW | Yield or growth | 7-d EC50 | > 60 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Lemna minor | FW | Frond area | 7-d EC50 | > 60 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Chronic or Long Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Chlorella sp. | FW | Growth inhibition | 8-d LOEC | 228 | 2 | Tian et al., 2021 | Used ethanol solvent at 0.01%; effects were observed at all test concentrations |
| Chlorella sp. | FW | Growth inhibition | 8-d NOEC | < 228 | 2 | Tian et al., 2021 | ||
| Raphidocelis subcapitata (=Selenastrum capricornutum) | FW | Growth rate | 72-h NOEC | 32,000 | 2 | ECHA | ||
| Invertebrate | Caenorhabditis elegans | FW (soil) | Growth (body length) | 72-h NOEC | < 290.4 | 2 | Huang et al., 2022 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.1% in culture media with E.coli food source; nominal concnetrations included 1, 5, 10, 100, and 500 μM without analytical verification in test media |
| Caenorhabditis elegans | FW (soil) | Reproduction (eggs in utero) | 72-h NOEC | 290.4 | 2 | Huang et al., 2022 | ||
| Caenorhabditis elegans | FW (soil) | Reproduction (eggs in utero) | 72-h IC50 | 3,600 | 2 | Huang et al., 2022 | ||
| Caenorhabditis elegans | FW (soil) | Reproduction (eggs in utero) | 72-h IC10 | 95.11 | 2 | Huang et al., 2022 | ||
| Caenorhabditis elegans | FW (soil) | Reproduction (brood size) | 72-h NOEC | 1452 | 2 | Huang et al., 2022 | ||
| Caenorhabditis elegans | FW (soil) | Reproduction (brood size) | 72-h LOEC | 2,904 | 2 | Huang et al., 2022 | ||
| Chironomus riparius (sediment study) | FW | Mortality | 28-d NOEC | ≥ 50,000 μg/kg DW sediment (nominal) ≥ 43,509 μg/kg DW sediment (Measured geo. Mean) | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | Used OECD 218 guideline and tested at 0.08, 0.4, 2, 10, and 50 mg/kg DW sediment | |
| Chironomus riparius (sediment study) | FW | Reproduction (# clutches, # eggs per egg mass, mean emergence time, sex ratio) | 28-d NOEC | ≥ 50,000 μg/kg DW sediment (nominal) ≥ 43,509 μg/kg DW sediment (Measured geo. Mean) | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 21-d NO-ELR | ≥60 | 1 | ECHA | Used OECD 211 guideline with a static renewal test and weekly changes |
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction | 21-d NO-ELR | ≥ 60 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Growth | 21-d NO-ELR | ≥ 60 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Total # molts | 21-d LOEC | 12 | 2 | Lambert et al., 2021 | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Delayed development (curved tail spine but recovered) | 21-d LOEC | 75 | 2 | Lambert et al., 2021 | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction | 21-d NOEC | ≥ 15 | 2 | Pablos et al., 2015 | Used acetone solvent at 0.1% | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction | 21-d NOEC | 40 | 2 | Sieratowicz et al., 2011 | Used OECD 211 guideline with ethanol solvent at 0.05% | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction | 21-d LOEC | 80 | 2 | Sieratowicz et al., 2011 | ||
| Lumbriculus variegatus | FW | Biomass. (# worms per replicate) | 28-d NOEC | ≥ 50,000 μg/kg DW sediment (nominal) | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | Used OECD 225 guideline with nominal exposure concentrations of 0.08, 0.4, 2, 10, and 50 mg/kg DW sediment and all controls | |
| ≥ 32,125 μg/kg DW sediment (measured geo mean) | ||||||||
| Melanoides tuberculata | FW | Reproduction (# embryos per snail) | 28-d NOEC | 2,000 μg/kg DW sediment (nominal); | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | ||
| Potamopyrgus antipodarum | FW | Reproduction (Mean # embryos per snail) | 56-d NOEC | 80 μg/kg DW sediment (nominal) | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | Control, solvent control used. Ethyl acetate solvent. Measured conc at beginning/end 0.00064, 0.0032, 0.016, 0.08, and 0.4 mg/kg sediment DW |
| Potamopyrgus antipodarum | FW | Reproduction (Mean # embryos per snail) | 56-d LOEC | 400 μg/kg DW sediment (nominal) 212.6 μg/kg DW sediment (measured geo mean) | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | ||
| Fish | Danio rerio | FW | Gonadal histology and hepatotoxicity | 63-d NOEC | < 46.9 | 1 | ECHA | Used OECD 234 |
| Danio rerio | FW | Gonadal histology and hepatotoxicity | 63-d LOEC | 46.9 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Danio rerio | FW | Length and weight | 63-d NOEC | < 46.9 | 1 | |||
| Danio rerio | FW | Length and weight | 63-d LOEC | 46.9 | 1 | |||
| Danio rerio | FW | Mortality | 63-d NOEC | ≥ 46.9 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Danio rerio | FW | Sex ratio | 63-d NOEC | ≥ 46.9 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Danio rerio | FW | Hatch rate | 63-d NOEC | ≥ 46.9 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Oryzias latipes (F0: 24-hpf began exposure through 154-d; mating period: 106-d-154-d) | FW | Reproduction (eggs/brood/d) | 154-d NOEC | < 50 | 1 | Lee et al., 2019 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.01%; included water and solvent controls; test involved 5 nominal concentrations including 1 w/in water solub. 0.05-5 mg/L | |
| Oryzias latipes (F0: 24-hpf began exposure through 154-d; mating period: 106-d-154-d) | FW | Reproduction (eggs/brood/d) | 154-d LOEC | 50 | 1 | Lee et al., 2019 |
TABLE E.5 Octocrylene
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute or Short Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Desmodesmus subspicatus | FW | Growth rate (OECD 201) | 72-h EC50; | > 220,000 | 2 | ECHA | Used OECD GD 23 guideline with no solvent; nominal exposure concentrations included 10, 22, 46, 100, 220 mg/L |
| Invertebrate | Balanus Amphitrite (nauplii) | SW | Immobilization | 24-h EC50 | > 10,000 | 2 | Tsui et al., 2019 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.01% 5 nominal exposure concentrations (100, 300, 1,000, 3,000, 10,000 μg/L) |
| Chironomus riparius (4th instar larvae) | FW | Survival | 24-h effect | No effect @ 10,000 | 2 | Ozáez et al., 2013 | Used ethanol solvent at 0.02%; tested nominal concentrations of 100, 1,000, 10,000 μg/L | |
| Chironomus riparius (4th instar larvae) | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 95,900 | 2 | Ozáez et al., 2016 | Used ethanol solvent at 0.02% and tested at 100, 1,000, 10,000, 100,000 μg/L nominal | |
| Chironomus riparius | FW | Hatching (eclosion) in eggs (3d) | 3-d effect | Significant reduction @ 1,000 (75% hatch cf. solvent control 87%) | 2 | Ozáez et al., 2016 | Used ethanol solvent at 0.1% with one exposure concentration of 1000 μg/L nominal | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | > 23 (measured) | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | > 100,000 | 1 | ECHA | Used OECD 202 guideline. 4 nominal concentrations (12,5, 25, 50, 100 mg/L); solutions prepared by stirring and centrifugation | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 3,180 | 2 | Park et al., 2017 | Used a modified OECD 202 guideline with 11 nominal concentrations (625-640,000μg/L); did not include analytical verifiction; particles observed at highest concentrations | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Feeding rate (inhibition) | 24-h NOEC | 50 | 2 | Pablos et al., 2015 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.01% with 5 nominal exposure concentrations with 3 greater than solubility limit | |
| Daphnia magna (<24h neonates) | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | 3,600 | 2 | Boyd et al., 2021 | LC50 concentrations based on 100–50,000 μg/L (all above solubility) | |
| Daphnia magna (<24h neonates) | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 30 | 2 | Boyd et al., 2021 | EC50 concentrations based on 20–200 μg/L | |
| Fish | Danio rerio | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | > 500 | 2 | ECHA | Used EU Method C.1. limit test with a saturated solution (one nominal concentration of 0.5 mg/L) |
| Danio rerio (embryos) | FW | Mortality | 96-h NOEC | > 250 | 2 | Cahova et al., 2021 | Used OECD embryo toxicity test with DMSO solvent at 0.01%, 6 concentrations were tested (0.1-250 μg/L); solvent and no solvent controls used | |
| Danio rerio (embryos) | FW | Hatching (percent) | 96-h NOEC | > 250 | 2 | Cahova et al., 2021 | ||
| Danio rerio (embryos) | FW | Malformation* | 96-h NOEC | > 250 | 2 | Cahova et al., 2021 | ||
| Leuciscus idus | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | > 10,000,000 | 2 | ECHA | Used DIN 38412 part 15 with 2 concentrations: 5,000 and 10,000 mg/L; undissolved chemical was observed at the bottom of aquaria and on the water surface | |
| Chronic or Long Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Desmodesmus subspicatus | FW | Growth rate (OECD 201) | 72-h NOEC | 100,000 | 2 | ECHA | Used OECD GD 23 without solvent; tested at nominal concentrations of 10, 22, 46, 100, 220 mg/L |
| Phaeodactylum tricornutum | SW | Growth inhibition (cell density) | 72-h EC20 | 13,950 | 2 | Vieira Sanches et al., 2021 | Nominal concentrations; highest test concentration was 10,000 μg/L | |
| Invertebrate | Chironomus riparius (water-sediment study) | FW | Mortality; male and female emergence time; sex ratio; # egg clutches; # eggs/mass; 3d hatch-ability | 28-d NOEC | All > 50,000; (60,000 measured) μg/kg DW | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | Used OECD TG218 with ethyl acetate solvent (amount not reported); 5 nominal sediment concentrations (0.08, 0.4, 2, 10, 50 mg/kg sediment); measured concentrations are the geometric means at the start and end of the test |
| Chironomus riparius (water-sediment study) 1st instar larvae | FW | Larval growth (length) | 10-d NOEC | 5; (1.27 measured) mg/kg WW | 2 | Campos et al., 2017a | OECD TG 218 modified method with artificial sediment; ethanol was used as a solvent to intoduce the UV filter to the sediment but was evaporated off before initiating the experiment; 3 nominal concentrations were tested (2.5, 5, 10 mg/kg sediment WW) and verification measurements revealed 0.53, 1.27, and 2.33 mg/kg WW | |
| Chironomus riparius (water-sediment study) 1st instar larvae | FW | Emergence | 28-d NOEC | > 10 (2.33 measured) mg/kg WW | 2 | Campos et al., 2017a | ||
| Chironomus riparius (water-sediment study) 1st instar larvae | FW | Development time (males) | 28-d NOEC | > 10 (2.33 measured) mg/kg WW | 2 | Campos et al., 2017a | ||
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chironomus riparius (water-sediment study) 1st instar larvae | FW | Development time (females) | 28-d NOEC | > 10 (2.33 measured) mg/kg WW | 2 | Campos et al., 2017a | ||
| Chironomus riparius (water-sediment study) 1st instar larvae | FW | Weight imagoes (males) | 28-d NOEC | > 10 (2.33 measured) mg/kg WW | 2 | Campos et al., 2017a | ||
| Chironomus riparius (water-sediment study) 1st instar larvae | FW | Weight imagoes (females) | 28-d NOEC | > 10 (2.33 measured) mg/kg WW | 2 | Campos et al., 2017a | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction | 21-d NOEC | 3.1 (2.66 measured) | 1 | ECHA | Used OECD 211 (semi-static, daily renewal) with DMF solvent (<83 ul/L); nominal and analytical verification of time weighted means for 5 conc. (3.1, 6.3, 12.5, 25, 50 μg/L) | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction (OECD 211) | 21-d NOEC | 2.66 | 2 | ECHA | Used OECD 211 using DMF solvent (<83 ul/L); with 5 concentrations with one just above solubility limit | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction OECD 211, 3d renewal) | 21-d NOEC | > 50 | 2 | Pablos et al., 2015 | Used 0ECD 211 with DMSO solvent (0.01%); tested 5 concentrations | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Body length | 21-d effect | No effect | 2 | Pablos et al., 2015 | ||
| Lumbriculus variegatus (water-sediment test) | FW | Number worms | 28-d NOEC | > 39 | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | Used ethyl acetate in a sediment test with 5 nominal concentrations (0.08, 0.4, 2, 10, 50 mg/kg DW); analytical verification provided for mean measured low and high dose (0.065, 39 mg/kg DW) | |
| Lumbriculus variegatus (water-sediment test) | FW | Biomass | 28-d NOEC | > 39 | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | ||
| Melanoides tuberculata (adult; 1.8-2 mm height) (water-sediment test) | FW | Growth (fresh weight) | 28-d NOEC | > 43 | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a |
| Melanoides tuberculata (adult; 1.8-2 mm height) (water-sediment test) | FW | Reproduction (# embryos in brood pouch) | 28-d NOEC | > 43 | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | ||
| Potamopyrgus antipodarum (water-sediment test) | FW | Reproduction (# embryos per snail) | 56d-NOEC | > 50 mg/kg DW | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012a | Sediment test employing ethyl acetate as a solvent; testing included 7 nominal concentrations from 0.00064 to 50 mg/kg DW) | |
| Invertebrate (coral) | Stylophora pistillata (adult fragments) | SW | Photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) | 35-d NOEC | 5,000 (1,318 measured) | 2 | Fel et al., 2019 | Used methanol solvent at 0.0067% with 3 test concentrations (above solubility limits) and analytical verification |
| Pocillopora damicornis (adult fragments) | SW | Mortality | 7-d LOEC | ≥ 1,000 (784 measured) | 2 | He et al., 2019b | Used methanol solvent at 0.01% in static test; analytical verification on unfiltered samples revealed decline in exposure concentrations over time so the mean measured values were used | |
| Pocillopora damicornis (adult fragments) | SW | Visual bleaching | 7-d LOEC | ≥ 1,000 (784 measured) | 2 | He et al., 2019b | ||
| Pocillopora damicornis (adult fragments) | SW | Zooxanthella density | 7-d LOEC | ≥ 1,000 (784 measured) | 2 | He et al., 2019b | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (adult fragments) | SW | Mortality | 7-d LOEC | ≥ 1,000 (831 measured) | 2 | He et al., 2019b | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (adult fragments) | SW | Visual bleaching | 7-d LOEC | ≥ 1,000 (831 measured) | 2 | He et al., 2019b | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (adult fragments) | SW | Zooxanthella density | 7-d LOEC | ≥ 1,000 (831 measured) | 2 | He et al., 2019b | ||
| Fish | Danio rerio (approx. 2 years old) | FW | Survival and hatch rate (embryo test) | 144-h effects | No effects up to 2,000 (925 measured) | 2 | Blüthgen et al., 2014 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.005%; 3 nominal concentrations were tested (100, 1,000, 2,000 μg/L) with analytical measurements indicating exposure concentrations were 69, 293, 925 μg/L |
| Danio rerio (approx. 6 months) | FW | Mortality, behavior, condition factor | 28-d effect | No effects up to 3,000 (1,249 measured) | 2 | Zhang et al., 2016 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.01%; tested with nominal concentrations of 100, 1,000, 3,000 μg/L; analytical measurements revealed exposure concentrations of 29, 506, and 1249 μg/L | |
| Danio rerio (sediment – water test) | FW | Mortality | 48h-NOEC | > 1,000 mg/kg. DW | 1 | Kaiser et al., 2012 | Used an acetone solvent; tested with 3 sediment concentrations (10, 100, 1,000 mg/kg DW) | |
| Gasterosteus aculeatus (1 yo female) | FW/SW | Survival | 21-d | No effects. @ 20 (4.85 measured) | 1 | ECHA | Used OECD GD 148 with a DMF solvent; tested one concentration (20 μg/L) |
TABLE E.6 Oxybenzone
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute or Short Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Chlamydomonas reinhardtii | FW | Growth inhibition | 96-h EC50 | 5,220 | 2 | Esperanza et al., 2019 | Used 0.1% MeOH solvent with 10 nominal concentrations; solvent control |
| Chlamydomonas reinhardtii | FW | Growth inhibition | 10-d EC50 | 1,850 | 2 | Mao et al., 2017 | ||
| Chlorella vulgaris | FW | Growth inhibition | 96-h EC50 | 2,980 | 2 | Du et al., 2017 | Used Chinese National Standards test method used: GB/T 21805-2008; DMSO solvent used unknown volume | |
| Desmodesmus subspicatus | FW | Growth inhibition | 72-h EC50 | 1,400 | 1 | ECHA | 1993 supporting study (reliability score 2); DMF/Tween 80 solvent used 46 μl/L | |
| Desmodesmus subspicatus | FW | Growth inhibition | 72-h IC50 | 960 | 2 | Sieratowicz et al., 2011 | Used ethanol solvent at 0.05% | |
| Microcystis aeruginosa | FW | Growth inhibition | 10-d EC50 | 2,460 | 2 | Mao et al., 2017 | Used methanol solvent at 0.1%; 10 nominal concentrations; only solvent controls | |
| Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata | FW | Biomass | 72-h EbC50 | 410 | 1 | ECHA | Japanese Standard Test Related to New Chemical Substance; no solvent used | |
| Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata | FW | Growth rate | 72-h ErC50 | 670 | 1 | ECHA | Japanese Standard Test Related to New Chemical Substance; no solvent used | |
| Scenedesmus obliquuus | FW | Growth inhibition | 96-h EC50 | 3,640 | 2 | Lee et al., 2020 | Used OECD TG 201 with no details on whether a solvent was used; tested 5 nominal concentratons (100, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 μg/L); one control | |
| Invertebrate | Balanus amphitrite (nauplii) | SW | Immobilization | 24-h EC50 | > 10,000 | 2 | Tsui et al., 2019 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.01%; tested 5 concentrations; one control |
| Daphnia carinata Daphnia magna | FW FW | Mortality Immobilization | 24-h LC50 48-h EC50 | 2,180 1,670 | 1 2 | Du et al., 2019a Sieratowicz et al., 2011 | 8 concentrations (5 above solubility 8-128 mg/L); no solvent used Used ethanol solvent at 0.05%; tested 5 concentrations (one above solubility; 10 mg/L); unclear on controls used | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC10 | 10,240 | 2 | Sieratowicz et al., 2011 | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 3,030 | 2 | Jang et al., 2016 | Used Daphtox Kit F (based on OECD 202 test) with methanol solvent at 0.001%; tested 5 concentrations (1000-10,000 μg/L); solvent and non solvent controls used | |
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daphnia magna (neonates) | FW | Mobility | 48-h EC50 | 1,870 | 1 | ECHA | Used Japanese Standard Test Related to New Chemical Substance; no solvent used | |
| Daphnia magna (neonates) | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | 1,090 | 2 | Du et al., 2017 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.1%; number of test concentrations were not reported | |
| Daphnia magna (neonates) | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 2,010 | 2 | Liu et al., 2015 | ||
| Daphnia magna (neonates) | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 1,200 | 2 | Boyd et al., 2021 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.1% | |
| Daphnia magna (neonates) | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | 1,700 | 2 | Boyd et al., 2021 | ||
| Dugesia japonica (adult) | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 500 | 2 | Li, 2012 | Tested 5 concentrations | |
| Mytilus galloprovincialis (embryo) | SW | Development | 48-h EC50 | 3,472.59 | 2 | Paredes et al., 2014 | Used DMSO solvent at no more than 0.1%; 3 concentrations were tested | |
| Paracentrotus lividus | SW | Development | 48-h EC50 | 3,280 | 2 | Paredes et al., 2014 | ||
| Paracentrotus lividus | SW | Development | 48-h EC10 | 2,423 | 2 | Paredes et al., 2014 | ||
| Cassiopea frondosa (planulae) | SW | Mortality | 72-h LOEC | 228 | 2 | Fitt and Hofmann, 2020 | Tested 5 concentrations; one control | |
| Cassiopea xamachana (planulae) | SW | Mortality | 72-h LOEC | 228 | 2 | Fitt and Hofmann, 2020 | ||
| Tetrahymena thermophila | FW | Growth inhibition | 24-h EC50 | 7,544 | 2 | Gao et al., 2013 | Used DMSO solvent at max of 0.1%; 7 concentrations; one control; cell viability in top 2 concentrations showed decreased viability with time | |
| Invertebrate (coral) | Galaxea fascicularis (adult fragment) | SW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 6,150 | 1 | Conway et al., 2021 | Used methanol solvent at 100ul/L except top dose which used 200ul/L with second solvent control; included independent tests, 5 concentration definitive range, measured concentrations (dissolved, particulate), control and solvent controls; top dose nominal; concentration dependent losses in exposures over 24hr and losses during analytical processing |
| Galaxea fascicularis (adult fragment) | SW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 6,370 | 1 | Conway et al., 2021 | Static, daily renewal | |
| Galaxea fascicularis (adult fragment) | SW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 7,060 (4,450 measured) | 1 | Conway et al., 2021 |
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxea fascicularis (adult fragments) | SW | Bleaching visual | 96-h EC50 | 4,400 | 2 | Conway et al., 2021 | ||
| Galaxea fascicularis (adult fragments) | SW | Bleaching visual | 96-h EC50 | 5,350 | 2 | Conway et al., 2021 | ||
| Galaxea fascicularis (adult fragments) | SW | Bleaching visual | 96-h EC50 | 310 (measured) | 2 | Conway et al., 2021 | ||
| Galaxea fascicularis (adult fragments) | SW | Chlorophyll-a content | 96-h EC50 | 7,120 | 2 | Conway et al., 2021 | ||
| Galaxea fascicularis (adult fragments) | SW | Chlorophyll-a content | 96-h EC50 | 5,080 | 2 | Conway et al., 2021 | ||
| Galaxea fascicularis (adult fragments) | SW | Chlorophyll-a content | 96-h EC50 | 2,810 (measured) | 2 | Conway et al., 2021 | ||
| Galaxea fascicularis (adult fragments) | SW | PSII yield | 96-h EC50 | 18,630 | 2 | Conway et al., 2021 | ||
| Galaxea fascicularis (adult fragments) | SW | PSII yield | 96-h EC50 | 10,940 | 2 | Conway et al., 2021 | ||
| Galaxea fascicularis (adult fragments) | SW | PSII yield | 96-h EC50 | 4,190 (measured) | 2 | Conway et al., 2021 | ||
| Stylophora pistillata (planula) | SW | Mortality | 24-h LC50 | 799dark, 139light | 2 | Downs et al., 2016 | Used DMSO solvent at 5ul/L; preliminary log-concentration range. Static, renewal 8h | |
| Stylophora pistillata (planula) | SW | Deformity | 24-h EC50 | 137light, 49dark | 2 | Downs et al., 2016 | ||
| Fish | Danio rerio | FW | biological response index [(unhatched egg involving dead eggs + total dead larva + survival abnormal larva)/ (initial) x 100] | 48-h EC50 | 2,410 | 2 | Jang et al., 2016 | Used Daphtox Kit F based on OECD 202 test with methanol solvent at 0.001%; tested 5 concentrations (1,000-10,000 μg/L); solvent and non solvent controls used and from graphs mortality seems <10%; MeOH use at 0.001%. |
| Danio rerio (embryo) | FW | Mortality; hatch rate; deformation; length | 96-h NOEC | 0.0008 | 2 | Cormier et al., 2019 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.01% and one concentration; control and solvent control with no control mortality; study also exposed embryos/larvae to 10, 100 mg/L coated on microplastics; finding no effects except a 3h pulse exposure increase in EROD but not after 96hr exposure. |
| Danio rerio (embryos) | FW | Mortality | 96-h NOEC | > 2000 | 1 | Cahova et al., 2021 | Used OECD embryo toxicity test with DMSO solvent at 0.01%; concentration range (0.1-2000 μg/L); solvent and no solvent controls used and no mortality in either controls. | |
| Danio rerio (embryos) | FW | Hatching (percent) | 96-h NOEC | > 2000 | 1 | Cahova et al., 2021 | ||
| Danio rerio (embryos) | FW | Malformation | 96-h NOEC | > 2000 | 1 | Cahova et al., 2021 | ||
| Danio rerio (juvenile) | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 3,890 | 2 | Du et al., 2017 | Used Chinese National Standards test method GB/T 21805-2008 with DMSO solvent at unknown volume | |
| Danio rerio (juvenile) | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 20,400 | 2 | ECHA | ||
| Danio rerio (embryos) | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 18.2 μM | 2 | Meng et al., 2020 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.1%; tested 6 concentrations (1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 μM); only solvent control | |
| Danio rerio (embryos) | FW | Hatching Rate | 96-h (LOEC?) | 8 μM | 2 | Meng et al., 2020 | ||
| Oryzias latipes | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 936 | 1 | Thia et al 2020 | DMSO solvent used (0.0125%) | |
| Oryzias latipes (Juvenile) | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 3,800 | 1 | ECHA | Japanese Standard Test Related to New Chemical Substance; no solvent used, no control mortality. Other endpoints reported in bioassay section (reliability score 1) | |
| Chronic or Long Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Chlamydomonas reinhardtii | FW | Growth inhibition | 10-d EC20 | 640 | 2 | Mao et al., 2017 | Used methanol solvent at 0.1% and 10 nominal concentrations |
| Desmodesmus subspicatus | FW | Growth inhibition | 72-h IC10 | 610 | 2 | Sieratowicz et al., 2011 | Used ethanol solvent at 0.05% | |
| Desmodesmus subspicatus | FW | Growth inhibition | 72-h NOEC | 1,100 | 1 | ECHA | 1993 supporting study (reliability score 2); DMF/Tween 80 solvent used 46ul/L | |
| Microcystis aeruginosa | FW | Growth inhibition | 10-d EC20 | 1,170 | 2 | Mao et al., 2017 | Used methanol solvent at 0.1% and 10 nominal concentrations below solubility | |
| Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Biomass | 72-h NOEC | 80 | 1 | ECHA | Used Japanese Standard Test Related to New Chemical Substance; no solvent used | |
| Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Growth rate | 72-h NOEC | 180 | 1 | ECHA | Used Japanese Standard Test Related to New Chemical Substance; no solvent used | |
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invertebrate | Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction | 21-d NOEC | No effect | 2 | Pablos et al 2015 | Used acetone solvent at 0.02%; tested 5 concentrations (12.5-200 μg/L) |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Body length | 21-d NOEC | > 200 | 2 | Pablos et al 2015 | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality, molting & release of broods | 21-d | No effect | 2 | Boyd et al., 2021 | Used modified OECD 211 test with 48hr exposure and 19 day post-exposure in control water with DMSO solvent at 0.1%; tested 4 nominal concentrations (0.2-200 μg/L) | |
| Daphnia carinata (neonates) | FW | Mortality | 21-d | Effects observed | 2 | Du et al., 2019a | Tested 3 nominal concentrations (0.1, 1 and 10) with no use solvent reported; control mortality not reported; effects were not concentration dependent. | |
| Daphnia carinata (neonates) | FW | Growth & various reproductive endpoints | 21-d | No significant effects except at lowest dose for time first brood | 2 | Du et al., 2019a | ||
| Invertebrate (coral) | Pocillopora damicornis (adult nubbins) | SW | Mortality (static, no renewal) | 7-d LOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | Used methanol solvent at 200 μl/L; includes range finder and definitive tests; used lower light intensity; no renewal of exposure solutions; limited analytical showing high loss of analyte at end of experiment; solvent and no solvent controls |
| Pocillopora damicornis (adult nubbins) | SW | Zooxanthellae density | 7-d LOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Pocillopora damicornis (planula) | SW | Mortality (static, no renewal) | 14-d LOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Pocillopora damicornis (planula) | SW | Bleaching | 14-d LOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (adult nubbin) | SW | Mortality (static, no renewal) | 7-d LOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (adult nubbin) | SW | Zooxanthellae density | 7-d LOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (adult nubbin) | SW | Bleaching | 7-d LOEC | 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c |
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seriatopora caliendrum (planula) | SW | Mortality (static, no renewal) | 14-d LOEC | 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (planula) | SW | Mortality (static, no renewal) | 14-d LC50 | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (planula) | SW | Settlement | 14-d LOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (planula) | SW | Settlement | 14-d EC50 | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum (planula) | SW | Bleaching | 14-d LOEC | 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Fish | Betta splendens | FW | Mortality | 28-d NOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | Chen et al., 2016 | 3 test concentration (10, 100, 1000 μg/L; measured at 0 and 48h); solvent control (0.1% EtOH); control mortality 90%. Data determined from graphs. |
| Betta splendens | FW | Condition Factor | 28-d LOEC | 1,000 | 2 | Chen et al., 2016 | ||
| Betta splendens | FW | GSI | 28-d NOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | Chen et al., 2016 | ||
| Danio rerio | FW | Biological response index [(unhatched egg involving dead eggs + total dead larva + survival abnormal larva)/ (initial) x 100] | 48-h EC50 | 2,410 | 2 | Jang et al., 2016 | Used Daphtox Kit F test (based on OECD 202) and methanol solvent at 0.001%; tested 5 nominal concentrations (1,000-10,000 μg/L); solvent and non solvent controls used | |
| Danio rerio (adult) | FW | Weight (growth); mortality; behaviour | 14-d NOEC | 312 | 2 | Blüthgen et al 2012 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.01%; 3 nominal concentrations were tested (10, 200, 600 μg/L) and analytical measurements indicated test concentrations of 2.4, 84, 312 μg/L; employed control and solvent controls; NOECs derived from statements in text not stated by author | |
| Danio rerio (larvae) | FW | Mortality, growth | 60-d | 388 | 1 | Kinnberg et al., 2015 | ||
| Danio rerio (larvae) | FW | Mortality | 12-d | 268 | 1 | Kinnberg et al., 2015 | ||
| Oryzias latipes | FW | Hatch (%) | 21d-LOEC | 620 | 2 | Coronado et al., 2008 | Used acetone solvent at 0.1%; tested 3 nominal concentrations (10, 100, 1,000 μg/L) with supporting measurements (16, 132, 620 μg/L); control and solvent controls |
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oryzias latipes | FW | Increased hatch time | 21d-LOEC | 16 | 2 | Coronado et al., 2008 | ||
| Oryzias latipes | FW | Number eggs | 7-21-d effect | no significant decrease at 21 days | 2 | Coronado et al., 2008 | ||
| Oryzias latipes (adult) | FW | Mortality, growth | 28-d NOEC | 90 | 2 | Kim et al., 2014 | ||
| Oryzias latipes (adult) | FW | Egg production | 28-d Effect | 26 | 2 | Kim et al., 2014 | ||
| Oryzias latipes (adult) | FW | Hatching rate | 28-d Effect | 90 | Kim et al., 2014 | |||
| Oryzias latipes (juvenile) | FW | Weight, survival, length, condition index | 30-d Effect | 30 | 2 | Kim et al., 2014 |
TABLE E.7 Sulisobenzone
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute or Short Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Chlamydomonas reinhardtii | FW | Growth inhibition | 96-h EC50 | 38,000 | 2 | Esperanza et al., 2019 | Used methanol solvent at 0.05%; nominal concentrations, solvent controls |
| Chlorella vulgaris | FW | Growth inhibition | 72-h EC50 | 109,550 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Chlorella vulgaris (acclimated) | FW | Growth inhibition | 96-h EC50 | 140,760 | 1 | Huang et al., 2018 | Acclimation by 10-d pre-exposure to sulisobenzone 10 mg/L; used BG11 medium for solutions | |
| Chlorella vulgaris (acclimated) | FW | Chlorophyll content reduced | 13-d LOEC | 5,000 | 2 | Huang et al., 2018 | ||
| Chlorella vulgaris (wild type FACHB-24) | FW | Growth inhibition | 96-h EC50 | 65,160 | 1 | Huang et al., 2018 | ||
| Chlorella vulgaris (wild type FACHB-24) | FW | Growth inhibition | 96-h EC50 | 201,000 | 2 | Du et al., 2017 | Used DMSO solvent of unknown amount; included blank and solvent controls from prepared stock sol in BG11 liquid medium | |
| Chlorella vulgaris (wild type FACHB-24) | FW | Chlorophyll content reduction | 13-d LOEC | > 100,000 | 2 | Huang et al., 2018 | ||
| Invertebrate | Balanus amphitrite | SW | Immobilization | 24-h EC50 | No effect to 10,000 | 2 | Tsui et al., 2019 | Used DMSO solvent at 0.01% and wild caught animals |
| Daphnia carinata (neonate) | FW | Mortality | 24-h LC50 | 82,270 | 1 | Du et al., 2019a | Solutions made in COMBO medium without use of solvent; tested at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 mg/L dose range | |
| Daphnia magna (adult) | FW | Immobility | 48-h EC0 | 100,000 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Daphnia magna (neonate) | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 570,000 | 2 | Liu et al., 2015 | Used OECD 202 with DMSO solvent at <0.1% | |
| Daphnia magna (neonate) | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 30,400 | 1 | Molins-Delgado et al., 2016 | Used Daphtoxkit F - ISO 6341 guideline without solvent | |
| Daphnia magna (neonate) | FW | Immobilization | 72-h EC50 | 25,900 | 1 | Molins-Delgado et al., 2016 | ||
| Daphnia magna (neonate) | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | 47,470 | 1 | Du et al., 2017 | Stocks were prepared in tap water and unclear if solvents were used; blank and control groups | |
| Dugesia japonica | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | 146,000 | 1 | Li, 2012 | Solute: ISO water | |
| Dugesia japonica | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 77,000 | 1 | Li, 2012 | Solute: ISO water | |
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mytilus galloprovincialis | SW | Larval development | 48-h EC50 | > 10,000 | 2 | Paredes et al., 2014 | ||
| Paracentrotus lividus | SW | Larval development | 48-h EC50 | > 10,000 | 2 | Paredes et al., 2014 | ||
| Siriella armata | SW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | > 10,000 | 2 | Paredes et al., 2014 | ||
| Fish | Danio (=Brachydanio) rerio | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 633,000 | 2 | Du et al., 2017 | Few details |
| Leuciscus idus | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | > 215,000 < 464,000 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Oryzias latipes | FW | Mortality (larval 7-dph) | 96-h LC50 | 1,803.6 | 1 | Thia et al., 2020 | Used OECD guidelines with DMSO solvent at 0.0125% in a static test, without renewal; tested wihtin concentration range of 1-50 μM | |
| Chronic or Long Term | ||||||||
| Invertebrate | Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction | 21-d NOEC | 5,000 | 1 | ECHA | |
| Invertebrate (coral) | Pocillopora damicornis | SW | Larval bleaching | 14-d LOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | Used methanol solvent at 0.02%; tested with nominal concntrations of 10, 100, 250, 750, 1000 μg/L |
| Pocillopora damicornis | SW | Larval mortality | 14-d LOEC | > 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Pocillopora damicornis | SW | Nubbin mortality | 2-d LC50 | < 1,000 | 2 | He et al., 2019c | Used methanol solvent at 0.02%; tested with nominal concentrations of 10, 100, 250, 750, 1000 μg/L; reported 100% mortality at highest concentration | |
| Seriatopora caliendrum | SW | Larval bleaching | 14-d LC50 not achieved | No effect | 2 | He et al., 2019c | LC50 not achieved – only 3 conc tested mortality | |
| Seriatopora caliendrum | SW | Larval mortality | 14-d LC50 not achieved | No effect | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum | SW | Larval settlement | 14-d LC50 not achieved | No effect | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum | SW | Nubbin bleaching | 14-d LC50 not achieved | No effect | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Seriatopora caliendrum | SW | Nubbin mortality | 14-d LC50 not achieved | No effect | 2 | He et al., 2019c | ||
| Fish | Pimephales promelas | FW | Juvenile growth | 14-d NOEC | 1,048 | 1 | ECHA | |
| Pimephales promelas | FW | Mortality | 14-d NOEC | > 4,897 | 1 | ECHA | ||
TABLE E.8 Titanium Dioxide1
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute or Short Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Growth inhibition | 72-h EC50 | 5,830 | 1 | Aruoja et al., 2009 | Nano form |
| Raphidocelis (Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Growth inhibition | 72-h EC50 | 35,900 | 1 | Aruoja et al., 2009 | Bulk form | |
| Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Growth inhibition | 72-h IC50 | 25,300 | 1 | Lee and An 2013 | Nano form, with and without visible, UVA, UVB | |
| Invertebrate | Artemia salina | SW | Growth inhibition | 48-h EC50 | 4,000 | 2 | Clemente et al., 2014 | Nano anatase/rutile mixture in presence of UV |
| Artemia salina | SW | Growth inhibition | 48-h EC50 | 4,000 | 2 | Clemente et al., 2014 | Nano anatase in presence of UV | |
| Artemia salina | SW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | > 100,000 | 1 | Ates et al., 2013a | Nano form | |
| Artemia salina | SW | Growth inhibition | 48-h EC50 | > 100,000 | 1 | Clemente et al., 2014 | Nano form (anatase/rutile and anatase), visible light only | |
| Caenorhabditis elegans | FW | Reproduction | 96-h NOEC | 3,000 | 1 | Angelstorf et al., 2014 | Nano form | |
| Caenorhabditis elegans | FW | Reproduction | 96-h NOEC | > 100,000 | 1 | Angelstorf et al., 2014 | Bulk form | |
| Ceriodaphnia dubia | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | 7,600 | 1 | Hall et al., 2009 | Nano form | |
| Ceriodaphnia dubia | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | > 10,000 | 1 | Griffitt et al., 2008 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | 20,000,000 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | > 100,000 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | > 500,000 | 1 | Lovern and Klaper 2006 | Nano form, commercial particles, a mixture of anatase and rutile | |
___________________
1 This table was modified after release of the prepublication version of the report to add details on the form of substance considered in some entries, and to add two missing entries.
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | > 100,000 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | > 500,000 | 1 | Ma et al., 2012 | Nano form, no UV | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 35,306 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2009 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | 143,390 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2009 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | > 500,000 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2009 | Bulk form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | 275,270 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2009 | Bulk form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | 29.8 | 2 | Ma et al., 2012 | Nano form, UVA (320–400 nm wavelength) 1,700 mW/cm2 | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 72-h EC50 | 1,620 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 72-h LC50 | 2,020 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 8-h LC50 | 139 | 2 | Mansfield et al., 2015 | Nano form, UV | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 29,700 | 1 | Amiano et al., 2012 | Nano form, no UV radiation | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | 1,200 | 2 | Amiano et al., 2012 | Nano form, 0.56 mW/cm2 UVA radiation | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | > 100,000 | 1 | Wiench et al., 2009 | Nano and bulk, results from 19 of 25 tests | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 48-h EC50 | > 100,000 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia pulex | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | 9,200 | 1 | Hall et al., 2009 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia pulex (adult) | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | > 10,000 | 1 | Griffitt et al., 2008 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia similus | FW | Growth inhibition | 48-h EC50 | 60,160 | 2 | Clemente et al., 2014 | Nano anatase/rutile mixture in presence of UV | |
| Daphnia similus | FW | Growth inhibition | 48-h EC50 | 750,550 | 2 | Clemente et al., 2014 | Nano anatase in presence of UV | |
| Daphnia similus | FW | Growth Inhibition | 48-h EC50 | > 100,000 | 1 | Clemente et al., 2014 | Nano form (anatase/rutile and anatase), visible light only |
| Invertebrate (coral) | Acropora spp | SW | Expulsion of zooxanthellae, bleaching | 48-h Effect | > 6,300 | 2 | Corinaldesi et al., 2018 | Surface coated and doped nano form, nonstandard assay, minimal test concentrations |
| Fish | Cyprinodon variegatus | SW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | > 10,000,000 | 1 | ECHA | |
| Danio rerio | FW | Mortality | 48-h LC50 | > 10,000 | 1 | Griffitt et al., 2008 | Nano form | |
| Oryzias latipes | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 2,190 | 2 | Ma et al., 2012 | Nano form, UVA (320–400 nm wavelength) 1,700 mW/cm2 | |
| Oryzias latipes | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 155,000 | 1 | Ma et al., 2012 | Nano form, no UV | |
| Pimephales promelas | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | > 1,000,000 | 1 | ECHA | ||
| Pimephales promelas | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 500,000 | 1 | Hall et al., 2009 | Nano form | |
| Amphibian | Xenopus laevis | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 295,000 | 1 | Zhang et al., 2012 | Nano form, no UV |
| Xenopus laevis | FW | Mortality | 96-h LC50 | 69,600 | 2 | Zhang et al., 2012 | Nano form, with UV | |
| Chronic or Long Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Growth inhibition | 72-h NOEC | 10,100 | 1 | Aruoja et al., 2009 | Bulk form |
| Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Growth inhibition | 72-h NOEC | 980 | 1 | Aruoja et al., 2009 | Nano form | |
| Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Growth inhibition | 7-d IC25 | 1,000–2,000 | 1 | Hall et al., 2009 | Nano form, added organic matter decreases toxicity | |
| Prochlorococcus spp. | FW | Cell density | 72-h Effect | 500 | 2 | Dedman et al., 2021 | Nano form, nonstandard assay | |
| Invertebrate | Ceriodaphnia dubia | FW | Reproduction | 7-d IC25 | 9,400–26,400 | 1 | Hall et al., 2009 | Nano form |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction | 30-d LOEC | 10,000 | 1 | ECHA IUCLID | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction | 21-d NOEC | ≥ 1,720 | 1 | ECHA IUCLID | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction | 21-d NOEC | ≥ 2,920 | 1 | ECHA IUCLID | ||
| Daphnia magna | FW | Growth | 21-d LOEC | 100 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction (total living offspring) | 21-d LOEC | 460 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction (total living offspring) | 21-d NOEC | 2,620 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Adult mortality | 21-d NOEC | 30,000 | 1 | Wiench et al., 2009 | Coated nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Offspring production | 21-d NOEC | 3,000 | 1 | Wiench et al., 2009 | Coated nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction and fitness | 21-d LOEC | 1,000 | 2 | Campos et al., 2013 | Nano form, measured life history in relation to food depletion, limited concentrations tested | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction (progency counts), Growth | 21-d NOEC | >2,000 | 2 | Seitz et al., 2013 | P25 nano; flow through assay | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Reproduction (pro-greny counts) | 21-d LOEC | 60 | 2 | Seitz et al., 2013 | A-100 (∼330 nm) so larger than nanoparticle size; flow through assay | |
| Invertebrate (coral) | Montastraea (now Orbicella) faveolata | SW | Expulsion of zooxanthellae | 17-d Effect | 100 | 2 | Jovanović and Guzmán 2014 | Nano form, nonstandard assay, tested 2 concentrations |
| Fish | Danio rerio | FW | Growth (length) | 8-d LOEC | 1,000,000 | 1 | ECHA | |
| Danio rerio | FW | Reproduction (progeny counts, number of ovarian follicles) | 91-d LOEC | 100 | 2 | Wang et al., 2011 | Nano form | |
| Danio rerio | FW | Reproduction | 23-d LOEC | 870 | 2 | Ramsden et al., 2013 | Nano form, only a couple of concentrations | |
| Danio rerio | FW | Mortality | 21-d LOEC | 1 | 2 | Bar-Ilan et al., 2013 | Nano form, UV exposure, significant aggregation over 1 um in exposures | |
| Oryzias latipes | FW | Mortality | 17-d NOEC | 14 | 2 | Paterson et al., 2011 | Nano form | |
| Pimephales promelas | FW | Growth | 7-d IC25 | > 340,000 | 1 | Hall et al., 2009 | Nano form |
TABLE E.9 Zinc Oxide2
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute or Short Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Chlorella sp. | FW | Abundance | 6-d EC30 | 100,000 | 1 | Ji et al., 2011 | Bulk form |
| Chlorella sp. | FW | Abundance | 6-d EC30 | 20,000 | 1 | Ji et al., 2011 | Nano form | |
| Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Growth rate | 3-d NOEC | 20 | 1 | Aruoja et al., 2009 | Same for bulk and nano forms | |
| Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Growth rate | 3-d EC50 | 42 | 1 | Aruoja et al., 2009 | Same for bulk and nano forms | |
| Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Population growth rate | 3-d IC50 | 63 | 1 | Franklin et al., 2007 | Bulk form | |
| Raphidocelis (=Pseudokirchneriella) subcapitata | FW | Population growth rate | 3-d IC50 | 68 | 1 | Franklin et al., 2007 | Nano form | |
| Skeletonema costatum | SW | Population growth rate | 4-d IC50 | 1,850 | 1 | Wong et al., 2010 | Nano form, based on dissolved ion concentrations | |
| Skeletonema costatum | SW | Population growth rate | 4-d IC50 | 2,360 | 1 | Wong et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Skeletonema costatum | SW | Population growth rate | 4-d IC50 | 2,970 | 1 | Wong et al., 2010 | Bulk form | |
| Thalassiosira pseudonana | FW | Population growth rate | 4-d IC50 | 3,280 | 1 | Wong et al., 2010 | Nano form, based on dissolved ion concentrations | |
| Thalassiosira pseudonana | FW | Population growth rate | 4-d IC50 | 4,560 | 1 | Wong et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Thalassiosira pseudonana | FW | Population growth rate | 4-d IC50 | 6,650 | 1 | Wong et al., 2010 | Bulk form | |
| Invertebrate | Artemia salina | SW | Mortality | 1-d LC50 | > 100,000 | 1 | Ates et al., 2013b | Multiple sizes of nano form |
| Caenorhabditis elegans | FW | Progeny counts/numbers | 5-d LOEC | 800 | 1 | Wang et al., 2009 | Nano form | |
___________________
2 This table was modified after release of the prepublication version of the report to add details on the form of substance considered in some entries.
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caenorhabditis elegans | FW | Progeny counts/numbers | 5-d LOEC | 1,600 | 1 | Wang et al., 2009 | Bulk form | |
| Caenorhabditis elegans | FW | Mortality | 1-d LC50 | 2,200 | 1 | Wang et al., 2009 | Nano form | |
| Caenorhabditis elegans | FW | Mortality | 1-d LC50 | 2,300 | 1 | Wang et al., 2009 | Bulk form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 2-d EC50 | 1,700–9,000 | 2 | Blinova et al., 2010 | Nano form, depends on river water used | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 2-d EC50 | 6,900–16,200 | 2 | Blinova et al., 2010 | Nano form, depends on river water used | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 2-d EC50 | 2,600 | 1 | Blinova et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 2-d EC50 | 7,100 | 1 | Blinova et al., 2010 | Bulk form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 2-d LC50 | 8,800 | 1 | Heinlaan et al., 2008 | Bulk form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 2-d NOEC | 1,500 | 1 | Heinlaan et al., 2008 | Bulk form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 2-d LC50 | 3,200 | 1 | Heinlaan et al., 2008 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 2-d NOEC | 500 | 1 | Heinlaan et al., 2008 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 2-d LC50 | 2,140 | 1 | Naddafi et al., 2011 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 1-d LC50 | 2,580 | 1 | Naddafi et al., 2011 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 2-d EC50 | 1,000 | 1 | Wiench et al., 2009 | Nano and bulk form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 2-d EC50 | 481 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2009 | Bulk form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 2-d LC50 | 1,250 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2009 | Bulk form |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Immobilization | 2-d EC50 | 622 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2009 | Nano form | |
| Daphnia magna | FW | Mortality | 2-d LC50 | 1,511 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2009 | Nano form | |
| Elasmopus rapax | FW | Mortality | 4-d LC50 | 950 | 1 | Wong et al., 2010 | Nano form, based on dissolved ion concentrations | |
| Elasmopus rapax | FW | Mortality | 4-d LC50 | 370 | 1 | Wong et al., 2010 | Bulk form | |
| Elasmopus rapax | FW | Mortality | 4-d LC50 | 1,190 | 1 | Wong et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Radix luteola | FW | Mortality | 4-d LC50 | 42,670 | 1 | Ali et al., 2012 | Nano form | |
| Tetrahymena thermophila | FW | Population growth rate | 1-d EC50 | 12,400–16,400 | 2 | Blinova et al., 2010 | Nano form, depends on river water used | |
| Tetrahymena thermophila | FW | Population growth rate | 1-d EC50 | 12,000–16,600 | 2 | Blinova et al., 2010 | Bulk form, depend on river water used | |
| Tetrahymena thermophila | FW | Population growth rate | 1-d EC50 | 9,400 | 1 | Blinova et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Tetrahymena thermophila | FW | Population growth rate | 1-d EC50 | 27,100 | 1 | Blinova et al., 2010 | Bulk form | |
| Tetrahymena thermophila | FW | Mortality | 0.17-d EC50 | 3,900 | 1 | Mortimer et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Tetrahymena thermophila | FW | Mortality | 0.17-d EC50 | 3,700 | 1 | Mortimer et al., 2010 | Bulk form | |
| Thamnocephalus platyurus | FW | Mortality | 1-d LC50 | 240 | 1 | Heinlaan et al., 2008 | Bulk form | |
| Thamnocephalus platyurus | FW | Mortality | 1-d NOEC | 50 | 1 | Heinlaan et al., 2008 | Bulk form | |
| Thamnocephalus platyurus | FW | Mortality | 1-d LC50 | 180 | 1 | Heinlaan et al., 2008 | Nano form | |
| Thamnocephalus platyurus | FW | Mortality | 1-d NOEC | 30 | 1 | Heinlaan et al., 2008 | Nano form | |
| Thamnocephalus platyurus | FW | Mortality | 2-d EC50 | 140 | 1 | Blinova et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Thamnocephalus platyurus | FW | Mortality | 2-d EC50 | 190 | 1 | Blinova et al., 2010 | Bulk form | |
| Thamnocephalus platyurus | FW | Mortality | 2-d EC50 | 1,100–6,000 | 2 | Blinova et al., 2010 | Nano form, depends on river water used |
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thamnocephalus platyurus | FW | Mortality | 2-d EC50 | 190–3,000 | 2 | Blinova et al., 2010 | Bulk form, depend on river water used | |
| Tigriopus japonicus | FW | Mortality | 4-d LC50 | 1,220 | 1 | Park et al., 2014 | Nano form, in 5% saline environment | |
| Tigriopus japonicus | FW | Mortality | 4-d LC50 | 2,440 | 1 | Park et al., 2014 | Nano form, in 35% salinity | |
| Tigriopus japonicus | FW | Mortality | 4-d LC50 | 680 | 1 | Wong et al., 2010 | Nano form, based on dissolved ion concentrations | |
| Tigriopus japonicus | FW | Mortality | 4-d LC50 | 430 | 1 | Wong et al., 2010 | Bullk form | |
| Tigriopus japonicus | FW | Mortality | 4-d LC50 | 850 | 1 | Wong et al., 2010 | Nano form | |
| Invertebrate (coral) | Acropora spp | SW | Expulsion of zooxanthellae, bleaching | 48-h Effect | > 6,300 | 2 | Corinaldesi et al., 2018 | Uncoated ZnO size 20 to 200 nm (nanoparticles > 50% of the total particles), minimal test concentrations |
| Fish | Danio rerio | FW | Hatch | 3-d LOEC | 10,000 | 2 | Xia et al., 2011 | Nano form, iron doped, only one concentration |
| Danio rerio | FW | Survival | 3-d NOEC | 10,000 | 2 | Xia et al., 2011 | Nano form, iron doped, only one concentration | |
| Danio rerio | FW | Mortality | 4-d LC50 | 2,525 | 1 | Yu et al., 2011 | Bulk form | |
| Danio rerio | FW | Mortality | 4-d LC50 | 3,969 | 1 | Yu et al., 2011 | Nano form | |
| Danio rerio | FW | Mortality | 4-d LC50 | 1,550 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2008 | Bulk form | |
| Danio rerio | FW | Hatch | 3.5-d EC50 | 2,066 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2008 | Bulk form | |
| Danio rerio | FW | Mortality | 4-d LC50 | 1,793 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2008 | Nano form | |
| Danio rerio | FW | Hatch | 3.5-d EC50 | 2,065 | 1 | Zhu et al., 2008 | Nano form | |
| Amphibian | Xenopus laevis | FW | Mortality | 3.8-d NOEC | 500,000 | 1 | Bacchetta et al., 2012 | Nano form |
| Xenopus laevis | FW | Length | 4-d NOEC | 3,160 | 1 | Nations et al., 2011 | Nano form | |
| Xenopus laevis | FW | Deformation | 4-d EC50 | 10,300 | 1 | Nations et al., 2011 | Nano form | |
| Xenopus laevis | FW | Stage | 4-d NOEC | 31,600 | 1 | Nations et al., 2011 | Nano form |
| Chronic or Long Term | ||||||||
| Algae | Chlorella sp. | FW | Abundance | 6-d NOEC | 5,000 | 1 | Ji et al., 2011 | Bulk form |
| Chlorella sp. | FW | Abundance | 6-d NOEC | 50,000 | 1 | Ji et al., 2011 | Nano form | |
| Scenedesmus acutus var. acutus | FW | Population growth rate | 4-d NOEC | 24.7 | 1 | Meng et al., 2018 | Nano form | |
| Scenedesmus acutus var. acutus | FW | Population growth rate | 4-d LOEC | 661 | 1 | Meng et al., 2018 | Nano form | |
| Invertebrate | Corophium volutator | FW | Growth | 100-d LOEC | 500 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations |
| Corophium volutator | FW | Growth | 23-d NOEC | 500 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Corophium volutator | FW | Growth | 63-d NOEC | 500 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Corophium volutator | FW | Growth | 100-d NOEC | 500 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Corophium volutator | FW | Growth | 23-d NOEC | 500 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Corophium volutator | FW | Growth | 100-d NOEC | 500 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Corophium volutator | FW | Development | 23-d NOEC | 1,000 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Corophium volutator | FW | Development | 100-d NOEC | 1,000 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Corophium volutator | FW | Growth | 23-d LOEC | 1,000 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Corophium volutator | FW | Growth | 63-d LOEC | 1,000 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Corophium volutator | FW | Growth | 100-d NOEC | 1,000 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Corophium volutator | FW | Growth | 23-d LOEC | 1,000 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Corophium volutator | FW | Growth | 100-d LOEC | 1,000 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Corophium volutator | FW | Growth | 100-d NOEC | 1,000 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Organism Group | Species | FW/SW | Biological Measurement | Statistic | Effect Value (μg/L) | Category | Citation | Additional Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corophium volutator | FW | Mortality | 63-d NOEC | 1,000 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Corophium volutator | FW | Mortality | 63-d NOEC | 1,000 | 2 | Fabrega et al., 2012 | Nano form, only 3 concentrations | |
| Invertebrate (coral) | Stylophora pistillata | SW | Photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) | 35-d NOEC | 24 | 2 | Fel et al., 2019 | Unfiltered natural seawater used; measured concentrations; ionic form |