Previous Chapter: Appendix A: Safe System Policy Practices
Page 75
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Safe System Planning Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.

APPENDIX B

Safe System Planning Practices

Appendix B provides data on how respondents appraised various Safe System planning practices. See Table B-1 for scores related to each practice’s feasibility and impact.

Interpretive categorization of Z-scores (Feasibility and Impact columns), with a mean of zero (0) and standard deviation of one (1).

Categories Z-scores
High > 1 SD above mean
Moderate < 1 and > 0
Low > −1 and < 0
Very Low < −1 SD below mean

Note: SD = standard deviation round the mean score of zero (0).

Page 76
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Safe System Planning Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.

Table B-1. Planning practice feasibility and impact scores (n = 60).

Practice Feasibility Impact Category
Incorporating road safety audits in project scoping/planning phases. 0.724 0.302 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Prioritizing injury risk-based (systemic) safety assessments over crash “hot spot” or “black spot” approaches. 0.225 0.417 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Communicating with communities previously not involved in decision-making to learn about their safety issues and concerns on a routine basis (annually, quarterly). 0.402 0.225 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Coordinating with land-use planners to align land use and roadway purposes (e.g., deciding whether the road’s purpose is access- or mobility-centered). 0.052 0.257 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Simulating the safety effects of land developments and investments in long-range plans. −0.233 −0.019 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Incorporating nontraditional transportation safety data sources [e.g., emergency medical services, hospital, social determinants of health, environmental, and historical (e.g., redlining)] as part of problem identification and project prioritization processes. −0.307 −0.012 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Implementing or expanding car-free zones in areas with high pedestrian activity. −0.702 0.370 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Setting a goal to reduce road deaths by 50% by 2030 in safety plans. 0.071 −0.532 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Replacing travel forecasting (“predict and provide”) with backcasting (“decide and provide,” i.e., starting from a vision of desirable travel patterns and working backward to realize the vision). −0.294 −0.257 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Encouraging and facilitating public use of self-reporting (via mobile app or survey) to capture collisions and other events falling outside the scope of traditional crash reporting (e.g., near misses, pedestrian and bicyclist falls). 0.062 −0.751 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Page 75
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Safe System Planning Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.
Page 75
Page 76
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: Safe System Planning Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.
Page 76
Next Chapter: Appendix C: Safe System Design Practices
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.