A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations (2025)

Chapter: Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment

Previous Chapter: Appendix F: Safe System Post-Crash Response Practices
Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.

APPENDIX G

Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment

Instructions and Recommendations: Coordinate with at least two colleagues within your practice domain (e.g., planning, design, law enforcement) and at least two colleagues each for other practice domains (e.g., policy, operations and maintenance, post-crash response) to discuss and arrive at an agreement on the extent to which your Safe System or safety coalition has implemented strategies outlined in the Strategy table. Consult with the Score Interpretation section at the end of this assessment to discern where your coalition stands with respect to Safe System implementation. Consider referencing and recompleting this assessment each year to inform your coalition’s improvement efforts and to document your progress toward implementing a Safe System.

Date of the assessment:

Name of Safe System (or Safety) coalition:

ScoreMeaning
0The strategy has not yet been implemented.
1The strategy has started to be implemented within the past 6 months.
2The strategy has been implemented for between 6 and 12 months.
3The strategy has been implemented and has been the way we do things for at least the past 12 months.
Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.
Strategy0123Score
PolicyExample Practice(s)
Advance adaptive safety policiesAdjusting policies automatically based on anticipated events; Conducting regularly scheduled policy review; Diversifying the types of implemented policies
Build up Safe System-consistent practices AND break down inconsistent practicesAllocating revenues generated from speed safety and red-light-running cameras to filling network gaps in safety infrastructure, especially in areas that have not been involved in decision-making to date
Provide reliable and protective system redundanciesPairing automated vehicle lane-keeping technology with cable-wire barriers on the edges of rural roads
Policy Total
PlanningExample Practice(s)
Start from a collective vision for a Safe SystemDefining what the future of the system should be and implementing policies that can help bring about desired changes
Vertically and horizontally integrate planningEmbedding Safe System principles across policy, network planning, and implementation of street design projects (vertical integration)

Requiring transportation planners and urban designers to coordinate their site plan reviews, corridor audits, and street standard policies with local land-use planners (horizontal integration)
Clearly define the functionality of roadsAt a network level, determining which roadways will serve an access function and which will serve a mobility function, striving not to blend access and mobility where possible
Separate motor vehicle networks from active transportation networksAt a network level, separating motor vehicle traffic from vulnerable road users as vehicle speeds and volumes increase
Planning Total
Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.
Strategy0123Score
DesignExample Practice(s)
Institute self-explaining/enforcing roadsDesigning roads with the same function, speed profile, and type of road users to (a) look similar, (b) look different from roads with different functions, speed profiles, and types of road users, and to (c) clearly communicate the desired driver behavior on a route
Design around human tolerances to crash forcesIf vehicle-to-vehicle crashes could conceivably happen at angles of 90o or greater, introducing design speeds to not exceed 30 mph, and if vulnerable road users are exposed to vehicles, introducing design speeds to not exceed 20 mph
Physically separate fast-moving motor vehicles from vulnerable road usersProviding physical protection (e.g., via curbs, barriers, planters or bollards) to protect vulnerable road users along roads, and grade separation between road users of different masses and speeds at intersections
Design Total
Operations and MaintenanceExample Practice(s)
Separate road users of different mass, directions, and speeds in timeProviding discrete and alternating temporal opportunities for users to safely navigate the roadway (e.g., left-turn signal phasing, coordinated signal timing, leading pedestrian intervals)
Adapt road operations to changing environmental and social conditionsRegularly tracking operations performance and adjusting as needed (e.g., every three years or more often)
Inventory and manage infrastructure assets to sustain safety-related efficacyDeveloping and maintaining a physical asset inventory and subsequently repairing or replacing assets that have degraded
Operations and Maintenance Total
Law EnforcementExample Practice(s)
Work collaboratively to investigate serious crashes and share contextual insightsCoordinating with professional and community partners to identify the network of factors that shape road users’ behaviors that result in serious crashes, and share results of the investigations with the public and policymakers
Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.
Strategy0123Score
Enforce road-user protective policiesPreventing drunk driving (e.g., by installing ignition interlocks for all drivers convicted of driving under the influence) in addition to issuing fines for impaired driving
Observe, document, and share risk patterns with road designers and plannersObserving, documenting, and sharing risk patterns with road designers and planners to inform safety infrastructure improvements
Law Enforcement Total
Post-Crash ResponseExample Practice(s)
Invest in crash notification and communicationsInstituting advanced automatic crash notification (AACN) systems that share information on the probable injury severity of crash-involved parties with call centers
Strengthen prehospital care functionsShoring up roadside and in emergency vehicle care provision via pre-hospital care training and resourcing
Enhance safety investments via research and sharing trauma and road safety dataConnecting trauma with police-reported crash data to improve decision-making on emergency medical care, vehicle designs that reduce injury impacts to occupants and vulnerable road users, and safety infrastructure investments
Post-Crash Response Total
Grand Total (across all Domains)

Score Interpretation

Total Possible Score = 57

0–14: Exploration. In this phase, Safe System coalition members assess and create readiness for change through an appreciation of how each role’s leadership, resources, interorganizational coordination, and funding play in experimenting with Safe System strategies and practices across the domains of Safe System: policy, planning, design, operations and maintenance, law enforcement, and post-crash response.

15–28: Installation. In this phase, Safe System coalition members acquire or repurpose the resources (e.g., hiring and training staff) needed to fully and effectively install Safe System–aligned strategies and practices. Topics discussed in the Exploration phase—and often captured in safety action plans (promises made)—become realized in the Installation phase (promises kept), wherein coalition members begin implementing Safe System strategies and practices.

29–43: Initial Implementation. In this phase, Safe System coalition members attempt to use newly learned Safe System strategies and practices within organizations just learning how to adjust to and support new ways of planning, designing, operating, and maintaining safe roadways. This stage includes staff developing their Safe System competencies and organizational administrators rearranging roles and functions to align with Safe System strategies and practices,

Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.

and leaders fully supporting the change to Safe System management via offering access to safety resources and training.

44–57: Full Implementation. In this phase, Safe System–aligned strategies and practices become the standard ways of understanding and improving safety via planning, design, operations, and maintenance. To sustain full implementation, leaders reliably provide Safe System coalition members with access to safety-based resources and training, and involved organizations work more effectively with one another via the sharing of data, funding, skills, and other resources. In full implementation, Safe System–aligned strategies and practices, along with their implementation supports (e.g., training, funding, leadership) become the new status quo.

Note: Full implementation of Safe System strategies and practices will likely require at least two (2) to four (4) years of committed work.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.

Abbreviations and acronyms used without definitions in TRB publications:

A4AAirlines for America
AAAEAmerican Association of Airport Executives
AASHOAmerican Association of State Highway Officials
AASHTOAmerican Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
ACI–NAAirports Council International–North America
ACRPAirport Cooperative Research Program
ADAAmericans with Disabilities Act
APTAAmerican Public Transportation Association
ASCEAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
ASMEAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASTMAmerican Society for Testing and Materials
ATAAmerican Trucking Associations
CTAACommunity Transportation Association of America
CTBSSPCommercial Truck and Bus Safety Synthesis Program
DHSDepartment of Homeland Security
DOEDepartment of Energy
EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency
FAAFederal Aviation Administration
FASTFixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (2015)
FHWAFederal Highway Administration
FMCSAFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
FRAFederal Railroad Administration
FTAFederal Transit Administration
GHSAGovernors Highway Safety Association
HMCRPHazardous Materials Cooperative Research Program
IEEEInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
ISTEAIntermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
ITEInstitute of Transportation Engineers
MAP-21Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (2012)
NASANational Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASAONational Association of State Aviation Officials
NCFRPNational Cooperative Freight Research Program
NCHRPNational Cooperative Highway Research Program
NHTSANational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NTSBNational Transportation Safety Board
PHMSAPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
RITAResearch and Innovative Technology Administration
SAESociety of Automotive Engineers
SAFETEA-LUSafe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (2005)
TCRPTransit Cooperative Research Program
TEA-21Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (1998)
TRBTransportation Research Board
TSATransportation Security Administration
U.S. DOTUnited States Department of Transportation
Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.
Backcover
Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.
Page 85
Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.
Page 86
Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.
Page 87
Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.
Page 88
Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.
Page 89
Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.
Page 90
Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.
Page 91
Suggested Citation: "Appendix G: Safe System Strategy Implementation Self-Assessment." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29147.
Page 92
Subscribe to Emails from the National Academies
Stay up to date on activities, publications, and events by subscribing to email updates.