Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices (2025)

Chapter: Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices

Previous Chapter: Appendix C: Other Agency Survey Responses
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.

APPENDIX D
Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices

The contractor survey questionnaire and results are presented in this appendix. The following companies participated in this survey: California Nevada Cement Association, Pavement Recycling Systems, Mountain States Constructors, Inc., Ruston Paving Co., Inc., Slurry Pavers Inc., SurfaceCycle, Atlanta Paving and Concrete Construction, Mt. Carmel Stabilization Group, Inc., Recon Construction Services, Inc., and E. J. Breneman, L.L.C.

Part A: State-of-the-Practice Related to the Use of Full-Depth Reclamation

Question 1: Has your company conducted (within the past 5 years) Mechanical FDR or FDR pavement rehabilitation projects?

  • Both Mechanical FDR and FDR
  • Mechanical FDR only
  • FDR only
  • Our company has not conducted Mechanical FDR or FDR projects within the past 5 years
A pie chart shows data on responding contractors and their use of mechanical F D R and slash or F D R over the past 5 years.
Figure 74. Distribution of responding contractors and their use of mechanical FDR or FDR over the past 5 years (number of responses = 11).
Long Description.

The data is as follows. Both mechanical FDR and FDR, 11. Mechanical FDR only, 0. FDR only, 0. Mechanical FDR or FDR not used, 0.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.

Question 2: How many years of experience does your company have conducting FDR? (select best option):

  • <5
  • 5–10
  • 10–20
  • >20
A pie chart depicts the distribution of responding contractors and their years of experience with F D R.
Figure 75. Distribution of responding contractors and their years of experience with FDR (number of responses = 11).
Long Description.

The data is as follows. Less than 5, 0. 5 to 10, 1. 10 to 20, 4. More than 20, 6.

Question 3: What is the approximate number of lane miles per year that are recycled by FDR by your agency? (select best option):

  • <50
  • 50–100
  • >100
  • Unsure
A pie chart on responding contractors and the approximate number of lane miles per year recycled by F D R.
Figure 76. Distribution of responding contractors and the approximate number of lane miles per year recycled by FDR (number of responses = 10).
Long Description.

The data is as follows. Less than 50, 1. 50 to 100, 2. More than 100, 7.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.

Question 4: On which roadway types (average daily traffic levels) does your company typically carry-out FDR? – select all that apply:

  • <2,500
  • 2,500–5,000
  • 5,000–10,000
  • 10,000–20,000
  • 20,000–30,000
  • >30,000
  • Unsure
A bar graph depicts the distribution of responding contractors and roadway types on which F D R is carried out.
Figure 77. Distribution of responding contractors and the roadway types (ADT) on which FDR is carried-out (number of responding responses = 11).
Long Description.

The horizontal axis for the number of agencies ranges from 0 to 12 in increments of 2. The vertical axis for average daily traffic (ADT) lists different categories. The data is as follows. Less than 2,500, 10. 2,500 to 5,000, 8. 5,000 to 10,000, 8. 10,000 to 20,000, 5. More than 30,000, 5. 20,000 to 30,000, 4. Unsure, 1.

Question 5: When conducting FDR, what are the most common primary distress(es) in the existing pavement? – select all that apply:

  • Base failure
  • Fatigue cracking
  • Longitudinal and transverse cracking
  • Potholes
  • Rutting
  • Unsure
  • Other (please specify)
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
A bar graph shows data of responding contractors with respect to which existing primary distress FDR is carried out.
Figure 78. Distribution of responding contractors with respect to which existing primary distress(es) that FDR is carried out on (number of responses = 11).
Long Description.

The horizontal axis for the number of agencies ranges from 0 to 12 in increments of 2. The vertical axis lists different categories. The data is as follows. Base failure, 11. Rutting, 9. Fatigue cracking, 9. Potholes, 8. Longitudinal and transverse cracking, 7.

Question 6: Before conducting FDR, does your company perform a pre-design investigation? (select best option):

  • Yes – always
  • Yes – if the agency requires it
  • No
  • Unsure
Pie chart showing distribution of responding contractors on if their company performs pre-design investigations.
Figure 79. Distribution of responding contractors with respect to if their company performs pre-design investigations before conducting FDR (number of responses = 11).
Long Description.

A pie chart shows the data as follows. Yes, if the agency requires it, 9. Yes, always, 2. No, 0.

Table 49. Contractor reported “Other” testing conducted during FDR pre-design investigation.

Full Designs

Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.

Question 7: When conducting a pre-design investigation for FDR, what testing is conducted? – select all that apply:

  • Evaluation of strength/stiffness of layers of existing pavement structure (such as, Falling Weight Deflectometer or Dynamic Cone Penetrometer testing)
  • Evaluation of the thickness of layers of existing pavement (such as Ground Penetrating Radar testing or core drilling)
  • Sampling of material (for verification of layers for understanding lower layer condition from cored samples)
  • Other (please specify)
A bar graph shows the data of responding contractors with respect to pre-design testing.
Figure 80. Distribution of responding contractors with respect to the testing conducted during FDR pre-design investigations (number of responses = 11).
Long Description.

The horizontal axis for the number of agencies ranges from 0 to 12 in increments of 2. The vertical axis lists different categories. The data is as follows. Sampling of materials, 11. Evaluation of the thickness of layers, 6. Evaluation of strength or stiffness of layers, 4. Other, 1.

Question 8: Which of the following stabilizing agents or additives are generally used for an FDR project by your company? – select all that apply:

  • Calcium chloride
  • Cement
  • Emulsified asphalt
  • Foamed asphalt
  • Fly ash
  • Lime (or lime kiln dust)
  • Quarry by-products
  • Other (please specify)
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
A bar graph shows data of responding contractors with respect to stabilizing agents or additives used in F D R projects.
Figure 81. Distribution of responding contractors with respect to the stabilizing agents or additives used in FDR projects (number of responses = 11).
Long Description.

The horizontal axis for the number of agencies ranges from 0 to 12 in increments of 2. The vertical axis lists different categories. The data is as follows. Cement, 11. Lime or lime kiln dust, 5. Emulsified asphalt, 4. Foamed asphalt, 3. Fly ash, 3. Quarry by-products, 2. Calcium chloride, 1. Other, 1.

Table 50. Contractor reported “Other” stabilizing agents or additives used in FDR projects.

We use all of these, it would be helpful to define “generally”.

Part B: State-of-the-Practice Related to the Use of Stabilizing Agents in Full-Depth Reclamation

Question 9: Who determines/specifies the stabilizing agent type in FDR applications? (select best option):

  • Agency determined
  • Contractor determined based on agency requirements
  • Contractor determined independently
  • Unknown
  • Other (please describe briefly)
A bar graph shows the distribution of responding contractors with respect to who determines the stabilizing agent type.
Figure 82. Distribution of responding contractors with respect to who determines the stabilizing agent type in an FDR projects (number of responses = 11).
Long Description.

The horizontal axis for the number of agencies ranges from 0 to 8 in increments of 2. The vertical axis lists different categories. The data is as follows. Agency determined, 7. Contractor determined based on agency requirement, 3. Contractor determined independently, 0. Other, 1.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Table 51. Contractor reported “Other” of who determines stabilizing agent type in FDR projects.

Agency determined if Agency is involved. Contractor determined if no Agency involved.

Question 10: What is the primary factor your company uses to determine which stabilizing agent to use in an FDR project? (select best option):

  • Traffic level
  • Availability of material
  • Historic use or past performance
  • Life cycle cost analysis
  • Mix design results
  • Other (please specify)
A bar graph shows data of responding contractors with respect to the primary factor used to determine stabilizing agent type.
Figure 83. Distribution of responding contractors with respect to determination method of stabilizing agent type (number of responses = 3).
Long Description.

The horizontal axis for the number of agencies ranges from 0 to 4 in increments of 1. The vertical axis lists different categories. The data is as follows. Mix design results, 3. Traffic level, 0. Availability of material, 0. Historic use or past performance, 0. Life cycle cost analysis, 0.

Question 11: Who determines/specifies the stabilizing agent dosage in FDR applications? – (select best option):

  • Agency determined
  • Contractor determined based on agency requirements
  • Contractor determined independently
  • Unknown
  • Other (please describe briefly)
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
A bar graph shows the distribution of responding contractors with respect to who determines the stabilizing agent type.
Figure 84. Distribution of responding contractors with respect to who determines the stabilizing agent dosage in an FDR project (number of responses = 11).
Long Description.

The horizontal axis for the number of agencies ranges from 0 to 6 in increments of 1. The vertical axis lists different categories. The data is as follows. Contractor determined based on agency requirements, 4. Agency determined, 2. Contractor determined independently, 0. Other, 5.

Table 52. Contractor reported “Other” for who determines stabilizing agent dosage in FDR projects.

Agency determined if Agency is involved. Contractor determined if no Agency involved.

Perform mix design in order to meet specified compressive strength requirements.

Mix design results

Mix Design / Via Geo-Tech

Based on mix design as determined by geotechnical engineer

Question 12: How does your company determine the stabilizing agent dosage in an FDR project? – (select best option):

  • Fixed dosage based on stabilizing agent type (please briefly describe):
  • Dosage is determined based on our methodology (please briefly describe):
  • Based on agency guidelines
  • Other (please specify)
A pie chart shows the data of responding contractors with respect to the determination method of stabilizing agent dosage.
Figure 85. Distribution of responding contractors with respect to determination method of stabilizing agent dosage (number of responses = 4).
Long Description.

The data is as follows. Fixed dosage based on stabilizing agent type, 0. Dosage is determined based on our methodology, 2. Based on agency guidelines, 1. Other, 1.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Table 53. Contractor reported descriptions of how “Dosage is Determined Based on Our Methodology” in FDR projects.

Through the mix design to achieve desired strength

Determined based on Mix Design developed to agency guidelines given samples obtained from roadway

Table 54. Contractor reported “Other” for determination method of stabilizing agent dosage.

Based on design min/max strength requirements established by agency

Part C: State-of-the-Practice Related to Post-Construction for Full-Depth Reclamation

Question 13: What properties does your company evaluate during FDR construction for quality control (QC)? – select all that apply:

  • Moisture content
  • Compaction (in-situ density)
  • Gradation of pulverized material
  • Mechanical characterization
  • Stabilizing agent amount
  • Depth
  • Cross-slope
  • Surface properties (such as smoothness or deviation from a straight edge) of the FDR layer (post-compaction, pre-overlay)
  • Unknown
  • Other (please specify)
A bar graph shows the distribution of responding contractors with respect to parameters.
Figure 86. Distribution of responding contractors with respect to parameters required as part of contractor QC (number of responses = 10).
Long Description.

The horizontal axis for the number of agencies ranges from 0 to 10 in increments of 2. The vertical axis lists different categories. The data is as follows. Moisture content, 9. Compaction (in-situ density), 9. Gradation of pulverized material, 9. Stabilizing agent amount, 9. Depth, 9. Cross-slope, 7. Surface properties of FDR layer (post-compaction, pre-overlay), 5. Mechanical characterization, 2. Other, 2.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Table 55. Contractor reported “Other” for parameters required as part of contractor QC.

Strength

Lab test results of field samples

Question 14: How does your company determine when to allow traffic or place surfacing on the FDR layer? – select all that apply:

  • A set amount of time
  • Raveling resistance (e.g., short-pin raveling test)
  • Shear resistance (e.g., long-pin shear test)
  • Modulus/stiffness criteria
  • Moisture content criteria
  • Agency determines timing
  • Other (please specify)
A bar graph shows the distribution of responding contractors.
Figure 87. Distribution of responding contractors with respect to how it is determined when traffic or surfacing placement is allowed on a newly constructed FDR layer (number of responses = 10).
Long Description.

The distribution is with respect to how it is determined when traffic or surfacing placement is allowed on a newly constructed FDR layer. The horizontal axis for the number of agencies ranges from 0 to 5 in increments of 1. The vertical axis lists different categories. The data is as follows. A set amount of time, 4. Agency determines timing, 4. Moisture content criteria, 2. Modulus slash stiffness criteria, 1. Raveling resistance (for example, short-pin raveling test), 0. Shear resistance (for example, long-pin shear test), 0. Other, 1.

Table 56. Contractor reported “Other” for how it is determined when traffic or surfacing placement is allowed on a newly constructed FDR layer.

Set amount of time, agency determines, Monitor strength gain or stabilized layer with DCP

Question 15: When performing FDR, does your company routinely perform any treatments to reduce the potential for cracking in asphalt overlays on FDR?

  • Yes (please briefly describe which treatments)
  • No
  • Unsure
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
A pie chart depicts distribution of agencies regarding routine use of treatments to reduce cracking potential
Figure 88. Distribution of responding agencies with respect to routine utilization of treatments to reduce cracking potential in asphalt overlays on FDR (number of responses = 10).
Long Description.

A pie chart shows the data as follows. Yes, 6. No, 4.

Table 57. Contractor reported treatments routinely used to reduce cracking potential in asphalt overlays.

Microcracking

Microcracking

Microcracking. Moist cure or seal FDR surface. Curing time.

Microcracking when required per engineerʼs design

Microcracking is used on 10% of cement stabilization projects

Microcracking with roller

Part D: Identification of Challenges and Future Plans

Question 16: What challenges to starting (or continuing) to successfully perform FDR has your company experienced?

  • Lack of agency experience
  • Lack of contractor expertise
  • Lack of mix design methods and engineering-based design procedures
  • Lack of tests and criteria to determine dosage of stabilizing agents and/or performance
  • Poor performance of previously constructed FDR rehabilitated pavements
  • No significant challenges
  • Other (please describe briefly)
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
A bar graph depicts the distribution of responding contractors regarding challenges experienced in implementing FDR projects.
Figure 89. Distribution of responding contractors with respect to challenges experienced to implement FDR projects (number of responses = 10).
Long Description.

The horizontal axis for the number of agencies ranges from 0 to 8 in increments of 2. The vertical axis lists different categories. The data is as follows. Lack of agency experience, 7. Poor performance of previously constructed FDR, 4. Lack of contractor expertise, 3. Lack of mix design methods and design procedures, 2. Lack of criteria to determine stabilizing agent dose, 1. No significant challenges, 1. Other, 6.

Table 58. Contractor reported “Other” for challenges experienced to implement FDR projects.

Lack of consultant experience

In rare cases we are challenged by early cracking of FDR pavements

Poor project selection, poor additive selection

Other fly by night contractors improperly installing and pricing work- destroying the reputation of the product by spreading cement on shoulders, destroying cars, improper install and equipment.

We find that sometimes FDR is being used as a fix to more than what it is capable of. I.e., the road profile/drainage are needing addressed before FDR can be successful. We also see it being used in situations that are extremely complex due to concentration of homes/businesses etc. Without the proper closures in place to be able to perform the work correctly.

Educating Engineers

Question 17: If you have any additional information or thoughts you would like to share regarding this topic, please do so here:

  • (please provide additional information or thoughts regarding FDR)
Table 59. Contractor reported “Additional Information” that they would like to report on this topic.

With quality control and following best FDR practices we have found great success in performing FDR

Agencies need to understand there are specialized contractors who can perform the work in just about any circumstance. Our work at Hartsfield airport has enlightened them on the difference in contractors approach and skill. Having proper equipment, spreading and controls for dust, dust protection and layout make all the difference in the cleanliness of a project. We have completed some of the most complex roads in Atlanta and Georgia. One single contractor ruined a county for over a decade because of their poor technique.

FDR is a great tool and can be a successful solution for many roadways, airports, etc. Many times the understanding of what FDR can and canʼt do is not totally recognized by the agency/owner setting it up. Our company can help with that and find a path that either points to a project being a FDR success story or not.

The use of FDR should be expanded as a means to use less natural resources, reducing material that has to be landfilled or wasted and significant savings to ancillary costs by reducing truck traffic on adjacent infrastructure. Additionally FDR provides a quicker alternative to conventional construction while providing a stronger base. Gaining acceptance and understanding by specifying agencies is a significant barrier to increased use

Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.

Abbreviations and acronyms used without definitions in TRB publications:

A4A

Airlines for America

AAAE

American Association of Airport Executives

AASHO

American Association of State Highway Officials

AASHTO

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

ACI–NA

Airports Council International–North America

ACRP

Airport Cooperative Research Program

ADA

Americans with Disabilities Act

APTA

American Public Transportation Association

ASCE

American Society of Civil Engineers

ASME

American Society of Mechanical Engineers

ASTM

American Society for Testing and Materials

ATA

American Trucking Associations

CTAA

Community Transportation Association of America

CTBSSP

Commercial Truck and Bus Safety Synthesis Program

DHS

Department of Homeland Security

DOE

Department of Energy

EPA

Environmental Protection Agency

FAA

Federal Aviation Administration

FAST

Fixing Americaʼs Surface Transportation Act (2015)

FHWA

Federal Highway Administration

FMCSA

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

FRA

Federal Railroad Administration

FTA

Federal Transit Administration

GHSA

Governors Highway Safety Association

HMCRP

Hazardous Materials Cooperative Research Program

IEEE

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

ISTEA

Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991

ITE

Institute of Transportation Engineers

MAP-21

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (2012)

NASA

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASAO

National Association of State Aviation Officials

NCFRP

National Cooperative Freight Research Program

NCHRP

National Cooperative Highway Research Program

NHTSA

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

NTSB

National Transportation Safety Board

PHMSA

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

RITA

Research and Innovative Technology Administration

SAE

Society of Automotive Engineers

SAFETEA-LU

Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (2005)

TCRP

Transit Cooperative Research Program

TEA-21

Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (1998)

TRB

Transportation Research Board

TSA

Transportation Security Administration

U.S. DOT

United States Department of Transportation

Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.

Transportation Research Board
500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001

Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Page 123
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Page 124
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Page 125
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Page 126
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Page 127
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Page 128
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Page 129
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Page 130
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Page 131
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Page 132
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Page 133
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Page 134
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Page 135
Suggested Citation: "Appendix D: Results of Contractor Survey on Full-Depth Reclamation Construction Practices." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Full-Depth Reclamation: Current Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29222.
Page 136
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.