Completed
Regional focus
Global
North America
Topics
An ad hoc committee of NASEM reviewed the protection of technologies that have strategic importance for national security in an era of openness and competition, considering policies and practices related to the production and commercialization of research in critical domains. Based on its analysis, the committee offered in its report recommendations for changes to technology protection policies and practices that reflect the current realities of how technologies are developed and incorporated into new products and processes.
Featured publication
Consensus
ยท2022
U.S. leadership in technology innovation is central to our nation's interests, including its security, economic prosperity, and quality of life. Our nation has created a science and technology ecosystem that fosters innovation, risk taking, and the discovery of new ideas that lead to new technologie...
View details
Description
An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will be convened to advise the federal Government on the following questions:
1. Given today's competitive environment, how should federal R&D funding agencies evaluate or bound the openness of science and encourage transition from idea to commercialization, considering the benefits and drawbacks of specific technology protection and commercialization options?
2. What solutions are required to address market or institutional challenges, if any, related to the production and commercialization of advances discovered in research, particularly those that may have potentially significant impacts on U.S. national security?
3. What are the appropriate policy changes related to research, production, commercialization, and technology protection that will help accelerate the marketing/fielding of advances stemming from U.S.-funded research within and to the benefit of the United States, in particular for technologies critical for national security leadership?
These questions will be considered in the context of one or more specific science and technology domains that impact U.S. scientific leadership and national security and will include, at a minimum, synthetic biology, artificial intelligence, and microelectronics (including beyond Moore's Law). Questions of economic competitiveness may be considered when the U.S. economic position is crucial to national security concerns (e.g., maintaining DoD-available supply chains).
The committee will convene a series of meetings, including three workshops, to gather information and consider a broad range of views on the questions above. Drawing from the content of the workshops and other information sources, the committee will review current legal, regulatory, and policy regimes and prepare a consensus report with findings and recommendations.
Collaborators
Committee
Co-Chair
Co-Chair
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Committee Membership Roster Comments
Please note that there has been a change in the committee membership with the appointment of Robert J. Birgeneau, John O. Dabiri, Robert C. Dynes, Deborah Frincke, Gilbert Herrera, Leroy E. Hood, Michael Imperiale, J. Michael McQuade, Judith A. Miller, Richard M. Murray, and Dawn Song, effective 02/18/2021.
Please note that there has been a change in the committee membership with the resignation of John O. Dabiri, effective 03/02/2021.
Please note that there has been a change in the committee membership with the removal of Dawn Song, effective 04/01/2021.
Please note that there has been a change in the committee membership with the resignation of Gilbert Herrera, effective 08/15/21.
Editorial changes were made to committee biographies on 5/10/22 and 9/23/22.
Sponsors
DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency)
National Science Foundation
Major units and sub-units
Center for Health, People, and Places
Lead
Policy and Global Affairs
Lead
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences
Collaborator
Center for Advancing Science and Technology
Lead
Committee on Science, Technology, and Law
Lead
U.S. Science and Innovation Policy
Lead
Committee on Science, Engineering, Medicine, and Public Policy
Lead
Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy
Lead
Intelligence Community Studies Board
Collaborator
Science and Technology Policy and Law Program Area
Lead
Social and Economic Systems Program Area
Lead