Skip to main content

Protecting Critical Technologies for National Security in an Era of Openness and Competition

Completed

An ad hoc committee of NASEM reviewed the protection of technologies that have strategic importance for national security in an era of openness and competition, considering policies and practices related to the production and commercialization of research in critical domains. Based on its analysis, the committee offered in its report recommendations for changes to technology protection policies and practices that reflect the current realities of how technologies are developed and incorporated into new products and processes.

Description

An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will be convened to advise the federal Government on the following questions:
1. Given today's competitive environment, how should federal R&D funding agencies evaluate or bound the openness of science and encourage transition from idea to commercialization, considering the benefits and drawbacks of specific technology protection and commercialization options?
2. What solutions are required to address market or institutional challenges, if any, related to the production and commercialization of advances discovered in research, particularly those that may have potentially significant impacts on U.S. national security?
3. What are the appropriate policy changes related to research, production, commercialization, and technology protection that will help accelerate the marketing/fielding of advances stemming from U.S.-funded research within and to the benefit of the United States, in particular for technologies critical for national security leadership?
These questions will be considered in the context of one or more specific science and technology domains that impact U.S. scientific leadership and national security and will include, at a minimum, synthetic biology, artificial intelligence, and microelectronics (including beyond Moore's Law). Questions of economic competitiveness may be considered when the U.S. economic position is crucial to national security concerns (e.g., maintaining DoD-available supply chains).
The committee will convene a series of meetings, including three workshops, to gather information and consider a broad range of views on the questions above. Drawing from the content of the workshops and other information sources, the committee will review current legal, regulatory, and policy regimes and prepare a consensus report with findings and recommendations.

Collaborators

Committee

Co-Chair

Co-Chair

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Download all bios

Committee Membership Roster Comments

Please note that there has been a change in the committee membership with the appointment of Robert J. Birgeneau, John O. Dabiri, Robert C. Dynes, Deborah Frincke, Gilbert Herrera, Leroy E. Hood, Michael Imperiale, J. Michael McQuade, Judith A. Miller, Richard M. Murray, and Dawn Song, effective 02/18/2021.

Please note that there has been a change in the committee membership with the resignation of John O. Dabiri, effective 03/02/2021.

Please note that there has been a change in the committee membership with the removal of Dawn Song, effective 04/01/2021.

Please note that there has been a change in the committee membership with the resignation of Gilbert Herrera, effective 08/15/21.

Editorial changes were made to committee biographies on 5/10/22 and 9/23/22.

Sponsors

DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency)

National Science Foundation

Staff

Gail Cohen

Lead

GCohen@nas.edu

David Dierksheide

DDierksheide@nas.edu

Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.