Skip to main content

Advancing the Field of Forensic Pathology: Lessons Learned from Death in Custody Investigations

In progress

Any project, supported or not by a committee, that is currently being worked on or is considered active, and will have an end date.

This National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine study will examine the handing of deaths in custody by the medicolegal death investigation system in the United States. It will consider number and distribution of deaths in custody; measures forensic pathologists should follow to assess cause of death; the scientific bases and associated evidence needed to justify a diagnosis related to any death; mitigation of diagnostic biases; the role of the medicolegal death investigation as finder of fact for manner of death for public health (versus for the criminal justice system); and approaches to improve the handing of deaths in custody.

Description

An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine intends to conduct a study on the handling of deaths in custody (detained, arrested, en route to incarceration, or incarcerated in state or local facilities or a boot camp prison) by the medicolegal death investigation system in the United States and study related concerns with medical death investigations more generally. The study will consider:
(1) the number of deaths while in custody throughout the criminal justice process and how those deaths are investigated, diagnosed, recorded, reported and made transparent;
(2) the distribution of diagnoses for deaths that occur in custody (cause and manner of death) and the scientific bases for attributing such diagnoses to those deaths;
(3) measures (and limitations thereof) that forensic pathologists should follow to conduct independent assessments of cause of death generally and in particular for deaths in custody;
(4) the proper range of attributions for cause and manner of death that should be made in a medicolegal death investigation and the scientific bases and associated evidence needed to justify a diagnosis related to any death in general and, in particular, to deaths in custody;
(5) mitigation strategies to be used to protect forensic pathologists from factors that may bias their diagnosis;
(6) an assessment of the dual role played by the medicolegal death investigation system as fact finders of manner of death for public health as opposed to for the criminal justice system; and
(7) quality standards and regulations needed for improvement.
The committee will produce a consensus report with findings and recommendations.

Collaborators

Committee

Co-Chair

Co-Chair

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Sponsors

Arnold Ventures

Just Trust

Private: Non Profit

Universal Music Group

Staff

Anne-Marie Mazza

Lead

AMazza@nas.edu

Steven Kendall

SKendall@nas.edu

Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.