In progress
Any project, supported or not by a committee, that is currently being worked on or is considered active, and will have an end date.
This National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine study will examine the handing of deaths in custody by the medicolegal death investigation system in the United States. It will consider number and distribution of deaths in custody; measures forensic pathologists should follow to assess cause of death; the scientific bases and associated evidence needed to justify a diagnosis related to any death; mitigation of diagnostic biases; the role of the medicolegal death investigation as finder of fact for manner of death for public health (versus for the criminal justice system); and approaches to improve the handing of deaths in custody.
Featured publication
Consensus
ยท2025
The U.S. medicolegal death investigation system is responsible for investigating and providing determinations of cause and manner of death, playing a vital role in the nation's public health and criminal justice systems. Recent, high-profile deaths in custody cases have drawn widespread attention to...
View details
Description
An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine intends to conduct a study on the handling of deaths in custody (detained, arrested, en route to incarceration, or incarcerated in state or local facilities or a boot camp prison) by the medicolegal death investigation system in the United States and study related concerns with medical death investigations more generally. The study will consider:
(1) the number of deaths while in custody throughout the criminal justice process and how those deaths are investigated, diagnosed, recorded, reported and made transparent;
(2) the distribution of diagnoses for deaths that occur in custody (cause and manner of death) and the scientific bases for attributing such diagnoses to those deaths;
(3) measures (and limitations thereof) that forensic pathologists should follow to conduct independent assessments of cause of death generally and in particular for deaths in custody;
(4) the proper range of attributions for cause and manner of death that should be made in a medicolegal death investigation and the scientific bases and associated evidence needed to justify a diagnosis related to any death in general and, in particular, to deaths in custody;
(5) mitigation strategies to be used to protect forensic pathologists from factors that may bias their diagnosis;
(6) an assessment of the dual role played by the medicolegal death investigation system as fact finders of manner of death for public health as opposed to for the criminal justice system; and
(7) quality standards and regulations needed for improvement.
The committee will produce a consensus report with findings and recommendations.
Collaborators
Committee
Co-Chair
Co-Chair
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Sponsors
Arnold Ventures
Just Trust
Private: Non Profit
Universal Music Group
Major units and sub-units
Center for Advancing Science and Technology
Lead
Science and Technology Policy and Law Program Area
Lead