TABLE F-1 Mean and Percentiles for Intake of Vitamin A (μg/ REa/day) from Food, Nova Scotia and Québec, Canada (1990)
|
Sex/Age Categoryb |
Number of Respondents |
Mean |
Percentile |
|
5th |
|||
|
M 19–30 y |
536 |
1,518 |
380 |
|
Standard error |
|
37 |
|
|
M 31–50 y |
724 |
1,281 |
417 |
|
Standard error |
|
16 |
|
|
M 51–70 y |
663 |
1,479 |
481 |
|
Standard error |
|
43 |
|
|
M 71–74 y |
149 |
2,093 |
464 |
|
Standard error |
|
50 |
|
|
F 19–30 y |
548 |
1,129 |
417 |
|
Standard error |
|
17 |
|
|
F 31–50 y |
826 |
1,137 |
401 |
|
Standard error |
|
21 |
|
|
F 51–70 y |
657 |
1,245 |
426 |
|
Standard error |
|
24 |
|
|
F 71–74 y |
148 |
1,298 |
431 |
|
Standard error |
|
29 |
|
|
a RE = retinol equivalents. 1 RE = 6 μg β-carotene and 12 mg α-carotene or β-cryptoxanthin. b M = male, F = female. SOURCE: Nova Scotia Heart Health Program. 1993. Report of the Nova Scotia Nutrition Survey. Nova Scotia Department of Health, Health and Welfare Canada; Santé Québec. 1995. Les Québécoises et les Québécois Mangent-Ils Mieux? Rapport de l’Enquête Québécoise sur la Nutrition, 1990. Montréal: Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux, Gouvernement du Québec. |
|||
|
10th |
25th |
50th |
75th |
90th |
95th |
99th |
|
484 |
647 |
874 |
1,277 |
1,744 |
2,145 |
3,892 |
|
27 |
16 |
27 |
48 |
76 |
145 |
1,051 |
|
495 |
710 |
951 |
1,253 |
1,581 |
1,802 |
2,485 |
|
24 |
22 |
30 |
37 |
58 |
98 |
228 |
|
572 |
744 |
994 |
134 |
1,891 |
2,082 |
2,812 |
|
30 |
28 |
43 |
88 |
93 |
40 |
275 |
|
550 |
805 |
1,124 |
1,463 |
1,855 |
2,317 |
3,769 |
|
53 |
79 |
42 |
90 |
198 |
215 |
2,944 |
|
499 |
597 |
717 |
885 |
1,039 |
1,121 |
1,443 |
|
12 |
11 |
11 |
16 |
25 |
25 |
94 |
|
474 |
598 |
747 |
1,005 |
1,264 |
1,420 |
1,802 |
|
16 |
10 |
18 |
22 |
38 |
75 |
140 |
|
500 |
609 |
805 |
1,128 |
1,443 |
1,648 |
1,992 |
|
23 |
16 |
33 |
41 |
72 |
62 |
111 |
|
456 |
540 |
756 |
1,195 |
1,637 |
1,838 |
2,315 |
|
19 |
44 |
62 |
100 |
115 |
134 |
417 |
TABLE F-2 Mean and Percentiles for Intake of Iron (mg/day) from Food, Nova Scotia and Québec, Canada (1990)
|
Sex/Age Categorya |
Number of Respondents |
Mean |
Percentile |
|
5th |
|||
|
M 19–30 y |
536 |
17.9 |
10.3 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.4 |
|
|
M 31–50 y |
724 |
16.9 |
9.0 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.4 |
|
|
M 51–70 y |
663 |
15.1 |
8.2 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.4 |
|
|
M 71–74 y |
149 |
15.1 |
9.1 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.8 |
|
|
F 19–30 y |
548 |
11.8 |
6.2 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.2 |
|
|
F 31–50 y |
826 |
11.7 |
7.2 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.2 |
|
|
F 51–70 y |
657 |
11 |
7.0 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.3 |
|
|
F 71–74 y |
148 |
11 |
6.3 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.3 |
|
|
a M = male, F = female. SOURCE: Nova Scotia Heart Health Program. 1993. Report of the Nova Scotia Nutrition Survey. Nova Scotia Department of Health, Health and Welfare Canada; Santé Québec. 1995. Les Québécoises et les Québécois Mangent-Ils Mieux? Rapport de l’Enquête Québécoise sur la Nutrition, 1990. Montréal: Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux, Gouvernement du Québec. |
|||
|
10th |
25th |
50th |
75th |
90th |
95th |
99th |
|
11.2 |
13.7 |
16.1 |
19.2 |
22.4 |
23.9 |
31.6 |
|
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
1.0 |
2.2 |
|
10.2 |
12.6 |
15.7 |
18.7 |
21.9 |
24.7 |
31.6 |
|
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
1.2 |
2.2 |
|
9.0 |
11.2 |
14.5 |
17.8 |
20.4 |
22.2 |
29.5 |
|
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
2.4 |
|
10.0 |
11.4 |
13.6 |
16.8 |
20.4 |
21.6 |
31.6 |
|
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
2.6 |
5.2 |
|
7.1 |
8.6 |
10.9 |
13.4 |
15.9 |
17.5 |
20.8 |
|
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.9 |
|
8.2 |
9.6 |
10.8 |
12.1 |
13.7 |
14.8 |
17.8 |
|
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
|
7.8 |
9.0 |
10.5 |
11.8 |
13.3 |
14.0 |
17.3 |
|
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
1.1 |
|
6.6 |
8.0 |
9.7 |
11.9 |
13.7 |
17.2 |
24.9 |
|
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
1.4 |
3.2 |
4.6 |
TABLE F-3 Mean and Percentiles for Intake of Zinc (mg/day) from Food, Nova Scotia and Québec, Canada (1990)
|
Sex/Age Categorya |
Number of Respondents |
Mean |
Percentile |
|
5th |
|||
|
M 19–30 y |
536 |
15.9 |
11.2 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.3 |
|
|
M 31–50 y |
724 |
16.6 |
8.3 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.3 |
|
|
M 51–70 y |
663 |
12.6 |
7.4 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.4 |
|
|
M 71–74 y |
149 |
13.2 |
7.0 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.6 |
|
|
F 19–30 y |
548 |
9.9 |
5.9 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.2 |
|
|
F 31–50 y |
826 |
9.7 |
6.2 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.2 |
|
|
F 51–70 y |
657 |
8.8 |
4.0 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.2 |
|
|
F 71–74 y |
148 |
9.4 |
3.9 |
|
Standard error |
|
0.3 |
|
|
a M = male, F = female. SOURCE: Nova Scotia Heart Health Program. 1993. Report of the Nova Scotia Nutrition Survey. Nova Scotia Department of Health, Health and Welfare Canada; Santé Québec. 1995. Les Québécoises et les Québécois Mangent-Ils Mieux? Rapport de l’Enquête Québécoise sur la Nutrition, 1990. Montréal: Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux, Gouvernement du Québec. |
|||
|
10th |
25th |
50th |
75th |
90th |
95th |
99th |
|
12.0 |
13.0 |
14.0 |
14.9 |
15.8 |
16.5 |
20.2 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.08 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
1.4 |
|
9.4 |
11.2 |
13.1 |
14.9 |
16.6 |
18.2 |
21.9 |
|
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
|
8.5 |
9.7 |
11.3 |
13.2 |
15.8 |
18.0 |
20.1 |
|
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
|
8.0 |
8.9 |
11.0 |
13.3 |
15.1 |
16.2 |
21.9 |
|
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
1.4 |
2.5 |
|
6.6 |
7.6 |
8.8 |
10.1 |
11.3 |
12.1 |
14.1 |
|
0.1 |
0.09 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
|
6.7 |
7.5 |
8.5 |
9.7 |
10.8 |
11.6 |
13.9 |
|
0.09 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
|
5.8 |
6.8 |
8.2 |
9.3 |
10.6 |
11.5 |
13.2 |
|
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
1.1 |
|
4.2 |
6.2 |
7.4 |
9.0 |
12.0 |
13.0 |
20.7 |
|
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
2.8 |
4.1 |