Previous Chapter: 12 CONCLUSIONS
Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.

Index

A

Accounting practice

cost-center analysis, 137

information technology and, 22-23

productivity assessment of, 127

in traditional performance evaluation, 144-145

Aerospace industry, 240, 241, 245, 248

Aggregation of data, 119, 120, 128, 171-172, 176-177, 184

theory of composition, 185, 298

American Hospital Supply Corporation, 43-44

Automated teller machines, 46, 89-90, 202

Automobile industry, 2, 56, 61, 232, 264

B

Banking/finance industry, 17, 18-20, 21, 23, 56

automated teller machines, 46, 89-90, 202

Behavior modification

measurement of productivity and, 107-108, 110-111, 139-140

principles of, 108-109

Biotechnology, 2

Bottlenecks, 117, 144, 155-156, 165, 175

C

Clerical productivity, 20

information technologies and, 33-36, 86

Communications

in computer-aided design, 249-250, 251-252, 260

in downsizing efforts, 269-270, 273-275

formalization of, 28-29, 252

in gain-sharing plans, 70-72

indexicality of, 27

individual skills, 197

in lean production systems, 66-67, 68

negative effect on productivity, 166, 225

social effects, 230

in software development, 10, 221, 222, 223-225, 226-228, 294

speed of, 26-27

team design and, 221, 226-228

threat-rigidity effect, 270

Communications industry, 18

Competency multiplier effects, 219-220

Competition

international, 1-2

managerial overhead and, 264

strategic information processing, 43-44

Composition theory, 185-188, 190, 298-299

Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.

Computer-aided design

assessment methodology, 141-142

computer-aided manufacturing and, 241, 259

data collection and management in, 243

definition of productivity in, 10, 244

designer-team linkage, 250-255, 259-260

expectations for, 10-11, 241, 243

implementation, 256-257

information flow in, 249-250, 251-252, 254-255, 260

isolation of workers in, 245, 251-252, 259-260

organizational complexity in, 247-248, 255, 260

principal activities in, 242-243

productivity determinants in, 243-250

productivity linkages in, 11

research needs, 259-260

resource management in, 245-246, 257-258, 260

role of, 240, 241

specialization in, 244-245, 253, 260

supervision, 250, 253-254, 260

system support, 248-249, 255-256, 260

team-organization linkage, 255-259, 260

tools, 248

training, 247

as transitional technology, 246-247, 254, 258, 260

workstation time-sharing, 245-246, 257-258

Computer-aided manufacturing, 241, 259

Computer-aided software engineering, 221n

Computer industry. See Software development

Conceptual Schematic Productivity model, 111-114

Continuous improvement, 70-71, 107, 147, 150

Core activities, 61-62, 293

Corporate investments, 2-3, 15, 17-18, 46

Customer service, 44-46

automation in, 62

subtask productivity analysis, 59-60

D

Document preparation

document revisions in, 34-35

quality vs. quantity trade-offs, 29-30

spoken communication vs., 26-27

See also Information technology

Downsizing

attitudes of retained workers, 275-276, 283-284

compensation for casualties of, 275, 283

as cost reduction tactic, 278-279, 281

as crisis management, 269, 270, 271, 274

cross-level effects, 267-268

decision-making processes, 270-271, 273

early retirement incentives in, 279

employee targeting in, 263-264, 276-277, 282-283

implementation, 268, 269, 272

information flow in, 269-270, 273-275, 285

level of application, 266-267

linkage insensitivity in, 271

mistaken beliefs in, 271-280, 288

obstacles to productivity gains in, 268, 281-284, 285, 295

organizational productivity and, 284-286, 292

partial factor productivity in analysis of, 262

participants in design of, 272-273, 276-277, 282, 283-284, 285

as productivity initiative, 11, 263-268

removal of top management in, 279-280

simultaneous restructuring, 278, 284, 285-286

successful model of, 281-286, 288

total factor productivity in analysis of, 262

trends, 263-266

value analysis in, 283

E

E-mail, 35, 225, 252

speech vs., 27, 28

Educational system, 141

Effectiveness, as assessment criterion, 8, 106, 134-135

Efficiency

coordination in groups, 230

as organizational assessment criterion, 8, 106, 134, 135

Employee compensation

bonus plans, 70, 71, 86-87

in downsizing, 275

Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.

gain-sharing plans, 69-72

in lean production systems, 68

productivity and, 48

response to change and, 85

stock participation, 83

subtask focus of, 86-87

wages, 2, 48

work behavior and, 108-109

Employee evaluation

misuse of productivity assessments, 127-128

motivation in, 140, 168, 171

in Productivity Measurement and Enhancement System, 178, 182-183

productivity measurement for, 107, 127-128

productivity vs. performance, 126-127

unit cost analysis, 127

Employee participation

in downsizing decisions, 272-273, 282, 283-284, 285

employee ownership and, 83

in innovation process, 136-137

in office automation decisions, 85

organizational congruence and, 140-141

in Scanlon plan, 70

in technology implementation, 257

trends, 207

F

Focus of attention, 65, 70, 75

Food service industry, 21, 108

G

Gain-sharing plans, 69-72

Goal alignment, 9, 107-111, 119, 139-141, 174, 183-184, 187, 202

Group functioning

communications in, 223-225

in composition theory, 185

in computer-aided design, 11, 250-255

coordination in, 10, 215, 225

in decentralized environments, 207, 260

degree of interdependence in, 185-187

entrainment process in, 228-229

experimental modeling, 230-232

in Goal Alignment model, 109-110, 119

individual performance and, 82, 117-121, 214, 218-219, 229-232, 250-255

in information technology, 33-36, 48

in innovation process, 137

input factors, 118

as measure of individual performance, 197

in organizational performance, 118, 187, 232, 250-255

performance measurement system for, 178-184

productivity determinants, 205

productivity linkages in, 122-123, 129

productivity measurement of, 117-119

public goods problem, 226n

research, 4, 229-232

role accuracy in, 187

in software development, 10, 214-215, 216-217, 218-229, 231-233

supervision, 185, 253-254

team design, 220-223

types of group structures, 120-121

worker isolation as productivity factor, 251-252, 259-260

H

Hiring practices, 95, 188

for software development teams, 220

Hourly output, 2, 263

Human factors research, 3-4

I

Individual performance/productivity

aggregation of data, 119, 120, 128

behavior modification in measurement of, 107-108, 139-140

communication skills, 197

components of job performance, 195-197, 199

in composition theory, 185

in computer-aided design, 250-255

Conceptual Schematic Productivity model, 111-114

in context of total performance, 126-127

in core vs. peripheral tasks, 61-62, 64-65, 293

demonstrated effort as factor in, 197

Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.

determinants of, 197-198, 204-206

direct observation for assessment of, 200-201

discipline as factor in, 197

downsizing effects, 267-268

effects of measurement on, 193

facilitative processes in organizations, 65-72

financial measures in assessment of, 127

gain-sharing plans and, 69-72

group performance and, 117-119, 128, 218-219, 250-255

information technologies and, 26-33, 35, 206

input measures, 124-125, 129

job-specific task proficiency, 195-196, 199

leadership skills, 197

management skills, 197

measurement of, 9

misuse of assessments, 127-128

model for IT assessment, 194-198

motivation in, 197, 198

non-job-specific task proficiency, 196

obstacles to measurement of, 128-129

obstacles to organization-level change, 58-64, 65, 73

organizational linkages, 56-64, 65, 72-76, 297-298

output determinants, 185

output measures, 123-124, 128, 168-170

peak vs. typical, 199-200

process determinants, 5-6, 58, 65-66

Productivity Servosystem model, 114-117

quality as assessment factor, 125-126

rating method, 200

research in, 4, 105-106

research needs, 77-79, 123-129

role linkages in, 57, 59-64

in software development team productivity, 215, 218-219

standardized sample for assessment of, 200

subtask relationships in, 57, 58-61, 86-87, 94-95

system determinants, 82

uncontrollable factors, 112-113

variables in, 111, 112

Industrial engineers, 4

Industrial/organizational psychology

behavior modification, 108-109

productivity research, 4

Information technology

administrative overhead in, 36-38

case studies, 211-212

clerical productivity and, 20

corporate investment in, 2-3, 15, 17-18, 46

corporate strategic applications, 43-44

customer service and, 44-46

ease of use and overuse of, 35, 41-42, 86

equipment obsolescence issues, 31

increases in workload related to, 33-36

interindustry comparisons, 16, 20-21

interrole effects, 62

intraindustry comparisons, 16, 21-24

labor productivity in, 145

latent structure, 195, 210

macro modeling of, 296-297

management control-seeking behavior, 40-41

management information systems, 21-22, 40-42, 48

multilevel analysis, 16-17

operator skills, 31-33

opportunity for profitability, 44-46

organizational communication and, 26-29

organizational structure and, 205-206

planning for implementation, 148

in poorly run vs. well-run firms, 25-26

productivity and, 47-49

productivity assessment, 194, 202, 207-208, 209

productivity components, 203-204, 210

productivity determinants, 205-206, 210

productivity improvement strategies, 206-208

quality vs. quantity trade-off in, 29-30, 48, 125

research needs in, 49, 158, 209-212, 297

sectoral analyses, 16, 17-20

socioeconomic impacts, 13, 14-15

spiraling investment in, 46-47, 90-91

subtask productivity analysis, 59-60, 86-87

See also Office automation

Innovation

international comparison, 137, 222

as organizational assessment criterion, 8, 106, 134, 136-137

Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.

Insurance industry, 17, 23-24, 46

Internal Revenue Service, 30

International linkages, 1-2

IT. See Information technology

J

Job classification, 68

Just-in-time manufacturing, 28

L

Labor costs, 91, 124-125, 129

M

Management/supervision

assessment activities, 138-139

assessment of, 197, 263

in computer-aided design, 250, 253-254, 260

control-seeking behavior, 40, 150, 223

decentralized, 207, 260

of downsizing efforts, 268-271

in dynamic environment, 143-144

as group performance variable, 185

growth trends, 264

improvement/PDCA cycle, 139, 147

information culture in, 40-42

introduction of office automation, 84-85

in IT productivity, 206-207

knowledge of results, 140

leadership climate, 83

level-specific performance evaluation, 141-143, 153, 168

by numbers, 41, 42, 48

optimal production technique strategy, 155-156

as organizational subsystem, 88

as overhead in IT, 36-38

participants in downsizing efforts, 272-273, 276-277

paternalistic style, 269-270

performance measurement needs, 145-146, 147-149, 167

productivity analysis for, 107

in productivity assessment, 129

as productivity determinant, 131-132, 205, 206

removal of, in crisis, 279-280

resource allocation issues, 257-258

role of, 138

social context of decision-making, 270

in software development teams, 222, 223

strategic planning, 147-148

of successful downsizing, 281-284, 285

systems model, 133, 134, 146-147

total quality management, 93-94

traditional measures of success in, 263

Marketing activities

customer service, 44-46

growth in, 38

information technology in, 22-23, 44-46

Material velocity management, 143-144, 155-156

Measurement of productivity outcomes, 136

administrative/managerial factors in, 129

aggregation of data, 176-177, 184

analysis of variance in, 208

as behavior modifier, 107-108, 139-140

comparison across units, 183, 184, 188

in computer-aided design, 244

in context of total performance, 125-126, 297-298, 300

contingencies concept, 179-181

cultural aspects of organizations, 99

data sources, 24-25

defining linkages in, 132-133, 139

definition of productivity in, 8-9, 202, 209

design variables, 153-155

in engineering design, 10

errors in, 127

financial measures in, 127

flexibility in, 139, 143-144, 151, 189

goal alignment in, 139-141

goals of, 128

good qualities in, 142-143, 150-152, 201

group level, 117-119, 129

hierarchical model, 9

inadequacy of, 131, 133-134, 157-158

individual level, 9, 106-107, 195

in information technologies, 14, 15-16, 194, 195, 209

as input/output ratio, 55, 244

input units in, 124-125, 129

knowledge of results in, 140

latent variable vs. observed measure, 194

in management system model, 147, 148-149

Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.

methods in, 200-201

misuse of results, 127-128

natural phenomenon, 166-172

new thinking in, 150-152, 158-159

obstacles to, 128-129

organizational conflicts as obstacle to, 166, 173-174, 177, 183-184

organizational goal alignment in, 9, 107-111, 119, 174, 202

at organizational level, 59

output units in, 123-124, 128, 168-171, 175, 185, 187, 190, 296

peak vs. typical performance, 197-198

performance components, 195-197, 199

performance determinants, 197-198

problems in, 24-26, 207

as productivity determinant, 193

productivity determinants, 204-206

Productivity Measurement and Enhancement System, 177-184, 211

profit impact of market strategies approach, 21

profound knowledge in, 133, 292-293

quality issues in, 125-126

research needs, 145-146, 209-212, 296-297, 300

role of, 106-107, 156, 167-168

scaling in, 193, 230-232, 295

selection of measures in, 152-153, 168-171

self-reported data in, 30

side effects of interventions in, 175-176

as source of productivity paradox, 7-8, 166, 171, 174-177

in strategic planning, 148

substantive theory, 193

task classification in, 120

taxonomy of linkage problems, 189

time lag effects, 7, 31, 157, 165, 175, 207

traditional measures, 139, 144-145

unit of analysis in, 202-203

user needs in, 139, 141-143, 154

welfare economics framework for, 18-19

Motivation, 66, 68-69, 71, 76

employee ownership and, 83

equipment problems and, 258-259

measurement of, 176, 178

operant psychology, 108-109

performance evaluation systems and, 140, 168, 171, 197, 198

productivity measurement as, 110-111

O

Office automation

definition, 84

employee response, 84-85, 97-98

generalizability of productivity outcomes, 91

implementation, 84-85

individual productivity and, 86-87, 94-95

labor costs and, 91

maintenance investments, 90-91

negative productivity effects, 86, 90, 91

obstacles to productivity improvement, 7

organizational subsystem interactions, 89-93, 95-96

symbolic values in, 97-98

technical problems in, 258

training, 91

See also Information technology

Organizational culture, 92-94, 97, 100

Organizational productivity

administrative overhead and, 36-38

analysis of variance in, 208

benefits of, 48

communications technologies in, 26-29

in computer-aided design, 255-259

conditions for improvement in, 72-76

coordination systems in, 65, 66-67, 68, 71-72, 74-75

core vs. peripheral tasks in, 61-62, 64-65, 293

defining linkages in, 132-133

determinants of, 205-206

downsizing and, 11, 284-286, 292

effects of measurement on, 193

equifinality of interventions for, 89, 93-94

facilitative processes, 65-72, 293-294

focus of attention in, 65, 70, 75

gain-sharing plans and, 69-72

goal alignment in, 173-174, 183-184, 187, 202

group functioning in, 33-42, 118, 187, 232, 255-259

horizontal linkages in, 295-296

implementation of interventions, 94

individual productivity and, 26-33, 57, 59-61

industry productivity and, 43-44

Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.

information technology in, 26-42, 43-47, 48-49, 205-206

in lean production systems, 68-69, 72

management functions in, 40-42, 48, 206

motivation processes in, 66, 68-69, 71, 76

office automation and, 6-7, 84, 86-87, 90, 91

in open system theory, 94-96

organization-specific measures of, 9, 107-111, 119, 139-141

organizational evolution and, 65-66, 70-71, 75-76, 78

in poorly run vs. well-run firms, 25-26

problem-solving systems in, 65, 67-68, 69, 71-72, 75, 78

process determinants, 5-6, 58, 65-66, 293-294

research needs, 76-79

role linkages in, 57, 59-64

side effects of interventions, 7, 165-166, 175-176

social linkages in, 77

sources of intervention failure, 207

system determinants of, 82, 83, 293-294

in systems model, 8, 99-100

as target of downsizing initiatives, 266-267

theory of aggregation for, 185

theory of composition for, 185-188, 190, 298-299

types of organizational linkages in, 56-58

vertical linkages in, 295-296

wages and, 48

See also Productivity

Organizational structure

company size, 263

complexity of linkages in, 57-58, 299

in computer-aided design, 247-248, 255, 260

degree of interdependency in, 58, 88

design activities in, 11, 162-164

dynamic homeostasis in, 89, 92-93

effects of office automation in, 89-93

employee compensation, 68-72

group structure in, 119

information needs at different levels of, 141-143, 153, 168

in IT productivity, 205-206

lean vs. mass production systems, 66-69, 72

linkages in, 162-165

as obstacle to productivity growth, 7, 293

as open system, 87-89, 94-96

organizational evolution and, 76

organizational subsystems in, 88, 162-164

political context, 97, 98-99

as productivity factor, 165, 175, 293-295

project teams, 10

specialization in, 88, 89-90

subsystem linkage as source of paradox, 184-185

subsystem reverberations, 88, 90-91, 95

system-wide intervention, 81, 95-96

taxonomy of linkage problems, 189

team design, 220-223

types of linkages in, 55-56, 189

See also Downsizing

Organized labor, 63-64

P

Partial factor productivity, 55, 262

Postal Service, U.S., 60-61, 62, 63, 64

Problem-solving systems, 65, 67-68, 69, 71-72, 75, 78

in Scanlon plan, 70

Product development, 263

Productivity

capital/labor, 19-20, 21, 145

company size and, 263

in computer-aided design, 10-11, 241, 243-250, 260

computer security measures and, 249-250, 254-255, 260

corporate investment in, 2-3

definitions, 8-9, 55, 106, 136, 202, 209, 244, 262

determinants, 204-206, 209

downsizing effects, 265-268

importance of growth in, 1-2

information technology components, 203-204, 209

partial factor productivity, 55, 262

profitability and, 43, 44

resource management issues, 246, 260

software/hardware upgrades and, 246-247, 258, 260

strategic planning for, 147-148

Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.

supervision issues, 253-254, 260

systems support in, 255-256, 260

task specialization in, 245, 253, 260

technology implementation in, 256-257

technology problems and, 258-259

throughput, 13-14

total factor productivity, 55, 262

trends, 2, 14-15

See also Individual performance/productivity;

Measurement of productivity outcomes;

Organizational productivity

Productivity Measurement and Enhancement System (ProMES)

aggregation of data, 184

conceptual base, 177

definition of productivity, 177

feedback report, 178, 182-183

linkage issues, 183-184

process, 178-181, 211

role of, 177-178

Productivity research

case studies in, 211-212

decentralized management, 207

downsizing effects, 284-287

individual level, 105-106

information technology, 14, 16-24

large group performance, 229-232

level of analysis, 3-4, 105, 161-162, 292, 295

linkages in software development, 218-219

multidisciplinary approach, 5

needs, 123-129, 145-146, 157, 185, 189-190, 259-260, 286-287, 294, 300

organizational linkages, 4-5, 162

software development teams for, 215

theory development, 74, 298-299

Productivity Servosystem model, 114-117

Profitability

company size and, 263

new technologies and, 44-46

as organizational assessment criterion, 8, 106, 134, 137

productivity and, 43, 44

Profound knowledge, 133, 292-293

Public goods theory, 226n

Purchasing procedures

computerization of, 43-44

corporate software, 32

organizational politics in, 98

Q

Quality

checkpoints, 135-136

information technologies and, 29-30, 48

as organizational assessment criterion, 8, 106, 134, 135-136

in productivity assessment, 8, 125-126

productivity rewards for employees, 87

total quality management, 93-94

Quality of work life, 8, 68-69, 106, 134, 136

R

Resource management, 245-246, 257-258

Retail settings, 92

Retirement incentives, 279

Robotics, 2

S

Scaling issues, 193, 230-232, 295

Scanlon plan, 69-72, 77

Security measures, 249-250, 254-255, 260

Shipbuilding industry, 2, 230-231

Side effects of interventions, 7, 165-166, 175-176

Size of companies, 263

Slack, 7, 11, 60-61, 63-64, 67, 73, 77, 78, 165, 188

Social linkages, 77

Software

in information technology productivity, 203, 246-247

product obsolescence as productivity issue, 31-32

spreadsheet modeling, 41-42, 90

Software development

analysis phase, 215

authority structure, 222, 228

coding operations, 216

communications in, 221, 222, 223-225, 226-228, 294

competency multiplier effects, 219-220

complexity of, 216

computer-aided, 221n

coordination in, 215, 216-226

design phase, 215-216

documentation of, 216

Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.

entrainment process in, 228-229

individual-group linkages, 10, 218-219

in information technology productivity, 203

infrastructure costs, 223

interdependence of components, 217-218

object-oriented design, 221n

process, 215-216

productivity determinants, 214-215, 233, 294

reassignment of members, 229

research on linkages, 218-219

role of teams in, 214

team design in, 10, 214, 219, 220-223, 226-228, 294

uncertainty in, 217

as unit of analysis, 215

unit of output in, 124

Specialization, 11, 88, 89-90, 244-245, 253, 260

Spreadsheet programs, 41-42, 90

Steel industry, 2, 263

Strategic planning, 147-148

Systems theory

analysis of decision-making, 96

in design of measurement systems, 154

human resources assessment in, 96-97

limitations of, 96

of management, 133

open systems, 87-89

organizational functioning in, 133-137

in productivity interventions, 94-96, 299

subsystem interactions in organizations, 88-94

T

Tank crew performance, 232

Task classification, 120

Textile industries, 2

Throughput productivity, 13-14

Time lag effects, 7, 31, 157, 165, 207

Total factor productivity, 55, 262

Total quality management, 93-94, 136, 147

Training

after downsizing, 275, 283

competency multiplier effects, 219-220

in computer-aided design, 247

hardware/software obsolescence and, 31-33, 246-247

office automation, 85, 91

in problem-solving, 68

software development teams, 219-220

system interactions in, 83

V

Valve-manufacturing industry, 22-23

W

Wages, 2, 48

Warehousing/inventory activities information technology in, 43-44

Warehousing operations, 23

Waste, 190

Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.
Page 302
Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.
Page 303
Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.
Page 304
Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.
Page 305
Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.
Page 306
Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.
Page 307
Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.
Page 308
Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.
Page 309
Suggested Citation: "INDEX." National Research Council. 1994. Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2135.
Page 310
Subscribe to Emails from the National Academies
Stay up to date on activities, publications, and events by subscribing to email updates.