LiDAR is a remote sensing technology that measures distances by emitting pulsed laser beams toward a target and analyzing the reflected signals. LiDAR sensors can detect both motorized and non-motorized traffic. A LiDAR system is composed of three elements: a laser that is used to identify objects, a scanner, and a customized GPS receiver. LiDAR sensors can be categorized into flash LiDAR and rotating LiDAR. Flash LiDAR uses a single light pulse to scan a scene, generating high-density laser points within a focused area. In contrast, rotating LiDAR employs rotating assemblies or mirrors to direct laser beams, enabling a 360-degree scan of the surroundings. LiDAR can generate highly accurate 3D models of the surrounding environment, making it a powerful tool for various applications, including traffic data collection. LiDAR can detect vehicles on roadways, measure their speeds, classify their types, and even monitor pedestrian movements, making it a useful technology for traffic management, transportation planning, and other fields.
LiDAR works by rapidly emitting thousands of laser pulses per second, which reflect off objects such as vehicles or infrastructure. The sensor calculates each object’s exact distance and position by analyzing the time delay and wavelength of the returning pulses. This computation allows LiDAR to create real-time, detailed spatial maps of traffic conditions. The main LiDAR features typically used to select a model are the laser channels (i.e., the total number of laser beams), the vertical field of view, and the vertical resolution or angle between adjacent laser beams. Models containing higher laser channels tend to be more expensive but more accurate and provide improved coverage versus cheaper sensors with fewer beams.
The two primary types of LiDAR sensors are topographic and bathymetric. Topographic LiDAR, which uses near-infrared laser light, is commonly employed for ground-based applications, including traffic monitoring. Bathymetric LiDAR, which uses water-penetrating green light, is more specialized for measuring underwater terrains, such as riverbeds or seafloors (Jagirdar et al., 2019). While bathymetric LiDAR is less relevant to traffic data collection, topographic LiDAR has become a valuable tool for transportation agencies, enabling them to control signals, gather detailed traffic counts, monitor traffic flows, and enhance roadway safety by identifying patterns of congestion or incidents in real time.
In recent years, various LiDAR systems have become commercially available, providing more flexible and cost-effective options for traffic signal control and data collection. These systems can be mounted on infrastructure like traffic poles, bridges, or even drones, providing a bird’s-eye view of traffic conditions. Figure 31a and Figure 31b show a LiDAR sensor mounted on a traffic signal pole. LiDAR sensors (Figure 31) typically have a field of view ranging from 120 to 360 degrees, enabling them to monitor multiple directions of an intersection. Their detection range can span from a few feet to several hundred feet, with the typical range for sensors used at signalized intersections being approximately 164–656 ft (50–200 m).
LiDAR sensors perform well in various lighting conditions, including nighttime, as they rely on emitted rather than ambient light. This feature gives them an advantage over traditional optical cameras for traffic monitoring. However, despite its increasing use in data collection, LiDAR’s application for real-time traffic control remains limited due to the need for significant post-processing of data, which can be computationally intensive. This processing typically involves filtering the noise, classifying objects, and integrating data into traffic management systems. As computational power and data processing algorithms advance and as LiDAR costs
continue to decrease, it could play a more significant role in real-time traffic management and smart transportation systems.
Table 5 summarizes the main strengths and weaknesses of LiDAR sensors for counting motorized and non-motorized traffic.
Table 5. Strengths and Weaknesses of LiDAR Sensors.
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|
| Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic | |
|
|
| Motorized Traffic Only | |
| No additional strengths and weaknesses beyond those applicable to both modes | |
| Non-Motorized Traffic Only | |
| No additional strengths beyond those applicable to both modes |
|
The validation results from NCHRP Project 03-144 revealed that the counting accuracy (WMAPE) of motorized traffic volumes obtained from four LiDAR sensors was generally high, ranging between 1.5% to 8.4%. The correlations (R) between LiDAR and benchmark volumes were also high (0.99–1.00). However, the accuracy of temporary LiDAR sensors in counting non-motorized traffic was lower, with WMAPE ranging from 44.9% to 54.5%, and R between 0.73 and 0.79. The equipment did not exhibit a consistent undercounting or overcounting trend.
The most common causes of undercounting are:
Common causes of overcounting are:
Recommended installation, calibration, and maintenance practices related to LiDAR sensors are described below.