Infrared sensors are non-intrusive devices mounted overhead or at the side of the road to detect approaching or departing traffic. Like other traffic detection technologies, they can collect traffic volume, speed, and vehicle classification data. Some sensors can count both motorized and non-motorized traffic; however, they are more effective for motorized traffic counting.
Infrared sensors are categorized into two types: active and passive. Active infrared sensors function by emitting low-energy laser beams and measuring the time it takes for the beam to reflect back to the device. These sensors combine transmitter and receiver functions, determining the presence of a vehicle based on the reduced signal return time caused by the object’s interference. Active infrared sensors can classify vehicles and measure traffic volumes, speeds, vehicle length, and queue length.
On the other hand, passive infrared sensors are non-intrusive devices that operate only as a receiver without emitting any radiation. They detect changes in infrared radiation emitted by all objects with a temperature above zero (FLIR, 2023). The energy captured by the sensors is converted into electrical signals, which are processed and used to determine the presence of a vehicle. Passive infrared sensors with a single detection zone are capable of measuring traffic parameters such as volume, lane occupancy, and vehicle passage. Thermal sensors are a subset of passive infrared sensors that convert infrared energy (heat) into a visual image (FLIR, 2020). Figure 33 shows pictures of thermal sensors.
Table 6 and Table 7 summarizes the main strengths and weaknesses of active and passive infrared sensors, respectively, for counting motorized and non-motorized traffic.
Table 6. Strengths and Weaknesses of Active Infrared Sensors.
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|
| Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic | |
|
|
| Motorized Traffic Only | |
|
|
| Non-Motorized Traffic Only | |
|
|
Table 7. Strengths and Weaknesses of Passive Infrared Sensors.
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|
| Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic | |
|
|
| Motorized Traffic Only | |
|
|
| Non-Motorized Traffic Only | |
|
|
NCHRP Project 03-144 presented validation results for thermal cameras installed at three intersections in Arizona. All accuracy errors (WMAPE) exceeded 10%, with significant undercounting of volumes observed in most lanes. In general, infrared sensors are more effective for motorized traffic counting due to stronger heat signatures and clearer movement patterns. Detecting non-motorized users can be more challenging in crowded environments or under certain weather conditions. Their accuracy for non-motorized traffic counting depends on deployment characteristics, sensor type, and calibration.
Active infrared sensors may undercount traffic due primarily to:
Except for low-reflectivity objects, all the reasons listed above may affect the accuracy of passive infrared sensors. Additionally, these sensors may undercount traffic due to the following:
Active infrared sensors may overcount traffic primarily due to the following reasons:
In addition to these reasons, passive infrared sensors may overcount traffic due to:
Recommended practices and ideal characteristics of infrared sensors and data for traffic monitoring use are described below.