Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features (2025)

Chapter: Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies

Previous Chapter: Appendix B: Questionnaire Outline
Page 192
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28854.

APPENDIX C. RESPONSES FROM SELECTED AGENCIES

Table C-2. Implemented On-Street Bicycle Facilities.

City and State Agency Name Has your jurisdiction implemented any of the following on-street bicycle facility designs at intersection locations?
Conventional bicycle lane Buffered Bicycle Lane One-way Separated Bicycle Lane Two-Way Separated Bicycle Lane Contraflow Bicycle Lane
Arlington, VA Arlington County DOT Yes Yes Yes No No
Arlington, VA Virginia DOT Yes Yes No No No
Austin, TX Texas Department of Transportation Yes Yes Yes No No
Boston, MA MassDOT Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Chicago, IL Metro Strategies Yes Yes Yes No No
Cleveland, OH Ohio DOT Yes Yes No Yes No
Denver, CO Denver Regional Council of Governments Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Detroit, MI SEMCOG Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Honolulu, HI Hawaii DOT Yes No No No No
Minneapolis, MN Hennepin County, Minnesota Yes Yes Yes No No
New York City, NY NYC DOT Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Olympia, WA WDOT Yes Yes No No No
Philadelphia, PA Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Philadelphia, PA Office of Transportation, Infrastructure, Sustainability Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Portland, OR Oregon DOT Yes No Yes No No
Portland, OR Portland Bureau of Transportation Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Raleigh, NC ITRE Yes Yes Yes No No
San Francisco CA Presidio Trust Yes Yes Yes No No
San Francisco, CA San Francisco MTA Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Page 193
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28854.

Table C-3. Location and Installation date of Bicycle Facilities.

City and State Agency Name Please indicate what type of bicycle facility data your jurisdiction collects. Check all that apply.
Conventional bike lanes Location Conventional bike lanes Installation Date Buffered bike lanes Location Buffered bike lanes Installation Date Separated bike lanes Location Separated bike lanes Installation Date Contraflow bike lanes Location Contraflow bike lanes Installation Date
Arlington, VA Arlington County DOT Yes No Yes No Yes No No No
Arlington, VA Virginia DOT Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Austin, TX Texas Department of Transportation Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
Boston, MA MassDOT Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No
Chicago, IL Metro Strategies Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
Cleveland, OH Ohio DOT No No No No No No No No
Denver, CO Denver Regional Council of Governments Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
Detroit, MI SEMCOG Yes No Yes No Yes No No No
Honolulu, HI Hawaii DOT Yes Yes No No No No No No
Minneapolis, MN Hennepin County, Minnesota Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
New York City, NY NYC DOT Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Page 194
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28854.
City and State Agency Name Please indicate what type of bicycle facility data your jurisdiction collects. Check all that apply.
Conventional bike lanes Location Conventional bike lanes Installation Date Buffered bike lanes Location Buffered bike lanes Installation Date Separated bike lanes Location Separated bike lanes Installation Date Contraflow bike lanes Location Contraflow bike lanes Installation Date
Olympia, WA WDOT Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No
Philadelphia, PA Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission No No No No No No No No
Philadelphia, PA Office of Transportation, Infrastructure, Sustainability Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Portland, OR Oregon DOT Yes No No No Yes No No No
Portland, OR Portland Bureau of Transportation Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
Raleigh, NC ITRE Yes No Yes No Yes No No No
San Francisco CA Presidio Trust Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
San Francisco, CA San Francisco MTA Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Page 195
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28854.

Table C-4. Available Data.

City and State Agency Name As part of NCHRP 15-74, the research team is gathering data from agencies to aid in our analyses. Please indicate if your agency has or plans to collect any of the following data.
Bicycle count data Bicycle facility data Bicyclist crash data Motor vehicle volume Roadway inventory data Driveway location data Transit stop location data Parking data Land use data
Arlington, VA Arlington County DOT Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities
Arlington, VA Virginia DOT Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities
Austin, TX Texas Department of Transportation Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities
Boston, MA MassDOT Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Don’t have and don’t plan to collect Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities
Chicago, IL Metro Strategies Don’t have but plan to collect Have for most/all facilities Don’t have but plan to collect Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities
Cleveland, OH Ohio DOT Don’t have and don’t plan to collect Don’t have and don’t plan to collect Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Don’t have and don’t plan to collect Don’t have and don’t plan to collect Don’t have and don’t plan to collect Don’t have and don’t plan to collect
Denver, CO Denver Regional Council of Governments Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Don’t have but plan to collect Have for most/all facilities
Detroit, MI SEMCOG Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Don’t have but plan to collect Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities
Honolulu, HI Hawaii DOT Don’t have but plan to collect Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Don’t have and don’t plan to collect Have for most/all facilities
Page 196
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28854.
City and State Agency Name As part of NCHRP 15-74, the research team is gathering data from agencies to aid in our analyses. Please indicate if your agency has or plans to collect any of the following data.
Bicycle count data Bicycle facility data Bicyclist crash data Motor vehicle volume Roadway inventory data Driveway location data Transit stop location data Parking data Land use data
Minneapolis, MN Hennepin County, Minnesota Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities
New York City, NY NYC DOT Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities
Olympia, WA WDOT Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Don’t have but plan to collect Have for most/all facilities Don’t have but plan to collect Have for most/all facilities
Philadelphia, PA Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Don’t have and don’t plan to collect Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities
Philadelphia, PA Office of Transportation, Infrastructure, Sustainability Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Don’t have but plan to collect Don’t have but plan to collect Have for most/all facilities Don’t have and don’t plan to collect Have for most/all facilities
Portland, OR Oregon DOT Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Don’t have and don’t plan to collect Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities
Portland, OR Portland Bureau of Transportation Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Don’t have and don’t plan to collect Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities
Raleigh, NC ITRE Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities
San Francisco CA Presidio Trust Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities 0.00% Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities
Page 197
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28854.
City and State Agency Name As part of NCHRP 15-74, the research team is gathering data from agencies to aid in our analyses. Please indicate if your agency has or plans to collect any of the following data.
Bicycle count data Bicycle facility data Bicyclist crash data Motor vehicle volume Roadway inventory data Driveway location data Transit stop location data Parking data Land use data
San Francisco, CA San Francisco MTA Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for some facilities Have for most/all facilities Have for some facilities Don’t have and don’t plan to collect
Page 198
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28854.

Table C-5. Count Data Collection Method.

City and State Agency Name Please indicate which of the following methods your jurisdiction uses to collect bicyclist count data.
Permanent (continuous) counters Temporar y counters Video data Manual Other (please specify) Not sure
Arlington, VA Arlington County DOT Yes Yes No No No No
Arlington, VA Virginia DOT Yes Yes No No Yes No
Austin, TX Texas Department of Transportation Yes Yes No Yes No No
Boston, MA MassDOT Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
Chicago, IL Metro Strategies Yes Yes No No No No
Cleveland, OH Ohio DOT No No No No No No
Denver, CO Denver Regional Council of Governments Yes Yes No Yes No No
Detroit, MI SEMCOG No Yes No No No No
Honolulu, HI Hawaii DOT No No No No Yes No
Minneapolis, MN Hennepin County, Minnesota No No No No No No
New York City, NY NYC DOT Yes No No Yes No No
Olympia, WA WDOT Yes Yes No Yes No No
Philadelphia, PA Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Yes Yes Yes No No No
Philadelphia, PA Office of Transportation, Infrastructure, Sustainability Yes Yes No No No No
Portland, OR Oregon DOT Yes No Yes No No No
Portland, OR Portland Bureau of Transportation Yes Yes No Yes No No
Raleigh, NC ITRE Yes Yes Yes No No No
San Francisco CA Presidio Trust No No No No No No
San Francisco, CA San Francisco MTA Yes No Yes No No No
Page 192
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28854.
Page 192
Page 193
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28854.
Page 193
Page 194
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28854.
Page 194
Page 195
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28854.
Page 195
Page 196
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28854.
Page 196
Page 197
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28854.
Page 197
Page 198
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Responses from Selected Agencies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Safety Evaluation of On-Street Bicycle Facility Design Features. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28854.
Page 198
Next Chapter: Appendix D: Bike Counts from Cities Not Included in Safety Analysis
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.