Created by: Workshop planning committee and staff
Living Document: Last updated 11/28/2022
Project: National Academies for Science, Engineering, and Medicine’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Workshop on Considerations for Returning Individual Genomic Results from Population-Based Surveys: Focus on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Document Purpose: Created for internal use to facilitate the work of the group (e.g., staff, sponsors, committee members, speakers, moderators, discussants) across contexts and disciplines. This is a living document that will be updated periodically as needed and requested.
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)1—A program of studies designed to assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States. The survey is unique in that it combines interviews and physical examinations.
___________________
Survey—In the NHANES context and more generally in the social science, behavioral, and population studies research space the word “surveys” is often used to refer to “the identification [of] and data collection [based on] a sample of population units [e.g., individuals, institutions].”2 These are often data collection programs which include a traditional “survey” (e.g., a questionnaire that a respondent fills out) and other forms of data collection including but not limited to records linkage consent, biological data collection, environmental data collection (e.g., soil samples), and other means of data collection.
Active Survey—In the context of this workshop, “active survey” refers to data from the primary interaction with the participant but not to secondary research using the biospecimens.
Laboratory-Developed Test (LDT)—Defined by the Food and Drug Administration as an in vitro diagnostic test that is developed and used within a single testing laboratory. The FDA does not consider diagnostic devices to be LDTs if they are designed or manufactured completely, or partly, outside of the laboratory that offers and uses them. FDA has generally exercised enforcement discretion meaning that LDTs generally have not undergone FDA premarket review of analytic and clinical validity.3
Laboratory Assays—An assay is an investigative (analytic) procedure in laboratory medicine, mining, pharmacology, environmental biology and molecular biology for qualitatively assessing or quantitatively measuring the presence, amount, or functional activity of a target entity.
___________________
2 Saavedra, P. (2011). Complex sample surveys. In P. J. Lavrakas (Ed.) Encyclopedia of survey research methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947
3 Food and Drug Administration. (2018). Laboratory developed tests. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/in-vitro-diagnostics/laboratory-developed-tests (definition revised July 2023).
Variants—variant is the currently accepted term to describe the state of a nucleotide in a DNA or RNA macromolecule that differs from the reference sequence. This term is commonly modified with terms such as “rare” or “common”, and/or “pathogenic” or “benign.” For example, if the reference sequence harbors the C (cytosine) nucleotide at a specific base position in the genome, but a tested sample harbors an A (adenosine) at that position, the A is considered a variant.
Annotation—annotation of a genomic DNA variant comprises a variety of analyses and predictions regarding the molecular biologic consequences of the variant.
Classification—assessment of the probability of the validity of a variant-disease association for a specific genomic variant. (e.g., using ACMG/AMP Richards et al. 20154 recommendations to generate ClinVar entries.)
CLIA—Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) regulations include federal standards applicable to all U.S. facilities or sites, that test human specimens for health assessment or to diagnose, prevent, or treat disease. The CLIA regulations specify processes for establishing performance characteristics of laboratory test, primarily analytic validity.
Primary finding—a finding in a clinical assay or test that is related to the indication for the assay or test and was purposefully sought by the analyst of the data.
Incidental finding—a finding in a clinical assay or test that is not related to the indication for the test and was not a finding that was purposefully sought by an analyst of the data.
Secondary finding—a finding in a clinical assay or test that is not related to the indication for the test but was purposefully sought in a systematic, directed analysis of the data.
Actionable finding—a finding in a clinical assay or test that has a reasonable potential to lead to a health care intervention that can reduce the morbidity or mortality of a disease.
Confirmatory testing—CLIA-compliant testing to confirm a screening test result or research finding.
___________________
4 Richards, S., Aziz, N., Bale, S., Bick, D., Das, S., Gastier-Foster, J., Grody, W. W., Hegde, M., Lyon, E., Spector, E., Voelkerding, K., Rehm, H. L., and ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. (2015). Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genetics in Medicine, 17(5), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.30