Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities (2026)

Chapter: Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs

Visit NAP.edu/10766 to get more information about this book, to buy it in print, or to download it as a free PDF.
Previous Chapter: Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire
Page 87 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel

APPENDIX B
List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs

Table B-1. List of Departments of Transportation (DOTs) responding to the survey.
A table lists the names of state transportation departments that respond.
Long Description.

The table shows a list of responding transportation departments. The header reads Responding DOT. The entries appear one per row. The entries are Alabama Department of Transportation; Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities; Arizona Department of Transportation; Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department; California Department of Transportation; Colorado Department of Transportation; Connecticut Department of Transportation; Delaware Department of Transportation; District Department of Transportation; Florida Department of Transportation; Georgia Department of Transportation; Idaho Transportation Department; Illinois Department of Transportation; Indiana Department of Transportation; Kansas Department of Transportation; Kentucky Transportation Cabinet; Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development; Maine Department of Transportation; Maryland Department of Transportation; Massachusetts Department of Transportation; Michigan Department of Transportation; Minnesota Department of Transportation; Mississippi Department of Transportation; Missouri Department of Transportation; Montana Department of Transportation;

Page 88 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table lists the names of state transportation departments that respond.
Long Description.

The table shows a list of responding transportation departments. The header reads Responding DOT. The entries appear one per row. The entries are Nebraska Department of Transportation; Nevada Department of Transportation; New Hampshire Department of Transportation; New Jersey Department of Transportation; New Mexico Department of Transportation; New York State Department of Transportation; North Carolina Department of Transportation; North Dakota Department of Transportation; Ohio Department of Transportation; Oregon Department of Transportation; Pennsylvania Department of Transportation; Rhode Island Department of Transportation; South Carolina Department of Transportation; South Dakota Department of Transportation; Tennessee Department of Transportation; Vermont Agency of Transportation; Virginia Department of Transportation; Utah Department of Transportation; Washington State Department of Transportation; West Virginia Department of Transportation; Wisconsin Department of Transportation; Wyoming Department of Transportation.

Page 89 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-2. Individual DOT responses to Question 1 (agency that houses HSO).
A table lists states with their response type and any other state agency text.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Response; Other State Agency Text. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; DOT; dash. Row 4: Arizona; DOT; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; Other state agency; Arkansas State Police. Row 6: California; Other state agency; Office of Traffic Safety. Row 7: Colorado; DOT; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; DOT; dash. Row 9: Delaware; Other state agency; Falls under Department of Safety and Homeland Security. Row 10: District of Columbia; Other state agency; HSO in DC gov is under Office of Deputy Mayor for Operations and Infrastructure. Row 11: Florida; DOT; dash. Row 12: Georgia; DOT; dash. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; DOT; dash. Row 15: Illinois; DOT; dash. Row 16: Indiana; Other state agency; Indiana Criminal Justice Institute ICJI. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; DOT; dash. Row 19: Kentucky; DOT; dash. Row 20: Louisiana; Other state agency; Department of Public Safety. Row 21: Maine; Other state agency; State Department of Public Safety. Row 22: Maryland; dash; dash. Row 23: Massachusetts; Other state agency; In the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security. Row 24: Michigan; Other state agency; It is part of the Michigan State Police. Row 25: Minnesota; Other state agency; Department of Public Safety. Row 26: Mississippi; Other state agency; Mississippi Department of Public Safety. Row 27: Missouri; DOT; dash. Row 28: Montana; DOT; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; DOT; dash. Row 30: Nevada; Other state agency; Department of Public Safety Office of Traffic Safety.

Page 90 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table lists states with their response type and any other state agency text.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Response; Other State Agency Text. Row 31: New Hampshire; Other state agency; Department of Safety Office of Highway Safety. Row 32: New Jersey; Other state agency; NJ Division of Highway Traffic Safety. Row 33: New Mexico; DOT; dash. Row 34: New York; DOT; dash. Row 35: North Carolina; DOT; dash. Row 36: North Dakota; DOT; dash. Row 37: Ohio; Other state agency; Department of Public Safety. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; DOT; dash. Row 40: Pennsylvania; DOT; dash. Row 41: Rhode Island; DOT; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; Other state agency; We have a Traffic Safety Office in our DOT that manages HSIP. The Governors Office of Highway Safety is delegated to the Department of Public Safety. Row 43: South Dakota; Other state agency; Department of Public Safety. Row 44: Tennessee; Other state agency; Department of Safety and Homeland Security. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; Other state agency; Utah HSO is located within the Department of Public Safety. Row 47: Vermont; DOT; dash. Row 48: Virginia; Other state agency; DMV. Row 49: Washington; Other state agency; The SHSO is under the Washington State Traffic Safety Commission. Row 50: West Virginia; DOT; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; DOT; dash. Row 52: Wyoming; DOT; dash. A note states Summary of results DOT equals 24, Other state agency equals 21, Total responses equals 45.

Page 91 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-3. Text responses for HSO URLs for Question 1 (agency that houses HSO).
A table lists respondents and their H S O website addresses.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 45 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; HSO URL Text. Row 2: Alaska; h t t p s colon double slash d o t dot alaska dot gov double slash highway safety slash. Row 3: Arizona; h t t p s colon double slash g o h s dot a z dot gov slash. Row 4: Arkansas; h t t p s colon double slash d p s dot arkansas dot gov slash law hyphen enforcement slash arkansas hyphen state hyphen police slash services hyphen programs slash highway hyphen safety hyphen office slash. Row 5: California; h t t p s colon double slash d o t dot c a dot gov slash programs slash safety hyphen programs. Row 6: Colorado; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot c o dot dot gov slash business slash grants slash safety grants. Row 7: Connecticut; h t t p s colon double slash portal dot c t dot gov slash highway safety office slash about hyphen us question mark symbol language equals e n underscore US. Row 8: Delaware; h t t p s colon double slash o h s dot delaware dot gov slash. Row 9: District of Columbia; h t t p s colon double slash vision zero dot d c dot gov slash pages slash highway hyphen safety hyphen office. Row 10: Florida; f d o t dot gov slash Safety. Row 11: Idaho; h t t p s colon double slash i t d dot idaho dot gov slash safety slash. Row 12: Illinois; h t t p s colon double slash i d o t dot Illinois dot gov double slash transportation hyphen system double slash local hyphen transportation hyphen partners slash county hyphen engineers hyphen and local hyphen public hyphen agencies slash funding hyphen programs slash h s i p dot h t m l. Row 13: Indiana; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot i n dot gov slash c j i slash traffic hyphen safety slash. Row 14: Kansas; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot k s d o t dot gov double slash about double slash our organization double slash divisions double slash transportation safety double slash behavioral safety. Row 15: Kentucky; h t t p s colon double slash transportation dot k y dot gov slash Highway Safety slash Pages slash default dot a s p x. Row 16: Louisiana; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot l a highway safety dot org slash. Row 17: Maine; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot maine dot gov slash d p s slash b h s. Row 18: Maryland; h t t p s colon double slash zero deaths m d dot gov slash highway hyphen safety hyphen office slash. Row 19: Massachusetts; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot mass dot gov slash orgs slash office hyphen of hyphen grants hyphen and hyphen research. Row 20: Michigan; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot michigan dot gov slash m s p slash divisions slash o h s p. Row 21: Minnesota; h t t p s colon double slash d p s dot m n dot gov slash divisions slash o t s. Row 22: Mississippi; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot d p s dot m s dot gov slash public hyphen safety hyphen planning slash highway hyphen safety. Row 23: Missouri; w w w dot save m o lives dot com. Row 24: Montana; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot m d t dot m t dot gov slash vision zero slash plans slash safety p r g dot a s p x. Row 25: Nebraska; h t t p s colon double slash d o t dot nebraska dot gov slash safety slash h s o slash. Row 26: Nevada; h t t p s colon double slash o t s dot n v dot gov slash. Row 27: New Hampshire; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot n h dot gov slash h s a f e t y slash.

Page 92 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table lists respondents and their H S O website addresses.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 45 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; HSO URL Text. Row 28: New Jersey; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot n j o a g dot gov slash about slash divisions hyphen and hyphen offices slash division hyphen of hyphen highway hyphen traffic hyphen safety hyphen home slash. Row 29: New Mexico; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot d o t dot n m dot gov slash planning hyphen research hyphen multimodal hyphen and hyphen safety double slash modal double slash traffic hyphen safety slash. Row 30: New York; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot d o t dot n y dot gov double slash divisions double slash operating double slash o s s s double slash highway improvement program. Row 31: North Carolina; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot n c d o t dot gov double slash initiatives policies double slash safety double slash traffic safety double slash Pages double slash default dot a s p x and h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot n c d o t dot gov double slash initiatives policies double slash safety double slash g h s p double slash Pages double slash default dot a s p x. Row 32: North Dakota; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot d o t dot n d dot gov double slash travel and safety double slash highway safety. Row 33: Ohio; h t t p s colon double slash o t s o dot ohio dot gov double slash. Row 34: Oregon; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot oregon dot gov double slash o d o t double slash safety double slash pages double slash index dot a s p x. Row 35: Pennsylvania; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot p a dot gov double slash agencies double slash penn d o t double slash traveling in p a double slash safety dot h t m l. Row 36: Rhode Island; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot d o t dot r i dot gov double slash safety double slash hashtag highway safety. Row 37: South Carolina; h t t p s colon double slash s c d p s dot s c dot gov double slash o h s j p. Row 38: South Dakota; h t t p s colon double slash d p s dot s d dot gov double slash safety enforcement double slash highway safety. Row 39: Tennessee; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot t n dot gov double slash safety double slash tennessee highway safety office dot h t m l. Row 40: Utah; h t t p s colon double slash highway safety dot u t a h dot gov double slash. Row 41: Vermont; h t t p s colon double slash s h s o dot v e r m o n t dot g o v slash question mark underscore g l equals 1 star t m d 3 e 8 star underscore g a s t a r MTY 2 M j A 2 O TA u MT c z NT g 0 N j U z OA dot dot star underscore g a underscore V 9 WQH 7 7 KLW star MT c 0 MT g 4 NT l z N i 4 1 N y 4 x L j E 3 NDE 4 ODU j N j M u MC 4 w L j A. Row 42: Virginia; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot d m v dot virginia dot gov double slash safety. Row 43: Washington; h t t p s colon double slash w t s c dot w a dot gov double slash. Row 44: West Virginia; h t t p s colon double slash transportation dot w v dot gov double slash DMV double slash Safety double slash Pages double slash default dot a s p x. Row 45: Wyoming; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot d o t dot state dot w y dot u s double slash home double slash d o t safety dot h t m l.

Page 93 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-4. Individual DOT responses to Question 2 (who HSIP manager reports to).
A table lists states, their response type, and a description of the respondent’s role.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Response; Description. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; State Highway Safety Engineer; dash. Row 4: Arizona; State Highway Safety Engineer; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; Other division head; Planning and Research Division. Row 6: California; Other division head; Office Chief Safe System Approach Integration. Row 7: Colorado; Other division head; State Traffic Engineer. Row 8: Connecticut; Other division head; Division of Traffic Engineering. Row 9: Delaware; Other division head; Chief of Traffic Engineering. Row 10: District of Columbia; Other executive staff; Chief Traffic Safety Engineer. Row 11: Florida; Other executive staff; Florida DOT Assistant Secretary of Engineering and Operations. Row 12: Georgia; Other; Assistant State Traffic Engineer. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; Other; Traffic Operations Section Manager. Row 15: Illinois; Other; HSIP manager reports to Bureau of Safety Programs and Engineering Bureau Chief who also serves as the State Highway Safety Engineer and reports to the state secretary of transportation. Row 16: Indiana; Other division head; Director of Traffic Engineering. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; State Highway Safety Engineer; dash. Row 19: Kentucky; Other division head; Direction of the Division of Traffic Operations. Row 20: Louisiana; State Highway Safety Engineer; dash. Row 21: Maine; Other executive staff; Chief Engineer. Row 22: Maryland; Other; Director of the Office of Traffic and Safety, State Highway Administration. Row 23: Massachusetts; Other division head; Assistant Administrator Traffic and Safety. Row 24: Michigan; State Highway Safety Engineer; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; Other division head; Traffic Office Assistant Director.

Page 94 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table lists states, their response type, and a description of the respondent’s role.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Response; Description. Row 26: Mississippi; State Highway Safety Engineer; dash. Row 27: Missouri; State Highway Safety Engineer; dash. Row 28: Montana; State Highway Safety Engineer; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; Other division head; State Traffic Engineer. Row 30: Nevada; Other executive staff; Assistant Director of Planning. Row 31: New Hampshire; Head of DOT; dash. Row 32: New Jersey; Head of DOT; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; Other division head; Planning Division Director. Row 34: New York; Other division head; Highway Safety Bureau Director. Row 35: North Carolina; State Highway Safety Engineer; dash. Row 36: North Dakota; Other division head; Programming Division. Row 37: Ohio; Other executive staff; Reports to the administrator of the Office of Transportation and Economic Development. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; Other division head; Traffic Engineering Section Manager. Row 40: Pennsylvania; Other; Highway Safety Section Chief. Row 41: Rhode Island; State Highway Safety Engineer; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; State Highway Safety Engineer; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; Other; South Dakota DOT does not have an HSIP manager. The State Highway Safety Engineer manages HSIP and works in the Project Development Program in the Division of Planning and Engineering. Row 44: Tennessee; Other executive staff; TDOT Chief Engineer and Traffic Design Division Director. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; Other division head; The Director of Traffic and Safety. Row 47: Vermont; Other division head; Operations and Safety Bureau Manager responsible for traffic signals, traffic mobility operations, safe systems section including HSIP, active transportation, and SHSO. Row 48: Virginia; State Highway Safety Engineer; dash.

Page 95 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table lists states, their response type, and a description of the respondent’s role.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Response; Description. Row 49: Washington; Other; Washington does not have an HSIP manager. The State Safety Engineer is responsible and reports to an executive. Row 50: West Virginia; Other division head; Our HSIP is managed through the Safety Section of the Traffic Engineering Division and reports to the Chief of Operations. Row 51: Wisconsin; Other division head; Division of Transportation Investment Management Administrator. Row 52: Wyoming; Other executive staff; Assistant Chief Engineer of Operations. A note states Summary of results Head of DOT equals 2, Other executive staff equals 7, State Highway Safety Engineer equals 12, Other division head equals 18, Other equals 7, Total responses equals 46.

Page 96 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-5. Individual DOT responses to Question 3 (job duties of HSIP manager).
A table lists each state and shows which H S I P tasks they complete, marked with X marks.
Long Description.

The table has 9 columns and 53 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Completes HSIP annual report; Approves projects; Evaluates projects; Identifies projects; Selects projects; Leads education and public outreach campaigns; Tracks HSIP budgets and allocations; Other. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; X; X; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 4: Arizona; X; X; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; X; dash; X; X; dash; X; dash; dash. Row 6: California; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 7: Colorado; X; X; X; dash; dash; X; X; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; X; X; X; X; X; X; X; dash. Row 9: Delaware; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X; X. Row 10: District of Columbia; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 11: Florida; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 12: Georgia; X; X; X; X; X; X; X; dash. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 15: Illinois; X; X; X; X; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 16: Indiana; X; X; X; X; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 19: Kentucky; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 20: Louisiana; X; dash; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 21: Maine; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 22: Maryland; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X; X. Row 23: Massachusetts; X; dash; X; X; dash; X; dash; X. Row 24: Michigan; X; X; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; X; X; X; dash; X; X; X; X. Row 26: Mississippi; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 27: Missouri; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; X; X. Row 28: Montana; X; dash; X; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; X; dash; X; X; dash; dash; X; X. Row 30: Nevada; X; dash; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; X; X; X; X; X; X; X; dash.

Page 97 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table lists each state and shows which H S I P tasks they complete, marked with X marks.
Long Description.

The table has 9 columns and 53 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Completes HSIP annual report; Approves projects; Evaluates projects; Identifies projects; Selects projects; Leads education and public outreach campaigns; Tracks HSIP budgets and allocations; Other. Row 32: New Jersey; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 34: New York; X; X; X; dash; dash; dash; X; X. Row 35: North Carolina; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 36: North Dakota; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 37: Ohio; X; X; X; dash; X; X; X; dash. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 40: Pennsylvania; X; X; X; X; X; X; dash; dash. Row 41: Rhode Island; X; dash; X; X; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; X; dash; X; X; X; X; dash; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X; X. Row 44: Tennessee; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; X; X; X; dash; X; dash; X; X. Row 47: Vermont; X; dash; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 48: Virginia; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 49: Washington; X; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 50: West Virginia; X; X; X; X; X; X; X; X. Row 51: Wisconsin; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; X. Row 52: Wyoming; X; X; X; X; X; X; X; dash. Row 53 shows the counts: 45; 29; 42; 30; 29; 12; 37; 14.

Page 98 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-6. Text responses for “Other” for Question 3 (job duties of HSIP manager).
A table lists other H S I P related tasks described in text entries.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 14 rows. Row 1 lists the column header: Other Text. Row 2: Provide analysis and regions prioritize and select projects. Row 3: SHSP, VRUSA, manages crash data geocode and dissemination and manages all RSAs. Row 4: Identifies HSIP locations and prepares crash data and diagrams for field engineers. Row 5: Our Safety Programs and Analysis Engineer is responsible for the HSIP, the Railroad Grade Crossing Safety Program, Planning and Evaluation for Lighting and ITS, SHSP Development and Implementation, Incident Management Plan Development, Safety Culture, Highway Safety Studies, Safety Integration, the State Crash Records Database all aspects crash data collection through analysis, FARS, Traffic Monitoring Functions, Traffic Asset Management including Model Inventory of Roadway Elements. Row 6: Manages crash database, FARS analyst, and state property damage coordinator. Row 7: Provides guidance and oversight to district staff for identifying, selecting and implementing engineering safety projects. Row 8: Accountable for the SHSP. Row 9: Just wanted to point out again that these are all things the State Highway Safety Engineer is in charge of. Row 10: Verifies projects meet federal requirements. Row 11: Project selection, identification and evaluation are also part of my responsibilities but are primarily done by other DOT staff or outside support. Row 12: The Florida DOT SSO manages the HSIP, evaluates the program effectiveness, determines eligibility for funding approval, and provides policies, tools, and guidelines to assist the Districts, Turnpike Enterprise, and local agencies with implementing the HSIP. Row 13: Tracking project implementation to meet the HSIP obligation goal and planning HSIP strategies and policies such as systemic approach, safe system, complete street, and VRU safety. Row 14: Manages crash data systems, tracks fatal crashes, and reviews project plans.

Page 99 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-7. Individual DOT responses to Question 4 (who head of HSO reports to).
A three column table shows each state with a response category and a description of the role or position involved, followed by a summary note.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 52 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent, Response, Description. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; Other; State Traffic and Safety Engineer. Row 4: Arizona; Governor; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; Other intermediate division head; Arkansas State Police, Deputy Director of Administration. Row 6: California; Other state department; California State Transportation Agency. Row 7: Colorado; State Director for DOT; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; Other intermediate division head; Bureau Chief of Policy and Planning. Row 9: Delaware; State Director for Department of Public Safety; dash. Row 10: District of Columbia; Other state department; Deputy Mayor for Operations and Infrastructure. Row 11: Florida; Other; Florida DOT Assistant Secretary of Engineering and Operations. Row 12: Georgia; Other; We do not have a separate office. It is a program. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; Other intermediate division head; Chief External Affairs Officer. Row 15: Illinois; State Director for DOT; dash. Row 16: Indiana; Other state department; Executive at ICJI. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; Other intermediate division head; Chief of Transportation Safety. Row 19: Kentucky; State Director for DOT; dash. Row 20: Louisiana; Governor; dash. Row 21: Maine; Other; Commissioner State Department of Public Safety and Governor’s representative for highway safety. Row 22: Maryland; Other; Administrator of Maryland Department of Transportation Motor Vehicle Administration. Row 23: Massachusetts; Other intermediate division head; Executive Director of Office for Grants and Research. Row 24: Michigan; Other state department; Michigan State Police. Row 25: Minnesota; Other intermediate division head; Assistant Commissioner Department of Public Safety. Row 26: Mississippi; State Director for Department of Public Safety; dash.

Page 100 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A three column table shows each state with a response category and a description of the role or position involved, followed by a summary note.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 52 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent, Response, Description. Row 27: Missouri; Other intermediate division head; State Highway Safety Engineer. Row 28: Montana; Other intermediate division head; Planning Division Administrator. Row 29: Nebraska; Other intermediate division head; State Traffic Engineer. Row 30: Nevada; State Director for Department of Public Safety; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; State Director for Department of Public Safety; dash. Row 32: New Jersey; Other; Attorney General. Row 33: New Mexico; Other intermediate division head; Strategic Infrastructure Development Division Director. Row 34: New York; Other intermediate division head; Office Director Office of Traffic Safety and Mobility. Row 35: North Carolina; Other; North Carolina DOT State Traffic Engineer. Row 36: North Dakota; State Director for DOT; dash. Row 37: Ohio; Other intermediate division head; Department of Public Safety Assistant Director of Public Safety and Law Enforcement. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; State Director for Bureau of Motor Vehicles BMV; dash. Row 40: Pennsylvania; Other; Highway Safety Section Chief. Row 41: Rhode Island; Other; State Highway Safety Engineer. Row 42: South Carolina; State Director for Department of Public Safety; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; State Director for Department of Public Safety; dash. Row 44: Tennessee; State Director for Department of Public Safety; dash. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; State Director for Department of Public Safety; dash. Row 47: Vermont; Other; SHSO is contained within the Safe Systems Section HSIP, active transportation, SHSO and reports to associated manager. Row 48: Virginia; State Director for Bureau of Motor Vehicles BMV; dash. Row 49: Washington; Governor; dash. Row 50: West Virginia; State Director for Bureau of Motor Vehicles BMV; dash.

Page 101 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A three column table shows each state with a response category and a description of the role or position involved, followed by a summary note.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 52 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent, Response, Description. Row 51: Wisconsin; State Director for DOT; dash. Row 52: Wyoming; Other intermediate division head; Assistant Chief Engineer for Operation DOT. A note states Summary of results Governor equals 3, State Director for Department of Public Safety equals 8, State Director for Bureau of Motor Vehicles BMV equals 3, State Director for DOT equals 5, Other state department equals 4, Other intermediate division head equals 13, Other equals 10, Total responses equals 46.

Page 102 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-8. Individual DOT responses to Question 5 (entities with organizational chart).
A table lists states with their response as H S I P only, H S O only, both, unsure, none, or dash.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Response. Row 2: Alabama; dash. Row 3: Alaska; None of the above. Row 4: Arizona; None of the above. Row 5: Arkansas; Unsure. Row 6: California; HSIP and HSO. Row 7: Colorado; None of the above. Row 8: Connecticut; Unsure. Row 9: Delaware; None of the above. Row 10: District of Columbia; HSO only. Row 11: Florida; HSO only. Row 12: Georgia; HSIP only. Row 13: Hawaii; dash. Row 14: Idaho; None of the above. Row 15: Illinois; HSO only. Row 16: Indiana; Unsure. Row 17: Iowa; dash. Row 18: Kansas; HSIP and HSO. Row 19: Kentucky; HSO only. Row 20: Louisiana; Unsure. Row 21: Maine; HSIP and HSO. Row 22: Maryland; None of the above. Row 23: Massachusetts; HSO only. Row 24: Michigan; None of the above. Row 25: Minnesota; Unsure. Row 26: Mississippi; Unsure. Row 27: Missouri; HSIP and HSO. Row 28: Montana; None of the above. Row 29: Nebraska; HSO only. Row 30: Nevada; Unsure. Row 31: New Hampshire; HSIP and HSO.

Page 103 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table lists states with their response as H S I P only, H S O only, both, unsure, none, or dash.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Response. Row 32: New Jersey; HSIP only. Row 33: New Mexico; HSIP and HSO. Row 34: New York; HSIP and HSO. Row 35: North Carolina; HSIP and HSO. Row 36: North Dakota; HSO only. Row 37: Ohio; HSIP only. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash. Row 39: Oregon; HSO only. Row 40: Pennsylvania; HSO only. Row 41: Rhode Island; Unsure. Row 42: South Carolina; Unsure. Row 43: South Dakota; HSO only. Row 44: Tennessee; None of the above. Row 45: Texas; dash. Row 46: Utah; HSIP and HSO. Row 47: Vermont; HSIP and HSO. Row 48: Virginia; HSIP and HSO. Row 49: Washington; HSO only. Row 50: West Virginia; None of the above. Row 51: Wisconsin; HSO only. Row 52: Wyoming; HSO only. A note states Summary of results HSIP only equals 3, HSO only equals 13, HSIP and HSO equals 11, None of the above equals 10, Unsure equals 9, Total responses equals 46.

Page 104 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-9. DOT resources submitted for Question 5 (entities with organizational chart).
A table lists state agencies with titles and U R L details when available.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 17 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: State or Agency; Title; URL if available. Row 2: District of Columbia; Deputy Mayor for Operations and Infrastructure Organizational Chart; dash. Row 3: Florida; Organizational Structure; f d o t dot gov double slash agency resources double slash organization dot s h t m. Row 4: Kansas; Bureau of Transportation Safety Organization Chart; dash. Row 5: Kentucky; Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Information Guide; h t t p s colon double slash transportation dot k y dot gov slash Organizational hyphen Resources slash Documents slash KYTC hyphen Information hyphen Guide dot p d f hashtag Highway Safety. Row 6: Kentucky; Office of Highway Safety Organizational Chart; h t t p s colon double slash transportation dot k y dot gov slash Organizational hyphen Resources slash Organizational percent 20 Charts slash Highway percent 20 Safety dot p d f. Row 7: Nevada; Highway Safety Office Organizational Chart; dash. Row 8: New Hampshire; NHDOT Highway Safety Active Transportation Staff; dash. Row 9: New York; Highway Safety Improvement Program Procedures and Techniques Red Book; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot d o t dot n y dot gov double slash divisions slash operating slash o s s s slash highway repository slash Red Book dot p d f. Row 10: North Carolina; Highway Safety Program Directory; h t t p s colon double slash apps dot n c d o t dot gov slash d o t slash directory slash authenticated slash Unit Page dot a s p x question i d equals 5 9 9. Row 11: North Carolina; Traffic Safety Unit Directory; h t t p s colon double slash apps dot n c d o t dot gov slash d o t slash directory slash authenticated slash Unit Page dot a s p x question i d equals 1 3 3 8. Row 12: Ohio; O DOT Table of Organization; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot transportation dot ohio dot gov slash about slash us slash divisions slash o d o t hyphen to. Row 13: Oregon; DMV Transportation Safety Office; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot oregon dot gov slash o d o t slash Safety slash Documents slash TSO Org Chart dot p d f. Row 14: Oregon; Office Structure Table of Organization; dash. Row 15: South Dakota; Department of Public Safety Organization Chart; h t t p s colon double slash d p s dot s d dot gov slash about slash agencies slash organizational hyphen chart. Row 16: Virginia; Virginia Highway Safety Improvements Program; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot v d o t virginia dot gov slash doing hyphen business slash technical hyphen guidance hyphen and hyphen support slash traffic hyphen operations slash v h s i p. Row 17: Virginia; Virginia Highway Safety Office Contacts; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot d m v virginia dot gov slash safety slash resources slash safety contacts.

Page 105 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-10. Individual DOT responses to Question 6 (number of employees at HSIP and HSO).
A table lists states with H S I P and H S O staff count ranges.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; HSIP; HSO. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; 1 to 3; 4 to 6. Row 4: Arizona; 1 to 3; 16 to 20. Row 5: Arkansas; 7 to 10; 11 to 15. Row 6: California; 21 or more; 21 or more. Row 7: Colorado; 4 to 6; 7 to 10. Row 8: Connecticut; 7 to 10; 7 to 10. Row 9: Delaware; 4 to 6; 7 to 10. Row 10: District of Columbia; 21 or more; 21 or more. Row 11: Florida; dash; 21 or more. Row 12: Georgia; 4 to 6; dash. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; 1 to 3; 11 to 15. Row 15: Illinois; 7 to 10; 21 or more. Row 16: Indiana; 11 to 15; 7 to 10. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; 4 to 6; 7 to 10. Row 19: Kentucky; 4 to 6; 21 or more. Row 20: Louisiana; 7 to 10; Unsure. Row 21: Maine; 4 to 6; 11 to 15. Row 22: Maryland; 1 to 3; 21 or more. Row 23: Massachusetts; 11 to 15; 1 to 3. Row 24: Michigan; 1 to 3; Unsure. Row 25: Minnesota; 11 to 15; 16 to 20. Row 26: Mississippi; 11 to 15; Unsure. Row 27: Missouri; 4 to 6; 11 to 15. Row 28: Montana; 7 to 10; 7 to 10. Row 29: Nebraska; 4 to 6; 7 to 10. Row 30: Nevada; 16 to 20; 11 to 15. Row 31: New Hampshire; 7 to 10; dash.

Page 106 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table lists states with H S I P and H S O staff count ranges.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; HSIP; HSO. Row 32: New Jersey; 7 to 10; Unsure. Row 33: New Mexico; 1 to 3; 21 or more. Row 34: New York; 1 to 3; 11 to 15. Row 35: North Carolina; 21 or more; 11 to 15. Row 36: North Dakota; 1 to 3; 7 to 10. Row 37: Ohio; 4 to 6; 16 to 20. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; 7 to 10; 21 or more. Row 40: Pennsylvania; 4 to 6; 7 to 10. Row 41: Rhode Island; 1 to 3; 4 to 6. Row 42: South Carolina; 4 to 6; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; 1 to 3; 11 to 15. Row 44: Tennessee; 11 to 15; Unsure. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; 1 to 3; 11 to 15. Row 47: Vermont; 1 to 3; 4 to 6. Row 48: Virginia; 11 to 15; 21 or more. Row 49: Washington; 1 to 3; 21 or more. Row 50: West Virginia; 1 to 3; 16 to 20. Row 51: Wisconsin; 11 to 15; 21 or more. Row 52: Wyoming; dash; 16 to 20. A note states Summary of results for HSIP 1 to 3 equals 14, 4 to 6 equals 11, 7 to 10 equals 8, 11 to 15 equals 7, 16 to 20 equals 1, 21 or more equals 3, Unsure equals 0, Total responses equals 44. A second note states Summary of results for HSO 1 to 3 equals 1, 4 to 6 equals 3, 7 to 10 equals 9, 11 to 15 equals 9, 16 to 20 equals 5, 21 or more equals 11, Unsure equals 5, Total responses equals 43.

Page 107 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-11. Individual DOT responses to Question 7 (custodian for SHSP).
A table lists states with response text and related descriptions.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Response Text; Description. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; DOT; dash. Row 4: Arizona; DOT; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; DOT; dash. Row 6: California; DOT; dash. Row 7: Colorado; DOT; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; DOT; dash. Row 9: Delaware; DOT; dash. Row 10: District of Columbia; Other state agency; HSO. Row 11: Florida; DOT; dash. Row 12: Georgia; Other state agency; GOHS. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; DOT; dash. Row 15: Illinois; DOT; dash. Row 16: Indiana; DOT; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; DOT; dash. Row 19: Kentucky; DOT; dash. Row 20: Louisiana; DOT; dash. Row 21: Maine; DOT; dash. Row 22: Maryland; DOT; dash. Row 23: Massachusetts; DOT; dash. Row 24: Michigan; DOT; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; DOT; dash. Row 26: Mississippi; DOT; dash. Row 27: Missouri; DOT; dash. Row 28: Montana; DOT; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; DOT; dash. Row 30: Nevada; DOT; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; DOT; dash.

Page 108 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table lists states with response text and related descriptions.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Response Text; Description. Row 32: New Jersey; DOT; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; Other state agency; Technical Unit Supervisor, HSIP Manager. Row 34: New York; DOT; dash. Row 35: North Carolina; DOT; dash. Row 36: North Dakota; DOT; dash. Row 37: Ohio; DOT; dash. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; DOT; dash. Row 40: Pennsylvania; DOT; dash. Row 41: Rhode Island; DOT; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; DOT; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; DOT; dash. Row 44: Tennessee; Other state agency; Partnership with Department of Safety. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; DOT; dash. Row 47: Vermont; DOT; dash. Row 48: Virginia; DOT; dash. Row 49: Washington; Other state agency; Washington State DOT and Washington Traffic Safety Commission co lead the SHSP. Row 50: West Virginia; DOT; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; DOT; dash. Row 52: Wyoming; DOT; dash. A note states Summary of results DOT equals 41, Other state agency equals 5, Total responses equals 46.

Page 109 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-12. Individual DOT responses to Question 8 (coordination level (1 = Low, 5 = High) between state HSIP and HSO for activities) — Part 1 of 2.
A multi column table shows states with numeric ratings across several coordination and planning categories, followed by averages and standard deviations.

(continued on next page)

Long Description.

The table has 10 columns and 55 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Allocation of Funding; Analysis of Crash Data; Behavioral Safety Initiatives; Coordination with Emergency Medical Services; Coordination with Law Enforcement; Development of HSIP Implementation Plan; Development of HSP Report; Development of SHSP; Engagement with Local Agencies. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; 3; 5; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 5; 4. Row 4: Arizona; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5. Row 5: Arkansas; 1; 5; 2; 2; 3; 2; 1; 4; 2. Row 6: California; 5; 5; 4; 5; 5; 5; 4; 5; 5. Row 7: Colorado; 3; 4; 3; 3; 3; 2; 3; 5; 4. Row 8: Connecticut; 3; 4; 4; 1; 1; 3; 3; 5; 5. Row 9: Delaware; 3; 4; 3; 2; 5; 1; 1; 3; 2. Row 10: District of Columbia; 2; 5; 5; 5; 5; 2; 2; 5; 5. Row 11: Florida; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5. Row 12: Georgia; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; 2; 5; 5; 1; 3; 3; 2; 2; 1. Row 15: Illinois; 5; 5; 5; 3; 3; 5; 4; 4; 3. Row 16: Indiana; 5; 1; 1; 1; 4; 4; 1; 5; 1. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; 3; 5; 3; 3; 3; 1; 1; 5; 4. Row 19: Kentucky; 1; 3; 1; 1; 1; 1; 2; 5; 2.

Page 110 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-12. (Continued).
A multi column table shows states with numeric ratings across several coordination and planning categories, followed by averages and standard deviations.
Long Description.

The table has 10 columns and 55 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Allocation of Funding; Analysis of Crash Data; Behavioral Safety Initiatives; Coordination with Emergency Medical Services; Coordination with Law Enforcement; Development of HSIP Implementation Plan; Development of HSP Report; Development of SHSP; Engagement with Local Agencies. Row 20: Louisiana; 3; 3; 3; 2; 5; 2; 2; 4; 3. Row 21: Maine; 4; 5; 4; 5; 5; 4; 5; 4; 5. Row 22: Maryland; 3; 5; 5; 4; 4; 4; 5; 5; 5. Row 23: Massachusetts; 2; 4; 3; 2; 3; 2; 2; 5; 4. Row 24: Michigan; 1; 2; 2; 2; 2; 1; 1; 5; 3. Row 25: Minnesota; 3; 4; 3; 3; 2; 2; 4; 5; 5. Row 26: Mississippi; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 3; 1. Row 27: Missouri; 2; 3; 3; 1; 3; 2; 2; 5; 3. Row 28: Montana; 2; 4; 3; 2; 2; 3; 2; 5; 4. Row 29: Nebraska; 1; 4; 1; 2; 2; 1; 2; 3; 2. Row 30: Nevada; 4; 3; 3; 3; 3; 1; 1; 4; 4. Row 31: New Hampshire; 3; 5; 5; 5; 5; 3; 3; 3; 5. Row 32: New Jersey; 1; 3; 1; 3; 2; 3; 1; 5; 4. Row 33: New Mexico; 4; 3; 3; 1; 4; 1; 4; 4; 2. Row 34: New York; 5; 5; 3; 3; 4; 3; 3; 4; 4. Row 35: North Carolina; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 5; 3. Row 36: North Dakota; 5; 5; 5; 2; 5; 5; 4; 5; 5. Row 37: Ohio; 3; 4; 5; 2; 3; 3; 3; 5; 4. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash.

Page 111 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-12. (Continued).
A multi column table shows states with numeric ratings across several coordination and planning categories, followed by averages and standard deviations.
Long Description.

The table has 10 columns and 55 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Allocation of Funding; Analysis of Crash Data; Behavioral Safety Initiatives; Coordination with Emergency Medical Services; Coordination with Law Enforcement; Development of HSIP Implementation Plan; Development of HSP Report; Development of SHSP; Engagement with Local Agencies. Row 39: Oregon; 2; 5; 3; 3; 4; 1; 2; 3; 1. Row 40: Pennsylvania; 2; 5; 4; 5; 5; 2; 3; 5; 4. Row 41: Rhode Island; 4; 5; 5; 4; 5; 4; 5; 5; 4. Row 42: South Carolina; 1; 3; 1; 1; 1; 2; 2; 4; 1. Row 43: South Dakota; 2; 4; 3; 2; 3; 2; 2; 4; 3. Row 44: Tennessee; 2; 5; 4; 4; 4; 4; 5; 5; 5. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; 3; 5; 4; 4; 5; 4; 3; 5; 4. Row 47: Vermont; 3; 2; 4; 3; 5; 2; 3; 4; 3. Row 48: Virginia; 3; 4; 2; 2; 2; 1; 2; 5; 2. Row 49: Washington; 3; 4; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 5; 3. Row 50: West Virginia; 3; 1; 3; 2; 3; 1; 2; 5; 3. Row 51: Wisconsin; dash; 3; 1; 2; 2; 1; 1; 5; 3. Row 52: Wyoming; 4; 5; 5; 3; 5; 5; 5; 5; 4. Row 53: Average; 2.9; 4.0; 3.3; 2.8; 3.4; 2.6; 2.7; 4.5; 3.4. Row 54: Standard Deviation; 1.3; 1.2; 1.3; 1.3; 1.3; 1.4; 1.3; 0.8; 1.3. Row 55: Number of Responses; 44; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45.

Page 112 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-13. Individual DOT responses to Question 8 (coordination level (1 = Low, 5 = High) between state HSIP and HSO for activities) — Part 2 of 2.
A multi column table shows states with numeric ratings for activities such as safety identification, project evaluation, outreach, and planning, followed by averages and standard deviations.
Long Description.

The table has 11 columns and 55 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Identification of Project Delivery Methods; Identification of Safety Focus Areas; Identification of Safety Strategies; Project Evaluation after Construction such as Before and After Safety Analysis; Project Screening and Selection; Public Participation and Engagement; Road Safety Audits RSAs; Safety Outreach Activities; Safety Planning; Other. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; 2; 5; 4; 3; 3; 5; 3; 5; 4; dash. Row 4: Arizona; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; 1; 4; 3; 1; 1; 2; 1; 3; 2; dash. Row 6: California; 5; 5; 5; 5; 4; 5; 4; 4; 5; dash. Row 7: Colorado; 2; 4; 4; 2; 2; 3; 2; 4; 4; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; 2; 3; 3; 1; 1; 1; 1; 3; 2; dash. Row 9: Delaware; 2; 4; 3; 1; 1; 1; 2; 3; 3; dash. Row 10: District of Columbia; 3; 4; 4; 3; 2; 5; 5; 5; 5; dash. Row 11: Florida; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5. Row 12: Georgia; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; 5. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; 3; 5; 3; 5; 5; 2; 3; 4; 3; 5. Row 15: Illinois; 3; 4; 5; 4; 4; 2; 5; 2; 3; dash. Row 16: Indiana; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; 2; 5; 5; 2; 1; 3; 1; 4; 5; dash. Row 19: Kentucky; 1; 4; 4; 1; 1; 1; 3; 1; 1; dash.

Page 113 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-13. (Continued).
A multi column table shows states with numeric ratings for activities such as safety identification, project evaluation, outreach, and planning, followed by averages and standard deviations.

(continued on next page)

Long Description.

The table has 11 columns and 55 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Identification of Project Delivery Methods; Identification of Safety Focus Areas; Identification of Safety Strategies; Project Evaluation after Construction such as Before and After Safety Analysis; Project Screening and Selection; Public Participation and Engagement; Road Safety Audits RSAs; Safety Outreach Activities; Safety Planning; Other. Row 20: Louisiana; 2; 5; 4; 3; 3; 3; 1; 3; 4; dash. Row 21: Maine; 3; 5; 5; 2; 2; 4; 4; 4; 5; dash. Row 22: Maryland; 3; 4; 4; 3; 3; 4; 3; 4; 4; 4. Row 23: Massachusetts; 1; 3; 3; 1; 3; 2; 2; 4; 2; dash. Row 24: Michigan; 1; 5; 3; 1; 1; 2; 1; 3; 2; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; 3; 5; 3; 3; 2; 3; 2; 4; 3; dash. Row 26: Mississippi; 1; 3; 3; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; dash. Row 27: Missouri; 2; 4; 3; 2; 2; 1; 3; 3; 3; dash. Row 28: Montana; 2; 5; 5; 1; 2; 2; 2; 2; 2; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; 1; 3; 3; 1; 1; 2; 1; 1; 2; dash. Row 30: Nevada; 2; 3; 2; 1; 1; 3; 2; 2; 1; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; 3; 5; 5; 3; 3; 5; 1; 5; 3; dash. Row 32: New Jersey; 2; 5; 4; 1; 1; 3; 3; 3; 4; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; 1; 5; 5; 1; 4; 2; 1; 1; 5; dash. Row 34: New York; 3; 4; 4; 3; 3; 3; 3; 4; 4; dash. Row 35: North Carolina; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 4; 3; dash. Row 36: North Dakota; 2; 5; 5; 2; 3; 4; 5; 5; 5; dash. Row 37: Ohio; 1; 4; 4; 1; 1; 2; 1; 4; 4; dash. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash.

Page 114 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-13. (Continued).
A multi column table shows states with numeric ratings for activities such as safety identification, project evaluation, outreach, and planning, followed by averages and standard deviations.
Long Description.

The table has 11 columns and 55 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Identification of Project Delivery Methods; Identification of Safety Focus Areas; Identification of Safety Strategies; Project Evaluation after Construction such as Before and After Safety Analysis; Project Screening and Selection; Public Participation and Engagement; Road Safety Audits RSAs; Safety Outreach Activities; Safety Planning; Other. Row 39: Oregon; 1; 3; 3; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 3; 4. Row 40: Pennsylvania; 3; 5; 4; 2; 3; 4; 2; 3; 5; dash. Row 41: Rhode Island; 3; 4; 5; 3; 3; 4; 5; 4; 5; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; 1; 3; 3; 1; 1; 1; 2; 1; 1; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; 2; 4; 4; 2; 2; 3; 3; 3; 3; dash. Row 44: Tennessee; 4; 4; 4; 2; 2; 2; 2; 2; 2; 4. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; 3; 5; 5; 3; 3; 5; 4; 5; 4; dash. Row 47: Vermont; 2; 5; 4; 2; 3; 3; 3; 4; 4; dash. Row 48: Virginia; 1; 5; 5; 1; 1; 1; 1; 2; 3; dash. Row 49: Washington; 3; 5; 5; 3; 2; 3; 1; 3; 2; dash. Row 50: West Virginia; 3; 4; 4; 1; 1; 3; 2; 4; 3; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; 2; 5; 3; 1; 2; 3; 1; 3; 3; dash. Row 52: Wyoming; 3; 5; 5; 5; 4; 4; 4; 5; 5; dash. Row 53: Average; 2.3; 4.2; 3.9; 2.2; 2.3; 2.8; 2.5; 3.2; 3.3; 4.5. Row 54: Standard Deviation; 1.1; 0.9; 1.0; 1.3; 1.2; 1.3; 1.4; 1.3; 1.3; 0.5. Row 55: Number of Responses; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 6.

Page 115 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-14. Text responses for “Other” for Question 8 (coordination level between state HSIP and HSO for activities).
A table lists additional coordination related text entries.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 7 rows. Row 1 lists the column header: Other, Text. Row 2: Coordination with Local Highway Technical Assistance Council. Row 3: Actively involved together through the SHSP. Row 4: Set up safety performance target. Row 5: Coordination meeting. Row 6: We do not have an HSO. Row 7: Florida DOT SSO administers HSIP so coordination is inherent.

Page 116 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-15. Individual DOT responses to Question 9 (coordination level (1 = Low, 5 = High) between state HSIP and HSO for programs).
A table showing states with values for rural road risk, rail crossings, school routes, penalty funds, and user assessments.
Long Description.

The table has 7 columns and 55 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; High Risk Rural Road; Railroad At Grade Crossings; Safe Routes to School; Use of NHTSA Penalty Funds; Vulnerable Road User Assessment; Other. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; dash; 1; 1; 5; 5; dash. Row 4: Arizona; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; 1; 1; 1; dash; 4; dash. Row 6: California; 4; 3; 4; 3; 4; dash. Row 7: Colorado; 1; 1; 1; 5; 5; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; 5; 1; 2; 1; 3; dash. Row 9: Delaware; 1; 1; 2; 5; 2; dash. Row 10: District of Columbia; dash; dash; 5; dash; 5; dash. Row 11: Florida; 5; 5; 5; dash; 5; 5. Row 12: Georgia; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; dash; 3; 3; dash; 5; dash. Row 15: Illinois; 5; 5; 4; 1; 5; dash. Row 16: Indiana; 1; 1; 1; 5; 3; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; 1; 1; 3; dash; 3; dash. Row 19: Kentucky; 1; 1; 2; dash; 3; dash. Row 20: Louisiana; dash; 1; dash; 1; 3; dash. Row 21: Maine; 5; 4; 5; 1; 5; dash. Row 22: Maryland; 1; 5; 4; dash; 5; dash. Row 23: Massachusetts; 2; 1; 1; 1; 4; dash. Row 24: Michigan; dash; dash; 1; dash; 1; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; 1; 1; 2; 4; 4; dash. Row 26: Mississippi; 1; 1; dash; 3; 1; dash. Row 27: Missouri; dash; dash; dash; 2; 2; dash.

Page 117 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table showing states with values for rural road risk, rail crossings, school routes, penalty funds, and user assessments.
Long Description.

The table has 7 columns and 55 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; High Risk Rural Road; Railroad At Grade Crossings; Safe Routes to School; Use of NHTSA Penalty Funds; Vulnerable Road User Assessment; Other. Row 28: Montana; 2; 3; 2; 5; 5; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; 1; 1; 1; dash; 1; dash. Row 30: Nevada; 2; 1; 3; 1; 3; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; dash; 2; dash; 1; 1; dash. Row 32: New Jersey; 1; 1; 2; 1; 3; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; 1; 1; 3; 5; 3; dash. Row 34: New York; 3; 3; 3; 3; 4; dash. Row 35: North Carolina; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; dash. Row 36: North Dakota; dash; 3; 3; 5; 5; dash. Row 37: Ohio; 1; 1; 2; 3; 3; dash. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; 3; dash; 5; 4; 5; 5. Row 40: Pennsylvania; 2; 1; 3; dash; 3; dash. Row 41: Rhode Island; 4; 2; 3; 5; 5; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; dash; dash; dash; 2; dash; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; dash; 1; 3; 3; 3; dash. Row 44: Tennessee; 1; 1; 3; 5; 3; dash. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; 3; 3; 4; 4; 4; dash. Row 47: Vermont; 2; 2; 4; 4; 3; dash. Row 48: Virginia; 2; 1; 1; 3; 4; dash. Row 49: Washington; 1; 1; 1; 3; 3; dash. Row 50: West Virginia; 1; 1; 1; dash; 3; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; 1; 1; 1; 1; 4; 5. Row 52: Wyoming; 5; 1; 1; 5; 5; dash. Row 53: Average; 2.1; 1.8; 2.5; 3.1; 3.5; 5.0. Row 54: Standard Deviation; 1.5; 1.3; 1.3; 1.6; 1.3; 0.0. Row 55: Number of Responses; 35; 40; 40; 34; 44; 3.

Page 118 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-16. Text responses for “Other” for Question 9 (coordination level (1 = Low, 5 = High) between state HSIP and HSO for programs).
A table lists additional coordination notes in text form.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 5 rows. Row 1 lists the column header: Other, Text. Row 2: Florida DOT SSO administers HSIP so coordination is inherent. Row 3: Work Zone and Roadway Safety. Row 4: SHSP and Safety Performance Measures. Row 5: We do not have an HSO.

Page 119 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-17. Individual DOT responses to Question 10 (lead agency for programs).
A table listing states and programme types used for rural roads, rail crossings, school routes, penalty funds, and user assessments.
Long Description.

The table has 7 columns and 52 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; High Risk Rural Road; Railroad At Grade Crossings; Safe Routes to School; Use of NHTSA Penalty Funds; Vulnerable Road User Assessment; Other Program. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; dash; HSIP; Other Agency; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 4: Arizona; HSIP; HSIP; Other Agency; Other Agency; HSIP; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; dash; HSIP; dash. Row 6: California; HSIP; HSO; HSO; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 7: Colorado; HSIP; Other Agency; Other Agency; HSIP; HSIP; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; HSIP; HSIP; Other Agency; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 9: Delaware; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; dash. Row 10: District of Columbia; dash; dash; Other Agency; dash; HSIP; dash. Row 11: Florida; HSO; HSO; HSO; dash; HSO; HSO. Row 12: Georgia; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; dash; HSIP; dash. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; dash; Other Agency; Other Agency; dash; HSO; dash. Row 15: Illinois; HSIP; HSIP; Other Agency; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 16: Indiana; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; HSIP; Other Agency; Other Agency; dash; HSIP; dash. Row 19: Kentucky; HSIP; Other Agency; HSIP; dash; HSIP; dash. Row 20: Louisiana; dash; HSIP; dash; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 21: Maine; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; dash. Row 22: Maryland; HSIP; Other Agency; Other Agency; dash; HSIP; dash. Row 23: Massachusetts; HSIP; Other Agency; Other Agency; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 24: Michigan; dash; dash; HSIP; dash; HSIP; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 26: Mississippi; HSIP; HSIP; dash; dash; HSIP; dash.

Page 120 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table listing states and programme types used for rural roads, rail crossings, school routes, penalty funds, and user assessments.
Long Description.

The table has 7 columns and 52 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; High Risk Rural Road; Railroad At Grade Crossings; Safe Routes to School; Use of NHTSA Penalty Funds; Vulnerable Road User Assessment; Other Program. Row 27: Missouri; dash; dash; dash; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 28: Montana; HSIP; HSIP; HSO; HSO; HSO; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; HSIP; Other Agency; HSO; dash; HSIP; dash. Row 30: Nevada; HSIP; HSIP; Other Agency; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; dash; HSIP; dash; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 32: New Jersey; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; HSIP; Other Agency; Other Agency; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 34: New York; HSIP; HSO; HSO; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 35: North Carolina; HSIP; HSIP; Other Agency; dash; HSIP; dash. Row 36: North Dakota; dash; HSIP; Other Agency; HSIP; HSIP; dash. Row 37: Ohio; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; HSIP; dash; HSO; HSO; HSIP; HSO. Row 40: Pennsylvania; HSIP; HSIP; Other Agency; dash; HSIP; dash. Row 41: Rhode Island; HSIP; Other Agency; Other Agency; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; dash; dash; dash; HSIP; dash; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; dash; HSIP; Other Agency; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 44: Tennessee; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; dash. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 47: Vermont; HSIP; Other Agency; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; dash. Row 48: Virginia; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; dash. Row 49: Washington; HSIP; HSIP; HSIP; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 50: West Virginia; HSIP; HSIP; Other Agency; dash; HSIP; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; HSIP; HSIP; Other Agency; HSO; HSIP; dash. Row 52: Wyoming; HSO; Other Agency; Other Agency; HSO; HSO; dash.

Page 121 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table listing states and programme types used for rural roads, rail crossings, school routes, penalty funds, and user assessments.
Long Description.

Notes: Summary of results, High Risk Rural Road, HSIP, 34; HSO, 2; Other Agency, 0; Total responses 36. Summary of results, Railroad At-Grade Crossings: HSIP, 27; HSO, 3; Other Agency, 11; Total responses, 41. Summary of results, Safe Routes to School: HSIP, 15; HSO, 6; Other Agency, 20; Total responses, 41. Summary of results, Use of NHTSA Penalty Funds: HSIP, 9; HSO, 22; Other Agency, 1; Total responses, 32. Summary of results, Vulnerable Road User Assessment: HSIP, 41; HSO, 4; Other Agency, 0; Total responses, 45. Summary of results, Other Program: HSIP, 0; HSO, 3; Other Agency, 0; Total responses, 3.

Table B-18. Text responses for “Other” for Question 10 (lead agency for programs).
A table lists additional coordination related text entries.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 5 rows. Row 1 lists the column header: Other, Text. Row 2: Behavioral Programs or Traffic Records or MTSC. Row 3: Department of Safety receives a percentage of annual penalty funds. Row 4: Work Zone and Roadway Safety. Row 5: Florida DOT SSO administers HSIP so coordination is inherent.

Page 122 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-19. Individual DOT responses to Question 11 (use of NHTSA penalty funds received).
A table listing states and the presence of alcohol programmes, H S I P activities, emergency medical services, and other programmes.
Long Description.

The table has 5 columns and 53 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Alcohol Impaired Driving Programs; HSIP Eligible Activities; Emergency Medical Services, EMS; Other. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; X; X; dash; dash. Row 4: Arizona; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 5: Arkansas; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 6: California; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 7: Colorado; X; X; dash; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 9: Delaware; X; X; dash; X. Row 10: District of Columbia; X; X; X; dash. Row 11: Florida; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 12: Georgia; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 15: Illinois; dash; X; dash; dash. Row 16: Indiana; X; X; dash; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 19: Kentucky; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 20: Louisiana; X; X; dash; dash. Row 21: Maine; dash; X; dash; dash. Row 22: Maryland; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 23: Massachusetts; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 24: Michigan; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; X; X; X; dash. Row 26: Mississippi; dash; X; dash; X.

Page 123 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table listing states and the presence of alcohol programmes, H S I P activities, emergency medical services, and other programmes.
Long Description.

The table has 5 columns and 53 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Alcohol Impaired Driving Programs; HSIP Eligible Activities; Emergency Medical Services, EMS; Other. Row 27: Missouri; X; X; dash; dash. Row 28: Montana; X; X; dash; X. Row 29: Nebraska; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 30: Nevada; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 32: New Jersey; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 33: New Mexico; X; X; dash; dash. Row 34: New York; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 35: North Carolina; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 36: North Dakota; X; X; dash; dash. Row 37: Ohio; X; dash; dash; X. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 40: Pennsylvania; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 41: Rhode Island; X; X; dash; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; dash; X; dash; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; X; X; dash; dash. Row 44: Tennessee; dash; X; dash; X. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; X; X; dash; dash. Row 47: Vermont; X; X; dash; dash. Row 48: Virginia; X; X; dash; dash. Row 49: Washington; X; X; dash; dash. Row 50: West Virginia; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; X; dash; X, dash. Row 52: Wyoming; X; X; X; dash. Row 53: Count; 23; 23; 4; 13.

Page 124 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-20. Text responses for “Other” for Question 11 (use of NHTSA penalty funds received).
A table lists text entries describing how penalty funds are handled or understood.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 14 rows. Row 1 lists the column header: Other, Text. Row 2: Penalty funds are split evenly between the two agencies and are spent independently. Row 3: Not certain. Row 4: Not 100 percent sure. Row 5: Other behavioral related programs. Row 6: Section 164 funds can be used for alcohol or drug impaired driving program. Row 7: Unsure. Row 8: Unknown. Row 9: General 402 programming. Row 10: Department of Safety uses funds for enforcement education programs. Row 11: Not sure how these funds are used. Row 12: HSIP gets 65 percent of funds and HSO gets 35 percent. Row 13: NA. Row 14: DOT does not use any NHTSA penalty funds.

Page 125 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-21. Individual DOT responses to Question 12 (level of coordination (1 = low, 5 = high) between HSIP and HSO for safety focus areas).
A table showing states with ratings for aggressive driving, distracted driving, crashes, road users, and work zones.
Long Description.

The table has 15 columns and 55 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Aggressive Driving; Commercial Motor Vehicles; Distracted Driving; Impaired Driving; Intersection Crashes; Lane Departure Crashes; Motorcyclist Safety; Occupant Protection; Older Drivers; Speeding; Teen Drivers; Vulnerable Road Users; Work Zones; Other. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; 2; 1; 1; 1; 2; 2; 2; 1; 1; 4; 1; 4; 1; dash. Row 4: Arizona; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; 2; 2; 2; 2; 2; 2; 2; 2; 2; 2; 2; 4; 2; dash. Row 6: California; 5; 3; 5; 5; 4; 5; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 5; 5; dash. Row 7: Colorado; 3; 3; 3; 4; 3; 3; 4; 3; 3; 3; 3; 4; 3; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; 3; 2; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 2; dash. Row 9: Delaware; 3; 2; 4; 5; 2; 2; 5; 4; 4; 4; 4; 3; 2; dash. Row 10: District of Columbia; 3; 3; 3; 3; 5; 5; 5; 3; 3; 5; 3; 5; 3; dash. Row 11: Florida; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5. Row 12: Georgia; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; 4; 4; 4; 4; 5; 5; 4; 4; 4; 5; 4; 4; 4; dash. Row 15: Illinois; 3; 3; 3; 3; 5; 5; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 5; 5; dash. Row 16: Indiana; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; 3; 2; 3; 3; 3; 3; 2; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 4; dash. 4. Row 19: Kentucky; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 2; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 3; 1; dash. Row 20: Louisiana; 3; 3; 3; 4; 3; 3; 2; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; dash. Row 21: Maine; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 4. Row 22: Maryland; 5; 5; 4; 4; 5; 5; 4; 4; 4; 5; 4; 5; 5; dash. Row 23: Massachusetts; 2; 1; 3; 3; 2; 1; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 4; 2; dash.

Page 126 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table showing states with ratings for aggressive driving, distracted driving, crashes, road users, and work zones.
Long Description.

The table has 15 columns and 55 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Aggressive Driving; Commercial Motor Vehicles; Distracted Driving; Impaired Driving; Intersection Crashes; Lane Departure Crashes; Motorcyclist Safety; Occupant Protection; Older Drivers; Speeding; Teen Drivers; Vulnerable Road Users; Work Zones; Other. Row 24: Michigan; 1; 2; 2; 1; 1; 1; 2; 1; 2; 3; 1; 3; 3; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; 2; 4; 2; 2; 4; 4; 4; 2; 4; 4; 4; 5; 4; dash. Row 26: Mississippi; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; dash. Row 27: Missouri; 3; 2; 3; 3; 3; 3; 2; 2; 2; 3; 2; 3; 3; dash. Row 28: Montana; 3; 4; 4; 3; 4; 4; 4; 3; 3; 3; 3; 4; 3; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; 2; 4; 4; 3; 2; 2; 3; 4; 4; 3; 3; 2; 3; dash. Row 30: Nevada; 2; 2; 3; 3; 3; 3; 4; 4; 4; 5; 4; 5; 4; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 3; 5; 5; 5; 5; dash. Row 32: New Jersey; 1; 3; 2; 2; 2; 2; 2; 1; 2; 2; 2; 3; 2; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; 2; 1; 3; 3; 1; 1; 3; 2; 1; 4; 2; 4; 2; dash. Row 34: New York; 3; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 3; 3; 4; 3; 4; 5; dash. Row 35: North Carolina; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; dash. Row 36: North Dakota; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; dash. Row 37: Ohio; 3; 3; 5; 5; 3; 3; 5; 4; 5; 3; 5; 4; 4; dash. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 4; 3; 3; 5; 5; 1. Row 40: Pennsylvania; 5; 3; 5; 5; 3; 5; 4; 4; 5; 5; 4; 4; 3; dash. Row 41: Rhode Island; 4; 3; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; 3; 3; 4; 3; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 3; 3; 4; dash. Row 44: Tennessee; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; 4; 3; 4; 4; 3; 3; 5; 3; 5; 5; 5; 5; 4; dash. Row 47: Vermont; 4; 2; 4; 4; 3; 3; 4; 4; 4; 5; 4; 4; 3; dash.

Page 127 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table showing states with ratings for aggressive driving, distracted driving, crashes, road users, and work zones.
Long Description.

The table has 15 columns and 55 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Aggressive Driving; Commercial Motor Vehicles; Distracted Driving; Impaired Driving; Intersection Crashes; Lane Departure Crashes; Motorcyclist Safety; Occupant Protection; Older Drivers; Speeding; Teen Drivers; Vulnerable Road Users; Work Zones; Other. Row 48: Virginia; 3; 2; 2; 2; 2; 2; 1; 2; 2; 3; 2; 3; 2; dash. Row 49: Washington; 3; 3; 3; 4; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 4; 3; 5; 3; dash. Row 50: West Virginia; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; 2; 2; 3; 2; 2; 2; 3; 2; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; dash. Row 52: Wyoming; 3; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; dash. Row 53: Average; 2.9; 2.8; 3.2; 3.2; 3.1; 3.1; 3.3; 3.0; 3.2; 3.5; 3.1; 3.7; 3.2; 3.5. Row 54: Standard Deviation; 1.3; 1.3; 1.3; 1.3; 1.3; 1.4; 1.3; 1.3; 1.3; 1.3; 1.3; 1.2; 1.3; 1.7. Row 55: Number of Responses; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 4.

Table B-22. Text responses for “Other” for Question 12 (level of coordination (1 = low, 5 = high) between HSIP and HSO for safety focus areas).
A table lists additional safety focus area text entries from respondents.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 5 rows. Row 1 lists the column header: Other Safety Focus Areas, Text. Row 2: Florida DOT SSO administers HSIP so coordination is inherent. Row 3: All focus areas are addressed quarterly with SHSP meetings. Row 4: We do not have an HSO. Row 5: Wildlife.

Page 128 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-23. Individual DOT responses to Question 13 (methods for coordination of HSIP and HSO activities).
A table listing states and the presence of decision rules, agreements, meetings, document sharing, procedures, and steering committees.
Long Description.

The table has 10 columns and 53 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Decision rules; Designated personnel to serve as liaisons; Formal agreements; Meetings at regular intervals; Meetings at irregular intervals; Sharing of documents; Standard operating procedures; Steering committee; Other. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 4: Arizona; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; X; X; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash; dash. Row 6: California; dash; dash; X; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 7: Colorado; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; dash; X; dash; dash; X; X; X; X; dash. Row 9: Delaware; X; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X dash. Row 10: District of Columbia; dash; X; dash; X; dash; X; X; dash; dash. Row 11: Florida; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 12: Georgia; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 15: Illinois; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; X. Row 16: Indiana; dash; X; X; X; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; dash; X; dash; X; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 19: Kentucky; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 20: Louisiana; dash; X; dash; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 21: Maine; dash; X; X; X; dash; X; dash; X; X. Row 22: Maryland; X; X; X; X; dash; X; X; X; dash. Row 23: Massachusetts; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 24: Michigan; dash; X; dash; X; X; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; X; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 26: Mississippi; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash.

Page 129 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table listing states and the presence of decision rules, agreements, meetings, document sharing, procedures, and steering committees.
Long Description.

The table has 10 columns and 53 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Decision rules; Designated personnel to serve as liaisons; Formal agreements; Meetings at regular intervals; Meetings at irregular intervals; Sharing of documents; Standard operating procedures; Steering committee; Other. Row 27: Missouri; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 28: Montana; dash; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; dash; X; dash; X; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 30: Nevada; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 32: New Jersey; dash; X; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; dash; dash; dash; X; X; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 34: New York; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash. Row 35: North Carolina; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; X; dash; dash; X. Row 36: North Dakota; X; X; dash; X; X; X; X; X; dash. Row 37: Ohio; dash; dash; dash; X; X; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; dash; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash; X; X. Row 40: Pennsylvania; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash; dash; X. Row 41: Rhode Island; X; dash; dash; dash; X; X; X; dash; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; dash; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 44: Tennessee; dash; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; dash; X; X; X; X; X; dash; X; dash. Row 47: Vermont; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; X. Row 48: Virginia; dash; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 49: Washington; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 50: West Virginia; dash; X; X; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; X; dash; dash. Row 52: Wyoming; X; X; X; X; X; X; X; X; dash. Row 53: Count; 7; 22; 10; 29; 20; 28; 10; 22; 11.

Page 130 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-24. Text responses for “Meeting Intervals” for Question 13 (methods for coordination of HSIP and HSO activities).
A table lists states with text describing their S H S P or meeting intervals.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 19 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Meeting Intervals, Text. Row 2: California; Monthly SHSP Steering Committee meetings and bi annual executive leadership meetings. Row 3: Colorado comma Michigan comma Montana comma Nevada comma New Hampshire comma Oregon; Monthly. Row 4: Delaware, Indiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, Virginia; Quarterly. Row 5: Florida; Quarterly and semi annual meetings among traffic safety coalitions of SHSP emphasis areas. Row 6: Kansas; Weekly manager meetings. Row 7: Louisiana; Statewide SHSP emphasis area meetings and Safety Project HSIP Selection Team meeting quarterly. Row 8: Maine; Quarterly at a minimum but also on an as needed basis. Row 9: Maryland; Emphasis area meetings every 3 months. Row 10: Nebraska; Monthly division staff meetings. Row 11: North Dakota; Every other week. Row 12: Ohio; Minimum monthly. Row 13: Pennsylvania; Weekly. Row 14: South Dakota; State Highway Safety Engineer and Director of Office of Highway Safety have a monthly meeting. Row 15: Tennessee; Quarterly with SHSP Committee and program specific meetings when needed. Row 16: Utah; As often as needed comma bi weekly minimum. Row 17: West Virginia; West Virginia has a Highway Safety Management Task Force which meets quarterly with activity occurring each month of the quarter including SHSP emphasis area team meetings, leadership meetings, and full task force meetings. Row 18: Wisconsin; Dash. Row 19: Wyoming; HSIP Manager works in the HSO.

Page 131 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-25. Text responses for “Other” for Question 13 (methods for coordination of HSIP and HSO activities).
A table lists text entries describing how H S I P and H S O groups work or coordinate.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 12 rows. Row 1 lists the column header: Other, Text. Row 2: Groups are located within the same section and the HSIP manager is manager of the Safe Systems Section that SHSO reports to. Row 3: SHSP emphasis area focus groups. Row 4: HSO and HSIP both report to the State Traffic and Safety Engineer and they make connections when tasks or strategies overlap. Row 5: HSIP staff is housed within Bureau of Safety Programs and Engineering, Illinois HSO, and HSIP is administered as part of regular duties. Row 6: Performance measure targets and their alignment. Row 7: The HSIP and HSO program managers work within the same section, allowing easy collaboration. Row 8: Idaho Transportation Department does not have a dedicated HSIP office and the work is done by people in HSO and Traffic Operations. Row 9: We do not have an HSO. Row 10: MTSC and TRCC. Row 11: Florida DOT SSO administers the HSIP so coordination is inherent. Row 12: The HSIP and HSO staff physically work in the same building beside each other which helps with regular communication.

Page 132 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-26. Individual DOT responses to Question 14 (resources developed to support coordination between HSIP and HSO).
A table lists states with a yes or no response.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Response. Row 2: Alabama; dash. Row 3: Alaska; No. Row 4: Arizona; No. Row 5: Arkansas; No. Row 6: California; Yes. Row 7: Colorado; No. Row 8: Connecticut; No. Row 9: Delaware; No. Row 10: District of Columbia; No. Row 11: Florida; No. Row 12: Georgia; No. Row 13: Hawaii; dash. Row 14: Idaho; Yes. Row 15: Illinois; Yes. Row 16: Indiana; No. Row 17: Iowa; dash. Row 18: Kansas; No. Row 19: Kentucky; No. Row 20: Louisiana; No. Row 21: Maine; No. Row 22: Maryland; No. Row 23: Massachusetts; No. Row 24: Michigan; No. Row 25: Minnesota; No. Row 26: Mississippi; No. Row 27: Missouri; No. Row 28: Montana; No. Row 29: Nebraska; No. Row 30: Nevada; No. Row 31: New Hampshire; No.

Page 133 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table lists states with a yes or no response.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Response. Row 32: New Jersey; No. Row 33: New Mexico; No. Row 34: New York; Yes. Row 35: North Carolina; No. Row 36: North Dakota; No. Row 37: Ohio; No. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash. Row 39: Oregon; No. Row 40: Pennsylvania; No. Row 41: Rhode Island; No. Row 42: South Carolina; No. Row 43: South Dakota; Yes. Row 44: Tennessee; Yes. Row 45: Texas; dash. Row 46: Utah; No. Row 47: Vermont; No. Row 48: Virginia; Yes. Row 49: Washington; No. Row 50: West Virginia; No. Row 51: Wisconsin; No. Row 52: Wyoming; No. A note states Summary of results: Yes equals 7, No equals 39, Total responses equals 46.

Page 134 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-27. DOT resources submitted for Question 14 (resources developed to support coordination between HSIP and HSO).
A table lists states with titles and U R L details when available.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 7 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: State or Agency; Title; URL, if available. Row 2: California; SHSP Crash Data Dashboard; h t t p s colon double slash s h s p dot d o t dot c a dot gov. Row 3: California; Strategic Highway Safety Plan; h t t p s colon double slash d o t dot c a dot gov slash programs slash safety hyphen programs slash s h s p. Row 4: Idaho; HSCA Narrative Quick Reference; dash. Row 5: New York; Crash Analysis Toolbox; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot d o t dot n y dot gov slash divisions slash operating slash o s s s slash highway slash crash hyphen analysis hyphen toolbox. Row 6: South Dakota; Reduce Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes Final Report; dash. Row 7: Washington; Washington 2023 Traffic Safety Annual Report; dash.

Page 135 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-28. Individual DOT responses to Question 15 (custodian for crash data).
A table lists states with response type and description of the agency handling duties.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Response; Description. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; Other state agency; Department of Administration DMV is under Department of Administration. Row 4: Arizona; DOT; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; State Highway Patrol; dash. Row 6: California; State Highway Patrol; dash. Row 7: Colorado; Other state agency; Department of Revenue, transfers crash data to DOT for analysis purposes. Row 8: Connecticut; DOT; dash. Row 9: Delaware; Other state agency; Department of Safety and Homeland Security. Row 10: District of Columbia; DOT; dash. Row 11: Florida; Other state agency; Florida Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. Row 12: Georgia; DOT; dash. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; DOT; dash. Row 15: Illinois; DOT; dash. Row 16: Indiana; State Highway Patrol; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; DOT; dash. Row 19: Kentucky; Other state agency; Kentucky State Police. Row 20: Louisiana; DOT; dash. Row 21: Maine; Other state agency; Maine State Police, Department of Public Safety. Row 22: Maryland; Other state agency; Maryland Department of State Police. Row 23: Massachusetts; DOT; dash. Row 24: Michigan; State Highway Patrol; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; Other state agency; Department of Public Safety. Row 26: Mississippi; State Highway Patrol; dash. Row 27: Missouri; State Highway Patrol; dash. Row 28: Montana; State Highway Patrol; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; DOT; dash.

Page 136 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table lists states with response type and description of the agency handling duties.
Long Description.

The table has 3 columns and 52 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers: Respondent; Response; Description. Row 30: Nevada; Other state agency; Department of Public Safety. Row 31: New Hampshire; Other state agency; Department of Safety Division of Motor Vehicles. Row 32: New Jersey; DOT; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; DOT; dash. Row 34: New York; Other state agency; DMV is official data holder and DOT receives copy and adds location. Row 35: North Carolina; DOT; dash. Row 36: North Dakota; DOT; dash. Row 37: Ohio; State Highway Patrol; dash. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; DOT; dash. Row 40: Pennsylvania; DOT; dash. Row 41: Rhode Island; DOT; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; Other state agency; DMV. Row 43: South Dakota; Other state agency; Office of Highway Safety. Row 44: Tennessee; Other state agency; Department of Safety and Homeland Security. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; Other state agency; Department of Public Safety, HSO. Row 47: Vermont; DOT; dash. Row 48: Virginia; Other state agency; DMV HSO. Row 49: Washington; DOT; dash. Row 50: West Virginia; DOT; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; Other state agency; Agreement between State Patrol and University of Wisconsin Madison Traffic Operations and Safety Lab. Row 52: Wyoming; DOT; dash. A note states Summary of results DOT equals 21, State Highway Patrol equals 8, Other state agency equals 17, Total responses equals 46.

Page 137 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-29. Individual DOT responses to Question 16 (level of information and resource sharing (1 = low, 5 = high) between HSIP and HSO).
A table showing states and their use of analysis tools, data sources, dashboards, feedback, metrics, and safety analysis results.
Long Description.

The table has 14 columns and 55 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Analysis Tools; Artificial Intelligence Analyses; Crowd Sourced Data; Crash Data; Dashboards; Data Collection Practices; Data from Local Agencies; Data for Public Sharing; Feedback from Law Enforcement; Feedback from Public Participation and Engagement PPE Efforts; Performance Metrics; Results from Safety Analyses; Other. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; 4; 1; 2; 5; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 3; 5; 4; dash. Row 4: Arizona; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; 1; 1; 1; 5; 2; 5; 2; 5; 2; 2; 3; 1; dash. Row 6: California; 4; 2; 3; 5; 5; 4; 4; 5; 4; 4; 4; 4; dash. Row 7: Colorado; 2; 1; 1; 4; 5; 1; 1; 3; 1; 2; 5; 1; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; 5; 1; 3; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 3; 3; 5; 5; dash. Row 9: Delaware; 2; 1; 3; 4; 4; 2; 2; 3; 5; 5; 2; 2; dash. Row 10: District of Columbia; 5; 1; 1; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; dash. Row 11: Florida; 5; dash; dash; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5. Row 12: Georgia; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; 5; 3; 4; 5; 1; 5; 3; 5; 2; 1; 4; 5; dash. Row 15: Illinois; 5; 1; 1; 5; 4; 5; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 4; dash. Row 16: Indiana; 1; 3; 1; 5; 1; 1; 1; 1; 5; 1; 5; 1; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; 4; 1; 2; 5; 5; 5; 1; 5; 3; 3; 5; 5; dash. Row 19: Kentucky; 3; 1; 1; 5; 5; 1; 1; 1; 2; 1; 3; 2; dash. Row 20: Louisiana; 4; 1; 2; 5; 5; 5; 5; 4; 5; 3; 5; 4; dash.

Page 138 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table showing states and their use of analysis tools, data sources, dashboards, feedback, metrics, and safety analysis results.
Long Description.

The table has 14 columns and 55 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Analysis Tools; Artificial Intelligence Analyses; Crowd Sourced Data; Crash Data; Dashboards; Data Collection Practices; Data from Local Agencies; Data for Public Sharing; Feedback from Law Enforcement; Feedback from Public Participation and Engagement PPE Efforts; Performance Metrics; Results from Safety Analyses; Other. Row 21: Maine; 5; dash; dash; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; dash. Row 22: Maryland; 4; 1; 1; 5; 5; 5; 2; 5; 5; 4; 5; 4; dash. Row 23: Massachusetts; 5; 1; 2; 5; 5; 4; 4; 4; 3; 2; 5; 4; dash. Row 24: Michigan; 3; 1; 1; 5; 4; 3; 4; 4; 3; 3; 4; 4; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; 4; 3; 3; 5; 4; 5; 2; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; dash. Row 26: Mississippi; 1; 1; 1; 5; 3; 3; 1; 1; 1; 1; 4; 1; dash. Row 27: Missouri; 4; 1; 2; 5; 5; 3; 3; 4; 3; 2; 4; 5; dash. Row 28: Montana; 3; 1; 1; 4; 4; 1; 4; 1; 2; 3; 4; 4; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; 4; 3; 2; 5; 4; 5; 3; 4; 5; 3; 5; 3; dash. Row 30: Nevada; 2; 2; 2; 4; 3; 3; 2; 2; 2; 2; 4; 3; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; 5; 3; 5; 3; 3; 3; 3; 1; 5; 3; 5; 3; dash. Row 32: New Jersey; 3; 2; 2; 4; 4; 3; 3; 3; 2; 3; 5; 3; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; 5; 1; 1; 4; 3; 3; 2; 3; 1; 1; 4; 3; dash. Row 34: New York; 5; 2; 3; 5; 5; 4; 3; 3; 4; 3; 4; 5; dash. Row 35: North Carolina; 4; 3; 3; 5; 5; 5; 5; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3, dash. Row 36: North Dakota; 5; 1; 1; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 4; 5; 5; dash. Row 37: Ohio; 3; 2; 3; 5; 4; 3; 3; 3; 2; 2; 3; 4; dash. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; 5; 1; 1; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 3; 5; 3; 1. Row 40: Pennsylvania; 5; 4; 4; 5; 5; 3; 4; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; dash.

Page 139 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table showing states and their use of analysis tools, data sources, dashboards, feedback, metrics, and safety analysis results.
Long Description.

The table has 14 columns and 55 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Analysis Tools; Artificial Intelligence Analyses; Crowd Sourced Data; Crash Data; Dashboards; Data Collection Practices; Data from Local Agencies; Data for Public Sharing; Feedback from Law Enforcement; Feedback from Public Participation and Engagement PPE Efforts; Performance Metrics; Results from Safety Analyses; Other. Row 41: Rhode Island; 3; 1; 4; 5; 5; 4; 4; 3; 5; 4; 4; 5; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; 5; 1; 1; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 1; 5; 5; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; 4; 1; 2; 5; 3; 3; 4; 4; 3; 3; 4; 4; dash. Row 44: Tennessee; 5; 2; 2; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 4; 3; 4; 4; 5. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; 5; 3; 3; 5; 5; 5; 3; 5; 4; 3; 4; 5; dash. Row 47: Vermont; 4; 1; 2; 5; 4; 5; 4; 3; 3; 3; 4; 4; dash. Row 48: Virginia; 3; 1; 1; 5; 3; 5; 5; 3; 2; 2; 5; 3; dash. Row 49: Washington; 5; 3; 4; 5; 3; 4; 4; 3; 4; 3; 5; 5; dash. Row 50: West Virginia; 3; 1; 1; 4; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 5; 3; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; 4; 2; 4; 5; 4; 5; 5; 5; 2; 2; 5; 3; dash. Row 52: Wyoming; 5; 3; 3; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; 5; dash. Row 53: Average; 3.8; 1.7; 2.1; 4.7; 4.1; 3.9; 3.4; 3.6; 3.4; 2.9; 4.3; 3.7; 3.7. Row 54: Standard Deviation; 1.3; 0.9; 1.1; 0.7; 1.2; 1.4; 1.4; 1.4; 1.4; 1.2; 0.9; 1.3; 2.3. Row 55: Number of Responses; 45; 43; 43; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 45; 3.

Page 140 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-30. Text responses for “Other” for Question 16 (level of information and resource sharing between HSIP and HSO).
A table lists three statements about coordination and agency relationships.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 4 rows. Row 1 lists the header Other, Text. Row 2: We have a very good relationship with Department of Safety for all resources that are available. Row 3: Florida DOT SSO administers HSIP so coordination and sharing are inherent. Row 4: We do not have an HSO.

Page 141 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-31. Individual DOT responses to Question 17 (entity maintaining dash boards).
A table showing state use of crash statistics, project status, funding allocation, data collection efforts, and other categories.
Long Description.

The table has 6 columns and 52 rows. Row 1: Respondent; Crash Statistics; Status of Project or Initiative Implementation; Funding Allocation; Other Data Collection Efforts; Other. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; HSIP and HSO; HSO Only; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 4: Arizona; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; HSO Only; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 6: California; HSIP and HSO; HSIP Only; HSIP Only; dash; dash. Row 7: Colorado; HSIP Only; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; Other State Agency; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 9: Delaware; HSIP and HSO; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 10: District of Columbia; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 11: Florida; HSO Only; HSO Only; dash; dash; HSO Only. Row 12: Georgia; HSIP Only; HSIP Only; HSIP Only; dash; dash. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; HSO Only; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 15: Illinois; Other State Agency; HSIP Only; HSIP Only; dash; dash. Row 16: Indiana; HSIP and HSO; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; HSIP and HSO; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO. Row 19: Kentucky; HSO Only; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 20: Louisiana; HSIP Only; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 21: Maine; HSIP and HSO; dash; dash; HSIP and HSO; dash.

Page 142 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table showing state use of crash statistics, project status, funding allocation, data collection efforts, and other categories.
Long Description.

The table has 6 columns and 52 rows. Row 1: Respondent; Crash Statistics; Status of Project or Initiative Implementation; Funding Allocation; Other Data Collection Efforts; Other. Row 22: Maryland; HSIP and HSO; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 23: Massachusetts; HSIP Only; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO; dash; dash. Row 24: Michigan; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO; dash; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; HSO Only; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO; dash; dash. Row 26: Mississippi; HSIP and HSO; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 27: Missouri; HSIP and HSO; HSIP Only; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 28: Montana; HSIP and HSO; HSIP Only; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; HSIP Only. Row 30: Nevada; HSIP and HSO; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 32: New Jersey; HSIP and HSO; HSIP Only; HSIP Only; dash; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; HSO Only; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; HSIP Only; dash. Row 34: New York; HSIP and HSO; HSIP Only; HSIP Only; dash; dash. Row 35: North Carolina; HSIP and HSO; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 36: North Dakota; HSO Only; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 37: Ohio; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO; dash; dash. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; Other State Agency; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed. Row 40: Pennsylvania; HSIP and HSO; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 41: Rhode Island; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO; dash; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; HSO Only; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash.

Page 143 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table showing state use of crash statistics, project status, funding allocation, data collection efforts, and other categories.
Long Description.

The table has 6 columns and 52 rows. Row 1: Respondent; Crash Statistics; Status of Project or Initiative Implementation; Funding Allocation; Other Data Collection Efforts; Other. Row 43: South Dakota; HSIP and HSO; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 44: Tennessee; Other State Agency; HSIP Only; HSIP Only; dash; dash. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; HSIP and HSO; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 47: Vermont; Other State Agency; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO; dash; dash. Row 48: Virginia; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO; HSIP Only; dash. Row 49: Washington; HSO Only; HSO Only; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; HSIP Only. Row 50: West Virginia; HSIP and HSO; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; HSIP and HSO; Dashboard Not Developed; Dashboard Not Developed; dash; dash. Row 52: Wyoming; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO; HSIP and HSO; dash; dash. Notes: Summary of results, Crash Statistics: HSIP Only, 4; HSO Only, 9; HSIP and HSO, 25; Other State Agency, 5; Dashboard Not Developed, 3; Total responses, 46. Summary of results, Status of Project or Initiative Implementation: HSIP Only, 8; HSO Only, 3; HSIP and HSO, 9; Other State Agency, 0; Dashboard Not Developed, 24; Total responses, 44. Summary of results Funding Allocation: HSIP Only, 6; HSO Only, 0; HSIP and HSO, 8; Other State Agency, 0; Dashboard Not Developed, 29; Total responses, 43. Summary of results, Other Data Collection Efforts: HSIP Only, 2; HSO Only, 0; HSIP and HSO, 2; Other State Agency, 0; Dashboard Not Developed, 1; Total responses, 5. Summary of results, Other: HSIP Only, 2; HSO, Only 1; HSIP and HSO, 1; Other State Agency, 0; Dashboard Not Developed, 1; Total responses, 5.

Page 144 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-32. Text responses for “Other Data Collection Efforts” for Question 17 (entity maintaining dashboards).
A table lists additional data collection effort text entries.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 5 rows. Row 1 lists the header Other Data Collection Efforts, Text. Row 2: VRUSA. Row 3: HSIP tracks project locations for evaluation. Row 4: VRUSA. Row 5: Maine public crash query tool and Bureau of Highway Safety data warehouse with e citation data.

Table B-33. Text responses for “Other” for Question 17 (entity maintaining dashboards).
A table lists other categories with related text entries.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 5 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers Other and Other, Text. Row 2: HSIP only; crash data portal. Row 3: HSIP only; traffic incident management roadway clearance time dashboard. Row 4: HSO only; Florida Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, official crash data custodian and Florida DOT support publicly accessible crash data. Row 5: HSIP and HSO; safety corridor program.

Table B-34. Text responses for “Other State Agency” for Question 17 (entity maintaining dashboards).
A table lists crash statistics dashboard types with associated agencies.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 6 rows. Row 1 lists the column headers Dashboard Type and Other State Agency, Text. Row 2: crash statistics; University of Connecticut. Row 3: crash statistics; Oregon DOT crash analysis and reporting unit and Oregon State Police. Row 4: crash statistics; data management unit within the agency of transportation. Row 5: crash statistics; crash data is maintained by Illinois DOT bureau of data collection. Row 6: crash statistics; Department of Safety.

Page 145 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-35. Dashboard URLs for Question 17 (entity maintaining dashboards).
A table listing states and the dashboard U R Ls they provide for crash, safety, or related reporting.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 33 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Dashboard URL. Row 2: Alaska; crash data or stats is internally facing only at this time. SHSP dashboard is managed by HSO. h t t p s colon double slash app dot power b i dot com slash view question mark equals e y dot J r l j o i i M 2 Y 2 N G N M m Y t Y z M 3 Z S 0 0 N 2 Z h L T g 4 Z W Y t N j J i M W O Q z Z T g 4 Y m Z l l i wid C l 6 l m Y 5 Y W Q 5 Zj J J L T k w Y T g t N G Y 4 M i 1 i N z Q w L T V k M z Z j c 2 M G Q x Z C l s l m M i O N 9. Row 3: Arkansas; h t t p s colon double slash g i s dot a r d o t dot g o v slash portal slash apps slash dashboards slash 3 a e 3 5 f 9 4 2 f a 3 4 0 8 8 8 a b d 2 7 f 2 6 d 4 0 5 5 5 8. Row 4: California; h t t p s colon double slash s h s p dot d o t dot c a dot g o v slash. Row 5: Connecticut; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot c t c r a s h dot u c o n n dot e d u slash. Row 6: District of Columbia; h t t p s colon double slash experience dot a r c g i s dot com slash experience slash 9 2 7 e 7 8 3 7 c 1 4 9 4 7 d a 8 d 1 d 5 4 e f c 7 b d e c 3 7 and h t t p s colon double slash open data dot d c dot g o v slash data sets slash crashes hyphen in hyphen d c slash about. Row 7: Florida; f l h s m v dot g o v slash traffic hyphen crash hyphen reports slash crash hyphen dashboard slash signal 4 analytics dot com slash g i s dot f d o t dot g o v slash s s o s i slash. Row 8: Georgia; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot d o t dot g a dot g o v slash GDOT slash pages slash Crash Reporting dot a s p x. Row 9: Idaho; h t t p s colon double slash t i d dot a a s h t o w a r e s a f e t y dot net slash t i d hyphen safety hyphen dashboards slash question mark view underscore i d equals 2. Row 10: Illinois; h t t p s colon double slash apps dot d o t dot illinois dot g o v slash Fatal Crash slash historic snapshot dot html; h t t p s colon slash slash i d o t dot illinois dot g o v slash transportation hyphen system slash transportation hyphen safety slash roadway hyphen safety slash Illinois hyphen roadway hyphen crash hyphen data slash facts hyphen and hyphen statistics slash crash hyphen facts dot html. Row 11: Kansas; h t t p s colon double slash storymaps dot arcgis dot com slash stories slash 0 1 b 8 e 7 8 4 d 1 6 3 e 4 9 b 4 8 e a 0 d 6 f 7 8 a e a 4; h t t p s colon double slash storymaps dot arcgis dot com slash stories slash d 2 f 8 4 d 5 c 2 2 b 4 b 4 9 8 3 c 3 0 7 d c 7 6 f 4 b; h t t p s colon double slash storymaps dot arcgis dot com slash stories slash 7 b 2 2 8 6 7 b 1 8 9 b 4 4 6 8 3 8 5 0 0 0 3 5 6 1 2 c 1 5 9 d e c. Row 12: Kentucky; h t t p s colon double slash app dot power b i gov dot u s double slash view question mark r e q u a l s e y J r I j o i N z F h O G Y 2 N j k t N j M w M y 0 0 M T A 4 L T h h Z j Q t N G M 3 Z D d l N D k y N D k w I i w i d C I 6 I m Q 3 N 2 M 3 Z j R k L W Q 3 N j c t N D Y x Z i 1 i N j I 1 L T A 2 M j g 3 O T J l O W U y Y S J 9; h t t p s colon double slash app dot powerbigov dot u s double slash view question mark r equals e y J r I j o i N j k 5 Z m N i Z T k t M 2 F h Z S 0 0 O G I y L W E z N W E t N z E x O G M 1 Y W Z m N D Q 3 I i w i d C I 6 I m Q 3 N 2 M 3 Z j R k L W Q 3 N j c t N D Y x Z i 1 i N j I 1 L T A 2 M j g 3 O T J l O W U y Y S J 9; h t t p s colon double slash app dot power b i gov dot u s double slash view question mark r e q u a l s e y J r I j o i O D Q y N z k 0 M j g t Y W Y x M C 0 0 N D Q 2 L W J j N T M t Y j Q 5 Z j U z Y z B j O G M x I i w i d C I 6 I m Q 3 N 2 M 3 Z j R k L W Q 3 N j c t N D Y x Z i 1 i N j I 1 L T A 2 M j g 3 O T J l O W U y Y S J 9; h t t p s colon double slash app dot power b i gov dot u s double slash view question mark r e q u a l s e y J r I j o i Z D c 1 M W Z l Y j A t M j E 1 N S 0 0 Z m N h L W E 0 O W M t Y j k 1 N D k 1 N m Q 3 M G Q x I i w i d C I 6 I m Q 3 N 2 M 3 Z j R k L W Q 3 N j c t N D Y x Z i 1 i N j I 1 L T A 2 M j g 3 O T J l O W U y Y S J 9. Row 13: Louisiana; h t t p s colon slash slash c a r t s dot l s u dot e d u slash data reports slash report slash s h s p crash; h t t p s colon slash slash c a r t s dot l s u dot e d u slash data reports slash report slash crash; h t t p s colon slash slash c a r t s dot l s u dot e d u slash data reports slash report slash performance measures.

Page 146 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table listing states and the dashboard U R Ls they provide for crash, safety, or related reporting.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 33 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Dashboard URL. Row 14: Maine; The dashboards are not publicly available, intranet only. The public crash query tool is here: h t t p s colon double slash m d o t a p i s dot maine dot g o v slash maine crash public slash. Row 15: Maryland; h t t p s colon double slash zero deaths m d dot o r g slash resources slash crash data slash. Another crash statistics dashboard is currently in development under HSIP for internal customers. Row 16: Massachusetts; h t t p s colon double slash a p p s dot impact dot DOT dot state dot m a dot u s slash c d p slash home. Row 17: Mississippi; crash dashboards are not publicly available. Row 18: Missouri; w w w dot save m o lives dot com. Row 19: Montana; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot m d t dot m t dot g o v slash publications slash data stats slash crash data dot a s p x; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot m d t dot m t dot g o v slash pub involv e slash active hyphen projects dot a s p x. Row 20: Nebraska; Traffic Incident Management Roadway Clearance Time Dashboard colon h t t p s colon double slash g i s dot n e dot g o v slash portal slash apps slash dashboards slash b 1 6 2 f 5 4 5 6 3 8 0 4 1 c 6 9 9 3 c 2 6 0 e 9 3 3 c e c 6. Row 21: Nevada; h t t p s colon double slash app dot power b i dot com slash view question mark equals e y J r l j o i N 2 R j Z m R i Y 2 M t M D E z Z i 0 0 M l j L W I 4 M Z U t O D N k Y 2 F h Z D U w N T k z I w i d C l 6 l j d l M j l w Z D M w L T B i N T k N D d I N S O 4 Y T g x L W E 0 Y T l K O W F m Y m Rj N C l s I m M i O j N 9; h t t p s colon double slash experience dot arcgis dot com slash experience slash 5 a 6 6 f 4 4 2 c 0 2 2 c 0 f 4 5 5 8 a d b 7 f 9 7 2 e 7 7 8 3 7 5. Row 22: New Jersey; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot saferoadsforallnj dot com slash about 1; h t t p s colon double slash n i s h o dot c h o p dot e d u slash; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot numeric dot com slash; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot n j dot g o v slash transportation slash r e d f a t a slash accident slash. Row 23: New Mexico; crash hyphen h t t p s colon double slash ops dot u n m dot e d u slash tru slash reports slash crash hyphen dashboards slash index dot h t m l; VRUSA hyphen h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot arcgis dot com slash apps slash dashboards slash 8 3 0 3 8 6 6 7 b 4 f 4 3 6 8 a 3 4 f e d 5 5 8 4 d 2 e a 6 5. Row 24: North Carolina; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot n c d o t dot g o v slash initiatives hyphen policies slash safety slash traffic hyphen safety slash Pages slash safety hyphen data hyphen maps dot a s p x; h t t p s colon double slash n c vision zero dot o r g slash data hyphen analytics slash visualisations slash. Row 25: Ohio; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot transportation dot o h i o dot g o v slash traveling slash safety slash data slash strategic hyphen highway hyphen safety hyphen plan hyphen dashboards slash; h t t p s colon double slash state patrol dot ohio dot g o v slash dashboards hyphen statistics slash o s t a t s hyphen dashboards slash crash hyphen dashboard. Row 26: Oregon; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot oregon dot o r dot g o v slash o d o t slash Data slash Pages slash Crash hyphen Data hyphen Viewer dot a s p x; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot oregon dot o r dot g o v slash o d o t slash Data slash Pages slash Initial hyphen Fatal hyphen Info hyphen Viewer dot a s p x. Row 27: Pennsylvania; h t t p s colon double slash crash info dot penn dot p a dot g o v slash.

Page 147 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table listing states and the dashboard U R Ls they provide for crash, safety, or related reporting.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 33 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Dashboard URL. Row 28: South Dakota; h t t p s colon double slash intersection crash diagram dot s d dot g o v slash and h t t p s colon slash slash d p s dot s d dot g o v slash records slash accident hyphen records slash s d c a t. Row 29: Tennessee; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot t n dot g o v slash safety slash stats slash dashboards dot h t m l. Row 30: Utah; h t t p s colon double slash highway safety dot u t a h dot g o v slash crash hyphen data slash; h t t p s colon double slash sites dot google dot com slash u t a h dot g o v slash u d o t hyphen safety hyphen standards slash dashboards question mark author user equals 0. Row 31: Virginia; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot d m v dot virginia dot g o v slash safety slash crash hyphen data; h t t p s colon double slash dashboard dot v d o t dot virginia dot g o v slash pages slash safety slash crashes dot a s p x; h t t p s colon double slash w w w dot v d o t dot virginia dot g o v slash about slash safety hyphen plan slash; h t t p s colon double slash app dot power b i dot com slash view question mark r equals e y J r l j o i M j h l Z j F h Z D A t N T l j M C 0 0 M D A 1 L W E y O T M t Y W w M 2 N i M m R i M m R k l i w i d C l 6 I j Y y M G F I N W E 5 L T R I Y z E t N G Z h M c 0 4 N j O x L T V k O W Y z O D Z j N z M w O S J 9; h t t p s colon double slash v d o t dot maps dot arcgis dot com slash apps slash Map Series slash index dot h t m l question mark app i d equals c 2 2 a 3 3 a b a c 1 5 4 4 e 3 b 6 5 b 5 0 d b e 9 6 c 0 3 5 e. Row 32: Washington; h t t p s colon double slash remote apps dot w s d o t dot wa dot g o v slash highway safety slash collision slash data slash portal slash public slash. Row 33: Wisconsin; h t t p s colon double slash wisconsin d o t dot g o v slash Pages slash safety slash education slash crash hyphen data slash crash facts dot a s p x.

Page 148 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-36. Individual DOT responses to Question 18 (types of dashboards available to the public).
A table listing states and which dashboard types are publicly available, including crash statistics, project status, funding, and other data.
Long Description.

The table has 7 columns and 53 rows. Row 1: Respondent; None of the following types of dashboards are available to the public; Crash Statistics; Status of Project or Initiative Implementation; Funding Allocation; Other Data Collection Efforts; Other. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 4: Arizona; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 6: California; dash; X; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 7: Colorado; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 9: Delaware; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 10: District of Columbia; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 11: Florida; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 12: Georgia; dash; X; X; dash; dash; X. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 15: Illinois; dash; X; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 16: Indiana; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; dash; X; dash; dash; X; X. Row 19: Kentucky; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 20: Louisiana; dash; X; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 21: Maine; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 22: Maryland; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 23: Massachusetts; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 24: Michigan; dash; X; X; X; dash; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 26: Mississippi; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash.

Page 149 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table listing states and which dashboard types are publicly available, including crash statistics, project status, funding, and other data.
Long Description.

The table has 7 columns and 53 rows. Row 1: Respondent; None of the following types of dashboards are available to the public; Crash Statistics; Status of Project or Initiative Implementation; Funding Allocation; Other Data Collection Efforts; Other. Row 27: Missouri; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 28: Montana; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 30: Nevada; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 32: New Jersey; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; dash; X; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 34: New York; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 35: North Carolina; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 36: North Dakota; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 37: Ohio; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 40: Pennsylvania; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 41: Rhode Island; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 44: Tennessee; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 47: Vermont; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 48: Virginia; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 49: Washington; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 50: West Virginia; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X. Row 52: Wyoming; dash; X; X; X; dash; dash. Row 53: Count; 0; 34; 9; 2; 5; 7.

Page 150 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-37. Text responses for “Other Data Collection Efforts” for Question 18 (types of dashboards available to the public).
A table lists additional data collection efforts.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 6 rows. Row 1 lists the column header Other Data Collection Efforts, Text. Row 2: VRUSA link provided. Row 3: VRUSA. Row 4: lane departures, bike and pedestrian fatal and serious injuries, speeding, and many other challenge areas. Row 5: VRU dashboard. Row 6: performance measures for crash reporting, timeliness.

Table B-38. Text responses for “Other” for Question 18 (types of dashboards available to the public).
A table lists several additional items described as other text.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 8 rows. Row 1 lists the column header Other, Text. Row 2: safety corridors, link provided. Row 3: crash data and traffic safety trends. Row 4: Wisconsin has community maps that show statewide crash data to help local communities understand driver behaviours. Row 5: HSIP network screening with two links written as h t t p s colon double slash v d o t dot maps dot arcgis dot com slash apps slash web app viewer slash index dot h t m l question mark i d equals 1 9 9 7 c c 3 2 5 a d 6 4 0 d 5 a 7 4 a b f 8 c 1 a 6 6 2 6 f 3 and h t t p s colon double slash v t r a n s dot virginia dot g o v slash mid hyphen term hyphen planning slash mid hyphen term hyphen needs hyphen and hyphen priorities. Row 6: crash data. Row 7: TIM roadway clearance time dashboard. Row 8: crash locations and diagrams.

Page 151 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-39. Individual DOT responses to Question 19 (methods for sharing information between HSO and HSIP).
A table showing states and methods of sharing data including pushed data, on demand requests, agreements, shared servers, and other options.
Long Description.

The table has 7 columns and 53 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Data pushed at regular intervals; Data requests on as-needed basis; Data sharing agreement; Shared server; Other; None of the above. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 4: Arizona; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; X; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 6: California; X; X; dash; X; dash; dash. Row 7: Colorado; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 9: Delaware; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 10: District of Columbia; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 11: Florida; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 12: Georgia; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; dash; X; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 15: Illinois; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 16: Indiana; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash. Row 19: Kentucky; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 20: Louisiana; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 21: Maine; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 22: Maryland; X; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 23: Massachusetts; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 24: Michigan; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; dash; X; X; X; dash; dash. Row 26: Mississippi; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash.

Page 152 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table showing states and methods of sharing data including pushed data, on demand requests, agreements, shared servers, and other options.
Long Description.

The table has 7 columns and 53 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Data pushed at regular intervals; Data requests on as-needed basis; Data sharing agreement; Shared server; Other; None of the above. Row 27: Missouri; dash; X; dash; X; dash; dash. Row 28: Montana; dash; X; dash; X; dash; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; X; X; dash; X; dash; dash. Row 30: Nevada; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 32: New Jersey; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 34: New York; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 35: North Carolina; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 36: North Dakota; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 37: Ohio; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 40: Pennsylvania; dash; X; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 41: Rhode Island; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 44: Tennessee; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; X; X; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 47: Vermont; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 48: Virginia; X; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 49: Washington; X; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 50: West Virginia; dash; X; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; X; X; dash; X; dash; dash. Row 52: Wyoming; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 53: Count; 23; 28; 11; 7; 12; 0.

Page 153 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-40. Text responses for “Other” for Question 19 (methods for sharing information between HSO and HSIP).
A table lists various statements describing other coordination and data-sharing practices.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 13 rows. Row 1 lists the column header Other Text. Row 2: team coordination and communications. Row 3: data is requested as needed. Row 4: We are implementing a safety software platform which will house many tools and dashboards for everyone. Row 5: the crash information program manager works in the same section as the HSIP and HSO managers, enabling collaboration. Row 6: We partner with the University of Utah traffic lab to manage crash data across agencies. Row 7: same office really. Row 8: Florida DOT SSO administers HSIP so data and information sharing is inherent. Row 9: HSIP is housed in Illinois DOT HSO and data is shared freely. Row 10: We share the same working space and can share over the Idaho transportation department network. Row 11: We do not have an HSO. Row 12: AASHTO ware safety. Row 13: same manager for both units, and staff sits proximate to one another, so it is informal and frequent collaboration.

Page 154 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-41. Individual DOT responses to Question 20 (lead agency for PPE efforts).
A two column table lists states with response text across fifty two rows and includes a summary note.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 52 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Response text. Row 2: Alabama; dash. Row 3: Alaska; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 4: Arizona; HSO. Row 5: Arkansas; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 6: California; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 7: Colorado; HSO. Row 8: Connecticut; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 9: Delaware; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 10: District of Columbia; HSO. Row 11: Florida; Other. Row 12: Georgia; HSIP. Row 13: Hawaii; dash. Row 14: Idaho; Other. Row 15: Illinois; Other. Row 16: Indiana; HSO. Row 17: Iowa; dash. Row 18: Kansas; HSO. Row 19: Kentucky; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 20: Louisiana; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 21: Maine; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 22: Maryland; HSO. Row 23: Massachusetts; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 24: Michigan; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 25: Minnesota; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 26: Mississippi; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 27: Missouri; HSO. Row 28: Montana; HSIP or HSO depending on context.

Page 155 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A two column table lists states with response text across fifty two rows and includes a summary note.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 52 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Response text. Row 29: Nebraska; HSO. Row 30: Nevada; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 31: New Hampshire; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 32: New Jersey; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 33: New Mexico; HSO. Row 34: New York; Other. Row 35: North Carolina; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 36: North Dakota; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 37: Ohio; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash. Row 39: Oregon; HSO. Row 40: Pennsylvania; HSO. Row 41: Rhode Island; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 42: South Carolina; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 43: South Dakota; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 44: Tennessee; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 45: Texas; dash. Row 46: Utah; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 47: Vermont; HSO. Row 48: Virginia; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 49: Washington; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 50: West Virginia; HSIP or HSO depending on context. Row 51: Wisconsin; Other. Row 52: Wyoming; HSIP or HSO depending on context. A note states Summary of results of HSIP equals 1, HSO equals 12, HSIP or HSO depending on context equals 28, Other equals 5, and Total responses equals 46.

Page 156 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-42. Text responses for “Other” for Question 20 (lead agency for PPE efforts).
A one column table lists five rows of text about which groups lead different safety and infrastructure efforts.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 6 rows. The column header in Row 1 is Other Text. Row 2: It depends on the effort. If it is related to behavioral or law enforcement it comes from the HSO. If it is related to engineering or infrastructure it comes from staff involved in the HSIP. Row 3: Florida DOT SSO and Communications Office lead PPE efforts for traffic safety and HSIP. Row 4: Same. Row 5: HSO for Behavioral and Idaho Transportation Department or Local Agency Project Managers for Infrastructure. Row 6: For RSAs and road safety reviews HSIP HSO. For other public engagement other bureaus or Illinois DOT districts take the lead.

Page 157 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-43. Individual DOT responses to Question 21 (HSIP and HSO methods of collaboration for PPE).
A table lists states with marks showing participation in different P P E activity categories and includes a count row.
Long Description.

The table has 8 columns and 53 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Joint participation in PPE activities; PPE results shared on as-needed basis; PPE results shared on regular basis; Shared website for PPE outreach; Other; None of the above. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 4: Arizona; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 6: California; X; dash; X; X; dash; dash. Row 7: Colorado; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 9: Delaware; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 10: District of Columbia; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 11: Florida; X; X; X; X; X; dash. Row 12: Georgia; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; dash; X; dash; X; dash; dash. Row 15: Illinois; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 16: Indiana; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 19: Kentucky; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 20: Louisiana; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 21: Maine; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 22: Maryland; X; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 23: Massachusetts; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 24: Michigan; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 26: Mississippi; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash.

Page 158 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A table lists states with marks showing participation in different P P E activity categories and includes a count row.
Long Description.

The table has 8 columns and 53 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Joint participation in PPE activities; PPE results shared on as-needed basis; PPE results shared on regular basis; Shared website for PPE outreach; Other; None of the above. Row 27: Missouri; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 28: Montana; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 30: Nevada; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 32: New Jersey; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 34: New York; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 35: North Carolina; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 36: North Dakota; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 37: Ohio; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 40: Pennsylvania; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 41: Rhode Island; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 44: Tennessee; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 47: Vermont; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 48: Virginia; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 49: Washington; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 50: West Virginia; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 52: Wyoming; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 53: Count; 18; 25; 9; 3; 7; 0.

Page 159 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-44. Text responses for “Other” for Question 21 (HSIP and HSO methods of collaboration for PPE).
A one column table shows several rows of text describing information sources and coordination related to H S O and H S I P.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 8 rows. The column header in Row 1 is Other, Text. Row 2: Wisconsin has Traffic Safety Commissions for all 72 counties. Every Traffic Safety Commission has a law enforcement liaison from the HSO and safety engineer involved in the HSIP along with many other stakeholders. Row 3: Unknown. Row 4: It is on an Agency website Mass dot gov. Row 5: Florida DOT SSO administers HSIP so data and information sharing is inherent and SSO Public Information Officer works closely with Florida DOT Communications Office. Row 6: share based on context. Row 7: HSIP and Safety are one unit essentially. Row 8: We do not have an HSO.

Page 160 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-45. Individual DOT responses to Question 22 (challenges for coordinating HSIP and HSO activities).
A table shows states and the challenges they face in P P E coordination, marked with X in different challenge categories.
Long Description.

The table has 11 columns and 53 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Data availability; Differences in data collection procedures or standards; Differences in organizational structures or processes; Evaluating program performance; Funding constraints; Need to coordinate with internal and external partners; Staffing constraints; Stakeholder concerns; Other; None of the Above. Row 2: Alabama; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 3: Alaska; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 4: Arizona; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 5: Arkansas; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 6: California; X; dash; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 7: Colorado; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 8: Connecticut; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 9: Delaware; dash; X; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 10: District of Columbia; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 11: Florida; X; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 12: Georgia; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash. Row 13: Hawaii; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 14: Idaho; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 15: Illinois; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 16: Indiana; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 17: Iowa; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 18: Kansas; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash.

Page 161 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-45. (Continued).
A table shows states and the challenges they face in P P E coordination, marked with X in different challenge categories.

(continued on next page)

Long Description.

The table has 11 columns and 53 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Data availability; Differences in data collection procedures or standards; Differences in organizational structures or processes; Evaluating program performance; Funding constraints; Need to coordinate with internal and external partners; Staffing constraints; Stakeholder concerns; Other; None of the Above. Row 19: Kentucky; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 20: Louisiana; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 21: Maine; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 22: Maryland; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 23: Massachusetts; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 24: Michigan; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 25: Minnesota; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 26: Mississippi; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 27: Missouri; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 28: Montana; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 29: Nebraska; X; dash; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 30: Nevada; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 31: New Hampshire; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 32: New Jersey; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 33: New Mexico; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash. Row 34: New York; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 35: North Carolina; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 36: North Dakota; dash; dash; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 37: Ohio; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash.

Page 162 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-45. (Continued).
A table shows states and the challenges they face in P P E coordination, marked with X in different challenge categories.
Long Description.

The table has 11 columns and 53 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent; Data availability; Differences in data collection procedures or standards; Differences in organizational structures or processes; Evaluating program performance; Funding constraints; Need to coordinate with internal and external partners; Staffing constraints; Stakeholder concerns; Other; None of the Above. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 39: Oregon; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 40: Pennsylvania; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 41: Rhode Island; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; X; X; dash; dash. Row 42: South Carolina; dash; dash; X; X; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 43: South Dakota; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 44: Tennessee; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash; dash; X; dash; dash. Row 45: Texas; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 46: Utah; dash; dash; X; X; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 47: Vermont; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 48: Virginia; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; X; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 49: Washington; X; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 50: West Virginia; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash; X; dash; dash; dash. Row 51: Wisconsin; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 52: Wyoming; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash; dash. Row 53: Count; 6; 4; 18; 9; 14; 10; 23; 2; 5; 0.

Page 163 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-46. Text responses for “Other” for Question 22 (challenges for coordinating HSIP and HSO activities).
A one column table shows text entries describing challenges related to H S O and H S I P coordination.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 6 rows. The column header in Row 1 is Other, Text. Row 2: Getting buy in for safety from higher ups within DOT who are not familiar with safety. Row 3: Lack of familiarity with the other programs. Row 4: HSIP and HSO administrators are in two different divisions of Idaho Transportation Department. Row 5: Subject matters go to specific areas. Turf war of the stay in your lane mentality. Row 6: We do not have an HSO.

Page 164 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-47. Individual DOT responses to Question 23 (other opportunities for safety discussions between HSIP and HSO).
A two column table shows state responses marked as Yes, No, Not applicable, or dash, ending with a summary note.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 52 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent and Response. Row 2: Alabama; dash. Row 3: Alaska; dash. Row 4: Arizona; No. Row 5: Arkansas; Yes. Row 6: California; Not applicable. Row 7: Colorado; Not applicable. Row 8: Connecticut; Not applicable. Row 9: Delaware; Not applicable. Row 10: District of Columbia; Yes. Row 11: Florida; Not applicable. Row 12: Georgia; dash. Row 13: Hawaii; dash. Row 14: Idaho; Not applicable. Row 15: Illinois; Not applicable. Row 16: Indiana; Not applicable. Row 17: Iowa; dash. Row 18: Kansas; Not applicable. Row 19: Kentucky; Yes. Row 20: Louisiana; Not applicable. Row 21: Maine; Not applicable. Row 22: Maryland; Not applicable. Row 23: Massachusetts; Yes. Row 24: Michigan; Yes. Row 25: Minnesota; Yes. Row 26: Mississippi; Yes. Row 27: Missouri; Not applicable. Row 28: Montana; Not applicable. Row 29: Nebraska; Not applicable. Row 30: Nevada; Not applicable.

Page 165 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A two column table shows state responses marked as Yes, No, Not applicable, or dash, ending with a summary note.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 52 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent and Response. Row 31: New Hampshire; Not applicable. Row 32: New Jersey; Yes. Row 33: New Mexico; Not applicable. Row 34: New York; Not applicable. Row 35: North Carolina; Yes. Row 36: North Dakota; Not applicable. Row 37: Ohio; Not applicable. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash. Row 39: Oregon; Not applicable. Row 40: Pennsylvania; Not applicable. Row 41: Rhode Island; Not applicable. Row 42: South Carolina; Yes. Row 43: South Dakota; No. Row 44: Tennessee; Yes. Row 45: Texas; dash. Row 46: Utah; Yes. Row 47: Vermont; Not applicable. Row 48: Virginia; Yes. Row 49: Washington; Yes. Row 50: West Virginia; Yes. Row 51: Wisconsin; Yes. Row 52: Wyoming; Not applicable. A note states Summary of results Yes equals 16, No equals 2, Not applicable equals 26, Total responses equals 44.

Page 166 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-48. Text responses for “Yes — Please Describe” for Question 23 (other opportunities for safety discussions between HSIP and HSO).
A one column table shows text entries describing coordination efforts, meetings, and discussions related to safety programs.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 15 rows. The column header in Row 1 is Please Describe, Text. Row 2: There should be some consideration of initiatives and collaboration to increase the effectiveness of projects. Row 3: SHSP, Statewide Traffic Records Coordinating Committee, Highway Traffic Safety Policy Advisory Council, other forms such as Target Zero Commission. Row 4: Quarterly meetings. Row 5: open discussions. Row 6: We have standing meetings with HSO. Row 7: During the development of the SHSP Kentucky’s HSIP and HSO coordinate and collaborate very well. Another area is during Road Safety Assessments especially Kentucky’s recent efforts towards VRU focused RSAs. One last effort which has not been utilized as much but should be is SHSP Emphasis Area Focus Groups. Row 8: We often collaborate on the many other safety initiatives, plans, and cross disciplinary traffic safety groups that the state currently has. Row 9: Some moderate level of discussion at regular meetings. Row 10: Advisory Council, Statewide Toward Zero Death planning structure. Row 11: Highway Safety Management Task Force Meetings. Row 12: SHSP Development, TRCC Coordination, Other Efforts. Row 13: Through the SHSP Steering Committee and regular HSO and HSIP managers meetings. Row 14: These are separate agencies with different priorities. Row 15: Governor’s Traffic Safety Advisory Council.

Page 167 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-49. Individual DOT responses to Question 24 (willingness to participate in case example).
A two column table shows state responses marked as Yes, No, or dash, followed by a summary note.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 52 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent and Response. Row 2: Alabama; dash. Row 3: Alaska; Yes. Row 4: Arizona; Yes. Row 5: Arkansas; No. Row 6: California; No. Row 7: Colorado; No. Row 8: Connecticut; No. Row 9: Delaware; No. Row 10: District of Columbia; dash. Row 11: Florida; Yes. Row 12: Georgia; No. Row 13: Hawaii; dash. Row 14: Idaho; No. Row 15: Illinois; Yes. Row 16: Indiana; No. Row 17: Iowa; dash. Row 18: Kansas; No. Row 19: Kentucky; Yes. Row 20: Louisiana; No. Row 21: Maine; Yes. Row 22: Maryland; No. Row 23: Massachusetts; dash. Row 24: Michigan; No. Row 25: Minnesota; No. Row 26: Mississippi; No. Row 27: Missouri; Yes. Row 28: Montana; Yes. Row 29: Nebraska; Yes. Row 30: Nevada; Yes. Row 31: New Hampshire; No.

Page 168 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A two column table shows state responses marked as Yes, No, or dash, followed by a summary note.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 52 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent and Response. Row 32: New Jersey; No. Row 33: New Mexico; No. Row 34: New York; No. Row 35: North Carolina; No. Row 36: North Dakota; No. Row 37: Ohio; No. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash. Row 39: Oregon; No. Row 40: Pennsylvania; No. Row 41: Rhode Island; Yes. Row 42: South Carolina; No. Row 43: South Dakota; No. Row 44: Tennessee; Yes. Row 45: Texas; dash. Row 46: Utah; Yes. Row 47: Vermont; No. Row 48: Virginia; No. Row 49: Washington; Yes. Row 50: West Virginia; Yes. Row 51: Wisconsin; No. Row 52: Wyoming; No. A note states Summary of results Yes equals 15, No equals 29, Total responses equals 44.

Page 169 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-50. Individual DOT responses to Question 25 (HSIP and HSO collaboration for survey).
A two column table shows how states completed the survey, including joint completion, exclusive D O T input, shared questions, or Other responses.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 52 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent and Response Text. Row 2: Alabama; dash. Row 3: Alaska; DOT and HSO filled out survey jointly at the same time. Row 4: Arizona; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 5: Arkansas; DOT completed survey and HSO reviewed survey responses. Row 6: California; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 7: Colorado; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 8: Connecticut; Other. Row 9: Delaware; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 10: District of Columbia; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 11: Florida; Other. Row 12: Georgia; Other. Row 13: Hawaii; dash. Row 14: Idaho; DOT and HSO filled out survey jointly at the same time. Row 15: Illinois; Other. Row 16: Indiana; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 17: Iowa; dash. Row 18: Kansas; DOT and HSO filled out survey jointly at the same time. Row 19: Kentucky; DOT shared survey questions with HSO and HSO provided input. Row 20: Louisiana; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 21: Maine; DOT shared survey questions with HSO and HSO provided input. Row 22: Maryland; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 23: Massachusetts; DOT and HSO filled out survey jointly at the same time. Row 24: Michigan; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 25: Minnesota; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 26: Mississippi; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 27: Missouri; Other. Row 28: Montana; Other. Row 29: Nebraska; DOT and HSO filled out survey jointly at the same time. Row 30: Nevada; Other.

Page 170 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
A two column table shows how states completed the survey, including joint completion, exclusive D O T input, shared questions, or Other responses.
Long Description.

The table has 2 columns and 52 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are Respondent and Response Text. Row 31: New Hampshire; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 32: New Jersey; Other. Row 33: New Mexico; Other. Row 34: New York; DOT and HSO filled out survey jointly at the same time. Row 35: North Carolina; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 36: North Dakota; DOT shared survey questions with HSO and HSO provided input. Row 37: Ohio; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 38: Oklahoma; dash. Row 39: Oregon; DOT shared survey questions with HSO and HSO provided input. Row 40: Pennsylvania; DOT shared survey questions with HSO and HSO provided input. Row 41: Rhode Island; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 42: South Carolina; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 43: South Dakota; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 44: Tennessee; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 45: Texas; dash. Row 46: Utah; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 47: Vermont; Other. Row 48: Virginia; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 49: Washington; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 50: West Virginia; DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO. Row 51: Wisconsin; Other. Row 52: Wyoming; Other. A note states Summary of results DOT and HSO filled out jointly at the same time equals 6, DOT shared survey questions with HSO and HSO provided input equals 5, DOT completed survey and HSO reviewed survey responses equals 1, DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from HSO equals 22, Other equals 12, Total responses equals 46.

Page 171 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Table B-51. Text responses for “Other” for Question 25 (HSIP and HSO collaboration for survey).
A one column table shows text entries describing how different staff contributed to completing the survey.
Long Description.

The table has 1 column and 13 rows. The column header in Row 1 is Other, Text. Row 2: I was able to fill out the portions for HSIP and HSO. I shared it with individuals who deal with the NHTSA side and never got a response back. Row 3: Florida DOT SSO which administers the HSIP completed this survey. Row 4: HSIP Manager is part of the DOT HSO. Row 5: DOT, HSIP, filled out and HSO provided input and both are under the DOT agency. Row 6: Due to time constraints to complete the survey DOT exclusively filled out survey without input from the HSO. Ideally survey responses would have had input between HSIP and HSO staff. Row 7: DOT filled out without input from HSO due to time constraints only. Row 8: The HSO is in the same DOT Division as the HSIP. The Division Director completed this survey. Row 9: HSIP Lead responded to the questions. Row 10: We did it together and are both part of the DOT. Row 11: We do not have an HSO. Row 12: Safe System Manager overseeing HSIP and SHSO completed the survey. Row 13: DOT filled out the survey with knowledge of Division of Highway Traffic Safety programs and initiatives based on recent meetings and close collaboration on SHSP development.

Page 172 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel

This page intentionally left blank.

Page 87 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 87
Page 88 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 88
Page 89 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 89
Page 90 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 90
Page 91 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 91
Page 92 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 92
Page 93 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 93
Page 94 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 94
Page 95 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 95
Page 96 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 96
Page 97 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 97
Page 98 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 98
Page 99 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 99
Page 100 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 100
Page 101 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 101
Page 102 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 102
Page 103 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 103
Page 104 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 104
Page 105 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 105
Page 106 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 106
Page 107 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 107
Page 108 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 108
Page 109 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 109
Page 110 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 110
Page 111 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 111
Page 112 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 112
Page 113 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 113
Page 114 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 114
Page 115 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 115
Page 116 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 116
Page 117 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 117
Page 118 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 118
Page 119 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 119
Page 120 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 120
Page 121 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 121
Page 122 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 122
Page 123 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 123
Page 124 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 124
Page 125 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 125
Page 126 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 126
Page 127 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 127
Page 128 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 128
Page 129 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 129
Page 130 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 130
Page 131 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 131
Page 132 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 132
Page 133 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 133
Page 134 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 134
Page 135 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 135
Page 136 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 136
Page 137 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 137
Page 138 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 138
Page 139 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 139
Page 140 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 140
Page 141 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 141
Page 142 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 142
Page 143 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 143
Page 144 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 144
Page 145 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 145
Page 146 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 146
Page 147 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 147
Page 148 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 148
Page 149 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 149
Page 150 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 150
Page 151 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 151
Page 152 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 152
Page 153 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 153
Page 154 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 154
Page 155 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 155
Page 156 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 156
Page 157 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 157
Page 158 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 158
Page 159 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 159
Page 160 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 160
Page 161 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 161
Page 162 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 162
Page 163 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 163
Page 164 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 164
Page 165 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 165
Page 166 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 166
Page 167 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 167
Page 168 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 168
Page 169 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 169
Page 170 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 170
Page 171 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 171
Page 172 Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix B: List of Responding DOTs and Individual Survey Responses from DOTs." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Coordination of Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Office Activities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29375.
Save
Cancel
Page 172
Next Chapter: Appendix C: Typical Case Example Interview Questions
Subscribe to Emails from the National Academies
Stay up to date on activities, publications, and events by subscribing to email updates.