Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide (2024)

Chapter: 9 Roundabout Intersection Analysis Methodology

Previous Chapter: 8 Signalized Intersection Analysis Methodology
Page 102
Suggested Citation: "9 Roundabout Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.

CHAPTER 9

Roundabout Intersection Analysis Methodology

Methodology Limitations

For the roundabout intersection calculations, the planning-level analysis methodology from NCHRP Report 825: Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the Highway Capacity Manual (Dowling et al. 2016) was implemented. The simplifications to the full operational analysis methodology include the following:

  • One lane on each approach and within the roundabout. (This is the predominant configuration in rural highway situations.)
  • Pedestrian crossings are not considered.
  • Right-turn by-pass lanes are not considered.

9.1 Equations and Exhibits

The variable definitions for these equations are shown in Section 9.2 Nomenclature.

Step 1: Convert Movement Demand Volumes to Flow Rates

  • Equation 22-8: Demand flow rate for movement i.
    v i = V i P H F (HCM7 Eq. 22-8)

Step 2: Adjust Flow Rates for Heavy Vehicles

  • Equation 22-9: Passenger car equivalent demand flow rate for movement i; uses results from Equation 22-10 and Exhibit 22-11.
    v i , p c e = V i f H V (HCM7 Eq. 22-9)
  • Exhibit 22-11: Passenger car equivalencies.
    Vehicle Type Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE), ET
    Passenger car 1
    Heavy vehicle 2
Page 103
Suggested Citation: "9 Roundabout Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
  • Equation 22-10: Heavy vehicle adjustment factor.
    f H V = 1 1 + P T ( E T 1 ) (HCM7 Eq. 22-10)

Step 3: Determine Circulating and Exiting Flow Rates

The circulating flow rate (vc) that opposes traffic entering the roundabout from a given leg comprises the following movements (assuming a four-leg roundabout):

  • U-turn movement of the leg immediately to the right of the subject leg.
  • U-turn and left-turn movements of the leg opposite of the subject leg.
  • U-turn, left-turn, and through movements of the leg immediately to the left of the subject leg.

For example, the calculation of the circulating flow rate opposing the northbound entry leg is given by Equation 22-11 (uses results from Equation 22-9).

vc,NB,pce = vWBU,pce + vSBL,pce + vSBU,pce + vEBT,pce + vEBL,pce + vEBU,pce

The exiting flow rate (vex) for a given leg comprises the following movements (assuming a four-leg roundabout):

  • U-turn movement of the subject leg.
  • Left-turn movement of the leg immediately to the right of the subject leg.
  • Through movement of the leg opposite of the subject leg.
  • Right-turn movement of the leg immediately to the left of the subject leg.

For example, the calculation of the exiting flow rate for the southbound exit leg is given by Equation 22-12 (uses results from Equation 22-9). Note that if a bypass lane is present on the immediate upstream entry (e.g., eastbound entry leg for a southbound exit leg), the right-turning flow using the bypass lane is deducted from the exiting flow.

vex,SB,pce = vNBU,pce + vWBL,pce + vSBT,pce + vEBR,pcevEBR,pce,bypass

Step 4: Determine Entry Flow Rates by Lane

  • Exhibit 22-14: Assumed (de facto) lane assignments.
  • Exhibit 22-15: Volume assignments for two-lane entries.

Step 5: Determine the Capacity of Each Entry Lane and Bypass Lane as Appropriate in Passenger Car Equivalents

  • Exhibit 22-16: Capacity equations for entry lanes.

This exhibit identifies the capacity equation to use for different combinations of number of entry lanes (1 or 2) and number of circulating lanes (1 or 2). Due to the simplification of this analysis methodology for rural highways, that is, only considering roundabouts with single lane entries (with no bypass lane) and single circulating lanes, only Equation 22-1 is applicable.

ce,pce = 1,380e(−1.02 × 10 −3)vc,pce (HCM7 Eq. 22-1)

  • Exhibit 22-17: Capacity equations for bypass lanes.

Again, because bypass lanes are not considered in the rural highway methodology, this calculation is skipped.

Page 104
Suggested Citation: "9 Roundabout Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.

Step 6: Determine Pedestrian Impedance to Vehicles

Methodology Limitation

This step is not implemented.

  • Exhibit 22-18: Model of Entry Capacity Adjustment Factor for Pedestrians Crossing a One-Lane Entry (Assuming Pedestrian Priority).
  • Exhibit 22-19: Illustration of Entry Capacity Adjustment Factor for Pedestrians Crossing a One-Lane Entry (Assuming Pedestrian Priority).
  • Exhibit 22-20: Model of Entry Capacity Adjustment Factor for Pedestrians Crossing a Two-Lane Entry (Assuming Pedestrian Priority).
  • Exhibit 22-21: Illustration of Entry Capacity Adjustment Factor for Pedestrians Crossing a Two-Lane Entry (Assuming Pedestrian Priority).

Step 7: Convert Lane Flow Rates and Capacities into Vehicles per Hour

  • Equation 22-13: Convert lane i flow rate from units of pc/h to veh/h; uses results from Equation 22-9 and Equation 22-15.

    vi = vi,PCE × fhv,e (HCM7 Eq. 22-13)

  • Equation 22-14: Calculate lane i capacity, in units of veh/h; uses results from Equation 22-15.

    ci = ci,PCE × fhv,e × fped (HCM7 Eq. 22-14)

  • Equation 22-15: Heavy vehicle adjustment factor for the entry lane; uses results from Equation 22-9.
Methodology Limitation

This equation is not implemented because the percentage of heavy vehicles is only specified for the approach lane, not for each individual movement within the approach lane. Thus, fhv,e is equal to fhv calculated in Step 2.

Step 8: Compute Volume-to-Capacity Ratio for Each Lane

  • Equation 22-16: Calculation of the volume-to-capacity ratio for lane i.
    x i = v i c i (HCM7 Eq. 22-16)

Step 9: Compute the Average Control Delay for Each Lane

  • Equation 22-17: Calculation of the control delay for lane i.
    d i = 3 , 6 0 0 c + 9 0 0 T [ x 1 + ( x 1 ) 2 + ( 3 , 6 0 0 c ) x 4 5 0 T ] + 5 × min [ x , 1 ] (HCM7 Eq. 22-17)
Page 105
Suggested Citation: "9 Roundabout Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.

Step 10: Determine LOS for Each Lane on Each Approach

The LOS for each approach, limited to a single lane per approach, is determined from Exhibit 22-8 based on the corresponding values of control delay.

Step 11: Compute the Average Control Delay and Determine LOS for Each Approach and the Roundabout As a Whole

  • Equation 22-18: Calculation of the control delay for approach.

Because the analysis is limited to single-lane approaches, the approach delay value is equal to the lane delay value from Step 9.

  • Equation 22-19: Calculation of the control delay for intersection.
    d i n t e r s e c t i o n = d i v i v i (HCM7 Eq. 22-19)
  • Exhibit 22-8: LOS criteria (motorized vehicle mode); the LOS is determined for the major roadway through movement for the analysis direction.
    Control Delay (s/veh) LOS
    –10 A
    >10–15 B
    >15–25 C
    >25–35 D
    >35–50 E
    >50 F

    If the v/c > 1.0, the LOS is F.

Step 12: Compute 95th Percentile Queues for Each Lane

Methodology Limitation

This step is not implemented.

  • Equation 22-20: Calculation of the 95th percentile queue.

9.2 Nomenclature

c = capacity (pc/h/ln).
ce,PCE = lane capacity, adjusted for heavy vehicles (pc/h).
ci = capacity for lane i (veh/h).
ci,PCE = capacity for lane i (pc/h).
di = control delay for lane i (s/veh).
ET = passenger car equivalent of one heavy vehicle in the traffic stream (PCEs).
fHV = heavy-vehicle adjustment factor.
fHV,e = heavy-vehicle adjustment factor for the entry lane.
fHV,i = heavy-vehicle adjustment factor for movement i.
fped = pedestrian impedance factor.
PHF = peak hour factor (decimal).
Page 106
Suggested Citation: "9 Roundabout Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
PT = proportion of SUTs and TTs in traffic stream (decimal).
T = analysis period (h) (T=0.25 h for 15-min analysis).
vc,NB,pce = circulating flow rate for the northbound direction (pc/h).
vc,pce = conflicting flow rate (pc/h).
ve,i,pce = entry flow rate for movement i (pc/h).
vex,i,pce = exit flow rate for movement i (pc/h).
vi = demand flow rate in direction i (veh/h).
vi,pce = demand flow rate for movement i (pc/h).
Vi = demand volume for direction i (veh/h).
x = volume-to-capacity ratio of the subject lane.

The following notations are used, individually or in combination, to designate vehicle movements and lanes at the roundabout:

  • PCE: passenger car equivalent.

Direction

  • NB: Northbound.
  • EB: Eastbound.
  • SB: Southbound.
  • WB: Westbound.

Movement

  • T: Through.
  • L: Left turn.
  • R: Right turn.
  • U: U-turn.

For example, the circulating flow rate for the northbound approach, in units of passenger cars, would be notated as vc,NB,pce. The volume for the southbound left-turn movement would be notated as vSBL.

Page 102
Suggested Citation: "9 Roundabout Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 102
Page 103
Suggested Citation: "9 Roundabout Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 103
Page 104
Suggested Citation: "9 Roundabout Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 104
Page 105
Suggested Citation: "9 Roundabout Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 105
Page 106
Suggested Citation: "9 Roundabout Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 106
Next Chapter: 10 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.