Previous Chapter: Appendix: Mitigation Strategies
Page 273
Suggested Citation: "Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.

Bibliography

AASHTO (2018). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. 7th ed., Washington, DC.

Allen, D. P., Rouphail, N., Hummer, J. E., and Milazzo, J. S. (1998). Operational Analysis of Uninterrupted Bicycle Facilities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1636(1), pp. 29–36.

Bae, B., Whetsel, B. C., and Han, L. D. (2017). Gray Areas In Isolated Intersection Control-Type Selection: Complementary Decision-Support Tool. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 143(11):04017055.

Bonneson, J. A., and Fontaine, M. D. (2001). NCHRP Report 457: Engineering Study Guide for Evaluating Intersection Improvements. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

Borgman, F. (2003). The Cycle Balance: Benchmarking Local Cycling Conditions. In Sustainable Transport: Planning for Walking and Cycling in Urban Environments, Chapter: The Cycle Balance: Benchmarking Local Cycling Conditions, p. 713. Taylor & Francis, Inc., London, UK.

Botma, H. (1995). Method to Determine Level of Service for Bicycle Paths and Pedestrian-Bicycle Paths. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1502, pp. 38–44.

Callister, D., and Lowry, M. (2013). Tools and Strategies for Wide-Scale Bicycle Level-of-Service Analysis. 139:250–257.

Danesh, A., Ma, W., and Wang, L. (2023). Identifying the Adaptability of Different Control Types Based on Delay and Capacity for Isolated Intersection. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2677(3), pp. 33–45.

Davis, G. A., Hourdos, J., and Gao, J. (2023). Criteria and Guidelines for Three-Lane Road Design and Operation, Volume MN 2023-09. Minnesota DOT, Office of Research & Innovation, St. Paul.

Davis, J. (1987). Bicycle Safety Evaluation. City of Chattanooga, and Chattanooga-Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission, TN.

De Groot, R. and Centrum voor Regelgeving en Onderzoek in de Grond, Water, e. W. e. d. V. (2007). Design Manual for Bicycle Traffic. C.R.O.W. record. CROW.

De Groot, R. and CROW kenniscentrum voor verkeer, v. e. i. (2016). Design Manual for Bicycle Traffic. C.R.O.W. record. CROW.

Dill, J., and McNeil, N. Revisiting the Four Types of Cyclists: Findings from a National Survey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, No. 2587, pp. 90–99, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3141/2587-11.

Dixon, L. B. (1996). Bicycle and Pedestrian Level-of-Service Performance Measures and Standards for Congestion Management Systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1538(1), pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196153800101.

Dowling, R., Ryus, P., Schroeder, B., Kyte, M., Creasey, T., Rouphail, N., Hajbabaie, A., and Rhoades, D. (2016). NCHRP Report 825: Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.

Epperson, B. (1994). Evaluating Suitability of Roadways for Bicycle Use: Toward a Cycling Level-of-Service Standard. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1438, pp. 9–16.

Ferenchak, N. N., and Marshall, W. E. (2020. Validation of Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress and Perceived Safety for Children. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2674(4), pp. 397–406 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120909833.

FHWA (n.d.). Intersection Control Evaluation. https://highways.dot.gov/safety/intersection-safety/ice.

FHWA (2009). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

Fitzpatrick, K., Brewer, M. A., Dorothy, P., and Park, E. S. (2014). NCHRP Report 780: Design Guidance for Intersection Auxiliary Lanes. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.

Page 274
Suggested Citation: "Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.

Fitzpatrick, K., Brewer, M. A., Eisele, W. L., Levinson, H. S., Gluck, J. S., and Lorenz, M. R. (2013). NCHRP Report 745: Left-Turn Accommodations at Unsignalized Intersections. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.

Florida DOT Forecasting and Trends Office (2023). Methodologies for the FDOT Source Book, A Technical Report. Florida DOT, Tallahassee.

Foster, N., Monsere, C. M., Dill, J., and Clifton, K. (2015). Level-of-Service Model for Protected Bike Lanes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2520(1), pp. 90–99.

Furth, P. G., Mekuria, M. C., and Nixon, H. (2016). Network Connectivity for Low-Stress Bicycling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2587(1), pp. 41–49.

für Strassen und Verkehrswesen, F. (2015). Handbuch für die Bemessung von Straßenverkehrsanla- gen:Stadtstraßen. Buch. Teil S. Forschungsgesellschaft für Strassen und Verkehrswesen.

Gattis, J., Gluck, J. S., Barlow, J. M., Eck, R. W., Hecker, W. F., and Levinson, H. S. (2010). NCHRP Report 659: Guide for the Geometric Design of Driveways. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.

Geller, R. (2006). Four Types of Cyclists. Portland Bureau of Transportation, Oregon.

GHSA (2022). America’s Rural Roads: Beautiful and Deadly. Washington, DC. https://www.ghsa.org/sites/default/files/2022-09/America%E2%80%99s%20Rural%20Roads%20-%20Beautiful%20and%20Deadly%20FNL.pdf.

Gresham Smith and Partners (2016). SR 109 Access Management Study, Final Report, Prepared for the Nashville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization, TN.

Han, L. D., Li, J.-M. J., and Thomas Urbanik, I. (2008). Control-Type Selection at Isolated Intersections Based on Control Delay Under Various Demand Levels. Transportation Research Record, Journal of Transportation Research Board, No. 2071(1), pp. 109–116.

Harkey, D. L. (1998). The Bicycle Compatibility Index: A Level of Service Concept. (December 1998):4.

Hoedl, S., Titze, S., and Oja, P. (2010). The Bikeability and Walkability Evaluation Table. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39(5):457–459.

Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) (2016). Traffic Engineering Handbook, 7th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

Isebrands, H., Hallmark, S., and Hawkins, N. (2014). Effects of Approach Speed at Rural High-Speed Intersections: Roundabouts Versus Two-Way-Stop Control. Transportation Research Record, Journal of Transportation Research Board, No. 2402(1), pp. 7–77.

IŠtoka Otković, I., and Dadić, I. (2012). Comparison of Delays at Signal-Controlled Intersection and Roundabout. Promet—Traffic & Transportation, 21(3):157–165. https://traffic.fpz.hr/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/221.

Jafari, A., Al-Kaisy, A., and Washburn, S. S. (2018). Passing Lane Optimum Length on Two-Lane Highways. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2017-0723.

Jensen, S. U. (2007). Pedestrian and Bicyclist Level of Service on Roadway Segments. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2031(1), pp. 43–51.

Jones, E. G., and Carlson, T. D. (2003). Development of Bicycle Compatibility Index for Rural Roads in Nebraska. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1828(1), pp. 124–132.

Kang, K. and Lee, K. (2012). Development of a Bicycle Level of Service Model from the User’s Perspective. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(6):1032–1039.

Kikuchi, S. and Chakroborty, P. (1991). Analysis of Left-Turn-Lane Warrants at Unsignalized T-Intersections on Two-Lane Roadways. Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1327, pp. 80–88.

Kittelson & Associates and Toole Design Group (2014). Montgomery County Bicycle Planning Guidance, 1st ed. Silver Spring, MD.

Landis, B. W. (1994). Bicycle Interaction Hazard Score: A Theoretical Model. Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1438.

Landis, B. W., Vattikuti, V. R., and Brannick, M. T. (1997). Real-Time Human Perceptions: Toward a Bicycle Level of Service. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1578(1), pp. 119–126.

Lowry, M., Callister, D., Gresham, M., and Moore, B. (2012). Assessment of Communitywide Bikeability with Bicycle Level of Service. Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2314, pp. 41–48.

Maryland DOT (2022). MDOT LTS Technical Memo, 1st ed. Annapolis.

Massachusetts DOT (2015). Separated Bike Lane Planning & Design Guide. Boston.

Mekuria, M. C., Appleyard, B., and Nixon, H. (2017). Improving Livability Using Green and Active Modes: A Traffic Stress Level Analysis of Transit, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Access and Mobility. Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, CA.

Page 275
Suggested Citation: "Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.

Mekuria, M. C., Furth, P. G., and Nixon, H. (2012). Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity. Mineta Transportation Institute, p. 84, San Jose, CA.

Minnesota DOT (2020). 2020 Minnesota Bicycle Facility Design Manual, 5th ed. St. Paul.

Moreno, A. T., Linares-Ramirez, S., Washburn, S. S., Al-Kaisy, A., Barrios, J., and Schroeder, B. (2023). Identification of Potential Improvements to the Highway Capacity Manual Methodology for Rural Bicyclists and Bicyclist Classification. Presented at 102nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.

Moreno, A. T., Llorca, C., Lenorzer, A., Casas, J., and Garcia, A. (2015). Design Criteria for Minimum Passing Zone Lengths: Operational Efficiency and Safety Considerations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2486, pp. 19–27.

Noël, N., Leclerc, C., and Lee-Gosselin, M. (2003). CRC INDEX: Compatibility of Roads for Cyclists in Rural and Urban Fringe Areas. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.

New Jersey DOT (1980). Bicycle Compatible Roadways and Bikeways, 5th ed. Ewing Township.

New York State DOT (2015). Highway Design Manual, 83rd ed. Chapter 17—Bicycle Facility Design, Albany.

Onta, S. (2018). 2018 AASHTO Bike Guide.

Oregon DOT (2020). Analysis Procedures Manual, 2nd ed. Chapter 14, Multimodal Analysis, pp. 1–1205.

Petritsch, T. A., Landis, B. W., Huang, H. F., McLeod, P. S., Lamb, D., Farah, W., and Guttenplan, M. (2007). Bicycle Level of Service for Arterials. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2031(1), pp. 34–42.

Rodegerdts, L. A., Jenior, P. M., Bugg, Z. H., Ray, B. J., Schroeder, B. L., and Brewer, M. A. (2014). NCHRP Report 772: Evaluating the Performance of Corridors with Roundabouts. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.

Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., Black, J. B., and Chen, D. (2003). Neighborhood-Based Differences in Physical Activity: An Environment Scale Evaluation. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9):1552–1558.

San Francisco Department of Public Health (2009). Bicycle Environmental Quality Index (BEQI). San Francisco, CA.

Schultheiss, B., Goodman, D., Blackburn, L., Adam, W., Reed, D., and Elbech, M. (2019). Bikeway Selection Guide. FHWA-SA-18-077, Washington, DC, p. 52.

Stamatiadis, N., Kirk, A., Hartman, D., Jasper, J., Wright, S., King, M., and Chellman, R. (2018). NCHRP Report 855: An Expanded Functional Classification System for Highways and Streets. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

Sullivan, J., Clouser, K., and Shaw. J. (2022). NCHRP Research Report 988: Rural Transportation Issues: Research Roadmap. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

TRB (2010). Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Washington, DC.

TRB (2014). Access Management Manual. Washington, DC.

TRB (2022). Highway Capacity Manual: A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis, 7th ed. Washington, DC.

Vale, D. S., Saraiva, M., and Pereira, M. (2015). Active Accessibility: A Review of Operational Measures of Walking and Cycling Accessibility. Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol. 9:1. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.593.

Vlahos, E., Polus, A., Lacombe, D., Ranjitkar, P., Faghri, A., and Fortunato, B. R. III. (2008). Evaluating the Conversion of All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections into Roundabouts. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2078(1), pp. 80–89.

Washburn, S. S. (2005). Improvement of Planning Level Analysis Procedures for Two-Lane Highways, Final Report, Prepared for the Florida DOT. Tallahassee.

Washburn, S. S., Al-Kaisy, A., Raza, S., Moreno, A., Barrios, J., Schroeder, B. (2024). NCHRP Web-Only Document 392: Developing a Guide for Rural Highways: Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

Washburn, S. S., Watson, D., Bian, Z., Luttinen, T., Al-Kaisy, A., Jafari, A., Dowling, R., and Elias, A. (2018). NCHRP Web-Only Document 255: Improved Analysis of Two-Lane Highway Capacity and Operational Performance. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

Washington State DOT (2020). Washington State Active Transportation Plan: 2020 and Beyond. Olympia.

Washington State DOT (2021). Chapter 1520. Roadway Bicycle Facilities. In Washington State DOT Design Manual M 22-01.20, p. 30.

Zhou, L., Zhang, L., and Liu, C. S. (2022). Comparing Roundabouts and Signalized Intersections Through Multiple-Model Simulation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(7):7931–7940.

Zolnik, E. J. and Cromley, E. K. (2007). Poisson Multilevel Methodology of Bicycle Levels of Service for Road Networks. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2031(1), pp. 1–8.

Page 276
Suggested Citation: "Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.

This page intentionally left blank.

Page 277
Suggested Citation: "Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.

Abbreviations and acronyms used without definitions in TRB publications:

A4A Airlines for America
AAAE American Association of Airport Executives
AASHO American Association of State Highway Officials
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
ACI–NA Airports Council International–North America
ACRP Airport Cooperative Research Program
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
APTA American Public Transportation Association
ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers
ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
ATA American Trucking Associations
CTAA Community Transportation Association of America
CTBSSP Commercial Truck and Bus Safety Synthesis Program
DHS Department of Homeland Security
DOE Department of Energy
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FAA Federal Aviation Administration
FAST Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (2015)
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FMCSA Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
FRA Federal Railroad Administration
FTA Federal Transit Administration
GHSA Governors Highway Safety Association
HMCRP Hazardous Materials Cooperative Research Program
IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (2012)
NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASAO National Association of State Aviation Officials
NCFRP National Cooperative Freight Research Program
NCHRP National Cooperative Highway Research Program
NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NTSB National Transportation Safety Board
PHMSA Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
RITA Research and Innovative Technology Administration
SAE Society of Automotive Engineers
SAFETEA-LU Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (2005)
TCRP Transit Cooperative Research Program
TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (1998)
TRB Transportation Research Board
TSA Transportation Security Administration
U.S. DOT United States Department of Transportation
Page 278
Suggested Citation: "Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.

Transporation Research Board 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 NATIONAL ACADEMIES Sciences Engineering Medicine The National Academies provide independent, trustworthy advice that advances solutions to society’s most complex challenges

Page 273
Suggested Citation: "Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 273
Page 274
Suggested Citation: "Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 274
Page 275
Suggested Citation: "Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 275
Page 276
Suggested Citation: "Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 276
Page 277
Suggested Citation: "Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 277
Page 278
Suggested Citation: "Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 278
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.