Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide (2024)

Chapter: 10 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology

Previous Chapter: 9 Roundabout Intersection Analysis Methodology
Page 107
Suggested Citation: "10 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.

CHAPTER 10

All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology

Methodology Limitations

The simplifications to the full operational analysis methodology include the following:

  • One lane on each approach (this is the predominant configuration in rural highway situations).
  • Pedestrian crossings are not considered.

10.1 Equations and Exhibits

The variable definitions for these equations are shown in Section 10.2 Nomenclature.

Step 1: Convert Movement Demand Volumes to Flow Rates

  • Equation 21-12: Demand flow rate for movement.
    v i = v i P H F (HCM7 Eq. 21-12)

Step 2: Determine Lane Flow Rates

With only single-lane approaches considered in this methodology, this step is skipped.

Step 3: Determining Geometry Group for Each Approach

  • Exhibit 21-11: Geometry groups.

This exhibit identifies the geometry group for each approach, as a function of the intersection configuration (four leg or T) and the number of lanes on the subject, opposing, and conflicting approaches. The possible geometry group classifications are 1, 2, 3a, 4a, 3b, 4b, 5, and 6. Intersection approaches with a single lane are classified as geometry group 1.

Step 4: Determine Saturation Headway Adjustments

  • Equation 21-13: Saturation headway adjustment; uses results from Exhibit 21-12.

    hadj = hLT,adjPLT + hRT,adjPRT + hHV,adjPHV (HCM7 Eq. 21-13)

  • Exhibit 21-12: Saturation headway adjustments by geometry group.
Page 108
Suggested Citation: "10 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.

Values for hLT,adj, hRT,adj, and hHV,adj are obtained from Exhibit 21-12. The values for geometry group 1 are as follows:

  • hLT,adj = 0.2
  • hRT,adj = −0.6
  • hHV,adj = 1.7

Step 5: Determine Initial Departure Headway

The process of determining departure headways (and thus service times) for each of the lanes on each of the approaches is iterative. For the first iteration, an initial departure headway of 3.2 s should be assumed. For subsequent iterations, the calculated values of departure headway from the previous iteration should be used if the calculation has not converged (see Step 11).

Step 6: Calculate Initial Degree of Utilization

  • Equation 21-14: Degree of utilization.
    x = v h d 3 6 0 0 (HCM7 Eq. 21-14)

Step 7: Compute Probability States

  • Equation 21-15: Probability state; uses results from Exhibit 21-13 and Exhibit 21-14.
    P ( I ) = j P ( a j ) (HCM7 Eq. 21-15)
  • Exhibit 21-13: Probability of aj (two-lane approaches).
    aj Vj P(aj)
    1 0 0
    0 0 1
    1 > 0
    0 > 0 1 –
  • Exhibit 21-14: Probability of DOC case: multilane AWSC intersections (two-lane approaches, by lane).

    The full exhibit contains 64 combinations of vehicle presence on three approach legs, with two lanes per approach, that can conflict with traffic on a subject approach. Since this method considers only single-lane approaches, just 8 degree-of-conflict (DOC) cases are applicable. These cases are shown as follows.

    i DOC Case Number of Vehicles Opposing Approach Conflicting Left Approach Conflicting Right Approach
    1 1 0 0 0 0
    2 2 1 1 0 0
    5 3 1 0 1 0
    7 3 1 0 0 1
    13 4 2 0 1 1
    16 4 2 1 1 0
    21 4 2 1 0 1
    45 5 3 1 1 1
Page 109
Suggested Citation: "10 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.

Step 8: Compute Probability Adjustment Factors

  • Equation 21-16: Probability of DOC C1; uses results from Equation 21-15 and Exhibit 21-14.

    P(C1) = P(1) (HCM7 Eq. 21-16)

  • Equation 21-17: Probability of DOC C2; uses results from Equation 21-15 and Exhibit 21-14.

    P ( C 2 ) = i = 2 4 P ( i )

    (HCM7 Eq. 21-17)

  • Equation 21-18: Probability of DOC C3; uses results from Equation 21-15 and Exhibit 21-14.
    P ( C 3 ) = i = 5 1 0 P ( i ) (HCM7 Eq. 21-18)
  • Equation 21-19: Probability of DOC C4; uses results from Equation 21-15 and Exhibit 21-14.
    P ( C 4 ) = i = 1 1 3 7 P ( i ) (HCM7 Eq. 21-19)
  • Equation 21-20: Probability of DOC C5; uses results from Equation 21-15 and Exhibit 21-14.
    P ( C 5 ) = i = 3 8 6 4 P ( i ) (HCM7 Eq. 21-20)
  • Equation 21-21: Probability adjustment factor 1; uses results from Equations 21-16, 21-17, 21-18, 21-19, and 21-20.
    A d j P ( 1 ) = α [ P ( C 2 ) + 2 P ( C 3 ) + 3 P ( C 4 ) + 4 P ( C 5 ) ] / 1 (HCM7 Eq. 21-21)
  • Equation 21-22: Probability adjustment factor 2-4; uses results from Equations 21-16, 21-17, 21-18, 21-19, and 21-20.
    A d j P ( 2 ) through A d j P ( 4 ) = α [ P ( C 3 ) + 2 P ( C 4 ) + 3 P ( C 5 ) P ( C 2 ) ] / 3 (HCM7 Eq. 21-22)
  • Equation 21-23: Probability adjustment factor 5-10; uses results from Equations 21-16, 21-17, 21-18, 21-19, and 21-20.
    A d j P ( 5 ) through A d j P ( 1 0 ) = α [ P ( C 4 ) + 2 P ( C 5 ) 3 P ( C 3 ) ] / 6 (HCM7 Eq. 21-23)
  • Equation 21-24: Probability adjustment factor 11-37; uses results from Equations 21-16, 21-17, 21-18, 21-19, and 21-20.
    A d j P ( 1 1 ) through A d j P ( 3 7 ) = α [ P ( C 5 ) 6 P ( C 4 ) ] / 2 7 (HCM7 Eq. 21-24)
  • Equation 21-25: Probability adjustment factor 38-64; uses results from Equations 21-16, 21-17, 21-18, 21-19, and 21-20.
    A d j P ( 3 8 ) through A d j P ( 6 4 ) = α [ 1 0 P ( C 5 ) ] / 2 7 (HCM7 Eq. 21-25)
Page 110
Suggested Citation: "10 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
  • Equation 21-26: Adjusted probability; uses results from Equations 21-16, 21-17, 21-18, 21-19, 21-20, 21-21, 21-22, 21-23, 21-24, and 21-25.
    P ' ( i ) = P ( i ) + A d j P ( i ) (HCM7 Eq. 21-26)

Step 9: Compute Saturation Headways

  • Equation 21-27: Saturation headway; uses results from Exhibit 21-15 and Equation 21-13.

    hsi = hbase + hadj (HCM7 Eq. 21-27)

  • Exhibit 21-15: Saturation headway values by case and geometry group.

    Values for hbase are obtained from Exhibit 21-15. The values for geometry group 1 are as follows:

    Case Base Headway (s)
    1 3.9
    2 4.7
    3 5.8
    4 7.0
    5 9.6

Step 10: Compute Departure Headways

  • Equation 21-28: Departure headway; uses results from Equations 21-26 and 21-27.
    h d = i = 1 6 4 P ' ( i ) h s i (HCM7 Eq. 21-28)

Step 11: Check for Convergence

The calculated values of hd are checked against the initial values assumed for hd. If the values change by more than 0.1 s (or a more precise measure of convergence), Steps 5 through 10 are repeated until the values of departure headway for each lane do not change significantly.

Step 12: Compute Capacity

This is an iterative procedure. Check the HCM7 for more information.

Step 13: Compute Service Times

  • Equation 21-29: Service time; uses results from Equation 21-28.

    ts = hdm (HCM7 Eq. 21-29)

Step 14: Compute Control Delay and Determine LOS for Each Lane

  • Equation 21-30: Calculation of the control delay; uses results from Equations 21-14, 21-28, and 21-29.
    d = t s + 9 0 0 T [ ( x 1 ) + ( x 1 ) 2 + h d x 4 5 0 T ] + 5 (HCM7 Eq. 21-30)
Page 111
Suggested Citation: "10 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.

Step 15: Compute Control Delay and Determine LOS for Each Approach and the Intersection

  • Equation 21-31: Control delay for an approach; uses results from Equations 21-30 and 21-12.
    d a = d i v i v i (HCM7 Eq. 21-31)
  • Equation 21-32: Control delay for the intersection; uses results from Equations 21-30 and 21-12.
    d i n t e r s e c t i o n = d a v a v a (HCM7 Eq. 21-32)
  • Exhibit 21-8: LOS criteria (motorized vehicle mode); the LOS is determined for the major roadway through movement for the analysis direction.
    Control Delay (s/veh) LOS
    –10 A
    >10–15 B
    >15–25 C
    >25–35 D
    >35–50 E
    >50 F

    If the v/c > 1.0, the LOS is F.

Step 16: Compute Queue Lengths

Methodology Limitation

This step is not implemented.

  • Equation 21-33: 95th percentile queue; uses results from Equations 21-14 and 21-28.

10.2 Nomenclature

α = 0.01 (or 0.00 if correlation among saturation headways is not taken into account).
aj = 1 (indicating a vehicle present in the lane) or 0 (indicating no vehicle present in the lane) (values of aj for each lane in each combination i are listed in Exhibit 21-14).
AdjP(1) = probability adjustment factor 1.
AdjP(2)throughAdjP(4) = probability adjustment factor 2 through 4.
AdjP(5)throughAdjP(10) = probability adjustment factor 5 through 10.
AdjP(11)throughAdjP(37) = probability adjustment factor 11 through 37.
AdjP(38)throughAdjP(64) = probability adjustment factor 38 through 464.
da = control delay for the approach (s/veh).
dintersection= control delay for the intersection (s/veh).
hadj = headway adjustment (s).
Page 112
Suggested Citation: "10 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
hbase = base saturation headway (s).
hd = departure headway (s).
hLT,adj = headway adjustment for left turns (see Exhibit 21-12) (s).
hRT,adj = headway adjustment for right turns (see Exhibit 21-12) (s).
hHV,adj = headway adjustment for heavy vehicles (see Exhibit 21-12) (s).
hsi = saturation headway (s).
j = O1 (opposing approach, Lane 1), O2 (opposing approach, Lane 2), CL1 (conflicting left approach, Lane 1), CL2 (conflicting left approach, Lane 2), CR1 (conflicting right approach, Lane 1), and CR2 (conflicting right approach, Lane 2) for a two-lane, two-way AWSC intersection.
m = move-up time (2.0 s for Geometry Groups 1 through 4; 2.3 s for Geometry Groups 5 and 6).
P(aj) = probability of aj, computed based on Exhibit 21-13, where Vj is the lane flow rate.
P(C1) = probability of degree-of-conflict case 1.
P(C2) = probability of degree-of-conflict case 2.
P(C3) = probability of degree-of-conflict case 3.
P(C4) = probability of degree-of-conflict case 4.
P(C5) = probability of degree-of-conflict case 5.
PHV = proportion of heavy vehicles in the lane.
P(i) = probability state for combination i.
P’(i) = adjusted probability for combination i.
PLT = proportion of left-turning vehicles in the lane.
PRT = proportion of right-turning vehicles in the lane.
PHF = peak hour factor (decimal).
ts = service time (s).
va = demand flow rate for approach a (veh/h).
vi = demand flow rate for movement i or lane i (veh/h).
Vi = demand volume for movement i (veh/h).
x = degree of utilization.
Page 107
Suggested Citation: "10 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 107
Page 108
Suggested Citation: "10 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 108
Page 109
Suggested Citation: "10 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 109
Page 110
Suggested Citation: "10 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 110
Page 111
Suggested Citation: "10 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 111
Page 112
Suggested Citation: "10 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Analysis Methodology." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Reliability and Quality of Service Evaluation Methods for Rural Highways: A Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27895.
Page 112
Next Chapter: 11 Urban Street Facility Analysis Methodology
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.