
The simplifications to the full operational analysis methodology include the following:
The variable definitions for these equations are shown in Section 10.2 Nomenclature.
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-12) |
With only single-lane approaches considered in this methodology, this step is skipped.
This exhibit identifies the geometry group for each approach, as a function of the intersection configuration (four leg or T) and the number of lanes on the subject, opposing, and conflicting approaches. The possible geometry group classifications are 1, 2, 3a, 4a, 3b, 4b, 5, and 6. Intersection approaches with a single lane are classified as geometry group 1.
hadj = hLT,adjPLT + hRT,adjPRT + hHV,adjPHV (HCM7 Eq. 21-13)
Values for hLT,adj, hRT,adj, and hHV,adj are obtained from Exhibit 21-12. The values for geometry group 1 are as follows:
The process of determining departure headways (and thus service times) for each of the lanes on each of the approaches is iterative. For the first iteration, an initial departure headway of 3.2 s should be assumed. For subsequent iterations, the calculated values of departure headway from the previous iteration should be used if the calculation has not converged (see Step 11).
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-14) |
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-15) |
| aj | Vj | P(aj) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 | > 0 | |
| 0 | > 0 | 1 – |
The full exhibit contains 64 combinations of vehicle presence on three approach legs, with two lanes per approach, that can conflict with traffic on a subject approach. Since this method considers only single-lane approaches, just 8 degree-of-conflict (DOC) cases are applicable. These cases are shown as follows.
| i | DOC Case | Number of Vehicles | Opposing Approach | Conflicting Left Approach | Conflicting Right Approach |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 13 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 16 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 21 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 45 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
P(C1) = P(1) (HCM7 Eq. 21-16)
|
(HCM7 Eq. 21-17) |
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-18) |
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-19) |
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-20) |
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-21) |
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-22) |
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-23) |
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-24) |
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-25) |
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-26) |
hsi = hbase + hadj (HCM7 Eq. 21-27)
Values for hbase are obtained from Exhibit 21-15. The values for geometry group 1 are as follows:
| Case | Base Headway (s) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 3.9 |
| 2 | 4.7 |
| 3 | 5.8 |
| 4 | 7.0 |
| 5 | 9.6 |
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-28) |
The calculated values of hd are checked against the initial values assumed for hd. If the values change by more than 0.1 s (or a more precise measure of convergence), Steps 5 through 10 are repeated until the values of departure headway for each lane do not change significantly.
This is an iterative procedure. Check the HCM7 for more information.
ts = hd − m (HCM7 Eq. 21-29)
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-30) |
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-31) |
| (HCM7 Eq. 21-32) |
| Control Delay (s/veh) | LOS |
|---|---|
| –10 | A |
| >10–15 | B |
| >15–25 | C |
| >25–35 | D |
| >35–50 | E |
| >50 | F |
If the v/c > 1.0, the LOS is F.
This step is not implemented.
| α = | 0.01 (or 0.00 if correlation among saturation headways is not taken into account). |
| aj = | 1 (indicating a vehicle present in the lane) or 0 (indicating no vehicle present in the lane) (values of aj for each lane in each combination i are listed in Exhibit 21-14). |
| AdjP(1) = | probability adjustment factor 1. |
| AdjP(2)throughAdjP(4) = | probability adjustment factor 2 through 4. |
| AdjP(5)throughAdjP(10) = | probability adjustment factor 5 through 10. |
| AdjP(11)throughAdjP(37) = | probability adjustment factor 11 through 37. |
| AdjP(38)throughAdjP(64) = | probability adjustment factor 38 through 464. |
| da = | control delay for the approach (s/veh). |
| dintersection= | control delay for the intersection (s/veh). |
| hadj = | headway adjustment (s). |
| hbase = | base saturation headway (s). |
| hd = | departure headway (s). |
| hLT,adj = | headway adjustment for left turns (see Exhibit 21-12) (s). |
| hRT,adj = | headway adjustment for right turns (see Exhibit 21-12) (s). |
| hHV,adj = | headway adjustment for heavy vehicles (see Exhibit 21-12) (s). |
| hsi = | saturation headway (s). |
| j = | O1 (opposing approach, Lane 1), O2 (opposing approach, Lane 2), CL1 (conflicting left approach, Lane 1), CL2 (conflicting left approach, Lane 2), CR1 (conflicting right approach, Lane 1), and CR2 (conflicting right approach, Lane 2) for a two-lane, two-way AWSC intersection. |
| m = | move-up time (2.0 s for Geometry Groups 1 through 4; 2.3 s for Geometry Groups 5 and 6). |
| P(aj) = | probability of aj, computed based on Exhibit 21-13, where Vj is the lane flow rate. |
| P(C1) = | probability of degree-of-conflict case 1. |
| P(C2) = | probability of degree-of-conflict case 2. |
| P(C3) = | probability of degree-of-conflict case 3. |
| P(C4) = | probability of degree-of-conflict case 4. |
| P(C5) = | probability of degree-of-conflict case 5. |
| PHV = | proportion of heavy vehicles in the lane. |
| P(i) = | probability state for combination i. |
| P’(i) = | adjusted probability for combination i. |
| PLT = | proportion of left-turning vehicles in the lane. |
| PRT = | proportion of right-turning vehicles in the lane. |
| PHF = | peak hour factor (decimal). |
| ts = | service time (s). |
| va = | demand flow rate for approach a (veh/h). |
| vi = | demand flow rate for movement i or lane i (veh/h). |
| Vi = | demand volume for movement i (veh/h). |
| x = | degree of utilization. |