Truck parking is an ongoing transportation issue affecting communities nationwide. Several studies emphasize the need for localized solutions because truck parking is not a one-size-fits-all problem. Through this project, the team identified key takeaways and recommendations for practitioners looking for guidance on local truck parking regulations. The recommendations are centered on model truck parking ordinances and funding sources.
The key takeaways are listed as follows and discussed further in the subsequent subsections.
States and MPOs are studying truck parking to identify gaps, opportunities, and solutions. These efforts primarily stem from the passage of Jasonʼs Law, which set in motion a focus on truck parking supply and demand. Numerous studies, plans, and coalitions emphasize the need for strong local government involvement and coordination to develop context-sensitive solutions. However, local governments often face challenges and barriers due to limited funding, staffing, and resources, which can exacerbate the prevalent truck parking issues. Common responses, such as banning truck parking on city streets, address resident complaints superficially but fail to resolve broader freight movement needs, leading to hidden problems such as increased business costs and air-quality issues.
Over the past few years, some regions and local governments have found solutions to improve truck parking while supporting their businesses and keeping constituents happy. ARC and NCTCOG are embarking on truck parking programs and working with elected officials to solve truck parking shortages in their respective regions. Jurisdictions like Washington, DC, and Seattle are engaging in curb space management to support urban delivery and reduce short-term truck parking and delivery challenges in these settings. While there are some local governments engaged in truck parking solutions, the truck parking challenge is multifaceted, with a diverse set of stakeholders complicating the collective capability to arrive at solutions.
The project identified several gaps affecting truck parking through literature reviews, interviews, surveys, and a stakeholder workshop. Safety, security, and community concerns were highlighted as top issues by 21 workshop participants.
To address the truck parking problem, several strategies were identified through literature, interviews, and a stakeholder workshop. Based on stakeholder input, land use and truck route planning, public-private partnerships, education and messaging, and model zoning ordinances ranked the highest as potential strategies. Details regarding all the identified opportunities or strategies are provided as follows.
The review of truck parking provisions within zoning codes, as outlined in this reportʼs literature review, highlights critical gaps and opportunities for advancing the practice. There is a need for the development of empirical studies to understand zoning impact, standardize zoning provisions, consider the importance of driver amenities, and address emerging industry issues. Furthermore, best practices sharing and community engagement can greatly enhance a responsive approach to developing truck parking regulations. Regional planning agencies, professional organizations, and online platforms provide useful avenues for knowledge dissemination, while engaging the community ensures that regulations are reflective of local priorities.
Cumulatively, the gaps and opportunities highlighted within this section call attention to the need for community solutions in response to emerging trends in freight movement in the United States. To develop context-sensitive solutions, it is necessary to understand why truck drivers park and what their needs are, depending on whether they are on a short-haul, long-haul, or drayage trip. Reasons for parking may include staging, queuing, emergency road closures, vehicle breakdowns, rest/driver fatigue management, human needs, and off-duty parking (see Figure 29).
Furthermore, there is a need to increase communitiesʼ capacity to develop and effectively administer truck parking regulations within zoning codes. Addressing these gaps and embracing these opportunities will require collaborative efforts, research, and a commitment to improving
Note: P3 = public-private partnership.
Source: Fehr & Peers (2024)
The flowchart from NCHRP Web-Only Document 446: Guide for Truck Parking Regulations depicts the key topics that need to be addressed for different types of truck parking (e.g., long-haul, short-haul, and drayage) when developing truck parking regulations. The guide addresses seven key topics based on long-haul, short-haul, and drayage needs. First, staging needs to address driver education, company and dispatcher instructions, on-site and off-site solutions, model ordinances, and off-peak deliveries for both long-haul and short-haul truck parking. Staging needs to address a staging lot provided at the port and on-street parking and staging in industrial areas near the port for drayage parking. Second, queuing needs to address model ordinances, on-street truck queuing lanes, off-peak deliveries, and allowing queuing on-site for both long-haul and short-haul truck parking. Queuing needs to address striping queuing lanes within the port and allowing queuing on-site for drayage parking. Third, emergency road closures need to address community involvement and education, industry solutions, P3 (large event centers, casinos), model ordinances, truck parking planning and resiliency, and on-street truck parking for long-haul truck parking. Fourth, vehicle breakdowns need to consider community involvement and education, model ordinances, truck parking planning and resiliency, and on-street truck parking for long-haul, short-haul, and drayage parking. Fifth, rest break parking needs to consider community involvement and education, industry solutions, P3 (large event centers, casinos), model ordinances, truck parking planning and resiliency, and freight mobility hubs (clean fueling centers) for long-haul parking. Sixth, human needs need to be considered and addressed through community involvement and education, industry solutions, P3 (large event centers, casinos), model ordinances, and a plan for access to laundry, medical and dental care for long-haul parking. Human needs should be considered in short-haul parking through model ordinances (off-street parking provisions, access to restrooms, access to employee break areas). Human needs for drayage parking need to consider access to restrooms and port planning to include staging area with access to restrooms. Seventh, off-duty parking for long-haul parking needs to address community involvement and education, industry solutions, P3 (large event centers, casinos), model ordinances, truck parking planning and resiliency, and freight mobility hubs (clean fueling centers). Off-duty parking for short-haul parking needs to consider how parking varies by owner-operators and company drivers, community involvement and education, industry solutions, public truck parking lots, model ordinances, on-street truck parking, and freight mobility hubs (clean fueling centers). Off-duty parking for drayage parking needs to address community involvement and education, model ordinances, on-street truck parking near port for tractors, and freight mobility hubs (clean fueling centers).
truck parking efficiency, safety, and community well-being. By acting on these insights, stakeholders across the planning and trucking industry can shape a more balanced, responsive, and sustainable truck parking landscape that benefits all. Some success stories to learn from were identified in this report; these include the city truck parking lot in Elmira, New York, Mt. Olive Pickle Company on-site truck parking in Mount Olive, North Carolina, and many others. Detailed insight into model truck parking ordinances and funding recommendations are provided in the subsequent sections.
The model ordinance incorporates key elements to address truck parking, loading, and queuing based on best practices from various municipalities and general practice. The specific requirements would need to be tailored to local conditions and priorities. Importantly, this model ordinance should aim to balance the truck access needs of businesses or property owners with the needs of the local residents by minimizing impacts on surrounding areas and public infrastructure.
The table has 4 columns and 11 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are: Use Group; Gross Floor Area in Square Feet; Number of Required Loading Spaces; Number of Required Short-Term Parking Spaces. Row 2: Industrial Uses; Less than 5,000; 0; 0. Row 3: Industrial Uses; 5,001 to 25,000; 1; 0. Row 4: Industrial Uses; 25,001 to 100,000; 2; 1. Row 5: Industrial Uses; 100,001 to 150,000; 3; 1. Row 6: Industrial Uses; Over 150,001; 4 plus 1 per 100,000 SF; 1 per 2 loading spaces. Row 7: Commercial and Office, Public and Institutional Uses; Less than 10,000; 0; 0. Row 8: Commercial and Office, Public and Institutional Uses; 10,001 to 100,000; 1; 0. Row 9: Commercial and Office, Public and Institutional Uses; 100,001 to 200,000; 2; 0. Row 10: Commercial and Office, Public and Institutional Uses; Over 200,001; 3 plus 1 per 100,000 SF; 1. Row 11: All Other Uses; NA; NA; NA. Table Notes: NA means Not Applicable; SF means square feet.
The table has 2 columns and 4 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are: Parking Dimensions; Space Requirement. Row 2: Parking Space Width; 12 feet. Row 3: Parking Space Length; 80 feet. Row 4: Height Clearance; 14 feet. Row 5: Aisle Width; 50 feet.
The table has 3 columns and 3 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are: Type of Requirement; Truck Stops; Other Uses. Row 2: Percentage of Pull-Through Spaces; 80 percent; 5 percent. Row 3: Dimensions of Pull-Through Spaces; 12 feet times 80 feet; 12 feet times 60 feet.
The table has 3 columns and 5 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are: Buffering Element; Enclosed Loading; Absence of Enclosed Loading. Row 2: Enclosure Requirement; Loading area must be enclosed by a roof or a wall; Not applicable. Row 3: Wall Design; Walls must fully screen delivery vehicles. Walls must include architectural elements (for example, windows and awnings) that match the main building; An 8-foot masonry or opaque wall must screen the loading area. Walls must match the building's exterior materials. Row 4: Buffer Yard; Buffer yard between the loading area and property line can have one reduced level of opacity. Remaining buffer yard must meet zoning requirements; Buffer yard must have one additional level of opacity than required by zoning regulations. Row 5: Screening Requirement; Not applicable; Buffer yard must screen the loading area along its entire length.
The table has 2 columns and 7 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are: Number of Loading Docks; Minimum Queuing Depth. Row 2: 1 to 50; 135 feet. Row 3: 51 to 70; 305 feet. Row 4: 71 to 90; 475 feet. Row 5: 91 to 110; 645 feet. Row 6: 111 to 130; 815 feet. Row 7: 131 or more; 985 feet.
Truck parking regulations are a crucial part of modern zoning codes, designed to address the specific needs of commercial vehicles while balancing community interests and land use goals. Effectively managing truck parking requires careful consideration of various site design elements for uses such as warehouses, distribution centers, fulfillment facilities, and logistics hubs. Jurisdictions may choose to implement truck parking regulations within a single comprehensive section of their zoning code or distribute the standards across multiple provisions. To promote public safety, operational efficiency, and compatibility with surrounding land uses, truck parking regulations often intersect with several key components of a zoning code, including the following:
The table has 3 columns and 3 rows. The column headers in Row 1 are: Parking Use; Time Limit; Conditions. Row 2: General Short-Term Truck Parking; Up to 4 hours; Short-term parking only for delivery or pickup-related purposes, available immediately before or after scheduled activities. Row 3: Off-Street Truck Parking; Must be designated for specific use times; Spaces are to be designated, maintained, and made available exclusively for pre- or post-delivery or pickup times.
The focus of this research is the development of model truck parking ordinances that foster more truck parking within the jurisdictions of counties, municipalities, and other local agencies that control land use planning and development. Although there are some examples of federal funding being allocated to the development of public-private truck parking facilities, most of the available funding sources are focused on state initiatives, such as expansion, redevelopment, or new development of safety rest areas. In addition to truck parking funding for safety rest areas at the federal level, in some states, there are funding sources at the state and regional levels. An overview of available funding for truck parking funding for safety rest areas is described in Appendix C.
The most significant source of funding for local truck parking solutions is anticipated to be provided by private developers of industrial warehouses, manufacturing plants, and private truck parking facilities, such as truck stops, travel plazas, and private/limited-access truck charging and truck storage lots. Requiring off-street truck parking and amenities for truck drivers as part of the development of industrial uses is challenging due in large part to land costs and a commonly shared concern that truck parking is not the highest and best use of limited vacant land. Success stories coming out of Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania, demonstrate how provisions for density bonuses in exchange for on-street truck parking and truck driver amenities can work. In addition, project design features proposed as part of master planned industrial parks, such as the World Logistics Center in Moreno Valley, California, support the business case for truck parking provisions. Truck parking provisions can be right-sized on a case-by-case basis and incorporated into development agreements. The two most significant challenges raised during this research effort are (1) demonstrating the business case for truck parking and (2) estimating truck parking demand.
NCHRP Project 08-141 tackles a multifaceted truck parking topic with numerous subtopics that warrant further research and exploration. Areas that could benefit from additional research include the following: