Since 2010, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) has been implementing planned improvements to 200 directional miles of the Interstate 35 (I-35) corridor through the Waco District in Central Texas. Reconstruction efforts expanded the roadway from four lanes to six in rural areas and six lanes to eight in urban areas in addition to upgraded geometrics, bridges, drainage, and safety features. Over the multiyear construction timeframe, this necessitated thousands of lane closures. The work zone and resultant queues came with four main issues: (1) drivers along the rural segments of I-35 did not expect traffic queues, especially at night, (2) the dynamic nature of the closures (necessity and locations) did not allow nightly travelers to develop an expectation of queues, (3) contractors used all available right-of-way for construction activities, making it difficult to position and leave end-of-queue (EOQ) warning equipment in place until needed, and (4) the I-35 corridor is the most heavily traveled freight roadway in the state, thereby increasing the severity and risk of work zone crashes.

Deploying/Operating Agency: Texas Department of Transportation
TxDOT developed the first application and use of end-of-queue warning systems applied on a mobile, nightly, basis to work zones across the 200 directional miles. TxDOT developed two typical plans for their EOQ deployments. Plan 1 utilized four sensors and one Portable Changeable Message Sign (PCMS). The layout had the first sensor at the lane closure taper, the next upstream sensor at a one-half-mile spacing, and the next two sensors at 1-mile-upstream spacings. The PCMS was located 1 mile in advance of the final sensor, or three and a half miles from the taper. Depending on the speeds identified by the sensors, the PCMS displays a notice of Work Zone Ahead, Slowing Traffic, or Stopped Traffic. The Slowing and Stopped Traffic messages incorporated a distance based on the sensor locations.
Plan 2 added in an additional four sensors at 1-mile spacings and an additional PCMS at seven and a half miles back from the taper. Utilizing this level of infrastructure allowed for warning traffic of both slowing and then stopped conditions, both with a distance component.
A critical component of the success of the EOQ deployments was a queuing analysis performed for each mainlane closure by hour of closure. Based on the longest anticipated queue during the entire timeframe of the lane closure, a deployment decision of no EOQ system, a Plan 1 or Plan 2 was made. If the queue analysis resulted in a queue estimation of less than 2.5 miles, Plan 1 was implemented. If the queue estimate was longer than 2.5 miles, a Plan 2 was implemented. Performing the initial queuing analysis incorporated several important data considerations, including a recent average of traffic, by hour, on representative nights of the closures, as well as updated truck percentages. This data collection was accomplished using a set of side-fire microwave sensors at various locations along the corridor. The entire process was automated and executed upon entry of a mainlane lane closure into the lane closure database for the corridor,
Another factor contributing to the success of these implementations was the significant outreach that was performed to the traveling public and specific populations such as freight, to increase awareness of the location, length, and activity within the work zones. Overall, the deployment of EOQ warning systems was a comprehensive effort involving:
The I-35 work efforts developed an entirely new application of traditional, static, EOQ systems. The comprehensive effort addressed
As detailed in the FHWA Work Zone clearinghouse, queue warning systems have been shown to reduce crashes that typically occur when queues are present by 55 percent. More importantly, the majority of the crashes that are avoided would likely have involved injuries or fatalities.
As a result of this innovation in the construction process, EOQ systems are being implemented across the state to mitigate work zone hazards and improve safety.
US-23 is the first implementation of Active Traffic Management on technologies on highways in Michigan. The Flex Route system was piloted on a nine-mile segment of US-23 north of Ann Arbor. This corridor is prone to bottlenecks during peak-travel periods, and the proximity to the University of Michigan campus means heavy congestion during off-peak times for special event traffic.

Michigan DOT (MDOT) was already actively using technology and incident response patrols to help address mobility and safety on US-23. A long-term solution was needed, and MDOT estimated it would have cost more than $185M to widen this corridor. ATM technologies were implemented to help MDOT dynamically manage changing congestion, address safety issues and improve incident response times on this corridor. Based on the success of piloting ATM on US-23, MDOT is extending the Flex Route on US-23 and implementing Flex Route strategies on other corridors, including I-96.
Deploying/Operating Agency: Michigan Department of Transportation
Partner Agencies: Michigan State Police, metropolitan planning organization
ATM strategies deployed on US-23 include
Additional features include the following:

In 2017, the City of Santa Clarita, California, deployed a dynamic lane on Soledad Canyon Road approaching Sierra Highway. The deployment addresses queuing concerns along eastbound on Soledad Canyon Road by transforming an exclusive right-turn only lane to a through/right-turn lane to create flexible operations that adapt to the demands of the intersection. During other hours of the day, when heavy right turns occur, the exclusive right-turn movement is preserved.

Deploying/Operating Agency: City of Santa Clarita
Key features involved in installing and supporting the deployment of the Soledad Canyon dynamic lane include the following:
Several operational characteristics make this an important deployment for the City of Santa Clarita, and in the context of arterial ATM deployments:
The City of Santa Clarita has been a pioneer of ITS technologies. Its challenges are unique in that it is a residential community with some industry while constrained by mountains and two major Caltrans facilities: I-5 and SR-14. Not only does it face commuter congestion, but it experiences cut-through traffic during peak hours or when incidents arise on SR-14 and I-5. It is also susceptible to wildfire fires due to its proximity to open space. These familiar, but unique challenges, have encouraged the City to expand its approaches beyond traditional traffic engineering, relying heavily on technology to optimize its existing roadway capacity. Dynamic lanes, detection systems, and a robust network fiber-optic and CCTV network are some of the many examples of the City’s investment in its traffic network.
Unique challenges addressed under this project include the following:
The City successfully documented the before-and-after conditions of this project area. The following results came from the project efforts:
There were several lessons learned from the project:
As the dynamic lane continues to operate there are future considerations for the City:
The Ohio Department of Transportation (Ohio DOT) needed solutions to address congestion issues on I-670 in Columbus, particularly during the afternoon peak. As part of a statewide Active Transportation and Demand Management Study completed as part of the agency’s new TSMO program, ATM strategies were identified to address recurring bottlenecks and delays on a 4.5-mile segment of I-670. Ohio DOT was already embarking on a reconstruction of the I-270/I-670 interchange near downtown Columbus and was able to integrate a flexible shoulder to support the increased demand during afternoon commutes.

Since implementing the Smart Lane system and technologies on I-670, travel times are more reliable, crashes have been reduced, and speeds are consistently free-flow.
Deploying/Operating Agency: Ohio DOT
Partner Agencies: Ohio State Patrol, Columbus Ohio Police
The I-670 Smart Lane includes several ATM strategies, including
Ohio DOT developed a TSMO Plan, and ATM systems and technologies were included among the early action implementation recommendations. This provided a foundation for Ohio DOT to explore ATM implementation. As part of the new TSMO program, Ohio DOT prepared a TSMO Guidebook to support districts in identifying potential strategies to address needs on specific corridors. Several
countermeasures, including a wide range of ATM strategies, are provided to assist District engineering staff in examining the full range of candidate technologies and operating strategies.
With new operating strategies and new technologies, Ohio DOT also developed new positions at the Traffic Management Center (TMC) to address ATM operating needs. The ATM components are operated by a newly created TMC Specialist. These Specialists are in charge of ATM operations and have decision-making authority to open the shoulder when conditions warrant. Ohio DOT staffs its TMC with four levels of operations staff who will contact the Specialist after hours. New operations procedures and training materials were developed so that all operations staff are familiar with the systems and can initiate ATM messages prior to the Specialist getting involved. Specialists can operate the ATM remotely for after-hours needs (such as incidents).

Ohio DOT’s processes included a sweep of the corridor by the Freeway Service Patrol and other Ohio DOT staff to be sure there are no vehicles blocking the shoulder prior to the shoulder being opened for traffic.
The I-670 Smart Lane was the first ATM implementation and the first major system deployed since the DOT developed its TSMO Plan. There are unique sight distance issues with a curve on this segment of I-670 that initially posed some challenges to raising the VSLs above 45 miles per hour when the shoulder was active. Ohio DOT was able to address this issue, and developed procedures where the ATM specialist can adjust the displayed speeds if queues build upstream of the curve. The additional camera coverage installed as part of the project supports enhanced real-time monitoring from the TMC.
The ATM system was a cost-effective addition to an existing capital project to reconstruct the I-270/I-670 interchange. The interchange improvements alone would not have addressed the recurring congestion issues, and the flexibility of the shoulder lane allows Ohio DOT to implement shoulder operations for both recurring and nonrecurring issues.
Law enforcement was actively involved in the concept development, particularly for the VSL and shoulder operations. Because the median shoulder serves as the flexible lane, Ohio DOT agreed to keep the right lane clear to allow for enforcement activities.
Ohio DOT had an extensive outreach campaign to prepare drivers for the new Smart Lane technologies and shoulder operations. Initially there was negative feedback from the public, largely through social media. After the Smart Lane was open, feedback was overwhelmingly positive and travelers noted the improvements to their commute times.
Ohio DOT has analyzed performance data for the Smart Lane operations, examining speeds, travel times and reliability and crashes. The figure below shows the dramatic improvement in travel speeds on I-670 since the Smart Lane was implemented; travel speeds are consistently free flow compared to unpredictable speeds prior to ATM operations.
The I-670 Smart Lane has also reduced crashes, which has reduced the workload for the Freeway Service Patrol tow trucks. These trucks support a sweep of the corridor in advance of opening the shoulder to mainline traffic.

Based on the success of the I-670 Smart Lane, Ohio DOT is implementing similar ATM strategies on I-275 near Cincinnati and is proposing a Smart Lane on I-71, also in Columbus.
Project Neon in Las Vegas includes an Active Traffic Management (ATM) System deployed along I-15 and is bordered by the “Spaghetti Bowl” interchange to the north and Sahara Avenue to the south. The “Spaghetti Bowl” is an informal name used to define the interchanges of I-15, I-515, US-93, and US-95. The Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) opted to integrate ATM as part of a large reconstruction and widening of I-15 through the heart of the Las Vegas Strip.

The I-15 ATM project includes 12 gantries, which span across all lanes of travel, and are spaced approximately mile in distance to maintain sight visibility and alert drivers. I-15 is faced with many of the recurring congestion issues that other major cities across America experience daily, in addition to frequent large-scale events throughout the year, which makes Las Vegas traffic challenges unique and unpredictable. The ATM system lends itself to being adaptable to these conditions and provides many operational and safety benefits for the public.
Deploying/Operating Agency: Nevada Department of Transportation, Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) of Southern Nevada
Key features of the Project Neon ATM system include the following:
Several operational characteristics make this an important project for the State of Nevada. The ATM is built on a strong foundation of the FAST Freeway Management System. The RTC operates both the freeway and arterial management systems from the FAST Traffic Management Center (TMC), which helps to support coordinating operations. Additional highlights include:
The travel patterns and challenges in Las Vegas are unique. The City’s 24-hour operation creates abnormal shift hours and peak periods. Unlike in other major cities, where the peak period is often two to three hours in the morning and two to four hours in the evening, and sometimes a small portion of the midday, Las Vegas sees an uptick in travel during the end and beginning of 8-hour shifts throughout the entire day; given the number of employees at the mega-resorts on the Strip, the shift schedule is a key factor in local traffic patterns.
Las Vegas’ tourism industry adds in another factor including travelers unfamiliar with the area that are navigating the “Spaghetti Bowl.” This convergence of major roadways can lead to additional confusion for visitors of the area. These factors create a need for clear signage, accurate travel time information, and warnings of hazards ahead. NDOT and FAST noted that the agencies did an extensive outreach campaign on the new ATM technologies, and residents who navigate this stretch of I-15 are familiar with the route, but reaching the tourists and new travelers with outreach on the system is a key challenge.
NDOT and RTC launched the I-15 ATM in March 2020, just as travel patterns and tourism levels were disrupted by the pandemic. This resulted in limited and inconsistent data shortly after commencing operations but also provided NDOT and RTC with an opportunity to fine-tune system operations. While limited in available data, NDOT and the RTC set forth the following goals and objectives, which are ultimately the guiding principles to measure Project Neon’s success:
Goal 1: Safety - Objectives
Goal 2: Reliability - Objectives
Some available metrics include that daily traffic counts are about 300,000 vehicles, which includes approximately 25,000 lane changes per hour. The area also experiences an average of 3 crashes daily. These metrics provide a baseline to measure the system’s effectiveness and impact on the Las Vegas community.
The RTC issued a survey to the public during the first year of the I-15 ATM operations to understand the public’s perception and awareness of the technologies, the messages being displayed, and to gauge overall trust and acceptance of the new system. Results showed that the public was confident in their abilities to understand guidance provided by the new signs and technology and were confident in the information being provided.
Additionally, the FAST TMC’s involvement in the daily monitoring and operations of the system provides them with firsthand knowledge of the ATM system’s successes and challenges. Overall, the FAST staff have noticed benefits in:
The Project Team will continue to monitor and adjust operations to meet the system’s needs. Engagement of partners continues to one of the best ways to receive feedback. Local media outlets are an integral part of providing information to the public, while promoting outreach and awareness.
NDOT and RTC participated in several peer exchanges with other ATM deployers during the planning and design stages, and feedback from agencies such as Minnesota DOT provided important insights that NDOT was able to incorporate into the I-15 ATM, such as providing maintenance and right-of-way access to the field equipment.
A project of this size involves several agency partners and contractors, particularly with the magnitude of the overall design-build for the I-15 reconstruction. In total the involved 717 companies, including subcontractors and vendors. The complexity of this project emphasized the following lessons to be carried over to future endeavors:
Ongoing coordination with Law Enforcement, particularly NHP, is a key element to the sustaining operations and expansion of the I-15 ATM. Not only was NHP actively involved in the concept of operations, but also provided some important feedback about enforcement needs on the corridor. NDOT implemented several public safety pull-out areas to allow law enforcement to safely conduct stops and investigations out of the travel lanes.
NDOT and RTC are examining applicability to corridors in Southern Nevada. The RTC and NDOT successfully secured a federal grant through the Advanced Transportation Congestion Management and Technology Deployment (ATCMTD) program, which will expand ATM technologies an additional five miles on US-95, between I-15 and Summerlin Parkway. The ATM is being expanded.
Las Vegas is the most visited city in the state, but other challenges can be addressed with this type of ATM improvement. Considerations for the future include expanding applicability to the following conditions on corridors throughout the state:
NDOT is currently completing a Statewide ITS and ATM Master Plan, which identifies corridors and different types of ATM technologies can address unique operating needs.

The Oregon DOT has numerous ATM solutions in operation, being planned, in design, or in construction throughout the state. All five regions in the state will have at least one ATM deployment in the future. As a result, five different TOCs are responsible for monitoring and operating some aspect of ATM. ATM in Portland includes the following:

The ATM pilot on OR217 was constructed in 2013 along a 7.5-mile stretch of the freeway connecting I-5 and US-26. This highly congested facility has 2 to 3 lanes in each direction and has an ADT of 122,000. The facility has limited right-of-way for future expansion. The ATM elements in operation include
Deploying/Operating Agency: Oregon Department of Transportation

Key features of the OR217 system include:
Different segment lengths are used for different systems with different systems having different priorities. Travel times are the lowest priority.
The OR217 deployment adheres to the overall ATM statewide goals and system features established by the department. The intent is to have a single statewide solution from a user standpoint that applies to both urban and rural areas of the state. They are noted below:
Oregon ATM Statewide Goals
Oregon ATM System Features
Oregon DOT recognizes that when utilizing DMSs for information communication, it is likely that the agency will switch from presenting travel times to communicating congestion on routes that serve as alternates to each other. Oregon DOT anticipates that they can address load balancing by curating messages appropriately.
With respect to messages for inclement weather that may be oncoming soon, ODOT notes that does not get massive, unexpected weather events like other areas. The area receives frequent/consistent rain. Oregon DOT will implement advanced warnings for weather conditions. Most issues are friction sensing, pavement temperature, etc., and the warning indicators are automated. Oregon DOT is looking at integrating a weather prediction system (Pikalert) to provide forecasting, though that information will not be posted on a DMS for liability reasons.
In 2017, Oregon DOT conducted an evaluation, however, the evaluation was limited in scope as noted below:
The evaluation showed that 89% of speed reductions were due to congestion and 11% were due to weather. Most of the weather-related speed reductions occurred in off-peak hours. There was better compliance with weather speeds compared to congestion speeds. When the speed was lowered to 35 mph, there was an 8.5% delta during congestion messages compared to a 1.5% delta for weather events. In general, motorists paid more attention to the messages during adverse weather than typical congestion. The evaluation showed a 11% overall reduction of crashes in the corridor but only compared 2013 to 2015 data. Prior to the deployment, there was a trend of increasing crashes for the prior five years as volumes increased. ATM reversed the trend of upward crashes.
The ATM Atlas is not a living document, so it is not updated that frequently. Parts of it are living though (e.g., Performance Report, Corridor Bottleneck Study are updated frequently and will inform any ATM planning). Costs are re-aligned at the scoping level to update costs.

In 2016, Oregon DOT developed an ATM Atlas that the agency uses to prioritize improvements and plan for funding. The Atlas provides insights on potential ATM strategies/tools to address specific issues. The Atlas includes recommendations on the following corridors:
OR-217 was already built out when the Atlas was developed.
The Atlas includes proposed infrastructure locations for ATM deployments and identifies segments of priority. Other details include the following:
It is noted that the planning-level costs are low compared to actual design/construction, but the document has been very helpful and useful to help with program continuity, planning, etc. An additional segment is in design on I-5. The project will be completed by 2027 to complete this segment. Two more projects (three project areas) are under consideration in the draft 2024–2027 STIP. Additionally, ODOT is examining lane management strategies and has recently started incorporating RITIS data into their systems and is looking at utilizing RITIS in lieu of agency detectors. RITIS data is being used to fill in gaps on segments and used in areas that are under construction where detectors are out of commission.
Hsieh, E., G. Ullman, G. Pesti, and R. Brydia. (2017). “Effectiveness of End-of-Queue Warning Systems and Portable Rumble Strips on Lane Closure Crashes.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 143(11). https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000084.