Previous Chapter: Appendix E: "In Their Own Words" Social Equity Case Study (Flagstaff)
Page 193
Suggested Citation: "Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Networks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27919.

Image

Endnotes

1. The Resilience Ecosystem, U.S. Climate Resilience Toolkit, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Program Office. https://toolkit.climate.gov/.

2. Williams, K. et al. 2004. NCHRP Synthesis 337: Cooperative Agreements for Corridor Management. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC. https://www.nap.edu/read/23332/chapter/1#vi.

3. Lund, S. et al. (2020). Risk, Resilience, and Rebalancing in Global Value Chains. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/risk-resilience-and-rebalancing-in-global-value-chains.

4. Transportation Research Board. 2021. Special Report 340: Investing in Transportation Resilience: A Framework for Informed Choices. (Washington, DC. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/26292/chapter/1#ii; Resilience Metrics. The Digital Coast, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office for Coastal Management, April 14, 2021, https://coast.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/training/resilience-metrics.html.

5. Asante S. et al. (2021). Exploring Resilience in MPO-Funded Corridor and Intersection Studies. Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization, MA. https://www.ctps.org/data/calendar/htmls/2021/MPO_0429_Report_Exploring_Resilience.html.

6. De Sherbinin, A. et al. (2019). Climate Vulnerability Mapping: A Systematic Review and Future Prospects. WIREs Climate Change 10, no. 5. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.600.

7. “What is VMAP?” Vulnerability Mapping and Analysis Platform (VMAP), University of Central Florida, accessed August 31, 2022, https://www.vulnerabilitymap.org/About.

8. Meyer, M. D., S. McLeod, T. Fidell, H. Gajjar, D. Sood, M. Kamali, R. Wingate, D. Willauer, and F. Southworth. (2019). NCFRP Research Report 39: Freight Transportation Resilience in Response to Supply Chain Disruptions. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/25463; Georgia Tech Research Corporation, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., and A. Strauss-Wieder, Inc. 2012. NCHRP Report 732: Methodologies to Estimate the Economic Impacts of Disruptions to the Goods Movement System. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/22702.

9. U.S. Department of Commerce. (2016). NIST Special Publication 1190: Community Resilience Planning Guide for Buildings and Infrastructure Systems, Volume 2, National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1190v2.

10. RAND Corporation. (2019). Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Planning and Assessment. NCHRP Project 08-36, Task 146. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/Transportation_Resilience_RAND_Final.pdf.

11. Monsreal, M., M. Miller, M. Metsker-Galarza, M. Graham, and J. C. Villa. (2019). NCHRP Synthesis 542: Prioritization of Freight Investment Projects. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/25581.

12. Dorney, C., M. Flood, T. Grose, P. Hammond, M. Meyer, R. Miller, E. R. Frazier, Sr., J, L. Western, Y. J. Nakanishi, P. M. Auza, J. Betak. (2021). NCHRP Web-Only Document 293: Deploying Transportation Resilience Practices in State DOTs. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/26209.

13. FHWA. (2016).Transportation Performance Management Capability Maturity Model. Office of Transportation Performance Management, Washington, DC. https://www.tpmtools.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/tpm-cmm.pdf.

14. Dorney et al. (2021). NCHRP Research Report 970: Mainstreaming System Resilience Concepts into Transportation Agencies: A Guide. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/26125.

15. FHWA. (2016). Transportation Performance Management Capability Maturity Model. Office of Transportation Performance Management, Washington, DC. https://www.tpmtools.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/tpm-cmm.pdf.

Page 194
Suggested Citation: "Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Networks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27919.

16. Swinhoe, D. (2019). Rebuilding after NotPetya: How Maersk Moved Forward. CSO, October 9. https://www.csoonline.com/article/3444620/rebuilding-after-notpetya-how-maersk-moved-forward.html.

17. Meerow, S., Pajouhesh, P., and Miller, T.R. (2019). Social Equity in Urban Resilience Planning. Local Environment 24, no. 9, pp. 793-808. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103.

18. Boyd, A., Caton, J., Singleton, A., Bromley, P. and Yorks, C. (2005). TCRP Report 86/NCHRP Report 525: Volume 8: Continuity of Operations (COOP) Planning Guidelines for Transportation Agencies. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/13553.

19. FEMA. (2022). Continuity Resource Toolkit. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. https://www.fema.gov/emergency-managers/national-preparedness/continuity/toolkit.

20. Natale, A., Poppensieker, T., and Thun, M. (2022). From Risk Management to Strategic Resilience. McKinsey & Company. March 9. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/risk-and-resilience/our-insights/from-risk-management-to-strategic-resilience.

21. U.S. Census Bureau, Small Business Pulse Survey: Tracking Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic. https://www.census.gov/data/experimental-data-products/small-business-pulse-survey.html.

22. Lund et al. (2020). Risk, Resilience, and Rebalancing in Global Value Chains. McKinsey & Company. August 6. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/risk-resilience-and-rebalancing-in-global-value-chains.

23. FEMA. Glossary. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, accessed September 9, 2022. https://training.fema.gov/programs/emischool/el361toolkit/glossary.htm.

24. Natale, A., Poppensieker, T., and Thun, M. (2022). From Risk Management to Strategic Resilience. McKinsey & Company. March 9. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/risk-and-resilience/our-insights/from-risk-management-to-strategic-resilience.

25. Pena, M., et al. (2023). NCHRP Research Report 1014: Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

26. Bucklew, K. J. Backing Resilience into Freight Mobility Planning, TR News (November–December 2020). https://www.hdrinc.com/sites/default/files/inline-files/tr-news-resiliency-freight-planning.pdf.

27. Item, C. (2020). Soft and Hard Allocation: Understanding the Difference. Sunrise Technologies Blog, Sunrise Technologies, April 16. https://sunrise.co/blog/soft-and-hard-allocation-understanding-the-difference/.

28. Kenton, W. (2021). Hard Asset. Investopedia. June 28. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hard_asset.asp.

29. The Asset Mapping Toolkit. (2022). Technology for Social Good. DePaul University, accessed September 9, https://tsg.cdm.depaul.edu/toolkit/.

30. Houston-Galveston Area Council, TxDOT, and Texas A&M Transportation Institute. (2021). Resilience and Durability in Extreme Weather in the H-GAC Region Pilot Program Report. FHWA, Washington, DC. https://www.hgac.com/getmedia/4a9d1f74-a43c-4279-8f82-f11da502e1e8/H-GAC-Resiliency-Pilot-Program-Final-Report.pdf.

31. Georgia Tech Research Corporation, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., and A. Strauss-Wieder, Inc. (2012). NCHRP Report 732: Methodologies to Estimate the Economic Impacts of Disruptions to the Goods Movement System. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/22702.

32. Dorney et al. (2021). NCHRP Research Report 970: Mainstreaming System Resilience Concepts into Transportation Agencies: A Guide. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/26125.

33. Moeckel, R. (2018). NCHRP Synthesis 520: Integrated Transportation and Land Use Models. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/25194.

34. Monsreal, M., Miller, M., Metsker-Galarza, M., Graham, M., and Villa, J. C. (2019). NCHRP Synthesis 542: Prioritization of Freight Investment Projects. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/25581.

35. FEMA. (2020). Whole Community. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. October 6, https://www.fema.gov/glossary/whole-community.

36. Georgia Tech Research Corporation, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., and A. Strauss-Wieder, Inc. (2012). NCHRP Report 732: Methodologies to Estimate the Economic Impacts of Disruptions to the Goods Movement System. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington. https://doi.org/10.17226/22702.

37. Smith, R. L. (2022). Use of Monte Carlo Simulation in Risk Assessments, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. September 8. https://www.epa.gov/risk/use-monte-carlo-simulation-risk-assessments.

38. Kurth et al. (2019). Lack of Resilience in Transportation Networks: Economic Implications. arXiv.org. http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04331.

39. Chapman et al. Community Resilience Economic Decision Guide for Buildings and Infrastructure Systems. (2015). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.1197.pdf.

40. Filosa, G., Plovnick, A., Stahl, L., Miller, R., and Pickrell, D. (2018). Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Framework, Third Edition. FHWA, Washington, DC. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/36188.

Page 195
Suggested Citation: "Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Networks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27919.

41. https://www.fema.gov/emergency-managers/national-preparedness/frameworks/recovery.

42. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/livability/cia/quick_reference/index.

43. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tpm/

44. Hughes, J. et al. (2020). Developing a Method for Quantifying Transportation Interdependencies. Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency Research Report 671. Wellington, New Zealand.

45. https://www.fema.gov/emergency-managers/national-preparedness/training.

46. https://www.transportation.gov/civil-rights/emergency-preparedness/emergency-categories.

47. https://www.fema.gov/glossary/whole-community.

48. Hughes, J. et al. (2020). Developing a Method for Quantifying Transportation Interdependencies. Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency Research Report 671. Wellington, New Zealand.

49. Meyer et al. (2019). NCFRP Research Report 39: Freight Transportation Resilience in Response to Supply Chain Disruptions. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

50. Czech, C. (2020). The Authentic Leader’s Role in Organizational Resilience and Citizenship. Forbes Online Magazine, June 2. Council Post: The Authentic Leader’s Role in Organizational Resilience and Citizenship (forbes.com).

51. Maersk Line: Surviving from a cyber-attack, SAFETY4SEA online. 31/05/18. https://safety4sea.com/cm-maersk-line-surviving-from-a-cyber-attack/.

52. World Health Organization. (2020). Critical Preparedness, Readiness and Response Actions for COVID-19–Interim Guidance. June 24.

53. Williams, E. (n.d.). Social Resiliency and Superstorm Sandy: Lessons from New York City Community Organizations. Association of Neighborhood and Housing Development Inc. social_resiliency_and_superstorm _sandy_lessons_from_new_york_city_community_organizations.pdf.

54. George, B. (2003). Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets to Creating Lasting Value. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

55. Czech, C. (2020). The Authentic Leader’s Role in Organizational Resilience and Citizenship. Forbes Online Magazine, June 2. Council Post: The Authentic Leader’s Role in Organizational Resilience and Citizenship (forbes.com).

56. Chesley, D. (2015). Creating a Culture of Resilience: What Really Enables Organizations to Survive and Thrive? Ethisphere Magazine Q3.

57. Florida Department of Transportation. (2020). Resilience Quick Guide: Incorporating Resilience in the MPO Long Range Plan, January.

58. White, M. (2013). Building a Resilient Organizational Culture. UNC Kenan Flagler Business School. White Paper.

59. Larson, J. et al. (2020). Uncovering Resilience: Measuring Organizational Networks During Crisis. Microsoft Workplace Insights. May 21. https://insights.office.com/workplace-analytics/uncovering-resilience-measuring-organizational-networks-during-crisis/.

60. Weilant, S. et al. (2019). Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Planning and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.7249/rr3038.

61. Transportation Research Board. (2021). Special Report 340: Investing in Transportation Resilience: A Framework for Informed Choices. Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/26292.

62. Renne, J. et al. (2020). Emergence of Resilience as a Framework for State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) in the United States. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 82, p. 102178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.007.

63. 2013–2015 Climate Resilience Pilot Program: Outcomes, Lessons Learned, and Recommendations. (2016). U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration, July. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/sustainability/resilience/pilots/2013-2015_pilots/final_report/.

64. Filosa, G., Plovnick, A., Stahl, L., Miller, R., and Pickrell, D. (2018). Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Framework, Third Edition. FHWA, Washington, DC. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/36188.

65. Transportation Research Board. (2021). Special Report 340: Investing in Transportation Resilience: A Framework for Informed Choices. Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/26292.

66. Resilience Pilots. (2021). U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/sustainability/resilience/pilots/.

67. Transportation System Resilience to Extreme Weather and Climate Change. (2015). U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration, November. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop15025/fhwahop15025.pdf.

68. Weilant, S. et al. (2019). Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Planning and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.7249/rr3038.

69. Transportation Research Board. (2021). Special Report 340: Investing in Transportation Resilience: A Framework for Informed Choices. Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/26292.

Page 196
Suggested Citation: "Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Networks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27919.

70. Renne, J. et al. (2020). Emergence of Resilience as a Framework for State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) in the United States. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 82, p. 102178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.007.

71. Adaptation and Resilience Planning, (n.d.). Southern California Association of Governments. https://scag.ca.gov/transit-adaptation-and-resilience-planning.

72. “Framework for Building ODOT’s Climate Change Resilience Plan & Roadmap. (n.d.). Oregon Department of Transportation. https://www.oregon.gov/odot/Programs/SiteAssets/Pages/Adaptation-Resources/Summary_ProgramsandPolicy.pdf.

73. Risk and Resiliency Plan for Critical Freight Transportation Assets. (2018). Wyoming Department of Transportation. https://www.dot.state.wy.us/files/live/sites/wydot/files/shared/Planning/2018%20WYDOT%20Freight%20Resilience%20Plan.pdf.

74. Colorado Resiliency Framework. (2020). Colorado Resiliency Office. https://www.coresiliency.com/colorado-resiliency-framework.

75. Statewide Freight Resiliency Plan. (2011). Texas Department of Transportation, February. https://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/library/reports/gov/tpp/spr/resiliency/resiliency_phase_1.pdf.

76. Transportation Resilience: Current Practices and Opportunities for MnDOT. (2020). Minnesota Department of Transportation, January. https://www.dot.mn.gov/sustainability/docs/resilience-report-2020.pdf.

77. Improve Resilience of the Transportation Network to Weather Events and Climate Change. (n.d.). Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning. https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/2050/draft/mobility/transportation-climate-resilience.

78. 25-Year Transportation Policy Plan. (n.d.). Tennessee State Government. https://www.tn.gov/tdot/long-range-planning-home/25-year-transportation-policy-plan.html.

79. Amoaning-Yankson, S. (2013). A Resiliency Framework for Planning in State Transportation Agencies. August. https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/49123/AMOANING-YANKSON-THESIS-2013.pdf.

80. Sustainability Bond Framework. (2017). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, August. https://cdn.mbta.com/sites/default/files/2017-10/mbta-sustainability-bond-framework-080117.pdf.

81. New Jersey Climate Change Resilience Strategy. (2021). Department of Environmental Protection, https://nj.gov/dep/climatechange/resilience-strategy.html.

82. NCDOT Resilience Strategy Report (2021). North Carolina Department of Transportation. https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/climate-change/resilience-plan/agency-reports/Department-of-Transportation-2021-Resilient-Strategy-Report.pdf.

83. The public version of this training can be found at https://public.cyber.mil/training/cyber-awareness-challenge/.

84. Weiss, R. S. (1995). Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies, New York: Free Press.

85. Marshall, C., and Rossman, G. (2011). Designing Qualitative Research, 5th ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Page 197
Suggested Citation: "Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Networks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27919.

Abbreviations and acronyms used without definitions in TRB publications:

A4A Airlines for America
AAAE American Association of Airport Executives
AASHO American Association of State Highway Officials
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
ACI–NA Airports Council International–North America
ACRP Airport Cooperative Research Program
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
APTA American Public Transportation Association
ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers
ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
ATA American Trucking Associations
CTAA Community Transportation Association of America
CTBSSP Commercial Truck and Bus Safety Synthesis Program
DHS Department of Homeland Security
DOE Department of Energy
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FAA Federal Aviation Administration
FAST Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (2015)
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FMCSA Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
FRA Federal Railroad Administration
FTA Federal Transit Administration
GHSA Governors Highway Safety Association
HMCRP Hazardous Materials Cooperative Research Program
IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (2012)
NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASAO National Association of State Aviation Officials
NCFRP National Cooperative Freight Research Program
NCHRP National Cooperative Highway Research Program
NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NTSB National Transportation Safety Board
PHMSA Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
RITA Research and Innovative Technology Administration
SAE Society of Automotive Engineers
SAFETEA-LU Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (2005)
TCRP Transit Cooperative Research Program
TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (1998)
TRB Transportation Research Board
TSA Transportation Security Administration
U.S. DOT United States Department of Transportation
Page 198
Suggested Citation: "Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Networks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27919.

Image

Page 193
Suggested Citation: "Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Networks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27919.
Page 193
Page 194
Suggested Citation: "Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Networks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27919.
Page 194
Page 195
Suggested Citation: "Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Networks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27919.
Page 195
Page 196
Suggested Citation: "Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Networks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27919.
Page 196
Page 197
Suggested Citation: "Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Networks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27919.
Page 197
Page 198
Suggested Citation: "Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Incorporating Resilience into Transportation Networks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27919.
Page 198
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.