Given the difficulty and expense—and the great importance—of collecting data on twins and adoptees, criminology would immediately benefit from more extensive and more standardized description and data analysis of existing samples. For example, it is curious that a significant genetic effect is reported for court convictions (irrespective of alcohol abuse) in Denmark but not in a similar age cohort in Sweden. Tetrachoric correlations have been reported separately for males and females in the Danish adoptee sample but not for the Stockholm sample. Complete cross-tabulations for violent crime in the Danish sample have not been reported. One inexpensive way to address these problems is to fund a meeting of the original investigators to present preplanned standardized analyses and deal with issues of replicability. Such a meeting could also lead to heuristic hypotheses about the nature of adoption preplacement effects, cross-cultural extrapolation of results, etc.
Although the issue of specialization in crime has not been fully clarified, pedigree studies of well-defined, homogeneous groups of offenders should be encouraged. There are very few direct family data on such important phenotypes as pedophiles and repetitive rapists.
Although future research might isolate one or more genetic syndromes associated with violence, polygenic influences on a number of different personality, cognitive, and psychopathological traits may be the major source of genetic predisposition to antisocial behavior. Future large-scale, epidemiological research with genetically informative samples should concentrate less on demonstrating the fact of a genetic diathesis and more on uncovering the sources of familial liability, both genetic and environmental. Consequently, data must be gathered to permit multivariate analysis involving, on the one hand, antisocial behavior and, on the other hand, personality factors such as impulsivity and sensation seeking, cognitive variables such as risk perception, and psychopathology, especially alcohol and drug abuse.
Identification of a personality trait or even a genetic locus that contributes to antisocial liability would be a major contribution to pure science, but it is not clear that such a discovery would have immediate practical applications for prevention and intervention. If genetic diathesis is multifactorial, then any single factor will be only a weak predictor. In addition, questions of genetic engineering of antisocial behavior are more appropriate
Sign in to access your saved publications, downloads, and email preferences.
Former MyNAP users: You'll need to reset your password on your first login to MyAcademies. Click "Forgot password" below to receive a reset link via email. Having trouble? Visit our FAQ page to contact support.
Members of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, or National Academy of Medicine should log in through their respective Academy portals.
While logged on as a guest, you can download any of our free PDFs on nationalacademies.org . You will remain logged in until you close your browser.
Thank you for creating a MyAcademies account!
Enjoy free access to thousands of National Academies' publications, a 10% discount off every purchase, and build your personal library.
Enter the email address for your MyAcademies (formerly MyNAP) account to receive password reset instructions.
We sent password reset instructions to your email . Follow the link in that email to create a new password. Didn't receive it? Check your spam folder or contact us for assistance.
Your password has been reset.
Verify Your Email Address
We sent a verification link to your email. Please check your inbox (and spam folder) and follow the link to verify your email address. If you did not receive the email, you can request a new verification link below