investigations appear incompatible and/or inconsistent. That is to say, we study attack and defense mechanisms in normal cats (and other animals) and violent behavior in abnormal (presumably) human subjects. Are there really any links between the two bodies of research? We must assume that the mechanisms and structures involved in the final common neural pathway for the expression of attack and defense are basically similar in all higher mammals. A further assumption is that the mechanisms for activating or suppressing the aggression/violence pathway(s) are vastly more complex in humans because of the increased size of the forebrain. Nevertheless, it seems reasonable to hypothesize that humans who are engaging in maladaptive, violent behavior have some brain abnormality that somehow temporarily (and, possibly, repeatedly) short-circuits the aggression/violence pathways leading to truly violent behavior. We consider the evidence bearing on this hypothesis in the review and discussion below.
To return to the issue of defining adaptive versus maladaptive aggressive behavior in humans, there is on the one hand likely to be general agreement that serial killers or sexual offenders who maim their victims are displaying disordered, maladaptive violent behavior. On the other hand, the label of "adaptive" would be applied to the behavior of soldiers who kill enemy personnel in the course of battle and to the actions of skilled boxers who inflict physical punishment on (and occasionally kill) an adversary. Unfortunately, most of the examples of human violence and aggression considered in this section appear to fall somewhere between these two extremes. Violent or aggressive behavior may be quite adaptive in young male persons raised and living in impoverished environments; it may also be one of the few means of expression available to persons with impaired cognitive or language capacities. Surveys of violence and aggression have implicated age, gender, socioenvironmental, and/or cognitive variables; it may be virtually impossible to identify the portion of the variance that is attributable to adaptive, as opposed to nonadaptive, factors. Nevertheless, to the extent possible we will try to bear this distinction in mind in the course of reviewing and discussing the areas of human violence.
The end points in measuring aggression/violence in animal models (see above) are simple, highly reliable, and almost stereotypic motor behaviors. By contrast, the measurement of human
Sign in to access your saved publications, downloads, and email preferences.
Former MyNAP users: You'll need to reset your password on your first login to MyAcademies. Click "Forgot password" below to receive a reset link via email. Having trouble? Visit our FAQ page to contact support.
Members of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, or National Academy of Medicine should log in through their respective Academy portals.
While logged on as a guest, you can download any of our free PDFs on nationalacademies.org . You will remain logged in until you close your browser.
Thank you for creating a MyAcademies account!
Enjoy free access to thousands of National Academies' publications, a 10% discount off every purchase, and build your personal library.
Enter the email address for your MyAcademies (formerly MyNAP) account to receive password reset instructions.
We sent password reset instructions to your email . Follow the link in that email to create a new password. Didn't receive it? Check your spam folder or contact us for assistance.
Your password has been reset.
Verify Your Email Address
We sent a verification link to your email. Please check your inbox (and spam folder) and follow the link to verify your email address. If you did not receive the email, you can request a new verification link below